N4008020R5255 Bldg. 1775 Install Macro Artifacts Gallery 13 and 14.pdf

1. Solicitation is Unrestricted

2. The magnitude of this project is betw een $250,000.00 and $500,000.00

3. Proposals must be received not later than 25 September 2020 at 2:00PM EST

4. Proposal must be valid for 120 days.

5. Point of Contact (POC) info is as follow s: Contract Specialist- Ms. Deidre Parker, 703-784-5459, deidre.parker@navy.mil.

6. A site visit w ill be held September 2, 2020 at 10:00 AM EST Bldg. 2004.

7. Request for Information are to be submitted via email only to the POC by 9:00 AM EST, 9 Septebmer 2020

8. NAICS 236220

DEIDRE PARKER 703-784-5459

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

26-Aug-2020

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________255 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________25 Sep 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

FEAD

P.O. BOX 1855

BLDG. 2004 BARNETT AVE.

QUANTICO VA 22134

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008020R5255 43

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008020R5255

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Project Bldg 1775 Museum Gallery 13 & 14 - Macro

FFP

The contractor shall provide all labor, material, equipment, transportation and supervision necessary to complete the work in accordance with (IAW) the drawings and specifications provided in the RFP in order to fabricate and install structual floor supports and install the macro artifacts in museum gallary 13 & 14 at Building 1775 at MCB Quantico, VA in accordance with attached scope of work. Contractors are required to submit invoices electronically at https://wawf.eb.mil.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 255 dys. ADC 1 ROICC

DEIDRE PARKER

BLDG. 2004 BARNETT AVE

P.O. BOX 1855

QUANTICO VA 22134-0855

703-784-5459 FOB: Destination

N40080

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable (LPTA) offer.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals

3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

4. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the three lowest priced Offerors at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, technical proposals shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of prices or any rank order of prices. If no proposals are found to be technically acceptable within the first group of proposals, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal.

5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.

An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

B. SAFETY EVALUATION

1. Per NFAS 15.304(d), solicitations utilizing source selection procedures for procurements within the 50 United States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas shall contain a standard “Safety” technical evaluation factor. This factor shall be included as a stand-alone evaluation factor and not as a sub-factor or an element of the Past Performance evaluation factor. This action will result in the selection of contractors that have consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and the ability to properly manage and implement safety procedures for themselves and all tiers of subcontractors under their purview.

2. The safety evaluation has three elements: Experience Modification Rate (EMR); Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) Days Away from Work, Job Restriction, or Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; and Technical Approach to Safety.

3. The safety elements should be collectively considered and then assigned an overall adjectival rating for the safety factor. The board will need to make a qualitative determination of the rating for safety taking into account the risk ratings for EMR, DART, TRC and the subjective evaluation of the narrative.

4. The board will not average the rating from the three (3) previous complete calendar years for the EMR, DART and TRC and should consider data trends.

5. The following should be utilized by evaluators as a general guideline to evaluate the EMR,DART and TRC rates:

Risk EMR Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

C. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

Each Offeror’s technical factors and past performance will be evaluated separately. Upon the conclusion of the evaluation of the technical factors, and past performance, an overall non-price factors rating of Acceptable (A) or Unacceptable (U) will be assigned to each Offeror’s non-price factors proposal.

1. The following adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign a rating to each technical factor. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factor ratings. Use lower case letter ratings for technical subfactor. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable (A) Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable (U) Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The weaknesses and/or deficiencies (as defined below) of each proposal for each non-price evaluation factor which influenced the assigned adjectival rating shall be identified.

Definitions

Risk The potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an Offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness

A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

2. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Past Performance shall be evaluated when using the LPTA process, unless waived by the PCO in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b). Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the following table:

Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable (A) Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable (U) Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

(a) Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the Offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. There are two aspects of the past performance evaluation.

(1) The first is to evaluate whether the Offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is relevant is unique to each LPTA source selection. For this solicitation, the first requirement for relevance is recency, a recent project as one being 100% completed five (5) years from the time of submission. Relevancy refers to construction work as a prime contractor or sub-contractor on a contract of similar size and scope. Two projects with rigging and installing museum artifacts within an existing building shell with a dollar magnitude equal to, or greater than, $250,000.00 or as a prime contractor whereby the major subcontractor performed this same work and magnitude as above. One project with fabrication and installation of artifact support structures for a dollar magnitude equal to, or greater than, $100,000.00. The Contractor must use the subcontractor who’s qualifications are submitted to qualify for Recency and Relevancy.

(2) The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the Offeror performed those past contracts

(b) SSEB members will review past performance information to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment.

D. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Subfactor A – Relevant Experience Subfactor B - Technical Approach - Sequencing and Schedule Subfactor C - Handling and Protecting Subfactor D - Technical Qualifications of Proposed Staffing

Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability shall be limited to the lowest priced offer. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable then the next lowest price proposal shall be evaluated. If that proposal is also not found to be technically acceptable, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. If the contracting officer later determines that discussions are necessary, the procedures in FAR 15.306 shall be followed.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Price Schedule, Attachment C of the RFP and breakdown of material and labor costs by specifications division for Prime Contractor and each subcontractor.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Technical Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Technical Acceptability: Technical acceptability is comprised of four (4) subfactors:

(1) Subfactor A – Relevant Experience

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit three (3) recent and relevant projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP, and in particular, experience with the installation and construction of macro artifacts. For this acquisition, recency refers to work that was 100% completed within a time period of no more than five (5) years prior to the date of submitting this proposal. Relevancy refers to construction work as a prime contractor or sub-contractor on a contract of similar size and scope. Two projects with rigging and installing museum artifacts within and existing building shell with a dollar magnitude equal to, or greater than, $250,000.00. One project with fabrication and installation of artifact support structures for a dollar magnitude equal to, or greater than, $100,000.00 or as a prime contractor whereby the major subcontractor performed this same work and magnitude as above. The Contractor must use the subcontractor who’s qualifications are submitted to qualify for Recency and Relevancy

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project. The Offeror shall not combine projects to meet the magnitude relevancy requirements described above. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the RFP, excess will not be evaluated.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages)

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed, value of the project, and the relevancy of the project to the requirements of the RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods).

NOTE: If the Offeror is a joint venture, recent and relevant project experience should be submitted for projects performed by the joint venture. However, if there are no recent and relevant projects performed by the joint venture, then projects must be submitted for each and all joint venture partners, not to exceed a total of five (5) projects for the combined joint venture entity. If a JV performed a project, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the Offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. The JV member proposed for this contract shall specifically address field work performed by that JV member including field staffing and direct field work oversight. The JV member proposed for this contract shall also address home office management performed by that JV member including the number/percent of employees provided for the overall contract by the JV member as well as the overall percentage of work performed by the JV member. In addition, the Offeror needs to provide a copy of the joint-venture agreement. Offerors failing to provide projects from each and all joint venture partners and a copy of the joint-venture agreement will be considered to have not met the requirements of the factor and shall be rated Unacceptable.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated recent and relevant corporate experience.

The requirement for acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the Offeror in its proposal, the Offeror must have at least three (3) projects that contains construction, or repair work of of electrical substation switchgears with microprocessor based interrupters and power lines to include high voltage electrical work performed as a prime contractor for a dollar magnitude equal to, or greater than $2,000,000.00 or as a prime contractor whereby the major subcontractor performed this same work and magnitude as above.

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Acceptable” if the Offeror submitted a minimum of three (3) projects for “Relevant Experience.” All three (3) projects must demonstrate the relevant experience required and that the work has been completed within the past five (5) years of the issuance of this RFP.

An Offeror’s Proposal will be rated “Unacceptable” if the Offeror fails to submit a minimum of three (3) projects.

The proposal will also be rated unacceptable if any of the projects fail to demonstrate relevant experience or if the projects have not been completed within the past five (5) years of the issuance of this RFP.

A proposal receiving an “Unacceptable” evaluation rating for Subfactor A will be ineligible for award unless corrected through discussions.

(2) Subfactor B - Technical Approach - Sequencing and Schedule

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit a written technical construction management approach plan that demonstrates understanding and capabilities of completing all work in accordance with the Statement of Work and project drawings.

a. The Offeror must address the three components. These three areas must be separately tabbed under this factor. The plan will address the following items: (1) rigging and moving large artifacts in a confined environment, (2) fabricating and installing supports for large artifacts and (3) an over-all understanding of the sequence of work within a building that will remain occupied. Additionally, the plan must identify all work that can be accomplished with in-house resources and demonstrate that they are capable of obtaining any project requirements that cannot be self-performed. The plan must identify how the Offeror will directly superintend the work, perform project and quality control management, comply with safety and environmental regulations; any project requirements that cannot be self-performed must be identified (e.g.

subcontractors list and manufacturers of key material components for the project).

b. A sequencing and schedule shall be also submitted with the plan that reflects a clear understanding of the scope of work required for the project. At a minimum, the sequence and schedule shall reflect the following:

(1). The sequencing of installing the exhibit supports and artifacts into the various galleries.

(2). An overall strategy that accomplishes all project goals and milestones as outlined in the Statement of Work.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated an understanding and capabilities of completing all work in accordance with the Statement of Work and project drawings. The Offeror shall submit a written technical construction management approach plan, and a sequencing and schedule. Technical Approach information will be evaluated based on the submission of a written technical plan that describes the proposed approach in accomplishing the scope of work within an occupied building and within the performance period prescribed.

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Acceptable” if the Offeror submitted a written technical construction management approach plan that addressed 2(i)aabove and a sequencing and schedule that addressed 2(i)b(1) & (2) above. All of the items identified in the submittal requirements and the plan and schedule demonstrates an understanding and capabilities of completing all work in accordance with the Statement of Work and project drawings.

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Unacceptable” if the Offeror failed to submit a written technical construction management approach plan that addressed 2(i)a. above, and a sequencing and schedule that addressed 2(i)b(1) & (2) above.

(3) Subfactor C - Handling and Protecting

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offer shall submit a narrative response of clearing understanding and an approach of how they will properly handle and protect the artifacts during construction. A written response should be no more than one (1) page.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The narrative response for handling and protection the Macro Artifacts should address a clearing understanding and an approach of how they will properly handle the artifacts. The Government is seeking to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated an understanding and capabilities of handling the objects. The Offeror shall submit a written narrative.

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Acceptable” if the Offeror submitted a written technical approach on how to handle and protect the artifacts.

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Unacceptable” if the Offeror failed to submit a written technical approach plan that addressed handle and protect the artifacts..

(4) Subfactor D - Technical Qualifications of Proposed Staffing

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit qualifications of proposed key sub contractors and staffing. Technical qualifications shall be no more than two pages. The Offeror shall submit information on the following personnel:

a. Subcontractor experience of completed projects that required rigging/moving of artifacts within an occupied museum. The Contractor must use the subcontractor who’s qualifications are submitted for the project.

b. Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) – Provide a resume and list of relevant projects with description and dollar amounts. To be considered technically acceptable, the Individual(s) must meet minimum requirements set forth in the specifications under Section 01 35 26, paragraph

1.7.1 Personnel Qualifications.

c. Quality Control Manager - Provide a resume and list of relevant projects with description and dollar amounts. To be considered technically acceptable and qualified, the individual must meet the qualifications set forth in the specifications under Section 01 45 00.00 20, paragraph 1.5.1.2 Qualification and paragraph 1.5.2 Construction Quality Management Training.

d. Site Superintendent - Provide a resume and list of relevant projects with description and dollar amounts. To be considered qualified, the individual shall be a Construction Manager with 5 years of experience in the type of work being performed on this project, or person with 10 years of experience supervising interior renovations work in the field with a construction company

e. Contractor shall provide a list of proposed major subcontractors to be used for this project, to include, at a minimum: mechanical, and interior remodeling

(ii) Provide a letter of commitment (signed by the individual and the Offeror) for the:

(A) Subcontractor

(B) Site, Safety, Health Officer (SSHO).

(C) Quality Control Manager (QCM); and

(D) Site Superintendent;

(iii) Basis of Evaluation:

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Acceptable” if the Offeror submitted technical qualifications demonstrate that the proposed Site Superintendent, Quality Control Manager and SSHO have the requisite education, training, qualifications, knowledge, experience, and ability to perform the work; and the Offeror provided a signed letters of commitment for the Site Superintendent, the QCM, and the SSHO.

An Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Unacceptable” if the Offeror’s submitted technical qualifications failed to demonstrate that the proposed Site Superintendent has the requisite education, training, qualifications, knowledge, experience, and ability to perform the work; and the Offeror failed to provide a signed letter of commitment for the Site Superintendent, the QCM, or the SSHO.

(2) Factor 2, Safety

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate:

For years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 & 2019, submit your OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA TRC Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC Rate data should be addressed as part of this element. OSHA TRC rates above 4.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

For years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 & 2019, submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data should be addressed as part of this element.

OSHA DART rates above 3.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(3) Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to qualify, evaluate, select and oversee its potential subcontractors. The Safety narrative shall be limited to one page. Offerors must submit both

(1) a plan to include the safety performance of subcontractors in the selection process for all levels of subcontractors and (2) a plan to monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 3.0. Offerors who fail to submit either of these will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine whether the Offeror has an acceptable safety record. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record as evidenced by the TRC and DART rates, if the Offeror’s plan includes safety in the evaluation and selection of subcontractors, and if the narrative includes a plan to monitor the safety performance of subcontractors during performance. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

(1) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

The Government will evaluate the OSHA TRC Rate to determine if the Offeror’s OSHA TRC rate is above 4.0 and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. OSHA TRC rates above 4.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror’s OSHA DART rate is above 3.0 and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. OSHA DART rates above 3.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine if subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the qualification, evaluation, selection, of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project, and both the plan to monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 3.0. Offerors who fail to address either of these items (i.e. whether the safety performance of subcontractors will be evaluated in the selection process for all levels of subcontractors and whether the safety of those subcontractors will be monitored during contract performance) will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

OfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferorOfferor

(3) Factor3, Past Performance:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(a) Submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1, Subfactor A for Relevant Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires

(PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. (Note: Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the Offeror. However, if the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Deidre Parker, Deidre.parker@navy.mil, Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1, Subfactor A. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues on the projects for Factor 1, Subfactor A – Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1, Subfactor A– Relevant Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

1. Submittal Requirements:

A. Solicitation Submittal Requirements – Proposals shall be submitted in three ring binders or bound, with tabs or separators. Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to. Proposals shall be submitted on 8.5” X 11” paper, utilizing both sides of the paper. The technical proposal and price/cost proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The technical proposal shall NOT contain any cost/pricing information, except for salary information provided on resumes. The contractor shall submit two (2) hard copies and one (1) CD copy each for the Technical proposal and one(1) hard copy and one (1) CD copy of the Price Proposal. The proposal presented by the Offeror to whom the award is made will be incorporated by reference into the contract at time of award.

B. Offeror shall submit the following in the Price Proposal:

1) Cover page that includes:

- The solicitation number;

- The name, address, telephone and email address of the Offeror;

- The DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the Offeror;

- A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

- Names, titles, phone and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

- Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

- Point of Contact Name, Phone Number, and Email

2) Tab 1 that includes

- Standard Form (SF) 1442 (pages 1 -2)

- Bid Schedule (Attachment G); and

- Breakdown of material and labor costs by specification division for Prime

Contractor and each sub-contractor.

3) Tab 2 that includes:

- Bid Guarantee

4) Tab 3 that includes:

- Amendments Acknowledged (if applicable)

5) Tab 4 that includes:

- Joint Venture agreement (if applicable)

- Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS) 100 and/or VETS report for the cycle

- Representations and Certifications (all pages) - Section 00600

C. Offeror shall submit the following in the Technical Proposal:

1) Tab 1that includes Factor 1-Technical Acceptability:

- Sub-factor A - Relevant Experience – Exhibit “A”- Construction Experience Project Data Sheet- Offeror

- Sub-factor B - Technical Approach

- Sub-factor C- Handling and Protecting

- Sub-factor D - Technical Qualification of Proposed Staffing- Exhibit “C” –

Offeror Team Composition and Management

2) Tab 2 that includes:

- Factor 2- Safety – Exhibit “D” – Safety Data Sheet

3) Tab 3 that includes:

- Factor 3 – Past Performance Exhibit “B” – Form PPQ-0

Section 00600 - Representations & Certifications

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-7 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (OCT 2018)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator means a four-character suffix to the unique entity identifier. The suffix is assigned at the discretion of the commercial, nonprofit, or Government entity to establish additional System for Award Management records for identifying alternative EFT accounts (see subpart 32.11) for the same entity.

Registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) means that--

(1) The Offeror has entered all mandatory information, including the unique entity identifier and the EFT indicator, if applicable, the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, as well as data required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (see subpart 4.14) into SAM;

(2) The offeror has completed the Core, Assertions, and Representations and Certifications, and Points of Contact sections of the registration in SAM;

(3) The Government has validated all mandatory data fields, to include validation of the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The offeror will be required to provide consent for TIN validation to the Government as a part of the SAM registration process; and

(4) The Government has marked the record ``Active''.

Unique entity identifier means a number or other identifier used to identify a specific commercial, nonprofit, or Government entity. See www.sam.gov for the designated entity for establishing unique entity identifiers.

(b)(1) An Offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer or quotation, and shall continue to be registered until time of award, during performance, and through final payment of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchasing agreement resulting from this solicitation.

(2) The Offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation ``Unique Entity Identifier'' followed by the unique entity identifier that identifies the Offeror's name and address exactly as stated in the offer. The Offeror also shall enter its EFT indicator, if applicable. The unique entity identifier will be used by the Contracting Officer to verify that the Offeror is registered in SAM.

(c) If the Offeror does not have a unique entity identifier, it should contact the entity designated at www.sam.gov for establishment of the unique entity identifier directly to obtain one. The Offeror should be prepared to provide the following information:

(1) Company legal business name.

(2) Tradestyle, doing business, or other name by which your entity is commonly recognized.

(3) Company physical street address, city, state, and Zip Code.

(4) Company mailing address, city, state and Zip Code (if separate from physical).

(5) Company telephone number.

(6) Date the company was started.

(7) Number of employees at your location.

(8) Chief executive officer/key manager.

(9) Line of business (industry).

(10) Company headquarters name and address (reporting relationship within your entity).

(d) Processing time should be taken into consideration when registering. Offerors who are not registered in SAM should consider applying for registration immediately upon receipt of this solicitation. See https://www.sam.gov for information on registration.

(End of Provision)

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAR 2020)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 236220.

(2) The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is not included in this solicitation, and the Offeror has an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM), the Offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The Offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

( ) Paragraph (d) applies.

( ) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c) (1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless—

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.

(iii) 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements--Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(iv) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.

(v) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that—

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(vi) 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services--Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(vii) 52.209-2, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation.

(viii) 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(ix) 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(x) 52.214-14, Place of Performance--Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(xi) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(xii) 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations (Basic, Alternates I, and II). This provision applies to solicitations when the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(A) The basic provision applies when the solicitations are issued by other than DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.

(B) The provision with its Alternate I applies to solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.

(C) The provision with its Alternate II applies to solicitations that will result in a multiple-award contract with more than one NAICS code assigned.

(xiii) 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids. This provision applies to solicitations when contracting by sealed bidding and the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(xiv) 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports. This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xv) 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance. This provision applies to solicitations, other than those for construction, when the solicitation includes the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xvi) 52.222-38, Compliance with Veterans' Employment Reporting Requirements. This provision applies to solicitations when it is anticipated the contract award will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and the contract is not for acquisition of commercial items.

(xvii) 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that require the delivery or specify the use of USDA-designated items; or include the clause at 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts.

(xviii) 52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification.