Attachment_P4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
Atlantic Test Range (ATR) & Atlantic Targets and Marine Operations (ATMO) Range Engineering, Technical, Operations and Maintenance Services
Solicitation number
N00421-11-R-0066
Issued by

About this file

Attachment P4

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Final_Industry_Q_and_A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
List_of_Attendees_at_the_ATR-ATMO_Industry_Day.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATR-ATMO__Pre-Solicitation_Conf_Final_10May2013.pptx PPTX presentation
ATR-ATMO_One_on_One's_Rules_of_Engagement_FINAL.docx DOCX document
ATR-ATMO_Pre_Solicitation_Agenda_-_29APR2013.docx DOCX document
Attachment_P6_Summary_of_Corporate_Experience_Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLs_303132.pdf PDF
CDRLs_789.pdf PDF
ATMO_Organizational_Chart_Feb_13.pptx PPTX presentation
CDRLs_222324.pdf PDF
ATR-ATMO_PreSolicitation_Conference_Registration_Form_-_Final_11April_2013.docx DOCX document
ATR_Organizational_Chart_October2012-1.pdf PDF
TE4_Acronym_List.doc DOC document
Attachment_5_DD254.pdf PDF
TE5_Workload_History.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_-_Surveillance_Activity_Checklist.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_-_Labor_Categories_ _Hours_Worksheet_7_Feb_13.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_P1_Relevant_Contract_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P2_Workforce_Qualifications.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLs_131415.pdf PDF
CDRLs_333435.pdf PDF
CDRLs_192021.pdf PDF
TE3_ATR_Facilities _Systems _and_Equipment_TOC.docx DOCX document
CDRLs_252627.pdf PDF
CDRLs_3637.pdf PDF
Attachment_P3_Workforce_Hour_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLs_2829.pdf PDF
CDRLs_101112.pdf PDF
022213_Attachment_1_-_Statement_of_Work_(SOW)_13_Jan_13.docx DOCX document
TE1_ATMO_Facility_ _Equip_Descriptions_20110315.doc DOC document
CDRLs_123.pdf PDF
N00421-11-R-0066_11_Apr_13_Final.doc DOC document
TE2_ATMO_Equip_Distro_Matrix_20110512.xls XLS spreadsheet
TE7_Overtime_Templates.doc DOC document
CDRLs_161718.pdf PDF
Attachment_P5_Summary_of_Relevant_Past_Performance_Contract_Data.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_P7_CLIN_Breakout_spreadsheet_V6_____20_June_2011_without_CIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
CDRLs_456.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION J – ATTACHMENT P4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form to Ms. Peggy Coberly, at margaret.coberly@navy.mil or via fax #(301) 757-9046 thereby allowing the customer approximately 2 weeks to complete their response.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor: _______________________

b. Program Title: _____________________

c. Contract Number: __________________

d. Type of Contract: ____________Percent Complete: ____________
e. Award Fee (if applicable): _________Percent of Award Fee Received: _________

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name: ________________________________________________

b. Agency: _______________________________________________

c. Position: _______________________________________________

d. Relation to Program: _____________________________________

e. Phone/Fax Number/Email Address: _________________________

f. Date Questionnaire Completed: ____________________________

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program:

a. Test management of air vehicle flight testing events_________

b. Airspace management is support safety of flight test and training events___

c. Software development, testing, and integration ____

d. Range systems development and integration ______

e. Meteorology support of open air range operations ____

f. Operation and maintenance of aircraft signatures and avionics measurement systems ______

g. Deployment of personnel, systems, equipment and supplies in support of test and training events.____

h. Maintenance support development for unique range instrumentation systems___

i. Logistics support of test range operations, maintenance, and system development____

j. Training program in support of operator and maintainer certification and qualifications_____

k. Information and Personnel Security program development and implementation

l. Hazmat/Environmental Control and Management_____

m. Operation and maintenance of offshore support vessels_____

n. Operation and maintenance of land, aerial and sea targets_____

o. Design, fabrication and modification of threat representative land and sea targets_____

p. Unique design, fabrication, and integration work performed associated with range peculiar equipment and land and sea range technical services, including vessels_____

q. Execution of Weapons Effects Testing_____

r. Execution of shock trials and sink exercises_____

s. Diving and sea salvage operations_____

t. Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP). ___________

u. Management of Personnel performing range system operations and maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites. _____

v. Engineering Services ________

w. Flight/Industrial Safety/Quality Assurance Management and Oversight of Range Operation and Maintenance activities. ____________

x. Directed subcontracts. ___________

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.2: SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.

4.2.3. COST PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor? Were there any significant and/or unanticipated costs that were billed after close-out of the contract?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage. _________

c. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

d. If available, provide earned value cost performance measures including indices for cost efficiency (CPI) and schedule efficiency (SPI). Based on this information, please provide a narrative assessment of their performance.

e. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

f. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.4 MANAGEMENT

4.2.4.1 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENSS

What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

Did you experience any significant problems related to the life cycle management of air and sea systems?

Did you experience any strengths or weaknesses related to staffing and asset management during periods of increasing decreasing workload?

4.2.4.2 SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals?

4.2.4.3 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

4.2.4.4 Overall Management Assessment

Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated____________________.

4.2.5. OTHER. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

4.3 SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), 1) definitely would not, 2) probably would not, 3) might, 4) might not, 5) probably would, 6) definitely would award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .