N3319126R0014.pdf

(See ).

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR

INFORMATION CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER

CODE

6. PROJECT NUMBER

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

4. CONTRACT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date)

11. The contractor shall begin performance within

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and

b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

is, is not required.

local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.

calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

INVITATION FOR BID

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement by the Government in writing within stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT

NUMBER

DATE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

26. ADMINISTERED BY

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print)

31c. DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022) BACK

31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES

CODE AT

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

10 U.S.C. 3204(a) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) ( )

20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

CLDJ Job Order Contract

N3319126R0014

1.

2.

3.

4.

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule

Additional Information/Notes

Introduction The Government intends to award an unrestricted, competitive Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Indefinite- Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Job Order Contract (JOC) for construction services within the NAVFAC PWD Camp Lemonnier geographic area and US Government controlled sites in Somalia. The work primarily consists of renovation, repair, maintenance, replacement, alteration, and demolition projects. These tasks will frequently involve specialty trades, including electrical, mechanical, painting, paving, flooring, roofing, structural repair, fencing, HVAC, and fire suppression/protection systems.

The resulting contract is limited to a maximum duration of 66 months--consisting of one 12-month base period, four 12-month option periods, and a potential six-month extension under FAR 52.217-8--or a total maximum value of $75,000,000, whichever occurs first. The guaranteed minimum for the life of this contract is $5,000.

Competitive Procedures This solicitation seeks competitive proposals utilizing full and open competition utilizing procedures discussed at FAR 15.

NAICS Code 236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Size Standard: $45 million and PSC code

Z2JZ.

Incurred Expenses The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with the preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

Allowed Per Order Minimum: 5,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Maximum: 15,000,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Government Obligation to Order Minimum: 5,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Maximum: 75,000,000.00 Dollars, U.S.

Item Supplies/Service Estimated Quantity

Unit Unit Price Amount

This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients.

The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer.

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Each

Option 1This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite

Option Line Item

Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer.

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Each

Option Line Item

Option 2This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer.

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Each

Option Line Item

Option 3This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer.

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Each

Option Line Item

Option 4This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer.

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Each

Option Line Item

Optional ExtensionThis is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with pre-established price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer.

Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price

1 Each

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date

Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

52.233-2 Service of Protest. (Deviation) Jan 2026

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference. (Jan 1998)

Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars.

(End of provision)

52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions. (Oct 2020)

Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Nov 2020)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any (48 CFR Chapter ) provision with an authorized Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 2 deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

(End of provision)

3.

4.

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

Proposal Due Date:

Proposals are due at the date and time specified in Block 13 A, on page #1 of the Standard Form 1442. If the due date is extended, it will be extended by Amendment.

Transmission of Proposals:

Electronic copies of each volume shall be submitted through the Solicitation Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) suite at https://piee.eb.mil/. Proposals submitted by mail or hand-carried will not be evaluated. Proposals sent through proprietary or third party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be retrieved. It is the responsibility of the offeror to confirm receipt of proposals. All proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo: https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf. Offerors must be registered with PIEE as a Proposal Manager in order to submit a proposal. Offerors are highly encouraged to complete the registration process in PIEE immediately, if the offeror does not currently have access.

It is the Offeror's responsibility to obtain written confirmation of receipt of all electronic files of the full proposal by the Contracting office. In the event that the Solicitation Module is down, the alternate method for proposal submission is via email to: paul.m.martha.civ@us.navy.mil and alex.h.wingert.civ@us.navy.

mil ONLY. Offerors are responsible for ensuring electronic copies are virus-free and shall run an anti-virus scan before submission.

Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following software products: Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017 and Microsoft Office Suite 2016. Narrative portions of the proposal shall be in Adobe Acrobat portable document file (pdf) searchable text format. The Offeror shall not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files into the proposal files.

Electronic files shall be clearly identified for each volume, section, and item.

Registrations Required Prior to Submission of Proposals:

Current System for Award Management Registration:

Offerors, including joint ventures, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have an active registration at the time of proposal submission. Any offeror whose registration is not active in SAM at the time of proposal submission will be excluded from the process and their proposal will not be evaluated.

Joint Contingency Contracting System (JCCS) Registration for ALL Non-U.S. Vendors:

All non-U.S. prime offerors and any proposed non-U.S. team members (e.g., non-U.S. joint venture partners, non-U.S. subcontractors, etc.) that will perform work under this contract anywhere within the United States Africa Command's Area of Responsibility (U.S. AFRICOM AoR) must register in the Joint Contingency Contracting System (JCCS) at https://www.jccs.gov/jccscoe prior to submission of proposals . The Contracting Officer will verify the prospective awardee's (and their non-U.S. team members') registrations in the JCCS and request a threat assessment. In accordance with AFRICOM policies, all non- U.S. vendors performing in the AFRICOM AOR must be vetted under AFRICOM's Vendor Threat

.Reduction Program

Site Visit There will not be a site visit for this project.

5.

6.

7.

1.

2.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Instructions for Submitting Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) Submit all Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) in writing via email to Paul Martha (paul.m.martha.civ@us.navy.mil) and Alex Wingert (alex.h.wingert.civ@us.navy.mil).

Requirements for Submission:

: Use the PPI Template provided in Attachment A.Format

: Each inquiry must reference the specific drawing, detail, or specification section (including Details paragraph number).

: Only written inquiries are accepted; verbal queries will not be addressed.Method

Important Deadlines and Posting:

: The Government may not respond to inquiries submitted after 11 March 2026.Deadline

: Official responses will be issued via a solicitation amendment and posted to both SAM.gov Responses and PIEE.

Amendments to the solicitation Official amendments will be posted to both www.sam.gov and PIEE.

: It is the offeror's responsibility to check SAM.gov periodically for any updates or Monitoring amendments

: All amendments SHALL be formally acknowledged within the offeror's proposal in Acknowledgment accordance with the instructions provided.

Proposal Submission Requirements and Evaluation Factors

The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

First page of the proposal shall be in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2).

All information required by the Price Proposal submission.

The NON-PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

First page of the proposal shall be in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2) All information required by Factor 1, Experience All information required by Factor 2, Management Approach All information required by Factor 3, Safety All information required by Factor 4, Past Performance

It is the contractor's responsibility to ensure the Government received the proposal and all enclosures by the proposal due date and time as set forth above.

PRE-AWARD SURVEY & RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

In accordance with FAR 9.104, the Government must verify that prospective contractors are responsible and have the resources necessary to perform the contract. This survey is separate from the technical evaluation.

Required Documentation: Please submit the following information with your proposal:

Financial Statements: Provide balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years Operating Capital: Submit evidence of available working capital dedicated to this contract Lines of Credit: If relying on external financial support, provide documentation showing maximum lines of credit available. These should account for the requirements of this specific contract.

Joint Ventures: Clearly define the financial responsibilities of each partner and provide the financial documentation listed above for every company in the venture.

PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

For any task order exceeding $150,000 (or as otherwise required by the Contracting Officer), the Contractor must provide one of the following within 10 days of issuance:

Performance Guarantee Letter: A notarized letter for an amount equal to 10% of the contract total.

Bonds: Performance and Payment Bonds pursuant to FAR 52.228-15, issued by an approved surety list in the U.S.

Treasury Circular 570.

Submission Standards for Guarantee Letters:

Authentication: Must include a notarized document confirming the financial institution's authority to sign the letter.

Translation: A certified English translation must be submitted simultaneously.

Validity: The guarantee takes effect upon signature and must remain valid until one (1) year after final inspection and U.

S. Government acceptance.

Banking & Payment Terms:

Funds must be deposited into a certified banking institution that issues an irrevocable letter guaranteeing payment (plus interest) to the U.S. Government upon demand.

The Contracting Officer will demand payment if the Contractor fails to fulfill contract terms.

Payments must be made via check payable to: "United States of America by the U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe, Africa, Central".

Consequences of Non-Compliance: Failure to provide the required guarantee or bonds within the 10-day window may result in termination for default. The Contractor will be liable for any re-procurement costs exceeding their original offer.

EVALUATION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value--the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

B. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

1. TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal.

a. A combined technical/risk evaluation includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings shall be used. The technical risk evaluation shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in the following table. Adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical factor. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factors as well as the overall rating. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Rating Description

Outstandi ng (O)

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good (G) Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptab le (A)

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (M)

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unaccept able (U)

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

2. Definitions: The following definitions are provided to assist evaluators in the evaluation of each non-price factor.

a. Significant Strength: An aspect of an Offeror's proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

b. Strength: An aspect of an offeror's proposal with merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the Government during contract performance.

c. Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

d. Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

e. Uncertainty: any aspect of a non-price factor proposal for which the intent of the offer is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

f. Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

C. SAFETY EVALUATION

1. Safety will be a stand-alone evaluation criterion in this solicitation. The safety evaluation is described under the Non-Price Factor 3 and consists of the Technical Approach to Safety.

D. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror's probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract's requirements. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance shall be considered. These are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each offeror.

2. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

The first is to evaluate the recency of the offeror's past performance. The second is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. The third is to establish the overall quality of the offeror's past performance.

Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration shall be given to those aspects of an offeror's contract history that would give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will satisfy the current procurement. Common aspects of relevancy include, but are not limited to, the following: similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, use of key personnel (for services) and extent of subcontract/teaming. The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror's past performance (see FAR 15.304[c][2]). The past performance evaluation conducted in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror's past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts. A separate quality assessment rating is not required; rather, the past performance rating using the confidence assessment rating, is based on the offeror's overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance.

3. For purposes of this evaluation, a recent project is defined as a project that was 100% completed no more than five (5) years prior to issuance of the solicitation.

4. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as an effort involving the same or similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Prior projects must at a minimum demonstrate:

a. A total value of no less than $50,000. (If a project was awarded in a currency other than US dollars, the offeror must convert the non-US dollar currency into US dollars using the appropriate exchange rate as of the day the contract for the submitted project was awarded); and

b. Be for renovation; repair; maintenance; replacement; alteration; demolition; or construction tasks performed under a single order or contract.

5. This source selection requires a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, the relevancy ratings in the following table shall be used in determining how relevant a prior project is to the requirements under this solicitation:

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating

Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6. The SSEB will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror's performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. A separate quality assessment rating is not required; rather, the past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the offeror's overall record of recency, relevancy and quality of performance.

In the case of offerors for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance. In this case, the offeror's past performance is unknown and assigned a confidence rating of "neutral." Although the SSEB may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the SSA may determine, that a "Substantial Confidence" or "Satisfactory Confidence" past performance rating is worth more than a "Neutral Confidence" past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent with stated selection criteria.

7. Performance Confidence Assessment. This source selection requires a greater level of discrimination within the past performance evaluation, therefore, the SSEB shall use all confidence ratings identified in Table 3 below.

Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments

Adjectiv al

Rating Description

Substanti al Confi dence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfact ory Conf idence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confiden ce

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confiden ce

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Conf idence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

E. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 - Experience Factor 2 - Management Approach Factor 3 - Safety Factor 4 - Past Performance

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is as follows: Factor 1, Factor 2, and Factor 3 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor, Factor 4.

When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the offerors' non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal's superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

a. PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS (Volume I - Price Proposal) For the purposes of establishing coefficients for this contract, the offeror shall provide a proposed coefficient for Coefficients 1 through 4 on the Coefficient Schedule, provided as an attachment to the solicitation (Attachment B). Failure to offer a coefficient for Coefficients 1 through 4 will result in the offeror being ineligible for award. The coefficients will become a part of the contract upon award and will be effective for the base period and all option periods. On the Coefficient Schedule, the offeror is to insert a proposed coefficient, which will be multiplied by the Example Value for Coefficients 1 through 4. The Example Value for Coefficients 1 - 4 are to be added together to arrive at the Total Evaluated Price (TEP).

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror's price proposal shall be separate from the technical proposal. Complete and submit the following:

1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including Solicitation Number; name, address, telephone and email address of the Offeror; in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), the name of the JV MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED; Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal; Unique Entity ID Number and CAGE or NCAGE Code of the Offeror; and a Unique Entity ID Number for each member of the JV.

2) Completed (Blocks 14 through 20c), signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. In block 14, please include a point of contract with a valid phone number and email address. Offerors shall provide a CAGE/NCAGE code in block 14.

3) Letter from the offeror's surety. The letter is to verify the offeror has at least a $3M aggregate bonding capacity.

4) Completed Coefficient Schedule.

5) A bulleted list, identifying all cost factor categories included in your coefficient. At a minimum, your coefficient is to include the cost elements identified in the General Requirements, Paragraph C.4 and its subparagraphs. This narrative is limited to one (1) 8.5" x 11" page, one inch margins, Times New Roman size 12 font.

6) Acknowledgement of all amendments.

7) Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable).

8) Financial Statements - The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If a new Joint Venture (JV) is being proposed, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

9) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

10) The Government intends to pay invoices in accordance with the clause for Wide Area Work Flow. To do this, your firm must have a U.

S. bank or a U.S. bank affiliate associated with your local bank. With your proposal, identify the name of your U.S. bank or affiliate for purposes of paying invoices.

Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total evaluated price (TEP). The TEP consists of the basic requirements and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

Comparison of proposed Total Evaluated Prices received in response to the RFP;

Comparison of proposed Total Evaluated Prices with the Government Estimate;

Comparison of proposed Total Evaluated Prices with available historical information;

Comparison of proposed Total Evaluated Prices with market average.

b. NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS (Volume II - Non-Price Proposal)

Factor 1 - Experience Factor 2 - Management Approach Factor 3 - Safety Factor 4 - Past Performance

FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE:

1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) examples of recent and relevant projects that best demonstrates the offeror's experience. Offerors shall utilize Attachment C - Project Sheet, to submit applicable project information. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages (8.5" x 11"; one inch margins;

times new roman size 12 font) per project. If the page limit is exceeded, only the first two (2) pages per project will be evaluated.

For each project the offeror shall provide:

1. Contract number, title, and location

2. Dollar value; annually and contract life

3. Type of contract (i.e. fixed price, cost reimbursable, or other - specify) If applicable, identify base period and all option periods

4. Contract start date and completion date and beneficial occupancy date (BOD)

5. Identify type of services provided - similar scope, size & complexity

6. Nature of firm's responsibility (prime contractor or subcontractor)

7. Percentage of the work that your firm performed as the prime contractor or subcontractor

A project is defined as a repair, alteration, demolition, maintenance services or construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed, the location of the work performed, and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). The projects may be for the U.S. Government or other clients.

For purposes of this evaluation, a recent project is defined as a project that was 100% completed no more than five (5) years prior to issuance of the solicitation.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as an effort involving the same or similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Prior projects must at a minimum demonstrate:

a. A total value of no less than $50,000. (If a project was awarded in a currency other than US dollars, the offeror must convert the non-US dollar currency into US dollars using the appropriate exchange rate as of the day the contract for the submitted project was awarded).

b. Be for renovation; repair; maintenance; replacement; alteration; demolition; or construction tasks performed under a single order or contract.

The projects submitted shall clearly identify if the offeror performed as a prime contractor, joint venture/team/partner member or as a subcontractor. If experience was as a subcontractor, then less credit may be given to the experience. If more than five (5) projects are submitted, only the most recent five will be reviewed in the evaluation.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience shall be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity.

If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 1 if it was performed by a firm other than the offeror and there is no supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, letter of commitment, or explanation of meaningful involvement. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

2) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include an assessment of the demonstrated experience and depth of experience of the offeror in performing recent and relevant projects, as defined in the solicitation requirements. The assessment of the offeror's recent and relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Only projects that meet the criteria for recency and relevancy will be evaluated.

Demonstrating any of the following may result in a more favorable consideration in the Government's evaluation:

1. Experience working on JOC contracts.

2. Experience with compliance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC).

3. Experience within the Camp Lemonier, Djibouti area of responsibility.

4. Experience within the NAVACSYSCOM EURAFCENT area of responsibility.

5. Experience leveraging local resources.

6. Fast response times on urgent requirements.

7. Experience self-performing relevant features of work.

8. Experience in performance of multiple projects and disciplines simultaneously.

9. Experience in ALL of the following types of work: new construction, renovation, and utility systems.

10. Experience in ALL of the following types of utility systems: potable water systems, waste water systems, electrical systems and mechanical systems (HVAC, Plumbing, pumps).

Proposals that fail to provide required and complete information will be deemed deficient/unacceptable.

FACTOR 2 - MANAGEMENT APPROACH:

1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror's response to Factor 2 shall be a maximum ten (10) pages (8.5" x 11" or A4; one inch margins; times new roman size 12 font) for this factor. If more than ten (10) pages are submitted, only the first ten (10) pages will be evaluated. The offeror shall provide the following:

1. Provide an organizational chart and a workforce management plan narrative describing the interrelationship of the off-site management team and on-site management team(s). Organization chart shall clearly show management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability. At a minimum the organization chart must display key personnel. Workforce management plan shall clearly describe how the offeror will meet the contract requirements for key personnel identified in Section C.2.6 (Project Manager, Quality Control Manager, and Site Safety and Health Officer).

2. Discuss approach to Subcontractor relationships (if applicable). Include any pre-established relationships with organizations qualified for work within the scope of this solicitation, quantifying number of projects that have been completed together and/or number of years of partnering. If an offeror does not intend to use sub-contractors, they must clearly state that all work will be self-performed.

3. Describe offeror's approach for working in areas of limited access, limited lay down space, and working around activities with minimal disruption.

4. Discuss how the offeror will provide labor, materials, equipment, subcontractors, and key personnel to perform multiple tasks and multiple sites simultaneously, when required.

5. Discuss how the offeror will respond to proposed task orders that may have short notice site visits and/or response times for submitting proposals.

6. Discuss management familiarity and approach to joint scoping work with the Government, to include examples of any previous joint-scoping efforts.

7. Discuss the how offeror will handle surges in workload and the offeror's approach to work scheduling.

8. Discuss the offeror's QA/QC program.

2) Basis of Evaluation:

The evaluation will include an assessment of proposed management approach and offeror's responses to the submittal requirements for this factor.

Offerors may receive a higher rating if they can successfully demonstrate in their narrative their ability to meet one or more of the following:

1. An organizational chart and supporting management approach that shows adequate personnel and organizational structure to manage multiple and simultaneous task orders (more than five (5)).

2. Effective use of subcontractors or in-house personnel in order to successfully accomplish projects.

3. Strong scheduling capabilities demonstrating the ability to manage multiple simultaneous project schedules with competing milestone dates.

4. Quick turnaround times on last minute requirements that includes the use of Joint Scoping.

5. A QA/QC program to maximize quality of workmanship.

FACTOR 3 - SAFETY:

1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit a Safety Narrative addressing the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, only one safety narrative is required but it shall address each partner contractor or joint venture member.

The narrative shall describe the offeror's technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Due to the variety of work that may be issued under this contract, the offeror shall submit their plan for potential subcontractors even if the offeror does not anticipate the use of subcontractors initially. Failure to submit a plan to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors will be considered a deficiency.

The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two (2) pages (8.5" x 11" or A4; one inch margins; times new roman size 12 font). If more than two (2) pages are submitted, only the first two (2) pages will be reviewed in the evaluation.

2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government's sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, the information provided in the Safety Narrative response, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC's Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases and other related resource. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

1. Offeror's technical approach to safety

2. Other sources of information available to the Government

Regarding subcontractors, the Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project.

Demonstrating any of the following may result in a more favorable consideration in the Government's evaluation:

1. A proven history of safety.

2. A proven history of hiring subcontractors with a culture of safety.

FACTOR 4 - PAST PERFORMANCE:

1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

For Factor 4, offerors shall submit past performance information as follows for the same prior projects the offeror identified in its proposal under Factor 1.

IF A COMPLETED CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS)EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE FOR A PRIOR PROJECT IDENTIFIED IN ITS PROPOSAL FOR FACTOR 1, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), i.e., Attachment D, included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project without a completed CPARS evaluation. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Paul Martha, via email at paul.m.martha.civ@us.navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last 5 years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, additional or other relevant past performance information retrieved through the CPARS using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary /affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

2) Basis of Evaluation:

The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand.

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A - Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log Attachment B - Coefficient Schedule Attachment C - Project Data Sheet Attachment D - Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.252-3 Alterations in Solicitation. (Mar 1984)

ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)

Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:

N/A ____ ____

(End of clause)

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Number Title Effective Date

Alternate/ Deviation

Variation Effective Date

252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls. Sep 2016

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic…