N00421-16-R-0040-0002_SF30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this modif ication is to modify Section L, Volume 3, paragraph 3.3(b) and to modify Attachment L-4.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

U 1 30

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Oct-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00421-16-R-0040

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Sep-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Oct-2016

CODE

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AD (PAX)

CODE 2.5.1.8.13 BLDG 441

21983 BUNDY ROAD

PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670

N00421 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00421-16-R-0040

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Bidders

SECTION L -- INSTRUCTIONS

PART A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 GENERAL

Offerors are required to submit sufficient information concerning all evaluation factors to enable Government personnel to fully assess the capabilities of the offeror to perform all requirements. Offerors shall clearly identify whether they are proposing for the Lot I (Unrestricted) or Lot II (Restricted) effort. If small businesses desire to propose for both Lot I and Lot II, than two separate clearly identified proposals must be submitted. Proposals must be sufficient in detail and scope to enable evaluation and provide the evaluators a clear understanding of the offeror’s approach, expertise, experience and capability as required by the solicitation. All proposals must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of all requirements and associated risks;

is able, willing, and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet all requirements; and has valid and practical solutions for all requirements and potential risk areas. The offeror shall not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The burden of proof for all substantiation within the proposal rests with the offeror. Offerors are advised that the Government may incorporate any part of the offeror’s proposal deemed beneficial to the

Government, into the final contract. No cost/price information, (e.g., Dollar Values and/or Hourly Rates) shall be included in any volume other than Volume 5 Cost/Price, Volume 6 Contract Administration, and if applicable, Annex B (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and Annex C (Table T-1 Small Business Goals).

In presenting material in the proposal, the offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization should be emphasized during proposal preparation. It is the responsibility of the offeror to present enough information to allow the Government to evaluate the various work efforts, support, and management approaches, as well as cost/price, without discussions. Unsubstantiated statements that the prospective offeror understands, can or shall comply with the specifications, or paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof are considered inadequate and may render a rating of unacceptable.

The offeror shall include any data necessary to illustrate the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. There is no need to repeat information in more than one volume. The detailed information must be included in the most logical place and summarized and referenced in other areas if an overlap exists.

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentation beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.

Throughout these instructions, offeror is defined as the prime contractor with its CAGE code identified in Block

15A on Standard Form (SF)-33, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. A “Joint Venture” (JV) is a partnership or teaming arrangement that is formed for the purpose of responding to this solicitation when the prime contractor consists of more than one legal entity that form a single legal entity. “JV Team Members” are the entities that make up a Joint

Venture. When either term “contractor name” or the term “entity” is used, they refer to the prime and JV team members.

Offerors may submit questions regarding clarification of solicitation requirements within five (5) days of the date this solicitation is posted. Questions received after this date may not be answered. Questions shall be submitted using Section L, Attachment L-9 “Solicitation Question Form” to Chris Woehrer, Contracts Specialist, at chris.woehrer@navy.mil. Answers to the questions will be posted on FedBizOps.

2.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMISSION

Proposals must be formatted using a Times New Roman 12 point normal font (no reduction permitted), single-spaced with 1-inch margins all around, and formatted for/printed on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper. If Government attachments have a different format/font, the Offeror may use the format/font in the attachment as provided. All pages should be numbered with volume, section, paragraph, and page numbers. When fold-out pages are used, they must not exceed 11 x 17 inches and will be counted as 1 page. If the offeror uses graphs to convey information the graphs must show enough detail to easily discern the information described. Graphs and tables shall be presented in no smaller than a 10 point font. Graphs should contain a grid, which allows values to be read directly from the graph to the same detail that a 10 x 10 to the ½ inch grid provides. Graphic resolution should be consistent with the purpose of the data presented. Text utilized in charts, figures, and graphics shall also be no smaller than a 10 point font and may use a font type selected by the offeror. Each volume, book, or annex shall be provided separately in a

3-ring binder. The binders should be of an appropriate thickness for the number of pages it contains (e.g., a 30-page book shall not be placed in a 2-inch binder).

2.1 Electronic Submission of Proposal

This section is intended to provide information to the offeror on the electronic format and application software to be used for submitting proposals. Use of the software and procedures described in this section will reduce the amount of time and effort needed to receive and install proposals onto the electronic evaluation system, and will ensure that the proposals received are suitable for reading electronically. If a discrepancy exists between the original paper copy of the proposal and the original electronic copy on the CD-ROM disk, the original electronic copy shall take precedence.

2.1.1 Electronic Proposal Media

The offeror should submit all volumes of its proposal electronically on CD-ROM(s) compatible with the operating system and applications defined in Section 2.1.2 below. The offeror should put as much proposal material as possible on each CD-ROM, keeping the portions of the proposal that contain pricing information on separate CD-

ROM(s) from the portions of the proposal that do not contain pricing information. For this solicitation, Annex B

(Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and Annex C (Table T-1 Small Business Goals); Volume 5 Price/Cost; and

Volume 6 Contract Administration contain price information and should be delivered on separate CD-ROM(s) from the remainder of the proposal. The offeror should submit two sets of CD-ROMs that contain its proposal. Table G-

3 (Proposal Structure) identifies the number of sets of CD-ROMs that the Offeror should submit. One set of CD-

ROM disks should be marked "Original," the other should be marked "Copy." Both sets of CD-ROM disks should be clearly marked with the offeror's name and address, the point of contact's name and phone number, and proposal volumes contained therein. The offeror is responsible for ensuring electronic proposals are virus free in accordance with Section 2.1.4

2.1.2 Operating System and Applications

The proposals will be accessed utilizing the Microsoft Windows 7 Operating System. Proposal information shall be submitted using the following applications: Microsoft Word 2010, Microsoft Excel 2010, Microsoft PowerPoint

2010, and Microsoft Project 2010; however letters and other signed documents shall be provided as a fully searchable Portable Document Format (.pdf) file. Use of other application software for submission of proposals is prohibited except where specific instructions for non-.pdf or Office 2010 applications are provided.

2.1.3 Hyperlinks

Offerors may use hyperlinks within and among proposal volumes that do not include price information. However, there shall be no links from any other volume into Volume 5 Price or any portion of the proposal that contains price information.

mailto:chris.woehrer@navy.mil

2.1.4 Virus Free Electronic Submission

Offerors are responsible for ensuring that its electronic proposal is virus free. The offeror shall certify, in its proposal cover letter, that all electronic proposal information has been checked for viruses, and specify the software, version, and virus definition used to check the data. With each subsequent submission of proposal information (e.g., responses to Evaluation Notices, Final Proposal Revisions, etc.), the offeror shall ensure and certify that its files are virus free.

2.1.5 Multimedia

The offeror should not embed sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files within the proposal submission.

2.1.6 Graphics

Large files require greater computer system resources and are discouraged. The offeror is encouraged to:

a. Simplify the color palette used in creating figures;

b. Minimize size of graphics files; and

c. Avoid scanned images.

2.1.7 File Naming Conventions

There is no limit to the number of files that may be submitted. However, it is preferable that each volume, book, or annex not be broken up into multiple electronic files. Valid extensions for files using their associated applications are listed below in Table G-1:

Table G-1: File Extensions

Type of Application/Files Valid Extensions

Portable Document Files .pdf

Microsoft Word documents .docx

Microsoft Excel documents .xlsx

Microsoft Power Point .pptx

Microsoft Project .mpp

The Offeror shall follow the basic structure of the file naming convention in Table G-2 (Offeror Electronic File

Naming Convention) for electronic file submissions (e.g., proposal volumes, attachments, appendices), where "#" represents the sequential numbering of files. Offeror’s shall keep the file name as short as possible (i.e., under 40 characters) so that the files are accessible on Government share drives. Files with longer names may become corrupt or inaccessible.

The Offeror should provide one folder for each volume or annex, containing all electronic files requested within the volume or annex. Please submit each volume, book, or annex as one file if possible. Offerors should not provide each section/paragraph as separate files.

The Offeror shall ensure that the electronically submitted files are directly traceable to paper copy submittals.

Table G-2: Offeror Electronic File Naming Convention

Volume

Number

Title File naming convention

1 Executive Summary Vol 1 ES#.docx

Table ES-1 Offeror Summary

Table ES-2 Relevant Contract Summary

Vol 1 ES Tables.xlsx

2 Past Performance Vol 2 PP#.docx

Table PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data Vol 2 PP-1 PP Con Data.xlsx

Past Performance Point of Contact Information Joint Venture

Team Members

PP POC Info#.docx

3 Technical Vol 3 Tech#.docx

Lot I – Sample Task 1 Technical Response Vol 3 Lot I ST1 Response.docx

2.1.8 Proposal Validity Date

The Offeror's proposal shall remain valid for at least 180 calendar days from date of proposal submittal.

3.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES

The Offeror must present its proposal information in a manner that facilitates a one for one comparison between the information presented and Section L proposal instructions. Proposal information must be structured such that its paragraph numbers/letters correspond to the proposal instructions paragraph numbers/letters, although the Offeror may add lower tier sub paragraphs.

Each volume of the proposal shall be submitted as original and additional hard and original and additional electronic copies as specified in Table G-3 (Proposal Structure). Each annex shall only be submitted electronically as original and additional copies. The Offeror shall submit all paper and/or electronic copies of the proposal to the address provided in section 4.0 (Submission and Packaging). Suggested page counts for each volume, if any, are also specified in Table G-3 (Proposal Structure). The title and table of contents pages, as well as tables, are not included in the suggested page count. All completed excel L-Attachments should be provided electronically with an electronic original and electronic copy with their respective proposals. If Offeror's choose to embed tables from the

L-Attachments in appropriate volumes, those tables will not count towards total page counts.

Information submitted as an Annex to a particular proposal volume could include manuals, specifications, plans, procedures, and company policies, as well as other information requested in “Part B Specific Instructions” and do not count towards the suggested page count. Additionally, the individual subcontracting reports for the past performance volume are not included in the suggested page count.

Cost/price information, (e.g., dollar values and/or hourly rates) shall not be included in any volume other than

Volume 5 Cost/Price, Volume 6 Contract Administration, and if applicable, Annex B (Small Business

Subcontracting Plan) and Annex C (Table T-1 Small Business Goals).

Lot II – Sample Task 2 Technical Response Vol 3 Lot II ST2 Response.docx

Lot II – Sample Task 3 Technical Response Vol 3 Lot II ST3 Response.docx

Management Plan (Lot I and Lot II) Vol 3 Mgmt. Plan.docx

Small Business Management (Lot I only) Vol 3 SB Mgmt.docx

4 Corporate Experience Vol 4 CE#.docx

Table CE-1 Evaluation Area Summary;

Table CE-2 Contract Comparative Analysis by Evaluation

Area

Vol 4 CE Tables.xlsx

5 Cost/Price Vol 5 Cost-Price#.docx

Cost/Price Attachments Vol 5 Cost-Price Attachments.xlsx

6 Contract Administration Vol 6 CA#.docx

General

Instructions

Cross Reference Matrix GenInst CE CRM.xlsx

Annex A Relevant Portions of Final Versions of Previous SOW/PWSs for Past Performance and Corporate Experience

AnnA Rel SOW PWSs#.pdf and

AnnA Rel SOW PWSs #.docx

Please note: The offeror should provide both a .pdf and .docx version if they are available. If not, a .pdf only version is acceptable.

Annex B Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Lot I Only) Ann B SBSP.docx

Please note: The offeror should provide both a .pdf and .docx version if they are available. If not, a .pdf version only is acceptable.

Annex C T-1 SB Goals (Lot I Only) Vol 1 T-1 SB Goals.docx

Table G-3: Proposal Structure

Volume

Number Volume Title Suggested Pages Copies Required

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 1 Original/1 Copy

2 PAST PERFORMANCE 40 1 Original/1 Copy

3 TECHNICAL 1 Original/1 Copy

Lot I Sample Task 1 Technical Response 25 1 Original/1 Copy

Lot II Sample Task 2 Technical Response 20 1 Original/1 Copy

Lot II Sample Task 3 Technical Response 10 1 Original/1 Copy

Lot I Management and Staffing Narrative 10 1 Original/1 Copy

Lot II Management and Staffing Narrative 10 1 Original/1 Copy

Lot I Small Business Management 5 1 Original/1 Copy

4 CORPORATE EXPERIENCE 25 1 Original/1 Copy

5 COST/PRICE As Needed 1 Original/1 Copy

6 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION As Needed 1 Original/1 Copy

Annex A

Relevant Portions of Final Versions of Previous

SOO/SOW/PWSs for Past Performance and Corporate

Experience

As Needed 1 electronic Original/1 electronic copy

Annex B Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Lot I Only) As Needed 1 electronic Original/1 electronic copy

Annex C T-1 SB Goals (Lot I Only) As Needed

1 electronic Original/1 electronic copy

Each binder must contain the following information:

a. Cover and title page;

b. Title of proposal and proposal number as applicable;

c. Offeror’s name, address and POC;

d. Solicitation number;

e. Proposal volume/book/annex number;

f. Copy number;

g. Table of Contents (The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to easily locate important elements).

h. Tabs and dividers.

The following table G-4 lists the attachments provided to the offeror with Section L, to assist with proposal development. All completed excel L-Attachments should be provided electronically with an electronic original and electronic copy with their respective proposals. If Offeror's choose to embed tables from the L-Attachments in appropriate volumes, those tables will not count towards total page counts.

Table G-4: Section L List of Attachments

Attachment

Number

Electronic File Title Attachment Name

L-1 Executive Summary Tables Table ES-1 Offeror Summary and Table ES-

2 Relevant Contract Summary

L-2 Past Performance Questionnaire Vol 2 PPQ

L-3a PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data-Lot I Past Performance Contract Data-Lot I

L-3b PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data-Lot II Past Performance Contract Data-Lot II

L-4 Lot I – Sample Task 1 Lot I – Sample Task 1 Information and

Instructions

L-5 Lot II – Sample Task 2 Lot II – Sample Task 2 Information and

Instructions

L-6 Lot II – Sample Task 3 Lot II – Sample Task 3 Information and

Instructions

L-7 T-1 SB Goals Annex C T-1 SB Goals

L-8 Corporate Experience Tables Table CE-1 Evaluation Area Summary;

Table CE-2 Contract Comparative Analysis by Evaluation Area

L-9 Question and Answer Form Solicitation Question Form

L-10a Cost/Price (Lot I) Cost/Price (Lot I)

L-10b Cost/Price (Lot II) Cost/Price (Lot II)

A Cross Reference Matrix (CRM), Table G-5, is included to help the offeror develop its proposal and to ensure traceability of Section L paragraphs to the requirements. The offeror’s CRM may be identical to the one provided or revised to add information. For example, the offeror’s CRM may cross-reference its proposal volumes, paragraph numbers, and pages to specific solicitation requirements identified within the table, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information. CRM submission is not required.

Table G-5: Cross Reference Matrix

Section L –

Proposal

Instructions

Volume or

Paragraph

Numbers

Section L - Proposal

Instructions Volume or

Paragraph Title

RFP

Sections

SOW

Paragraphs

Offeror

Proposal

Section

Volume 3 Technical

3.1.1 Lot I – Sample Task 1

M II B

4.0, 4.1, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7

3.1.2 Lot II – Sample Task 2 M II B 4.0, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7

3.1.3 Lot II – Sample Task 3 M II B 4.0, 4.5

3.2 Management Plan (Lot

I and Lot II)

M II B

4.0, 4.1, 4.2

3.3 Small Business

Management (Lot I)

M II B

All

Volume 4 Corporate Experience

4.2.1 Experience as a Prime

(Lot I and II)

M II C 4.1.2, 4.2.2

4.2.2 Ground Operating

Procedures (GOPs)

(Lot I and II)

M II C

4.0.2

4.2.3 Supporting Flight

Clearance

Documentation and

Conducting Test

Activities (Lot I)

4.1.1

4.2.4 Supporting Flight

Clearance

Documentation and

Test Activities (Lot II)

4.2.1

4.2.5 Advanced Reverse

Engineering (Lot I):

4.1.6

4.2.6 Basic Reverse

Engineering (Lot II):

4.2.6

No price information, (e.g., Dollar Values and/or Hourly Rates) shall be included in any volume other than Annex B

(Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and Table T-1 (Small Business Goals); Volume 5 Price, Volume 6 Contract

Administration.

4.0 PROPOSAL PACKAGING AND SUBMISSION:

4.1 Unclassified Data

All Proposals shall be UNCLASSIFIED. Clearly mark all packages with the solicitation number. The submission date for all volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in Block 9 of Standard Form 33 of the solicitation. However it is requested that one hard copy and one electronic copy on a CD-ROM of Volume 1

Executive Summary, Table ES-1 (Offeror’s Summary); and Volume 1 Executive Summary, Table ES-2 (Relevant

Contract Summary); Volume 3 Past Performance, Table PP-1 a or b (Past Performance Contract Data); Volume 4

Corporate Experience, Table CE-1 (Corporate Experience Element – Contract Reference Matrix); as well as one electronic copy of Annex A (Final Versions of Previous SOW/PWSs/Other Supporting Documentation for Past

Performance and Corporate Experience) be submitted no later than two weeks prior to proposal due date. In the official proposal submission, please indicate any changes made to the information. If no changes are made, please state so at the beginning of Volume 1 Executive Summary and Volume 3 Past Performance.

Method of delivery, such as by hand, United States Postal Service or commercial carrier, shall be coordinated with

Chris Woehrer, Contracts Specialist, at (301) 757-6517. Proposals shall be submitted using the address provided below. Initial and Final Proposals shall not be submitted by facsimile or electronically via email.

Naval Air Systems Command

Code: AIR- 2.5.1.13.8, Chris Woehrer

Building 441

21983 Bundy Road Unit 7

Patuxent River, Maryland 20670

United States Solicitation Number: N00421-16-R-0040

Email: chris.woehrer@navy.mil

4.2 Unclassified Proposal Packaging

The offerors shall package the proposal volumes in cartons or equivalent packaging containers in the most efficient manner possible grouping like volumes to the maximum extent possible. Each box should identify its contents by including a packing slip detailing each volume/book number and title, and copy number. The outside of the carton should be stamped or marked ― For Official Use Only; and Source Selection Information – See FAR-2.101 and

3.104, marked for the intended recipient as identified above in paragraph 4.1. The proposals shall be marked for

NAVAIR PCO, AIR- 2.5.1.13. The Master Set shall include all original proposal volumes, all proposal volumes on

CD-ROM, a completed and original signed Standard Form 33; acknowledgement of all solicitation amendments, if applicable; and Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors or Respondents (Section K of this

RFP) and other applicable fill-ins. Note: Any documents which contain cost/price data shall be on a separate disk(s) from the other disks from the non cost/price proposal information.

5.0 SOLICITATION QUESTIONS

Solicitation questions shall be emailed to the Contracting Officer identified in Section 4.1 using Attachment L-9, Solicitation Question & Answer Form and must be received no later than 10 calendar days after the pre-solicitation conference.

6.0 CHANGES TO SOLICITATION

All amendments to this solicitation will be posted at https://www.fbo.gov/ https://www.fbo.gov/

Search the database for the solicitation number: N00421-16-R-0040

7.0 TECHNICAL LIBRARY

A Technical Library of information directly related to the requirements of this solicitation is available to all Offerors intending to propose as a Prime or Joint Venture. The Technical Library will be available, upon request.

Please contact Chris Woehrer, Contracts Specialist via email at chris.woehrer@navy.mil.

PART B SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 VOLUME 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost/price aspects of the offer.

The following is a list of Section L Attachments that the offeror shall utilize to provide information for this volume:

Attachment L-1 Executive Summary Tables

The purpose of the Executive Summary is to provide the Government with an overview of the Offeror’s entire proposal, excluding cost/price. Each section within the Executive Summary shall contain the salient points contained in each of the proposal volumes. In addition, this volume should be used by the offeror to identify and highlight significant features of its proposal. The Executive Summary volume should be divided into the areas outlined below:

a. Pre-Requisite

Each Prime or JV Team Offeror must provide documentation to demonstrate that the Offeror meets the pre-requisite listed below. This requirement will first be validated on a pass/fail assessment. An Offeror who does not meet this pre-requisite, will be deemed UNACCEPTABLE and will be eliminated from this competition. As such its proposal will not be evaluated.

1. Offerors must provide, with its proposal, evidence of its AS9100 (no exclusions) certification. This certification (the Prime’s and/or the JV team certifications) must be submitted with the proposal at the proposal submission date/time specified on Standard Form 1449 (Block 8).

b. Offeror Summary Table

(1) The Offeror shall complete a table similar to the one below and submit it within this volume. This table summarizes the offeror and/or the JV Team Members’ roles and responsibility as well as their work commitment. Subcontractors will not be evaluated. “Subcontractors” includes any entity other than a

Prime Offeror or JV Team Member.

(2) The Offeror shall provide a definition of the legal relationship between the entities if it is other than a

Prime/subcontractor relationship. For the Past Performance and Corporate Experience evaluations, contract references that relate to a different CAGE code/DUNS than the proposed entity will be considered if the CAGE code/DUNS was created as a result of a corporate acquisition, reorganization, merger, or other administrative reason and refer to the same division in the same physical location for where the work is being performed or from where the work is being directed in accordance with the proposed roles and responsibilities. All current CAGE Codes/DUNS must appear in Table ES-1(Offeror

Summary Table) which indicates a commitment of work for those entities. To facilitate the Relevancy determination for Past Performance and Corporate Experience, the Offeror shall provide a written explanation if multiple CAGE codes/DUNS for the same physical location are applicable to one entity.

The written explanation shall detail the distinct roles and responsibilities for entities with different CAGE codes/DUNS at the same physical location for where the work is being performed or from where the work is being directed. The description shall include all changes in the organization as a result of a corporate acquisition, reorganization, merger, or other administrative reason and explain how the changes impact the relevance of any contract references provided.

ES-1 Offeror Summary Table

Offeror:

Contractor Name Place of Performance CAGE Codes Work

Description

c. Relevant Contract Summary Table

The offeror shall complete the Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) provided in Attachment L-1 (Executive

Summary Tables), for all contracts proposed as relevant for Past Performance and Corporate Experience for the

Prime and JV team members only. Offerors shall not submit Past Performance and Corporate Experience contracts for subcontractors since subcontractor's Past Performance and Corporate Experience will not be evaluated. If a

Prime intends to subcontract a portion of the effort evaluated under Past Performance and Corporate Experience for

Lot I or Lot II, or both, the Prime shall provide relevant contracts for the Prime for that subcontracted effort. This will allow the Prime to demonstrate its own Past Performance and Corporate Experience for that evaluated portion of Past Performance and Corporate Experience. Complete the table according to the instructions within the attachment and submit it within this section and as a separate electronic file. The contract references designated in

Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) shall be used in completing Volume 2 Table PP-1 (Past Performance

Contract Data) (i.e., the contract identified as P1 in the Relevant Contract Summary Table is the same P1 contract identified in Past Performance and the same P1 contract identified in Corporate Experience); and Volume 4 Table

CE-1 (Evaluation Area Summary). Contract references provided, that are performed by contractors other than the

Offeror (such as teaming partners or subcontractors) will NOT be evaluated as prime contractor past performance or corporate experience, unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture Offeror as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement.

ES-2 Relevant Contract Summary Table

Offeror: Referenced in:

Contractor

Name

Contract

Reference

Contract

Number

Contract

Type Contract Title

Volume 3

(Past

Performance)

Volume 4

(Corporate

Experience)

Prime or Joint

Venture

Company

P1

P2

P3

JV team member A

(where applicable)

T1

T2

T3

T4

JV team member N T5

(where applicable)

d. Contract Administration

The offeror shall provide a summary of any exceptions or deviations and proposed Section H clauses addressed in

Volume 6 Contract Administration.

2.0 VOLUME 2 PAST PERFORMANCE

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to the price aspects of the offer

The following is a list of Section L Attachments that the Offeror shall utilize to provide information for this volume:

Attachment L-2 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Attachment L-3a Past Performance Contract Data (PP-3a for Lot I)

Attachment L-3b Past Performance Contract Data (PP-3b for Lot II)

For this volume, the Offeror shall identify relevant contracts, or those portions of a relevant contract, whose performance is within five years of the RFP release date and contains efforts similar to those efforts as described in the appropriate table PP-1. Offeror’s shall NOT provide present/past performance contract references for any proposed subcontractors. Offerors shall also identify relevant contracts within the past five years that had any show-cause notices, cure notices, or termination for default.

Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment

L-2) will be the primary customer feedback data used to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance. The Past

Performance Information Reporting System (PPIRS) will be the primary method used to retrieve the CPARS for this source selection. For all contracts identified that do not have a CPARS, the Offeror shall forward a copy of the PPQ to that contract’s PCO, ACO, and PM; or commercial contractor equivalents. Please forward all applicable questionnaires within two weeks from this solicitation’s release date to allow adequate time for the recipient to respond. Note that the Offeror should not reference this solicitation’s number when distributing the past performance questionnaires to customers. The Offeror shall include instructions for the customers to send completed questionnaires within two weeks of its receipt via e-mail to Chris Woehrer, Contracts Specialist, at chris.woehrer@navy.mil. The Offeror shall ensure that all points of contact are current and include an email address and phone number. The Offeror shall not conduct follow-up actions with regard to this questionnaire, other than to confirm receipt by the recipient. The Government may contact customers identified by the Offeror to obtain follow-up Past Performance Information as needed.

Offerors are reminded that the Government reserves the right to use information to evaluate past performance obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror. The Government may send additional questionnaires and/or obtain information from other sources.

2.1 Past Performance Information Point of Contact

Any Past Performance information that requires further coordination will be with Chris Woehrer, Contracts

Specialist, at chris.woehrer@navy.mil.

2.2 Relevant Contract Data

For each contract identified for past performance in Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) provided in

Attachment L-1 (Executive Summary Tables), the Offeror shall complete an L-3a or L-3b (Table PP-1a or PP-1b, as appropriate) following the instructions provided within the attachment and submit it within this section and as a separate electronic file. Please note that this form is a summary of the prime’s or JV team members’ relevant contract data. All detailed information and comparative analysis of the past performance references to Lot I and Lot mailto:chris.woehrer@navy.mil

II DO/TO requirements shall be provided in Volume 2, Section 2.3 (Evaluation), of the Offeror’s proposal. The contract references designated in Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) shall be used in completing this Volume and all contract references shall be numbered the same throughout all of the Offeror’s proposal volumes (i.e. the contracts identified as P1, P2, etc.).

In general, more recent performances are considered better indicators of future performance. Commercial contracts may be included. Up to five delivery orders or task orders awarded under the same contract may be referenced at the contract level instead of at the delivery or task order level as a single reference. If the Offeror is proposing as a

JV, the Offeror should provide the relevant contracts for the JV as a whole, and for each team member of the JV.

Contracts detailed in this volume shall be consistent with the contracts identified in Volume 4 (Corporate

Experience).

Table PP-1a (Lot I) Past Performance Contract Data

1 Contractor Name

2 Contract Reference

3 Title of Contract

4 Contract Number

5 Contract Type

6 Relevant Delivery/Task Order Numbers (if applicable)

7 Subcontract Number/PO Number

8 Procuring agency

9 Description of product or service

10 Period of performance

11 CAGE Code

a. Scope

For the attribute below, briefly describe how the past performance contract demonstrates relevance and list PWS/SOW references that document the APSD/AIRWorks Prototyping and Limited Production Contract scope of the past performance contract submitted.

Design and Development of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.3)

Manufacturing of aircraft components/ systems, modification kits or ground based aircraft mission systems for prototyping, validation, verification or production activities (SOW 4.1.4, 4.5)

Integration and Installation of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.5, 4.1.10, 4.5.3)

Conducting functional performance validation test activities of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems laboratories (SOW 4.1.12, 4.4)

Prepare, update, amend required documentation for, and perform, Integrated Logistics Support functions (SOW

4.1.7)

b. Magnitude

Dollar value of contract (Total)

Dollar value of contract (Annualized)

c. Complexity

For the attribute below, briefly describe how the past performance contract demonstrates relevance and list PWS/SOW references that document the APSD/AIRWorks Prototyping and Limited Production Contract complexity element of the past performance contract submitted.

Perform analysis and verification of designs for airworthiness including structural, frequency response, electrical loads and thermal (SOW 4.1.1)

Develop systems architectures and associated documentation for integrated systems; i.e., aircraft avionics and mission systems integration. (SOW

4.1.11)

Perform software development and integration of that software into OEM baselines (4.1.11)

Develop, produce and deliver a Technical Data Package in accordance with MIL-STD-31000 up to Level III

(4.1.3)

Fabricate electrical and mechanical components, assemblies and modification kits for prototyping, verification, validation and limited production activities

(4.1.4)

Integration efforts inclusive of systems of systems on a single aircraft type (i.e. avionics systems and mission systems) (4.1.2, 4.1.13)

Perform ground and airborne testing activities for systems or modifications to also include associated development equipment and/or system integration laboratories. (SOW 4.1.12)

13 Date of last completed CPARs

14 Date past performance questionnaires were sent.

Points of Contact who can validate performance on the contract referenced in Cell C6 or specific delivery order or task order number referenced in Cell C8.

16 Gov't PCO or Commercial Purchasing Agent

Name:

Phone:

Email:

17 Gov't ACO

Name:

Phone:

Email:

18 Gov't PM or Commercial PM

Name:

Phone:

Email:

19 Other: Name:Title:Phone:Email:

Table PP-1b (Lot II) Past Performance Contract Data

1 Contractor Name

2 Contract Reference

3 Title of Contract

4 Contract Number

5 Contract Type

6 Relevant Delivery/Task Order Numbers (if applicable)

7 Subcontract Number/PO Number

8 Procuring agency

9 Description of product or service

10 Period of performance

11 CAGE Code

a. Scope

For the attribute below, briefly describe how the past performance contract demonstrates relevance and list PWS/SOW references that document the APSD/AIRWorks Prototyping and Limited Production Contract scope of the past performance contract submitted.

Design and Development of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.3)

Manufacturing of aircraft components/ systems, modification kits or ground based aircraft mission systems for prototyping, validation, verification or production activities (SOW 4.2.4, 4.5)

Integration and Installation of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.5, 4.5.3)

Support the Government in conducting functional performance validation test activities of Prototype

Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.2.1, 4.4)

Support the Government in preparing, updating, amending required documentation for, and performance of, Integrated Logistics Support functions (SOW 4.2.7)

b. Magnitude

Dollar value of contract (Total)

Dollar value of contract (Annualized)

c. Complexity

For the attribute below, briefly describe how the past performance contract demonstrates relevance and list PWS/SOW references that document the APSD/AIRWorks Prototyping and Limited Production Contract complexity element of the past performance contract submitted.

Perform analysis and verification of designs for airworthiness including structural, frequency response, electrical loads and thermal (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2)

Fabricate electrical and mechanical components, assemblies and modification kits for aircraft and ground based mission systems, support and test equipment and associated developmental equipment and system integration laboratories.(4.2.4)

Develop, produce and deliver a Technical Data Package in accordance with MIL-STD-31000 up to Level III

(SOW 4.2.3)

System Integration efforts on a single aircraft type at

Government Facilities (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.5)

Support Government acceptance testing for systems or modifications and associated developmental equipment

(SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2)

13 Date of last completed CPARs

14 Date past performance questionnaires were sent.

Points of Contact who can validate performance on the contract referenced in Cell C6 or specific delivery order or task order number referenced in Cell C8.

16 Gov't PCO or Commercial Purchasing Agent

Name:

Phone:

Email:

17 Gov't ACO

Name:

Phone:

Email:

18 Gov't PM or Commercial PM

Name:

Phone:

Email:

19 Other:

Name:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

2.3 Evaluation

The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance and systemic improvement information remains with the Offeror.

For each contract identified in a Table PP-1, the Offeror shall provide contract data regarding relevancy, past performance information, and demonstrated systemic improvement as described below, organized by contract.

Offerors shall submit a separate Table PP-1 for each individual present/past performance contract reference and label them appropriately (i.e. PP-1a_P1, PP-1a_P2, etc.). Individual DO/TOs are considered separate contract references, unless an Offeror is combining up to 5 orders from the same contract as a single reference as noted in 2.2 above. As this information is presented in the proposal, demonstrate the relevancy of the Prime’s and JV team members’ past performance with respect to the Lot I or Lot II DO/TO requirements. For any contracts referenced where the Prime and/or JV team members are aware of problems, the Offeror shall describe the issues in section

2.3.b (Past Performance Information). For each past performance problem identified, describe the status of the systemic improvement efforts in section 2.3.c (Demonstrated Systemic Improvement) and explain how the improvement effort reduces the risk of the problem reoccurring.

a. Relevancy: Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to Lot I or Lot II

DO/TO requirements. To demonstrate relevancy, Offerors should provide a comparative analysis to Lot I or

Lot II DO/TO requirements with regard to the criteria identified in their PP-1a or b submissions. In Annex A, Offerors should provide two electronic copies of the Statement of Work/Performance Work Statements

(SOW/PWS) from each of the referenced contracts identified in Table ES-2. Within the comparative analysis, Offerors should identify the applicable portions (sections, paragraphs and page numbers) of the referenced contract’s SOW/PWS to clearly identify how past tasks performed are similar to Lot I or Lot II DO/TO requirements and aligned with their PP-1. If an Offeror is combining up to 5 orders under a single reference, the individual SOWs for each order shall be provided. Do NOT provide self-assessed relevancy ratings. Only provide the comparative analysis as stated. Annex A should only be provided in electronic format and should not be provided in hard copy. In addition, the referenced sections only need to be referenced/identified, and do not need to be broken out separately from the complete SOW/PWS.

(1) The Offeror is advised that the Government will assess each present/past performance contract reference and assign a relevancy rating, where the Unrestricted Lot I pertains to the attributes listed in

PP-1a and the Restricted Lot II pertains to the attributes listed in PP-1b.

a) Very Relevant (VR) – A present/past performance contract reference involving essentially the same scope, magnitude of effort (annualized dollar value germane to the instant requirement), and complexity this solicitation requires. Specifically:

Lot I: In order for a submitted present/past performance contract reference to merit a relevancy rating of Very Relevant, the effort must demonstrate all of the following:

Essentially the same Scope from at least 4 of the following Scope areas:

1. Design and Development of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.3)

2. Manufacturing of aircraft components/ systems, modification kits or ground based aircraft mission systems for prototyping, validation, verification or production activities (SOW 4.1.4, 4.5)

3. Integration and Installation of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.5, 4.1.10, 4.5.3)

4. Conducting functional performance validation test activities of Prototype

Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.12, 4.4)

5. Prepare, update, amend required documentation for, and perform, Integrated

Logistics Support functions (SOW 4.1.7)

Essentially the same Complexity from at least 5 of the following Complexity areas:

1. Perform analysis and verification of designs for airworthiness including structural, frequency response, electrical loads and thermal (SOW 4.1.1)

2. Develop systems architectures and associated documentation for integrated systems; i.e., aircraft avionics and mission systems integration. (SOW 4.1.11)

3. Perform software development and integration of that software into OEM baselines (4.1.11)

4. Develop, produce and deliver a Technical Data Package in accordance with

MIL-STD-31000 up to Level III (4.1.3)

5. Fabricate electrical and mechanical components, assemblies and modification kits for prototyping, verification, validation and limited production activities

(4.1.4)

6. Integration efforts inclusive of systems of systems on a single aircraft type (i.e.

avionics systems and mission systems) (4.1.2, 4.1.13)

7. Perform ground and airborne testing activities for systems or modifications to also include associated development equipment and/or system integration

Magnitude dollar value: $15,000,000 or greater

Lot II: In order for a submitted present/past performance contract reference to merit a relevancy rating of Very Relevant, the effort must demonstrate all of the following:

Essentially the same Scope from at least 3 of the following Scope areas:

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.3)

2. Manufacturing of aircraft components/ systems, modification kits or ground based aircraft mission systems for prototyping, validation, verification or production activities (SOW 4.2.4, 4.5)

3. Integration and Installation of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.5, 4.5.3)

4. Support the Government in conducting functional performance validation test activities of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.2.1, 4.4)

5. Support the Government in preparing, updating, amending required documentation for, and performance of, Integrated Logistics Support functions

(SOW 4.2.7)

Essentially the same Complexity from at least 4 of the following Complexity areas:

structural, frequency response, electrical loads and thermal (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2)

2. Fabricate electrical and mechanical components, assemblies and modification kits for aircraft and ground based aircraft mission systems, support and test equipment and associated developmental equipment and system integration laboratories (4.2.4)

3. Develop, produce and deliver a Technical Data Package in accordance with

MIL-STD-31000 up to Level III (SOW 4.2.3)

4. System Integration efforts on a single aircraft type at Government Facilities

(SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.5)

5. Support Government acceptance testing for systems or modifications and associated developmental equipment (SOW 4.2.1, 4.2.2)

Magnitude dollar value: $500,000 or greater

b) Somewhat Relevant (SR) – A present/past performance contract reference involving some of the scope, magnitude of effort (annualized dollar value germane to the instant requirement), and complexity this solicitation requires. Specifically, if a present/past performance contract is not evaluated to merit a relevancy rating of VR as discussed above, then the Government evaluators may assign it a relevancy rating of Somewhat Relevant. Specifically:

Lot I: In order for a submitted present/past performance contract reference to merit a relevancy rating of Somewhat Relevant, the effort must demonstrate all of the following:

Similar Scope from at least 3 of the following Scope areas:

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.3)

2. Manufacturing of aircraft components/ systems, modification kits or ground based aircraft mission systems for prototyping, validation, verification or production activities (SOW 4.1.4, 4.5)

3. Integration and Installation of Prototype Aircraft systems, or Aircraft

Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.5, 4.1.10, 4.5.3)

4. Conducting functional performance validation test activities of Prototype

Aircraft systems, or Aircraft Modifications, or ground based aircraft mission systems (SOW 4.1.12, 4.4)

5. Prepare, update, amend required documentation for, and perform, Integrated

Logistics Support functions (SOW 4.1.7)

Similar Complexity from at least 4 of the following Complexity areas:

structural, frequency response, electrical loads and thermal (SOW 4.1.1)

2. Develop systems architectures and associated documentation for integrated systems; i.e., aircraft avionics and mission systems integration. (SOW 4.1.11)

3. Perform software development and integration of that software into…