22R2627 0005 Proposal Due Date.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the purposal due date. See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Jun-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N4008522R2627

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-May-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Jun-2022

CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008522R2627

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0005

This amendment hereby:

1. Revises the proposal due date to 15 June 2022, 1400 local time.

2. Issues Addendum A incorporating Design Changes.

3. Replaces section RFP, 5. Proposal Requirements, 5.2 Proposal Submission Instructions in its entirety as stated below:

5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Factors Proposal, submitted in accordance with the above Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Offerors shall submit both electronic and mailed hard copies of their proposal in accordance with below.

5.2.1 Electronic Copies

Offerors shall submit electronic proposals (.pdf format) in response to this solicitation. Only the PIEE Solicitation Module is authorized for the submission of electronic proposals in response to this solicitation.

Electronic proposal submissions should be no larger than 1.9 GB per file. Electronic proposals shall match the hard copy version of the proposal. In the event of a discrepancy, the electronic copy will govern. Offerors shall ensure that the Government has received the electronic proposal by the date and time specified. PIEE Solicitation Vendor Access Instructions are provided via Attachment D. Emailed submissions will not be accepted.

Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files which may be slower for non-DoD users and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. Offerors are also responsible for submitting files in the format specified and consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of the Offeror.

The PIEE system will record the date and time of package submittal. The date and time of package submittal recorded in PIEE shall govern the timeliness of any proposal submission. LATE PROPOSALS

WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

5.2.2 Mailed Hard Copies:

Offerors shall mail one (1) hard copy of the proposal and one (1) CD-ROM containing the proposal within 5 days of the electronic PIEE submission due date. Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR

NONCOST/PRICE FACTORS PROPOSAL FOR RFP N4008522R2627, 8A FOR GENERAL

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES MACC, ATTN: DEMETRICE JENKINS; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL

ROOM”.The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Hand delivered proposals or submitted electronically through any other means besides PIEE will not be accepted.

All hard copy proposals shall be mailed to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic

9324 Virginia Avenue Building Z-140, Room 225 Norfolk, Virginia 23511 Attn: Demetrice Jenkins, CON22

5.2.3 PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE

RECEIVED NO LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected.

4. Revises General Requirements, Proposal Delivery Information Proposals shall be submitted via PIEE and mailed hard copies in accordance with the instructions in RFP, 5.

Proposal Requirements, 5.2 Proposal Submission Instructions.

5. Revises (b) Non-Price Factors:

Minimum 10 point font, Times New Roman

6. Provides PPI responses. The cutoff date to submit PPIs is 3 June 2022.

Contractor

PPI#

Section of RFP or Page Number

Paragraph Reference

Drawing Number

Question RESPONSE

1 Pg. 9 of

RFP

Factor 1 – Experience

- Request to extend the past performance requirement from projects completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance to projects completed within the past eight (8) years

Bid per RFP.

2 16 of 59 5.2.3 Proposals are to be submitted on 6/1/22 via PIEE and hardcopies via mail. Hand delivered proposals are not allowed. Offerors will need to ship their proposals via commercial carrier two days prior to the closing date, which is a Federal Holiday. Proposals would now need to be shipped the Friday prior to the Holiday, and many subcontractors decline to bid projects when quotes are due the

See Amendment 0005.

Friday before a long federal holiday weekend.

Lately, commercial carriers are routinely missing overnight delivery deadlines. Will the government extend the solicitation’s close by one week to help mitigate risk?

3 01 35 26 01 45 00.10

Spec section 01 35 26 1.7.1.1.1 states the SSHO may not serve as the QC.

The SSHO may also serve as the superintendent.

Spec section 01 45

00.10 20 1.5.1.1 states the QC manager may perform duties of the project superintendent.

Please confirm if this project will only require 1 project supervisor performing the duties of all 3 (Super, QC, SSHO).

Specification sections 01 32 26 & 01 45 00.10 20 have been revised. Refer to Addendum A for revisions.

4 What is the value ( ROM ) for the seed project?

ROM is not provided on a NAVFAC designed Design Bid Build Contract.

5 Are the drawings issued for SP-254 final IFC drawings?

Yes these are the final IFC drawings.

6 Will this project be required to have a VA DEQ permit?

No, however the contract requires you follow the Erosion & Sediment Plan.

7 RFP Page

RFP states that hand delivered proposals will not be accepted. Many subcontractors hold their quotes until the final minutes of a

See Amendment 0005. PIEE will govern the timeliness of electronic proposal submission.

solicitation. If proposals must be shipped via mail, the government may not obtain competitive pricing. Can the proposal volumes be physically dropped off on bid day?

8 Can the RFI deadline be extended to after the site visit on 5/20/22?

Bid per RFP.

9 Please confirm that the seed project is fully designed?

Yes these are the final IFC drawings.

10 p. 16 5.3 Based on the current proposal due date of 6/1/22, PPI’s would be due 5/18/22 which is before the site visit on 5/20/22.

We anticipate having additional PPI’s after attending the site visit. Can the Gov’t extend both the PPI due date and proposal due date to accommodate the submission and response to site visit PPI’s?

See Amendment 0005.

11 p. 16 5.2.1 Most pricing for the seed project won’t be received until the day of the bid and if we are required to mail the proposal in we’d realistically need to ship it (2) days prior to the due date to make sure it was received in time.

Can the Gov’t please consider

See Amendment 0005.

allowing hand delivery or have the electronic PIEE submission due on the due date but allow for a mailed copy to be received within 3 days after the bid due date?

12 p. 10 2nd para. The 2nd paragraph states that if we’re submitting as a Mentor-Protégé 8a Joint Venture that a signed SBA approved JV agreement and Approval letter must be submitted.

The SBA no longer approves 8(a) Joint Ventures on Competitive contracts so this requirement isn’t possible. Can you please confirm this is no longer required?

Confirmed.

13 Drawings Keynote 1 HM101 Keynote 1 states that a HAZMAT survey is in the specifications however we don’t see it. Can the Gov’t please provide the hazmat survey?

Refer to Addendum A for a copy of the hazmat survey.

14 Specs 01 35 26 & 01 45 00.10

1.7.1.1.1 & 1.5.1.1

Spec Section 01 35 26 para.

1.7.1.1.1 states that the SSHO may NOT be the QCM but may also serve as the Superintendent.

However, spec section 01 45

00.10 20 para.

1.5.1.1 states that the QCM may perform the duties of the Superintendent.

Specification sections 01 32 26 & 01 45 00.10 20 have been revised. Refer to Amendment A for revisions.

Please clarify which spec is correct.

15 Specs 01 32 17.00

Spec section 01 32

17.00 20 requires a Primavera P6, cost-loaded schedule. Will the Gov’t consider eliminating this requirement and allow a non-cost loaded Microsoft Project schedule to be used?

Provide a Primavera P6 cost-loaded schedule per requirements.

16 Attachment A

Reference Attachment “A”.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture please advise which box in Box 1 is to be checked if the project being submitted for Construction Experience was performed by one of the Joint Venture partners.

The Offeror should check the box correlating to the manner in which the JV Partner performed under the submitted Project. The Offeror may also check “Other” and provide supporting details.

17 RFP pg. 7, para 3(a)(1)

The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy marked original via PIEE, one (1) hard copy marked copy and one (1) CD of the solicitation submittal requirements

In the interests of time and economy, as well as environmental impact and consideration of

COVID

precautionary measures, would the government please consider replacing the current submission requirement of PIEE, hardcopy, and CD with a PIEE submission only?

See Amendment 0005.

18 Attachment A

Attachment A is provided in Times New Roman size 10 font. Is it permissible to use Times New Roman size 10 font when

See Amendment 0005.

Minimum 10-point font, Times New Roman providing information within the government-provided forms?

19 Page 7 of 59

3(a)(1)

States, “The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy marked original via PIEE, one (1) hard copy marked copy and one (1)

CD”.

See Amendment 0005.

20 Page 16 of

5.2.1 States, “Mailed

Hard Copies: One

(1) original, one

(1) CD-ROM, and one (1) copy of the hard copy proposal shall be delivered by mail. Please clarify the number of hard copies to be mailed and how they are to be labeled (i.e., original, copy, etc.).

See Amendment 0005.

21 Page 15 of

Factor 4 (i) States, “Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

Offerors are permitted to provide copies of previously completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) in their proposal.” Is it the Government’s intention that offerors cannot incorporate references from a previously submitted PPQ, but they can provide the actual previously

Confirmed, “The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.”

submitted PPQ?

Please clarify.

(End of Summary of Changes)

PWD Norfolk, Facilities Engineering and Acquisition Division Page 1 of 1

Design Revision A eProjects Work Order Number: 1576521

Construction Contract Number: N/A

Building: SP-254

Project Title: Replace Roof & Seal Building Exterior

Date: May 23, 2022

Design Revision Purpose

1. Replace language for the requirements of the QC, SSHO and Superintendent.

2. Provide missing HAZMAT survey.

Specification Revisions

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

1.7.1.1.1 Additional Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) Requirements and Duties

Change the paragraph to read, “The SSHO may also serve as the Quality Control Manager. The SSHO may not serve as the Superintendent.”

SECTION 01 45 00.10 20 QUALITY CONTROL FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION

1.5.1.1 Duties

Change the second sentence to read, “In addition to implementing and managing the QC program, the QC Manager may not perform the duties of project superintendent.”