Solicitation-P990_Vertical_Lift_Fan_Test_Facility.pdf
PDF 827 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008519R9019
About this file
This pre-solicitation notice announces an upcoming solicitation for design-bid-build construction services for a P990 F-35B Vertical Lift Fan Test Facility at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point in North Carolina. The project scope includes construction of a reinforced concrete structure with three levels and a 40,000 HP electric motor prime mover. The government will issue a request for proposal on or about February 15, 2019. The anticipated contract value is between $10 million and $25 million. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management and capable of performing work under NAICS code 236220 for commercial and institutional building construction with a small business size standard of $36.5 million. The government conducted market research and determined no reasonable expectation of adequate small business participation. Questions may be directed to the point of contact by the specified deadline.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ACQR5526275
SOLICITATION NO. N40085-19-R-9019 DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB), P990 F-35B VERTICAL LIFT FAN TEST FACILITY, MCAS CHERRY POINT, NC
THIS ACQUISITION IS BEING SOLICITED AS FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.
PROPOSALS ARE DUE THURSDAY, 27 JUNE 2019 AT 2:00 PM EST, REFER TO SECTION 00 10 00 - "INSTRUCTIONS FOR OFFERORS" FOR
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROPOSAL DELIVERY INFORMATION.
SITE VISIT DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED VIA AMENDMENT
PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs) CUT-OFF DATE AND TIME IS TUESDAY, 11 JUNE 2019 AT 2:00 PM EST. ALL PPIs SHALL BE SUBMITTED USING ATTACHMENT D - PRE-PROPOPSAL INQUIRIES FORM AND EMAILED TO DEANNA WARD AT: DEANNA.WARD@NAVY.MIL
In accordance w ith DFARS 236.204, the magnitude of construction for this project is betw een $10,000,000 and $25,000,000. The appropriate Northern American Industry Classif ication System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 236220 -- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction and the Small Business Size Standard is $36,500,000.
WAGE DETERMINATION GENERAL DECISION NUMBER NC190065 01/04/2019
DEANNA D WARD 757-341-1226
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
01-May-2019
(RFP)
(IFB)
X
CALL:
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
X
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________588 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________3 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________27 Jun 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.
B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC
ACQUISITION CORE
9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE
NORFOLK VA 23511-3095
N40085
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
02:00 PM (hour)
Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:
N4008519R9019 32
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
N4008519R9019
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The work includes the construction of a roughly 10,500 SF test facility that will support the Vertical Lift Fan which is integral in operating the F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing aircraft. This will be a 3-level structure with cast-in-place reinforced concrete walls and roof to include a staging area, test facility control room, equipment room, inlet house area, lift fan test area, primary inlet plenum area, exhaust collector room, exhaust diffuser plenum area, 40,000 HP electric motor Prime Mover, and high pressure and high volume reinforced concrete air inlet/exhaust stack. This will be supported by a precast concrete pile foundation system. The building's electrical power will be provided from a new transformer operating at 12.47 kV primary voltage and 480V three phase secondary voltage. The prime mover electrical power will be provided by a new high-voltage substation adjacent to the building. The project also requires fire protection, plumbing, HVAC, lighting, site improvements, supporting utilities and incidental related work.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT INFORMATION
*Site Visit details will be provided via Amendment*
PROPOSAL DELIVERY INFORMATION
Your price and non-price proposals shall be submitted no later than: Thursday, 27 June 2019 at 2:00 PM EST.
In addition to the original, plus three (3) copies, your submission should include one (1) CD- ROM with the price and non-price proposal. Electronic submission of proposals will not be accepted (aside from the requirement to submit one (1) CD-ROM with the price and non-price proposal), and with the exception of Attachment B – Price Proposal Form. Attachment B – Price Proposal Form may be submitted via email to the following: deanna.ward@navy.mil. If an offeror chooses to submit Attachment B - Price Proposal Form via email, then such offeror does not need to include Attachment B with the hard copy (or CD-ROM copy) of the full price and non-price proposal to be mailed or delivered.
Pricing information is not required to be submitted under Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation in SF 1442.
All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.
Mail or hand deliver to:
(MAILED PROPOSALS ARE PREFERRED DUE TO RECENT SECURITY CHANGES
REQUIRED TO GAIN BASE ACCESS)
NAVFAC MIDLANT
9324 Virginia Avenue, Bldg, Z140, Room 225 Norfolk, VA 23511 Attn: Deanna Ward, Contract Specialist - ACQ 21
Security Information: Offerors who would like to hand deliver their proposal and who do not currently have a valid badge issued by the Department of Defense (DOD) to enter Naval Station Norfolk must do the following:
1. Please submit a Base Access Pass Registration SECNAV 5512/1 form (Attachment F) no later than Wednesday, 12 June 2019 to Deanna Ward at deanna.ward@navy.mil. SECNAV 5512/1 form is used to gain base access to Naval Station Norfolk for proposal submission only.
2. Present the following information at the pass office: Two forms of ID (i.e. Valid Driver’s License and (one of the following) U.S. Social Security Card or Birth Certificate), Current Vehicle Registration and/or Rental Car Contract, Current State Safety Inspection, Current Proof of Insurance. The Naval Station Norfolk Pass and ID Office is located in Bldg. CD9 at 9040 Hampton Boulevard across from Gate 5. All potential offers must adhere to this notice in order to avoid delay in submitting your proposal. The level of security at the Naval Station Norfolk may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Naval Station also increases. Early arrival is advised. Submission of a pass request form is no guarantee you will be able to get on the base. If for any reason you get to the gate and are not allowed onto the base (even if you have submitted a request form), you will need to find another way to get your proposal delivered. Government personnel may not be able to sponsor you on base to deliver your proposal. Ultimately, it is the contractor's responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission to the specified location. Due to heightened security, it is recommended that you allow sufficient time to get into the building and turn in your proposal. If approved, the submitted pass request only allows access on the proposal due date. If the proposal due date is extended, the offeror must seek to have the date on the pass request revised. Submission of a new pass request form may not be necessary. If any other information listed on a submitted pass request form changes, a new pass request form with the updated information must be submitted.
To verify identity, visitors MUST present a second form of identification at the pass office from the list of A or B Documents found at http://www.uscis.gov/i-9-central/acceptable-documents.
BASIS OF AWARD
1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.
2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)).
The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.
3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.
4. In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology.
Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order (lowest price to highest price).
The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the lowest priced proposal. In the event the proposal is deemed Unacceptable, the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technical acceptable proposal. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal from among the lowest priced proposals. However, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.
5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:
Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance
The distinction between Corporate Experience and Past Performance is Corporate Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past Performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.
2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.
(a) Price:
(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and one (1) copy, marked “Copy”, in a separate three ring binder (1/2 inch minimum) with the following:
Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS Number, Cage Code, Point of Contact, and E-mail Address;
Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged;
Price Proposal Form;
Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management (SAM);
Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS) VETS-
4212 for the 2018 filing cycle;
Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 – Bid Guarantee
(amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million); and
Responsibility Determination Information (see below).
Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Attachment E)
The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line item numbers (CLINs).
In the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies, the original version of the proposal will govern. Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal (non-price proposal) will not be considered. Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL
PACKAGE:
RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION – In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically FAR 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:
1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).
2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.
3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.
4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.
5. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS 252.219- 7003).
NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.
SB 45%
SDB 5%
HUBZone SB 3%
WOSB 15%
SDVOSB 5%
Small businesses identified by name shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with DFARS 252.219- 7003(e).
See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Attachment E) for format.
Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award.
Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.
(2) Basis of Evaluation:
The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section 00010 – Solicitation Contract Form of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00700 – Contract Clauses of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:
(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.
(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.
(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.
(iv) Comparison of market survey results.
(b) Non-Price Factors:
Non-price binder: The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and two (2) copies, marked “Copy”, each in a separate three ring binder with the following:
Cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Phone Number, and Email Address;
8 ½ x 11 paper, 12-point font;
Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated;
Additionally, include an electronic version of the non-price proposals on CD-
ROM.
As with the price proposal, in the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies (or CD- ROM), the original version of the proposal will govern. Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal (non-price proposal) will not be considered. Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.
(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The offeror shall submit the following information:
Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. The Government will not consider more than five projects and will review only the first five projects if more are submitted.
For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:
Size: Single or multiple building project with a cumulative square footage of 10,000 SF or greater and cost of $10 million or greater.
Scope / Complexity: Construction of high tolerance, cast-in-place reinforced concrete industrial facilities (e.g., buildings involving wind tunnels, test and evaluation facilities, laboratories, etc.) or jet engine test facilities, with high or medium voltage equipment.
Subcontractor experience will not be considered. Additionally, experience of the offeror while performing as a subcontractor will not be considered.
Projects submitted shall be completed within seven (7) years prior to the date of issuance of the RFP. Additionally, projects which are not complete as of the date of issuance of this RFP shall not be considered by the SSEB.
A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract.
For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.
The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information, including the project square footage, for each project. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. As such, submissions via any other medium will not be considered. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).
Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.
For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods) as defined above by Size, Scope, and Complexity. The Government may determine that the project is not relevant if the offeror does not clearly demonstrate how each project meets the Size, Scope, and Complexity requirements. In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.
If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience must be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. However, if the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects must be submitted for all Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.
If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate and explain as to how the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.
Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered. Likewise, the Offeror’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined above in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The requirement for Acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the offeror in its proposal; the offeror must have at least two (2) relevant projects that meet the Size, Scope, and Complexity stated in the Solicitation Submittal Requirements above or will be considered Unacceptable.
(2) Factor 2, Safety:
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
The offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)
(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2016, 2017, and 2018). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends must be addressed as part of the factor submission.
(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2016, 2017, and 2018). If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART rate, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.
(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2016, 2017, and 2018). If an offeror cannot submit
OSHA TRC rates, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.
(4) Technical Approach for Safety: The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages), and must address all items below.
1. The offeror shall describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.
2. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.
3. The offeror shall describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.
4. The offeror shall describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.
Information beyond this page limit will not be considered.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:
- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)
- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)
- Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates
- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety
- Other sources of information available to the Government
(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends must be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.
(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART rates, the offeror must affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data and negative trends must be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.
(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA TRC rates, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA TRC rates, the offeror must affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data and negative trends must be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA TRC rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.
(4) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.
(5) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.
(c) Past Performance
(1) Factor 3, Past Performance:
(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:
IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED
WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A
COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.
IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the offeror must ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror must complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D) with contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Ms. Deanna Ward, via email at deanna.ward@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.
In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.
While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide accurate points of contact for each identified contract and current telephone numbers and/or email addresses.
The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references’ unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.
Offerors are highly encouraged to provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors are also highly encouraged to address any adverse past performance issues. Such explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.
Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.
(ii) Basis of Evaluation:
The evaluation focuses on how well the offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government will determine whether there is a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.
The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance may include, but is not limited to:
- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;
- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;
- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and
- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand
The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of Acceptability/Unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or
Improper Activity
MAY 2014
52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal
Transactions
OCT 2010
52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct OCT 2015 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement
To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights
APR 2014
52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber
Content Paper
MAY 2011
52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier
Subcontract Awards
OCT 2018
52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and
Certifications.
DEC 2014
52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment
OCT 2015
52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters
OCT 2018
52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations
NOV 2015
52.210-1 Market Research APR 2011 52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.211-14 Notice Of Priority Rating For National Defense, Emergency
Preparedness, and Energy Program Use
APR 2008
52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity APR 1984 52.214-34 Submission Of Offers In The English Language APR 1991 52.214-35 Submission Of Offers In U.S. Currency APR 1991 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.215-2 Audit and Records--Negotiation OCT 2010 52.215-10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data AUG 2011 52.215-12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data OCT 2010 52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions OCT 2010 52.215-18 Reversion or Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement Benefits
(PRB) Other than Pensions
JUL 2005
52.215-19 Notification of Ownership Changes OCT 1997 52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data or
Information Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data
OCT 2010
52.215-21 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data -- Modifications
OCT 2010
52.215-23 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges OCT 2009 52.219-1 Small Business Program Representations OCT 2014 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2018 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting JAN 2017 52.219-16 Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan JAN 1999 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards - Overtime
Compensation
MAY 2018
52.222-6 Construction Wage Rate Requirements AUG 2018 52.222-7 Withholding of Funds MAY 2014 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records AUG 2018 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements FEB 1988 52.222-11 Subcontracts (Labor Standards) MAY 2014 52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment MAY 2014 52.222-13 Compliance With Construction Wage Rate Requirements and
Related Regulations
MAY 2014
52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards FEB 1988 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility MAY 2014 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016
52.222-27 Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction
APR 2015
52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans OCT 2015 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUL 2014 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans FEB 2016 52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor
Relations Act
DEC 2010
52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons MAR 2015 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification OCT 2015 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 DEC 2015 52.222-62 Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 JAN 2017 52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts
SEP 2013
52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011 52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace MAY 2001 52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming
Potential Hydrofluorocarbons.
JUN 2016
52.223-12 Maintenance, Service, Repair, or Disposal of Refrigeration Equipment and Air Conditioners.
JUN 2016
52.223-15 Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products DEC 2007 52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-Designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts
AUG 2018
52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving
AUG 2011
52.223-20 Aerosols JUN 2016 52.223-21 Foams JUN 2016 52.225-11 Buy American--Construction Materials Under Trade
Agreements
OCT 2016
52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements
MAY 2014
52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007 52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright
Infringement
DEC 2007
52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts DEC 2007 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security OCT 1997 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.228-11 Pledges Of Assets AUG 2018 52.228-12 Prospective Subcontractor Requests for Bonds MAY 2014 52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit NOV 2014 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction OCT 2010 52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts MAY 2014 52.232-17 Interest MAY 2014 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014 52.232-27 Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts JAN 2017 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award
Management
OCT 2018
52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business
Subcontractors
DEC 2013
52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions APR 1984
52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work APR 1984 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-6 Superintendence by the Contractor APR 1984 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities NOV 1991 52.236-8 Other Contracts APR 1984 52.236-9 Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements
APR 1984
52.236-10 Operations and Storage Areas APR 1984 52.236-11 Use and Possession Prior to Completion APR 1984 52.236-12 Cleaning Up APR 1984 52.236-13 Accident Prevention NOV 1991 52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services APR 1984 52.236-15 Schedules for Construction Contracts APR 1984 52.236-17 Layout of Work APR 1984 52.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction FEB 1997 52.236-26 Preconstruction Conference FEB 1995 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-14 Suspension of Work APR 1984 52.243-4 Changes JUN 2007 52.243-5 Changes and Changed Conditions APR 1984 52.243-6 Change Order Accounting APR 1984 52.244-5 Competition In Subcontracting DEC 1996 52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items OCT 2018 52.246-12 Inspection of Construction AUG 1996 52.246-13 Inspection--Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of
Improvements
AUG 1996
52.246-21 Warranty of Construction MAR 1994 52.247-34 F.O.B. Destination NOV 1991 52.249-2 Termination For Convenience Of The Government (Fixed-
Price)
APR 2012
52.249-10 Default (Fixed-Price Construction) APR 1984 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations In Provisions APR 1984 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD
Officials
SEP 2011
252.203-7001 Prohibition On Persons Convicted of Fraud or Other Defense- Contract-Related Felonies
DEC 2008
252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General DEC 2012 252.203-7004 Display of Hotline Posters OCT 2016 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD
Officials
NOV 2011
252.204-7006 Billing Instructions OCT 2005 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By
The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism
OCT 2015
252.215-7002 Cost Estimating System Requirements DEC 2012 252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels DEC 1991 252.223-7004 Drug Free Work Force SEP 1988 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or
Hazardous Materials
SEP 2014
252.227-7033 Rights in Shop Drawings APR 1966 252.231-7000 Supplemental Cost Principles DEC 1991
252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports
JUN 2012
252.232-7004 DOD Progress Payment Rates OCT 2014 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.236-7000 Modification Proposals-Price Breakdown DEC 1991 252.236-7001 Contract Drawings, and Specifications AUG 2000 252.236-7002 Obstruction of Navigable Waterways DEC 1991 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea APR 2014
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (OCT 2018)
(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 236220.
(2) The small business size standard is $36,500,000.
(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.
(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.
(2) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is not included in this solicitation, and the Offeror has an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM), the Offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The Offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:
( ) Paragraph (d) applies.
( ) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.
(c) (1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:
(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless—
(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;
(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or
(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.
(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.
(iii) 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements--Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.
(iv) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.
(v) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that—
(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;
(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and
(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.
(vi) 52.209-2; Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation.
(vii) 52.209-5; Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
(viii) 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law. This provision applies to all solicitations.
(ix) 52.214-14, Place of Performance--Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.
(x) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.
(xi) 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations (Basic & Alternate I). This provision applies to solicitations when the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.
(A) The basic provision applies when the solicitations are issued by other than DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.
(B) The provision with its Alternate I applies to solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.
(xii) 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids. This provision applies to solicitations when contracting by sealed bidding and the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.
(xiii) 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports. This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.
(xiv) 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance. This provision applies to solicitations, other than those for construction, when the solicitation includes the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.
(xv) 52.222-38, Compliance with Veterans' Employment Reporting…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .