N4008522R2695 Amendment 0001 with map.pdf

5928164

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N4008522R2695 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES AT BEAUFORT, SC

This amendment is issued to incorporate the site visit details and to revise Section M per the continuation pages. See continuation pages and separate attachment. The proposal due date of 28 March 2023 and all other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Mar-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008522R2695

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Feb-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Mar-2023

CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008522R2695

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001

FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES AT BEAUFORT, SC SITE VISIT INFORMATION

DATE: 14 March 2023

TIME: 9:00 AM

LOCATION:

MCRD Parris Island FEAD Conference Room 82 Atsugi Street, Building 852 Parris Island, SC 29905

Base Access: All contractors must submit a list of names with each individual’s date of birth and driver’s license state/number. The list of names must be turned in a week prior to the site visit. Send list of names to ashley.h.williams8.civ@us.navy.mil A valid government issued photo identification (driver’s license, passport, etc.), proof of insurance, and vehicle registration will be required to gain access to the base for the site visit.

See attached map titled Paris Island Map, marking the location of the building.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

BASIS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis for Award:

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

4. In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology: Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order of price (lowest price to highest price). The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the lowest priced proposal. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal. However, if the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review, until the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.

An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

The Government will select the lowest price technically acceptable offer at a reasonable cost to the

Government.

M.2 Evaluation Factors:

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 –Technical Approach/Management Factor 2 – Corporate Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

Offeror MUST be evaluated as technically ACCEPTABLE under Factors 1, 2 3, and 4 in order to be considered technically acceptable overall. Otherwise, the offeror will be ineligible for award.

NOTE: The distinction between Corporate Experience and Past Performance is Corporate Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past Performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

The non-cost/price proposal shall include submittals for each non-cost/price factor as specified below.

Addditonally, the Government will not consider any pages submitted beyond the any pages limits set forth below:

(1) Factor 1, Technical Approach/Management:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit a narrative response that clearly demonstrates its understanding of and approach to accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement. Each of the topics below must be included in the narrative and tabbed in the non-price/cost proposal and discussed separately. Otherwise, the proposal will be deemed Unacceptable.

a. Phase-In Transition Plan. Clearly describe what you will do to “start-up” for performance of this contract. The phase in transition period is 30 days as per F.2 of the RFP. Include a schedule of key events, personnel actions/staffing, and responsibilities regarding employees at all levels to ensure fully compliant contract performance on the start date of the performance period. The schedule of key events shall include addressing the Section F Deliverables submission requirements.

b. Workforce Management.

1. Describe your ability to respond to The Joint Commission requirements in accordance with the PWS.

2. Describe the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, and subcontractors.

3. Demonstrate your ability to provide and maintain a qualified workforce.

4. Demonstrate your ability to manage competing priorities at various locations.

5. Describe the work to be performed as the prime contractor as well as work to be performed by each subcontractor proposed. The work to be self-performed, subcontractors to be utilized and their roles shall be clearly identified. Offerors shall clearly state if it will self-perform 100% of the work as the prime.

Additionally, the offeror must meet requirements of FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, and submit Attachment E as part of this factor.

c. Quality Management. Provide a two to five page summary of your “Quality Management System” i.e. the Quality Processes (Practices, Resources and Activities) and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all performance objectives and standards as described in (0200000-C) Management and Administration). Include the methodology to be implemented to accomplish the performance requirements and detail how the proposed approach will effectively achieve each performance objective and standard.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Technical Approach/Management factor shall be evaluated based upon the following criteria:

a. The proposal demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the performance objectives and standards.

b. The proposal demonstrates a thorough plan for having equipment and personnel in place to commence work on the contract start date.

c. The proposal provides a feasible technical approach with the capability to, at least, meet solicitation performance objectives and standards.

(2) Factor 2, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the work requirements detailed below. The offeror or the Offeror’s small business first-tier subcontractor(s) that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement shall have been the prime contractor on at least one (1) of the submitted relevant projects. An offeror’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

For the purposes of this solicitation, a relevant project is further defined as follows:

Size: A Fire Protection service contract with a yearly estimated value of at least $600,000 for recurring services. If an Offeror intends to submit work completed\issued off an Indefinite Quantity/Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) contract as a qualifying project, the Offeror is limited to submitting the IDIQ contract itself. The board will not consider or evaluate any task orders whether submitted individually or collectively.

Scope: Offeror must have provided labor, management, supervision, tools, materials and equipment for fire protection services (fire alarm and fire supression systems) as described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Complexity: the proposed project must demonstrate the offeror’s ability to respond simultaneously to requirements for several customers or installations and supporting annexes.

In accordance with 13 CFR 125.2(g), small business Offerors may utilize the prime contractor experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor(s) to demonstrate experience under this evaluation factor if that small business Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement as defined above.

Considering13 CFR 125.2(g), the Offeror or, for a small business Offeror, a small business first-tier subcontractor, shall have been the prime contractor on at least one (1) relevant project as defined above. In order to utilize the experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor(s), the offeror must specifically identify the proposed small business first-tier contractor(s) in its proposal in accordance with this Factor.

The Government notes that 13 CFR 125.2(g) is specific to only small business Offerors and named small business first-tier subcontractors. As such, the small business Offeror is not permitted to use the experience of a large business subcontractor or large business corporate affiliate in place of its own if the small business Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement as defined above.

An offeror’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

The attached Corporate Experience Form (Attachment J-0200000-16) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form nor will the Government may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one double-sided page (or two single-sided pages).

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be ongoing (having been performed for a period of at least one year) or completed within the past five years of the date of issuance of this solicitation. Projects with completion dates beyond one year shall be clearly defined as multi-year contracts or as base contracts with option years. If the project has option periods, state which contract period is in progress (Base, 1st option, etc.) If the dates of the project or completion date do not clearly demonstrate that the project meets the above requirements, the Government may deem the project not relevant.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP as it relates to size, scope, and complexity as defined above, or the Government may deem the project not relevant.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the

Joint Venture entity. However, shared Joint Venture experience of the Offeror is not required in order to meet the requirements of the Factor. If the Offeror is submitting experience for individual JV partners in which the company was a partner in a different Joint Venture entity, the Offeror must specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted project was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and demonstrate that the work meets the Size, Scope, and Complexity as defined above, or the project will not be considered relevant. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

Offerors proposing as a JV shall submit a signed JV agreement. For Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures, the offeror shall submit the signed and U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) approved Mentor-Protégé agreement.

If permitted as discussed above, if an Offeror is utilizing the prime contractor experience of a corporate affiliate (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) or first-tier small business subcontractor; the proposal shall include, on the corporate affiliate or first-tier small business subcontractor’s letterhead, a teaming agreement or letter of commitment. In order for the experience to be considered, the Offeror is also required to clearly demonstrate that the corporate affiliate(s) or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliate(s) or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) that will be dedicated to the contract.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant corporate experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP as defined above. The minimum standard for this Factor has been met when the offeror or the Offeror’s small business first-tier subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement has demonstrated adequate experience by submitting at least one relevant project of similar size, scope, and complexity as defined above on which it was the prime contractor.

Projects completed by the offeror, or, if permitted as discussed above, its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies), or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) in any capacity other than as a prime contractor will be considered Not Relevant.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY) as well as a safety narrative, as described below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART and TCR rates for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

(1) DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000 and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

DART RATE = Number of DART Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

(2) TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

TCR RATE = Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000 , Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

(3) Offeror shall submit a separate OSHA 300A form for each of the last five complete calendar years.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management

System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

(5) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources public/Government internal) of information. These may include, but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. To meet the minimum requirements, the Offeror must demonstrate the following:

1. DART rates at or below 2.99

2. TCR Rates at or below 4.49

NOTE: If the Offeror’s rates exceed the established levels above for any of the five years, it will result in a deficiency.

3. Offeror shall submit a separate OSHA 300A form for each of the last five complete calenar years.

4. Technical Approach to Safety

a. Offeror describes its approach to implementing and executing a Safety

Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Offeror describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Offeror describes a logical management plan to hold both themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

5. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources public/Government internal) of information. These may include, but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall clearly demonstrate a history of successful performance within the past five years of the date of issuance of the solicitation.

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED

CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Corporate Experience). AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT

SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment J-0200000-17), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Ms. Phylysha Cherry, via email at phylysha.cherry@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the

Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five years from the date of issuance of the solicitation such as: awards, award fee determinations, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as J-0200000-17.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering some or all of the following:

-A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

-A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

-A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and -Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall submit one (1) hard copy and one CD-ROM that shall include the following:

• Signed Solicitation, Offer and Award Forms (SF 33), including Section B (CLINs 0001 through 0012), with all amendments acknowledged.

• Exhibits A through F. (Attachment J-0200000-15). Pricing shall be rounded to only two decimal places.

• Where Exhibit Line Items contain a quantity of zero, unit pricing must still be provided in the event future quantities may be added.

• Contractor Proposal Certification (See Section L, Paragraph 1)

• Current copy of Representations and Certifications and proof of registration in System of

Award management (sam.gov).

• Confirm submission of the most recent Vets 4212 Report.

In the event of a discrepancy between the hard copy and CD-ROM, the CD-ROM electronic copy of the proposal will govern. Additionally, the hard copy proposal shall match the electronic version of the proposal.

The price proposal shall be submitted separately but at the same time as the non-cost/price proposal. Any non-cost/price information in the price proposal will not be considered. Likewise, any price information in the non-cost/price proposal will not be considered.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION – In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information is the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Proposals will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness as follows:

(1) Completeness. All pricing information required by the solicitation has been provided, all mathematical computations are correct and the pricing application understood, prices are on an “all or none” basis, and failure to submit a price on an item or a number of items may cause this factor and the entire offer to be determined unacceptable.

(2) Reasonableness. Price analysis comparisons indicate the offered price to be fair and reasonable, balanced across option years, and balanced amongst all Recurring and Non-Recurring Exhibit Line items.

Unreasonable, unbalanced, or incomplete pricing may cause a proposal to be determined Unacceptable.

(End of Summary of Changes)

3RD B N

PARA DE

DEC K 3RD B ATTALION

TR ACK /PT COUR SE

4TH BN

TR ACK /PT

COURSE

4TH BN

PARA DE

DEC K

LEATHERNECK

SQUA RE

2ND B ATTALION

TR ACK /PT COUR SE

SUPPORT

BATTA LION

TR ACK

MAIN PARA DE D EC K

(PEATR OSS FIELD)

1ST

BATTA LION

TR ACK /PT

COURSE

120118

311315

144142

148146

11417

32536

145 104 102108

1 34

196198 200202

206204 21

6 18

6 22

133 115

111113

107109

103105

212B

218A 220A 222

217A

219A

186A

182A

215A215 184182

TENARU PLACE

CI

EN

FU

EG

OS

ST

ILU

ST

W

CUZ COCOURT E CUZCO COURT

NOUMEA PLACE

KANEOHE PLACE

TANAMBOGO ST

CHINA HUTUNG AVE

EN

GE

BI

ST

PA

RA

Y S T

NICARAGUA ST

PELELIEU ST

CHOSIN RESERVOIR RD

AL

LE

Y GWA

KE

BL

VD

FARM RD SAIPAN ST

KOJO DR

DA

K

TO

DR

S

SANTO

DOM INGO

ST

AL LEYF

CUBA ST

SEOUL ST

DONG HA ST

ALLEYD

TARAWA ST

PUNCHBOWL ST

BATAAN ST

NE

W

BR

ITA

IN

ST

ALLEYE

ALLEY CGUADALCANALST

QUANG TRI WAY

SUGARLOAF ST

VE

RA

CR

UZ

S S

AM

OA

ST

KO

RE

A

ST

AL

LE

YB

SHANGHAI ST

HONSHU ST

OL

ON

GA

PO

ST

PANAMA ST

ATSUGI ST

KYUSHU ST

AL

AS

KA

ST

PANAMA ST CA

VI

TE

ST

JO

HN

SO

N

ST

NICARAGUA ST

3rd BATTALION POND RD

REYKJAVI K

ST

MI

DW

AY

ST

BOULEVARD DE FRANCE

N

SA

MO

A S

T

VERDUN ST

S MEXICO ST TRIPOLI ST

TULAGI DR

N

SAN TO

DO MINGO

ST

CORREGIDOR ST

WAK

E B

LV

D

SOIS SON S

ST

CAPE GAUFFRE ST

N MEXICO ST

GUANTANAMO ST

IB

OK

I S T

MALECON DR

CAPE GAUFFRE ST

TA

LA

SE

A ST

A7B

739 7020A

738737A

A5

A4 315

A6

307A

307B

319A

319B

504 923

1134 501

LPS-PI02

310 310B

926A

908C 908A

926D 926C 926B

230B

517A 680686

699 305A

306A

304B

306B

304C 306C

937 926 926E

500A

682 683

304A 303 939

939A 940

LPS-PI41

6100 679

172A 942 116

151A 115 102

LPS-PI39

559A

697 696 694695

694A 6001A 6012

205 113

6767A 67B

40504050A

6004A 6007 6001 652

6201 6202 6203 6204

599E

599B 599C 202

MON27

MON26

MON14

MON13 8A

48B

1B 1C

66A 66B

410 421

601B 601A601

601E

601C 601D 598 599F

599A 599 288599D

283 287

MON24

MON23 MON25 147

145A

144B

4A4B

MON15 MON16

869865 569

408 404 848

670A 670

6010A

MON20

166A

145B

148A148 295A

MON17 17

444A

856855

567A

409A 854

MON12

MON605

LPS-PI40

158A

12 160

20 97

160C

160A 160B

444B

405B

401 N277 N281

N282

409 5101 5103

LPS-PI11 591A

591B

591E

591C

201645

158 331 577

159A

433 432

171-2

171173

864A864B

864C

LPS-PI12

665 661

591 591D

590A 589B

589E 6005 566

BJWSA 280

450181182

864 625A 667 868 589

589C 589D

589A

YORKTOW

N BLVD

HISTORIC

DRY DOCK

202148

4581B

4581C

MALECON DR

MA LE CO N DR

3rd BATTA L ION

POND R D

V IE QU ES RD

BO UG A INV ILL E

TRL

910D

958 953B

953C 953 956 318

T100

312 316

897A899

910W

898A

MON21

MON12

953A

910E 910910A

910B910C

900A900B

4581A950950A

9524570B

954BR

WEAPONS BATTALION

TRACK/PT COURSE

NA K T O N G

PI S T O L R A NG E

PU S A N

PI S T O L R A NG E

A R AN G E

KH E S AN H

B RAN GE

HUE CITY

C RAN GE

CHOSIN

D RAN GE

STA RLITE

E R ANGE

IN CHON

PH A NT O M

F URY

SU R IB A CH I

PI S T O L R A NG E

PIT R

D

IL U S

TKHE SAHN SERV ICE RD

ST M IH IEL RD

IN C HON SER V ICE RD

CHOS IN SERV ICE RD

WAKE B

LVD

PA LM Y RA S T

HUE C ITY SERVIC E RD

GUAM CIR

CR OS SH A IR R D

TO KTONG RD

NOU MEA PL

TEN A RU PL

PIT R D

IL U S

T

KA NEOH E PL

CH ULIN DR

WA KE B LV D

GUAM DR

T INIA

N R

D

MATA NIK AU PL

NA K TON G DR

SH UR I DR

GUAM CIR

GUAM DR

TO KTON G R D

STARLITE SERVIC

E R

D

710 725 724

750711

735739

743747

736740742

737741745749 752756760764

701705709713

751 739

799800

700C

715716

786D

786A 786C

LPS-PI15

LPS-PI14

700B

700A

1042A

1042B

795A

LPS-PI36

LPS-PI38

1043A

786E 7020A

800A

749B 4051

AS26

4031 4025

4033B4035F4035E

4036E4036F

4036A 4033A

4035D

4035A

4036D4036C

4570C

299D H51

AS36

40524054

4037A

AS49

MON22

4037D

MON19

MON18

4001A

40334036 4036B

4035C

4035B

4037B 4037C

299BF

299C 299A

299B

4034S

BELLEAU WOODS RD

CACTUS LN

YO RK TOW N B LVD

LAN G LEY

DR

BE

LL

S T

HE

ND

ER

SO

N

ST

CU BA S T

RA PPE L RO A D

RUNWAY D

RU NWAY C

RUNW

AY A

RUNWAY B

3 9

Driving Range

BE

LL

EA

U

W

OO

DS

R

D

ST M IH IEL RD

ST M IH IEL LOOP

CI

EN

FU

EG

OS

S

T

Y O R K TO WN B LV D

SA

IG

ON

A

VE

E L E X IN G T O N C TKOREA AVE

W CUZCO CTWAKE B

LVD

C U B A S T

YORKTOW

N BLVD

W L E X I N G TO N C T

E C U Z C O C T

ARGONNE DR

EB15

A9

EB1

A6

EB14

A8

A5

A1 A2

A4

A3

LPS-PI33

A7

E14A

EB16

6. Elliot's Beach

& ASP

5. Page Field & The Legends at Parris Island

4. Weapons and Field Training Battalion3. Main Gate & Horse Island

PMO / FD

1ST BATTALION

2ND BATTALION

3RD BATTALION

4TH BATTALION

DI SCHOOL

RTR / HEADQUARTERS

WAKE VILLAGE

MARSH LANDING

Prepared By: IGI&S Office Asset Mgt, Building 864

MCRD Parris Island, SC 29905 Jason McMahon, GIS Analyst

FOR REFERENCE ONLY

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)

NOT TO BE USED FOR TARGETING OR NAVIGATION

Disclaimer:

Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information, errors and conditions originating from the physical sources used to develop the database may be reflected in the data supplied.

The requestor must be aware of data conditions and ultimately bear responsibility for the appropriate use of the information with respect to possible errors, original map scale, collection methodology, currency of data, and other specific conditions to certain data.

This in formation does not depict all possible resources.

Field verification of all data is required for site-specific projects.

This information is deemed reliable, but not guaranteed.

3/20/2017

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

RECRUIT DEPOT PARRIS ISLAND, SC

3 r d B a t t a l i o n P o n d

NOTE-

Due to space limitations, housing building numbers have been shortened. Official building numbers for duplexes have the two units combined, starting with the lower.

Example:

PWV101103 (WAKE VILLAGE)

PWS701703 (WEAPONS SOUND)

PML215 (MARSH LANDING)

MALECON DR

324 323

322A

322 2. Scout Island

S a v a n n a h C r e e k µ

S a v a n n a h C r e e k

WEAPONS SOUND

1.Mainside

LOCATOR MAP

F i l l e r C r e e k B E A U F O R T R I V

E R

B a l l a s t C r e e k

B a l l a s t C r e e k

R i b b o n C r e e k

A r c h e r s C r e e k

B R O A D R

I V E

R

R i b b o n C r e e k

W hale Cre ek

M e a n s

C r e e k

BROAD RIVER

W h a l e C reek