Attachment 3 - MSS RFP RFI Log.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NAVAIR Moving Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0042125R0016
About this file
This is a Questions & Answers log for a NAVAIR Moving Support Services solicitation (N0042125R0016). The Q&A clarifies that responses are due March 07, 2025 at 1200 and should be submitted electronically to joshua.h.rogers9.civ@us.navy.mil. The procurement is an 8(a) set-aside being conducted under FAR Part 13.5 simplified acquisition procedures, with a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) evaluation approach.
Key details revealed include: Accubuild Construction Inc. is the incumbent contractor under contract N0042121D0019 (03/31/2021-03/31/2025) and prior contract N0042116D0007 (04/01/2016-03/31/2021), both firm-fixed-price contracts. The scope excludes dedicated carpenter and electrician labor categories, which will be procured separately. No certified cost and pricing data is required, no key personnel are specified, and clerical staff are not needed as an electronic system will be used for work orders. Questions will be accepted on a rolling basis until the solicitation closes, with answers provided via amendments.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers
| Moving Support Services - Request for Information (RFI) Log | ||||||
| RFI # | Question | Response | ||||
| 0001 | Item 9 states that “Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, …” However, we do not see any time or date identified in Item 8. Please confirm the deadline for submission of sealed offers and the number of original(s) and copies to be furnished, and whether offers should be submitted via email or other method. | The deadline for responses is March 07 2025 at 1200, all responses should be submitted electronically to: joshua.h.rogers9.civ@us.navy.mil | Current and Prior Contract/Order Numbers | Incumbent Contractor | Contract Type | Period of Performance |
| 0002 | We don’t see any instructions regarding the submission of questions. By what date should prospective offerors submit questions, and by what dates does the Government anticipate providing responses? | Questions will be taken on a rolling basis until the close of the solicitation. In the effort of transparency, the Government will issue answers to RFI as amendments to the RFP as frequently as is reasonably possible | N0042121D0019 | Accubuild Construction Inc. | FFP | 03/31/2021-03/31/2025 |
| 0003 | We are eager to collaborate with you on future projects. We are an SBA certified 8(a) and HUBZone business, as well as a Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB). Our extensive past performance is supported by an excellent CPARS rating. We would like to explore the possibility of connecting you with our Executive Team to discuss sole sourcing opportunities for upcoming projects. | This procurement is being conducted as a FAR Part 13.5 and so no discussions will be held. The Government welcomes and encourages proposals for this requirement | N0042116D0007 | Accubuild Construction Inc. | FFP | 04/01/2016-03/31/2021 |
| 0004 | I am reaching out to kindly request information regarding the current incumbent for the NAVAIR Moving Support Services. If possible, I would appreciate any details you can provide. | Please see the table to the right providing incumbent information and current and prior contracts | ||||
| 0005 | In reviewing the bid specification, I noted that it was 9a set aside. I wanted to verify that we are not qualified, or there would be no benefit to the government for us to submit a bid on this project before I removed it from consideration. | This procurement is an 8(a) set-aside. Offers from vendors not enrolled in the 8(a) program will not be considered eligible for award | ||||
| 0006 | There are no labor categories for Carpenters and Electricians included in Attachment 1 (Moving Support Services Level of Effort). Where do you want the pricing to appear for those categories? | The Government has determined that it is to its advantage to procure carpentry and electrician services through means other than this follow-on IDIQ. The awardee will co-ordinate any need for specialized work that is required to be performed in conjuction with moving support services with the Government Post-Award | ||||
| 0007 | Is any back-up information required to support the total proposed amounts for the fixed-priced and IDIQ CLIN labor rates? | No certified cost and pricing data is required for this procurement | ||||
| 0008 | The issued amendment includes Section M language stating “this solicitation will be evaluated using the lowed price technically acceptable source evaluation process”. Will you please provide vendors with the criteria to be used in determining a “technically acceptable” proposal? | In order to reduce confusion, the government will be removing the Proposal Adequacy Checklist provision and will add language to section M which will include questions. A potential offeror's answers to these will be used by the TPOC to make a determination of technically acceptability | ||||
| 0009 | Could the agency clarify in which volume we need to send the resumes of the key personnel and who are the key personnel? | There are no key personnel for this procurement | ||||
| 0010 | Could the agency clarify in which volume we need to submit the PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST? | In order to reduce confusion, the government will be removing the Proposal Adequacy Checklist provision and will add language to section M which will include questions. A potential offeror's answers to these will be used by the TPOC to make a determination of technically acceptability | ||||
| 0011 | Could the agency clarify that only pricing is to be submitted and no past performacne needs to be submitted as a part of this proposal? | The government asks potential offerors to speak to prior experience in order to demonstrate that a potential offeror currently has resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them | ||||
| 0012 | Based upon the labor classifications and the labor hours provided in Attachment 1 - Moving Support Services Level of Effort FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.xlsx, where does the offeror include the hours for clerical staff? | The Government will be utilizing an electronic system to create an issue work orders. Clerical staff are not anticipated to be required for this effort | ||||
| 0013 | Since there do not appear to be specific instructions in the solicitation as to a written Technical Proposal, the requirement appears to be that the provision of the specified documents and responses to the Proposal Adequacy Checklist will serve as the Technical Response. Would the Government please confirm? | In order to reduce confusion, the government will be removing the Proposal Adequacy Checklist provision and will add language to section M which will include questions. A potential offeror's answers to these will be used by the TPOC to make a determination of technically acceptability | ||||
| 0014 | I am reaching out again to check and see if you need any assistance at the moment. Please advise, I'd be more than happy to assist. | This procurement is being conducted as a FAR Part 13.5 and so no discussions will be held. The Government welcomes and encourages proposals for this requirement | ||||
| 0015 | Could you please provide details on the incumbent contractor and the current contractor? | Please see the table to the right providing incumbent information and current and prior contracts | ||||
| 0016 | How will "technically acceptable" be determined? | In order to reduce confusion, the government will be removing the Proposal Adequacy Checklist provision and will add language to section M which will include questions. A potential offeror's answers to these will be used by the TPOC to make a determination of technically acceptability | ||||
| 0017 | Could you confirm what specific documents must be included in the proposal package? The solicitation does not clearly outline the full list of required documents. |
Our assumption is that the following should be submitted:
| Cover Page | ||
| Company Information Page | ||
| Signed SF 33 | ||
| Signed Amendment 0001 | ||
| Completed Representations and Certifications | ||
| Completed Attachment 1 (Pricing Form) | Please consult the added language in section M for more detailed submission instructions | |
| 0018 | The Proposal Adequacy Checklist references FAR 15.408, which directs us to Table 15-2—Instructions for Submitting Cost/Price Proposals When Certified Cost or Pricing Data Are Required. Given that this procurement is conducted pursuant to FAR 13.5—using simplified acquisition procedures for commercial services—we would like to confirm whether submission of the Proposal Adequacy Checklist is required. | In order to reduce confusion, the government will be removing the Proposal Adequacy Checklist provision and will add language to section M which will include questions. A potential offeror's answers to these will be used by the TPOC to make a determination of technically acceptability |
| 0019 | Since the solicitation states that proposals will be evaluated using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source evaluation process, we assume that all submitted pricing will be firm fixed price and would not require certified cost or pricing data. Again, could you please confirm whether the checklist is necessary in this case? | This effort is FFP and certified cost and pricing data is NOT required |
| 0020 | Should Attachment 1 be submitted as a separate Excel document, or should it be incorporated within the main proposal submission as a PDF? Or can we submit iot both ways? | The government will accept the submission of pricing as an attachment or embedded in the capability statement |
| 0021 | ||
| 0022 | ||
| 0023 | ||
| 0024 | ||
| 0025 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .