N4008020R6202 0006.pdf

N4008020R6260

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PROJECT: Regional Asbestor, Lead and Mold Testing and Removal (ACQR 5793501)

See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 45

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Mar-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N4008020R6260

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Nov-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Mar-2021

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A. Extend Proposal due date to Monday, April 12, 2021.

B. Revise CLIN and Period of performance 1 June 2021 – 31 December 2026.

C. Post Govt Responses to Questions and incorporate changes.

D. Incorporate revisions to Sections A, B, G, H, L, and M.

E. Incorporate revised Factor 4, Safety (Section M).

F. Incorporate revised instructions to Offerors (Section L) to submit proposals via DoD SAFE.

G. RFI - Questions regarding revisiions are due Monday, March 22, 2021. (Section L.4)

GOV'T RESPONSE TO QUESTS

N40080-20-R-6260

GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY NOVEMBER 11, 2020.

NOTE: Similar questions have been gathered for organizational and clarity purposes.

1. Typically these types of requirements are limited to 8a’s from a particular SBA Office, Washington DC office for instance. Can this requirement be limited similarly to 8(a)’s out of the SBA Washington DC office?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. No. NAVFAC Washington is seeking to award to an 8(a) concern certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA), with the capacity, experience and interest in providing Regional Asbestos Test and Removal Services to be performed in the NAVFAC Washington’s Area of Responsibility (AOR) in accordance with the PWS ANNEX 0100000, Spec Item 1.2, Project Location.

2. Is bonding required for task orders over $100k? How much bonding capacity will be required for the entire contract?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Bonding is required and applicable to State Laws and regulations for task orders over the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT). See clauses incorporated regarding bond and bid guarantee FAR 52.228-1 and FAR 52.228.15

3. Will the NAVY require other General Contractors awarded NAVY contracts with Asbestos, Lead &

Mold issues on their contracts to use the 8a -prequalified contractor to perform work on their contracts on any of the installations listed in the RFP?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. No; as an 8(a) set-aside, the 8(a) awardee will be required to self- perform 51% of the work. The remaining 49% of the work does not have to be an 8(a) firm.

4. Are there potential opportunities identified on the different installations mentioned or will the successful awardee have to search for opportunities, installation by installation?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The award of this requirement will be specific to the Non-recurring orders made against the contract awarded in response to this solicitation.

5. Are there existing asbestos surveys available for work to be completed?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. No asbestos surveys are available at this time. However, completed survey results, if applicable, will be made available at the Task Order level.

6. How much work must the 8a Prime contractor or SBA approved 51% JV Partner perform with its own forces?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The 8(a) awardee will be required to self- perform 51% of the work. The remaining 49% of the work does not have to be an 8(a) firm.

7. Are you interested in seeing the selected Prime Contractor’s or Prime JV partners DC, MD & VA, Asbestos, Lead & Mold licenses prior to award (Section F mentions after award review by the KO)?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Licenses should be provided with submission of your proposal and again when work commences and as requested by the KO. REFERENCE: Solicitation Section F, Annex 0200000, Spec Item 2.3.4 Permits and Licenses. See FAR Clauses 52.228-1 and 52.228-15.

8. Will the work be covered under a facility ‘blanket permit’ or will individual/separate permits be required for each task order?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Permit requirement will be determined and only accepted in accordance with state and local jurisdiction; see Spec Item 2.3.4.

9. How many permits should bidders anticipate acquiring as there are several state & local jurisdictions with different requirements and fees?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Permit requirement will be determined and only accepted in accordance with state and local jurisdiction; see Spec Item 2.3.4.

10. Since this is an environmental requirement, are you interested in Contractors Pollution Coverage, Excess

Liability, Errors & Omissions Coverage?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Please review Annex 0200000, Spec Item 2.10 Environmental Management and Sustainability.

11. Is there an incumbent contractor? If so how much work has been performed historically by this contractor?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. This is a new requirement. There have been individual contracts for similar services over the past few years with various contractors.

12. Is there an incumbent contractor currently performing these services?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. This is a new requirement. There have been individual contracts for similar services over the past few years with various contractors, however not identical to this requirement.

REFERENCE: Section B.2, Prior Contract Information.

13. How will task orders be requested from the different NAVY installations?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Task Orders will be issued by the designated Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) of each PWD location.

14. Will each base have a separate environmental coordinator responsible for asbestos, lead & mold?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Yes, each Base/Installation will have an environmental coordinator.

15. There are a lot of pricing line items missing for things like equipment rentals, sample clearance, disposal, working on hot or high pipes, what are we to do in that case?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The Contractor shall enter, in the unit price bid space, the unit price for performing composite labor. REFERENCE: Solicitation Sections B.5 FULLY LOADED PRICING and B.8 BIDDING UNIT PRICES FOR LABOR Item c.

16. In Pricing, Section C, Attachment J, Items A023 & A100 (and associated option year line items) – There is reference to “Indiana Licensed Supervisors” needed.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. See Revised Attachment J-0200000-07 ELINs Item Numbers A023/B023/C023/D023 and A045/B045/C045/D045 removed "Indiana" from description. REFERENCE:

Attachment J-0200000-07 ELINs, revised.

17. There is no Davis Bacon Wage scale for Washington DC.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Refer to Attachment "J-0200000-02 Davis-Bacon Act WD # DC20200002 Mod 5.pdf" for Davis Bacon Wage scale for Washington DC. REFERENCE: Attachment J-0200000-02 Davis-Bacon Act WD # DC J-20200002.

18. Since the projects could occur in one of several Davis Bacon Wage jurisdictions, should Offerors utilize the highest asbestos worker/heat & frost insulator wage rate when determining the rate schedule? If not, are we able to provide pricing based on each wage determination jurisdiction?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Based on the job category and if there are any applicable job category, DAVIS BACON may be used.

19. Factor 3, Safety, Items a (1) & (2), refer to 2015, 2016 & 2018 (skipping 2017). Which three years should the EMR & DART represent?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Provide the EMR & DART for the three previous complete calendar years 2017, 2018, 2019; see revision.

20. In Section M, 3.a (1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR) and 3.a (2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, ratings from 2016, 2017, and 2018 are requested. May offerors also provide this data for the year 2019?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Provide the EMR & DART for the three previous complete calendar years 2017, 2018, 2019; see revision.

21. How many contracts will be awarded under this requirement?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. One contract will be awarded to a single contractor.

22. Regarding the Top-Secret Facility Clearance (FCL) – Is this is an absolute? Because there are only a handful of 8(a) Environmental Companies with TS Clearance and this will determine if we will submit a response.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Top-Secret Facility Clearance (FCL) is not required. Section H.2 is amended to reflect the following: No Top Secret Facility Clearance (FCL) is required; RFP is revised.

23. Section H.2 Security Requirements (pg 55 of 148) states “Reference Section C, Annex 0200000, Spec. item

2.8. Note: The Contractor must possess a current Top Secret Facility Clearance (FCL) at the time of proposal submission to be considered for award.” Spec item 2.8 does not provide any further requirements for Top Secret Facility Clearance. Can you please clarify if Top Secret Facility Clearance at time of proposal submission is in fact a requirement and if so, will you consider changing that to prior to task order execution?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Top Secret Facility Clearance is not required; RFP is revised

24. Should any sub-contractor to be hired on this project by an 8a prime have TS Clearance?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No Top Secret Facility Clearance (FCL) is required; RFP is revised.

25. Solicitation states that escorts will be provided when necessary. Will contractor’s employees be required to have Top Security Clearance for any portions of the work?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. No Top Secret Facility Clearance (FCL) is required; RFP has been revised.

26. The list below shows the five factors as listed in Section M (Pg. 139).

a. This list shows Price is Factor 1 but Section M doesn’t have Price numbered. Please verify.

b. There are Two Factor 4’s in the list (Safety & Past performance).

c. I’m assuming the proposal will have all five Factors, but it would be beneficial if the government would provide updated numbering.

i. Factor 1 – Price

ii. Factor 2 – Corporate Experience

iii. Factor 3 – Technical Approach

iv. Factor 4 – Safety

v. Factor 4 –Past Performance.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Numbering for the Factors have been corrected in the revised RFP.

27. Are any addenda to be submitted in Volume 1? Should the SF1449 & acknowledgement of all addendum be included in Volume 1 - Technical proposal or Volume 2 - Pricing?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Yes, acknowledgement of all amendments shall be included in Volume I - Pricing proposal, and Volume II - Non-pricing proposal.

28. L.5 Financial Data – Where does this information go?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Please submit this information with your Price Proposal.

29. Section L5 (pg 137 of 148) states contractor to “provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by …”. Can you clarify where or in which Tab that should be submitted in the Price Proposal?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please submit this information with your Price Proposal.

30. Section L6 (pg 137 of 148), Additional Information, can you clarify where or in which Tab that should be submitted in the Price Proposal?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please submit this information with your Price Proposal.

31. In Section M, “Spec Item Questions for Environmental ANNEX 1800000”, Will you clarify the following statement: “4.2.2. What is your quality of doing field testing?” GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The question has been revised: The question has been revised: What is your quality assurance methods of doing field testing?

REFERENCE: Solicitation Section M, FACTOR 3, Technical Approach, Questions for Environmental.

32. What is an FTE Worksheet?

a. Required in Section L, c. VOLUME 2: NON-PRICE PROPOSAL

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The statement ", except the FTE Worksheet should be in Excel format" is removed.

33. Section L2, Volume 2 Non-Price Proposal (pg 136 of 148) states “documents should be in Adobe Acrobat format, except the FTE Worksheet should be in Excel format.” I don’t see any additional requirements for what is to be included in the FTE Worksheet. Can you please provide additional details regarding what to include on this worksheet?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The statement ", except the FTE Worksheet should be in Excel format" is removed.

34. Will you provide the following:

a. The Performance Work Statement (PWS)

i. The Offeror must demonstrate experience performing all requirements identified in

Annex 1800000 in the PWS is MANDATORY to be rated Acceptable.

b. Attachment C - OFFEROR’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE INPUT FORM

i. Use of Attachment C - OFFEROR’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE INPUT FORM is MANDATORY and SHALL be used.

c. Attachment D – Is there a form? If so please provide.

d. Are there any additional “Attachments”?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The PWS is Section C of the Solicitation (Annex 0100000, Annex 0200000) with all attachments, including Annex 1800000. Attachment D, OFFEROR’S RELEVANT CORPORATE EXPERIENCE INPUT FORM, will be attached. Attachment C, Past Performance Questionnaire form, is attached. Additional attachments listed on page one of “Combined 0200000_1800000 J Management and Administration and Environmental”. REFERENCE: Solicitation, Section C and Section M.

35. Section M states “Use of Attachment C - OFFEROR’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE INPUT FORM is

MANDATORY and SHALL be used… Do not use more than 3 pages for each experience (i.e., the Attachment ‘D’ form itself and not more than 2 continuation pages).” I don’t see Attachment C or D in the solicitation. Can you please provide Attachment C or D?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Attachment C, Past Performance Questionnaire form and Attachment D, Offeror’s Relevant Corporate Experience Questionnaire, are attached with amendment.

36. RFP Section (1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience, (b), requests that corporate experience be provided via

Attachment C - OFFEROR’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE INPUT FORM. We are not able to locate this form. Can the Government please provide a copy? GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Per revised solicitation, FACTOR 2, Corporate Experience, see Attachment C, Past Performance Questionnaire form and Attachment D, Offeror’s Relevant Corporate Experience Questionnaire.

37. The RFP implies a big discussion on Corporate Experience but Section M seems to be looking at three

Attachment C forms.

a. Which of these does the NAVY want to see? A narrative or attachment C forms? Or should both be submitted?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Provide your narrative response on Attachment C, Past Performance Questionnaire form and Attachment D, Offeror’s Relevant Corporate Experience Questionnaire is attached.

38. 36. Section M: (2) Factor 2, Technical Approach: (a)

a. “Each of the five (5) components below must be tabbed in the technical proposal and discussed separately:” There are only four components listed? Is there a fifth component?

b. There are five Factors. Are Factors different from components?

c. The Government uses the term “components” in the requirement, not “Factor”. Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. There are 5 factors: Price; Corporate Experience; Technical Approach; Safety;

and Past Performance. The factor, Technical Approach has five components: Phase-in; Workforce Management Plan; Key Personnel; Subcontract Management; and Quality Management System. The fifth component is Quality Management System (QMS) in accordance with Annex 02000000, Spec Item 2.6.6.1, Quality Management Plan, and Section E2, Contractor Quality Management System. The components make up the Technical Approach (Factor 3) contractor intend to use for performance success. As a whole, Factor 3, Technical Approach will be evaluated.

39. Please confirm this IDIQ is for 1 base year and 4 option years.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The Government intends to award a performance-based fixed firm-price contract for the period of one (1) 12-month base period and four (4) 12-month option periods; a total of 5 years if the Government needs the services, performance is consistently met, and options are exercised.

40. Please provide the minimum and maxim dollar amounts for each task order/each year.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Minimum: $2,500.00; Maximum: $1,000,000.00.

41. Please confirm the Prime contractor can use subcontractor past performance to fulfill technical requirements.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Yes, the prime contractor can utilize subcontractors to perform on the contract;

however, the prime contractor shall not submit subcontractors past performance for evaluation for award of this solicitation. Per Factor 2, Corporate Experience, "experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered." REFERENCE: Solicitation SECTION M, Factor 2.

42. Please specify the number of contactors to be awarded.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. One contractor will be the awardee.

43. Please confirm the price proposal is to only include:

a. H.6 BLANKET TASK ORDERS

b. ELIN spreadsheet

c. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources.

d. Three (3) signed credit references

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Please review the Solicitation, Section M, Section L, and all attachments in its entirety for all information required for a complete proposal:

e. In accordance with (IAW) Section H, item H.6, task orders will be awarded as needed by the individual PWDs. See Revision to H.6.

f. IAW Section B, item B.3, Spreadsheet, Attachment J-0200000-07, ELINS Updated is required with proposal.

g. IAW Section L, item L.6, one (1) signed bank reference is required.

h. IAW Section L, item L.6, 3 credit references are required.

44. Please provide the Request Code to upload the documents to DoD Secure Access File Exchange Service, DoD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil).

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. DoD SAFE: In order to initiate your drop-off of your proposals (price and non-price), you must email the CS/KO:

SUBJECT: N40080-20-R-6260 REQUEST DROP-OFF

A “drop-off request” from CS/KO will be sent to your email; this request is valid for 14 days. See DoD SAFE Help, Section A, and Section L for more information.

45. The instructions in Section L2. (c) instructs that proposals should be submitted both as printed copies and CD copies, and through the DoD SAFE system. Please confirm whether the Government does want printed proposals.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Proposals will only be received electronically through DoD SAFE; no printed copies will be accepted. Section L.2 is revised.

46. Please clarify Indiana licensed asbestos supervisor requirement.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Indiana licensed is not required. Please see Revised Attachment J-0200000-07 ELINs Item Numbers A023/B023/C023/D023 and A045/B045/C045/D045 removed "Indiana" from description. REFERENCE: Attachment J-0200000-07 ELINs.

47. Please confirm this project is required US citizen only to perform the work.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Please refer to Annex 0200000, Spec Item 2.7.2 Employee Requirements and

2.7.2.6 Proof of Legal Residency. All contract and sub-contract employees will need to provide proof of legal residency.

48. Section L (pg 134 of 148) states “proposals shall be tabbed appropriately, and must include a cover page with the name of the prime contractor, addresses, phone and fax numbers, email addresses, solicitation number, and point of contact. Proposals must be marked as “Volume 1: Price Proposal” and “Volume 2:

Non-Price Proposal”. Recognizing that we are submitting electronic and not paper copies of the proposal, please clarify how proposals shall be tabbed?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. You should submit proposal electronically. Your electronic version shall have separated Volumes. For example, you may choose to name a file Volume 2, which has additional file for each Tab and/or Factor. REFERENCE: Solicitation Section L.2.

49. Section L2 (pg 135 of 148) states “SF1449, Section B, Supplies or Services and Prices, starting on page 2 –

Complete each item number by entering the offeror’s proposed price.” However, page 2 says to “See Schedule”. Can you please clarify how we complete each item to our offer?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. With solicitation amendment, the page shall be corrected.

50. Section L2, , Volume 2 Non-Price Proposal (pg 136 of 148) states to “submit one (1) original and three (3) copies in 8-1/2 x 11format, font size 12 in three ring binders and tabbed appropriately by major evaluation factors along with two (2) CD copies.” Can you please clarify these requirements given its an electronic submission?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. With solicitation amendment, requirement of three copies in a three ring binders is not required.

51. Section L4 – Can NAVFAC please change the RFI due date until after the pre-proposal conference on

November 16, 2020?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. An additional opportunity for Request for Information (RFI) will be taken into consideration.

52. Spec 1.5 – Verification of workload and conditions – states as per FAR 52.237-1 offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance. However Section B.5 requests fully loaded pricing be submitted to include all costs, OH and profit. At the task order level will the contractor be required to submit a hard bid taking into account information learned from a site visit? And will profit be negotiated at the task order level?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Site conditions for each site will be unique depending on the installation, age of facility etc. The awardee will be afforded an opportunity for a site visit prior to providing a proposal for each task order.

53. Spec 0200000 Section 2.4.2. Government Furnished Utilities. The first paragraph and the second paragraph appear to contradict each other. Is the Contractor responsible for the cost of all utilities as stated in the second paragraph? If yes, how will those utilities be metered and separated when using existing outlets in Government and Contractor shared occupied spaces?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The Government will furnish water and electricity at existing outlets required for the work to be performed under the contract. The Contractor will be responsible for utilities cost for the necessary service lines from the existing Government outlets to the work site; services required by the Contractor, for which there are no available Government outlets; and any additional Contractor-owned /occupied facilities. The utilities quantities will be estimated where meters are not provided based on UFC 3- 401-05N.

54. Attachment J ELIN spreadsheet formulas appear to be incorrect or include additional calculations. For example, A001 cell F13’s formula is =SUM(C13*E13/15). Why is the value divided by 15? There are other cell’s formulas divided by 5, 10, & and 25. Please clarify?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Formulas have been corrected; see Attachment J-0200000-07 ELINs.

55. Attachment J ELIN spreadsheet A046, A047, and A048 Mark-up on Material Cost are confusing. The description instructs Contractors to insert percentages into cells that are shaded or contain the description of work (e.g. A047 goes to cell B63). Also, the example provided shows $4,000 X 1.05 = $4,100 (should be $4,200). Please clarify if these instructions are correct?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Formulas have been corrected; see Attachment J-0200000-07 ELINs.

56. Please clarify the Contractor’s testing, inspection, and sampling scope of work (i.e. Industrial Hygiene scope of work). Specifications 0200000 2.10.2.1 and 1800000 4.2 both indicate Contractor IH Services however there are no ELIN’s for quantity or costs of testing, surveys, lab analysis, etc. Additionally, Specification 1800000 1.1 states that air sampling will be provided by others, however 4.3 states that others will provide a visual inspection without mention of final air clearance sampling.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. Specifications 0200000 2.10.2.1 and 1800000 4.2 Sampling, Testing and Laboratory Services calls for the Contractor to develop and submit proposed Sampling Plan for approval per Section F deliverables. Specifications 1800000 4.3 Final Cleaning & Inspection. Refer to the government validation of the cleaning and inspection after being inspected by site abatement supervisor. REFERENCE:

Annex 0200000 2.10.2.1 and 1800000 4.2 Sampling, Testing and Laboratory Services.

57. Can the deadline for submission of proposals be extended by at least 10 business days?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. The Government will extend the proposal due date as required; 3 days at minimal.

58. Evaluation Factors b. ii. Workforce Management Plan; item b requires the proposer to provide a rational that explain how your proposed number of direct labor hours is consistent with your technical approach and indicate the number of productive hours per week or year for each full time and part time employee.

We are not able to accurately estimate the productive hours per week or year based on an unknown quantity under this IDIQ contract. Can the government provide an explanation of how to estimate the asbestos testing and sampling quantities for a year in order to respond to this statement?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE. No, the Government is unable to provide an explanation of how a contractor estimates the testing and sampling for a year. The Government has provided estimated quantities in Attachment J-0200000-07, ELINs Updated 14 Dec 2020.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 17-Mar-2021 01:00 PM to 12-Apr-2021 01:00 PM.

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The CLIN description has changed from PHASE-IN PERIOD 1 Feb 2021 - 28 Feb 2021 to PHASE-IN PERIOD 1 May 2021 - 31 May 2021.

CLIN 1001

The CLIN description has changed from BASE PERIOD 1 Mar 2021-31 Mar 2022 to BASE PERIOD 1 Jun 2021-31May 2022.

CLIN 2001

The CLIN description has changed from OPTION PERIOD 1 1 Mar 2022 -31 Mar 2023 to OPTION PERIOD 1 1 Jun 2022-31 May 2023.

CLIN 3001

The CLIN description has changed from OPTION PERIOD 2 1 Mar 2023 -31 Mar 2024 to OPTION PERIOD 2 1 Jun 2023-31 May 2024.

CLIN 4001

The CLIN description has changed from OPTION PERIOD 3 1 Mar 2024 -31 Mar 2025 to OPTION PERIOD 3 1 Jun 2024-31 May 2025.

CLIN 5001

The CLIN description has changed from OPTION PERIOD 4 1 Mar 2025 -31 Mar 2026 to OPTION PERIOD 4 1 Jun 2025-31 May 2026.

CLIN 6001

The CLIN description has changed from 52.217-8 Option 1 Mar 2026 -31 Mar 2026 to 52.217-8 Option 1 1 Jun 2026-31 Dec 2026.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-FEB-2021 TO

28-FEB-2021

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192 FOB: Destination

N40080

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-MAY-2021 TO

31-MAY-2021

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-MAR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2021 TO

31-MAY-2022

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-MAR-2022 TO

31-MAR-2023

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2022 TO

31-MAY-2023

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-MAR-2023 TO

31-MAR-2024

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

POP 01-JUN-2023 TO

31-MAY-2024

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-MAR-2024 TO

31-MAR-2025

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2024 TO

31-MAY-2025

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 5001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-MAR-2025 TO

31-MAR-2026

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

POP 01-JUN-2025 TO

31-MAY-2026

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 6001 has been changed from:

CAGE

POP 01-MAR-2026 TO

31-MAR-2026

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

CAGE

POP 01-JUN-2026 TO

31-DEC-2026

N/A NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

JILLITA BULLUCK

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

(202) 685-3192

The following have been added by reference:

52.215-8 Order of Precedence--Uniform Contract Format OCT 1997 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee SEP 1996 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction JUN 2020

The following have been added by full text:

ATTACHMENT C PAST PERFORMANCE

ATTACHMENT C

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: Entity Identifier Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT

RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

ATTACHMENT D RELEVANT CORP EXP

Attachment D

RELEVANT CORPORATE EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposals

Solicitation Number: N40080-20-R-6260

REGIONAL ASBESTOS TESTING AND REMOVAL SERVICES

NAVAL WASHINGTON DISTRICT

Company/Agency Name

Address

Contract Title

Contract Number

Company/Agency P.O.C.

Telephone Number (**Please be sure # is current)

Fax Number

Contract Type/Cost

Award Date Total Contract Value Original Awarded

Amount Value Annual Value

Final Contract Value Explain Difference

Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date

Explain Differences

1. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.

2. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self–performed on this project.

3. Other information:

The following have been modified:

SECTION A

REVISED

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC), WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

BLDG 212, 4th FLOOR

NAVY YARD WASHINGTON DC 20374

NAVFAC REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N40080-20-R-6260

NAVAL DISTRICT WASHINGTON

REGIONAL ASBESTOS TESTING AND REMOVAL SERVICES

FOR

VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, VIRGINIA, AND MARYLAND

PROPOSALS ARE DUE BY 01:00 P.M. (EST) ON MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2021.

Proposal shall be submitted via DoD Secure Access File Exchange Service, DoD SAFE. Refer to DoD SAFE website for further guidance. (https://safe.apps.mil).

OFFERORS MUST SUBMIT PROPOSAL VIA

DoD SAFE Proposal Submission Guidance

NAVFAC Washington will require offerors to submit price and non-price proposals via DoD Secure Access File Exchange Service, DoD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil) due to the current COVID-19 pandemic and limited office access.

In order to initiate your drop-off of your proposals (price and non-price), you must email the CS/KO SUBJECT: N40080-20-R-6260 REQUEST DROP-OFF. A “drop-off request” from CS/KO will be sent to your email; this request is valid for 14 days. See DoD SAFE Help, and Section L for more information. Please allow SUFFICIENT TIME for your proposal to be received prior to the proposed closing time.

NAVFAC POINTS OF CONTACT

a. Offerors must email the Contract Specialist: shonn.gilkes@navy.mil and/or Contracting Officer:

jillita.bulluck@navy.mil as instructed in Section L of solicitation.

i. First Name and Last Name

ii. Company Name

iii. Email address that you will use to send the proposals. This is required for NAVFAC to receive your response.

PROPOSALS SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Washington ATTN: Jillita Bulluck, Code ACQ20 1314 Harwood Street SE, Bldg 212, Mail Room

Navy Yard Washington DC 20374

A.1 CONTRACT TITLE

Regional Asbestos Testing and Removal Services, Naval District Washington (NDW). To provide Asbestos, Lead & Mold Services, including but not limited to abatement, encapsulation, removal and disposal of asbestos containing material, removal of lead paint, disposal of lead containing material, remediation of mold, and incidental work, via an Non-Recurring Work type contract at Naval District Washington.

A.2 TYPE OF CONTRACT

This acquisition will result in the award of a Firm-Fixed-Price single award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract comprised of Non-Recurring Work.

A.3 COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS/SET-ASIDE

This procurement is will be a competitive 8(a) Small Business set-aside in accordance with FAR 19.5.

A.4 NAICS CODE

The NAICS code assigned to this procurement is 562910, Environmental Remediation Services. The small business size standard is $22 Million. Refer to Section L, Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors.

A.5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FILES

It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to obtain the RFP files, along with any amendments, from either beta.SAM.gov. Offerors are advised to check the website on a regular basis, as technological difficulties sometimes prevent the Government from simultaneously uploading to both sites. Unprotected editable electronic file copies of the RFP documents, including Word, Excel, and/or Adobe files will not be provided. Please plan accordingly.

A.6 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT

A pre-proposal phone conference will be on MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2020. The edited powerpoint is attached with a list of attendees. The site visits will be held on the Task Order Level and announced through communication between the PWD acquisition team and the contractor, to choose the date(s), time(s), location(s), and schedule(s).

See Section L for Details.

All prospective Offerors are urged to attend the pre-proposal conference.

The Pre-Proposal Conference will occur as follows:

Monday, November 16, 10:00 AM

Pre-Proposal Conference & briefing beginning at 10:00 AM. on a Conference Call. To participate, email your request to shonn.gilkes@navy.mil and jillita.bulluck@navy.mil before Thursday, November 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM. Only the first 2 will be accepted. Only one line to a company will be allowed. If you are affiliated with another company, we ask you share a line.

SECTION B

B.1 MAXIMUM NOT TO EXCEED (NTE) AND MINIMUM GUARANTEE

The maximum NTE value of an ordering period is the total of all the CLINs in that ordering period. The maximum or NTE value of the contract is the total value of all CLINs in the Schedule. Orders shall not be made that exceed the maximum NTE value for any ordering period. The maximum NTE value of an ordering period and of the contract may be increased by written modification to the contract in conjunction with any modification that increases the value of an existing task order that is authorized by a contract clause. Orders in excess of the estimated quantity set forth for any particular CLIN shall not be exceeded without the Contractor’s agreement which shall be indicated by signing or beginning performance of the order.

Concurrently with the award of the basic contract, the Government intends to issue a task order to obligate the contract minimum guarantee for:

CLIN 0001 Base Period Non-Recurring work;

Minimum guarantees do not apply to the option periods.

The maximum or NTE value of the contract is the total value of all the CLINs in the Schedule.

B.2. CONTRACT TERM

This contract contains provisions for one Base Period of up to twelve (12) months with 4 Option Periods of twelve

(12) months each, not-to-exceed a total of sixty (60) months. The Government has the option to extend the term of the contract in accordance with Section I, Contract Clauses, FAR Clause 52.217-9, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract. The Government may or may not exercise the option to extend services for an additional 6 months in accordance with FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. The Government intends to incorporate the FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services and requires to submit proposed prices (by separate CLIN) for purposes of evaluation.”

B.3 CONTRACT LINE ITEMS, CONTRACT EXHIBIT LINE ITEMS AND SUBCLINS

a. Offerors shall enter unit prices and amounts for Contract Line Items (CLINs) and Exhibit line items (ELINs) as indicated in the schedules and any accompanying exhibits. ELIN unit prices must be rounded to two (2) decimal places only. If an offeror does not round ELIN unit prices to two (2) decimal places then the Government will round the prices to two (2) decimal places and the rounded prices will be used for evaluation purposes. ELIN unit prices may not be less than $0.01, unless offering “$0.00.” If an offeror proposes a unit price greater than $0.00, but less than $0.01, then the Government will round the unit price to $0.01 and that rounded price and resultant extended total price will be used for evaluation purposes. (It is required that Offerors use cell format “currency” in the electronic Microsoft Excel ELIN spreadsheet).

b. In the event there is a difference between the unit price and the extended total amount, the unit price will be held to be the intended offer and the total of the CLIN and/or ELIN will be recomputed to take into account the change in the contract ELINs. If the offeror provides a total amount for an ELIN, but fails to enter the unit price, the total amount divided by the ELIN quantity will be held to be the intended unit price. In the event there is a discrepancy between the Section J ELIN pricing and the Section B CLIN price, the Section J ELIN will be held to be the intended offer, and the Section B CLIN will be adjusted accordingly.

c. The Schedule of Non-Recurring work (CLINs, 0001,…