16-R-3503_ATTACHMENT_I_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
US Flagged Ice Class tanker vessel to support world-wide bulk fuel
Solicitation number
N32205-16-R-3503
Issued by

About this file

Attachment I Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
16-R-3503_Amendment_8.docx DOCX document
Q A__4_Summary_of_Ice_Class_Tanker_Amendments_to_date.docx DOCX document
Ice_Class_Tanker_QA__6.docx DOCX document
Ice__Class_Tanker_Q A__5.docx DOCX document
CONSOL_DRAWINGS_2227933.pdf PDF
16-R-3503_Amend_5.docx DOCX document
16-R-3503_Amend_extend_closing_date.docx DOCX document
Ice_Class_Tanker_RFP_N32205-16-R-3503_Fillable_Boxes.docx DOCX document
Revised__Attachment_K.xls XLS spreadsheet
16-R-3503_Attachment_J_revised_Vessel-Minimum-Requirements_(2).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CBA_WD_American_Maritime_Officers.htm HTM file
CBA_WD_Seafarers_International_Union.htm HTM file
16-R-3503_Attachment_J_Vessel-Minimum-Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
16-R-3503_Amend_3_extend_closing_date.docx DOCX document
Q A__3__attachment_Decontamination_Station.doc DOC document
Q A__3_attachment.pdf PDF
Ice_Class_QA__3.docx DOCX document
Ice_Class_Tanker_QA___2_(3).docx DOCX document
Q A__2_answer_to_question_5__Shipboard_Force_Protection_5530.3_Series.pdf PDF
Ice_Class_Tanker_Q A__1.docx DOCX document
16-R-3503_Revised_K_-_Minimum_Technical_Experience_Requirements.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_E_SIU_letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_E__Aggregate_cover_letter.pdf PDF
16-R-3501_ATTACHMENT_F_Disclosure_of_Lobbying_Activites.pdf PDF
16-R-3503_Ice_Class_Amend_2.docx DOCX document
Attachment_E_Aggregate_Fringe_Benefit_Contributions.pdf PDF
Attachment_K-_Vessel_Minimum_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
16-R-3503_Amendment_1.docx DOCX document
16-R-3503_ATTACHMENT_L__MECSP_Worksheet.doc DOC document
16-R-3503_ATTACHMENT_C_Crew_Complement.docx DOCX document
16-R-3503_Attachment_B_Basic_Pricing_Data_Post.xls XLS spreadsheet
16-R-3503_Attachment_B-1_Fuel_Consumption_Data_post.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
16-R-3503_ATTACHMENT_H_-_Past_Performace_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
16-R-3503_ATTACHMENT_A_Government_Furnished_Property_and_Directives.docx DOCX document
16-R-3503_Ice_Class_Tanker_Final_RFP.docx DOCX document
16-R-3501_ATTACHMENT_D_-_DD254_Security_Classifications.pdf PDF
Solicitation_16-R-3503_Ice_Class_Tanker_DRAFT.docx DOCX document
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FROM: FACSIMILE:

TO: PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Schedule c.) Business Relations d.) Management of Key Personnel (Including Subcontractors) e.) Utilization of Small Business

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, to MS. CATHLENE JO STANGLER at cathy.stangler@navy.mil and Vivette Moore at Vivette.moore@navy.mil . Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Cathlene Jo Stangler
Contracting Officer

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.)Schedule: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Management of Key Personnel (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Utilization of Small Business: Provides for maximum participation of small businesses in the award of subcontracts consistent with efficient contract performance.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .