Exhbt C - Past Performance Questionnaire Rev 1.docx

DOCX document 97 KB Posted

Attached to
Operation and Maintenance of Pearl Harbor Inactive Vessels
Solicitation number
N00024-21-R-4204
Issued by

About this file

This past performance questionnaire relates to solicitation number N00024-21-R-4204 from the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command for operation and maintenance of Pearl Harbor inactive vessels. The contractor is evaluated on its ability to complete all tasks on time according to customer requirements, standards, contractual terms and conditions, and responsiveness to changes. Ratings of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory may be given for overall contract outcome and whether future contracts would be awarded. Supporting rationale is required for any rating other than satisfactory.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment J-1 Pre-Proposal Information Form 4.21.22.pdf PDF
Attachment J-1 Rev 1 19Apr22.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J-4 - Tank Soundings Template.xls XLS spreadsheet
N00024-21-R-4204 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
N00024-21-R-4204 RFP Amendment 3.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J15 Arrival Inspection.docx DOCX document
Pearl_RFP_3.4.2022_Solicitation_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J14 Integrity Inspection (1).docx DOCX document
Pearl_RFP_3.7.2022_Solicitation_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Exhbt C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment J-1 Pre-Proposal Information Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT J20 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN.pdf PDF
Attachment J-2 Cost Element Summary Spreadsheets Pearl Harbor.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL53-54 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J21 DD254 (PEARL HARBOR).pdf PDF
CDRL05_08.pdf PDF
Pearl_Harbor_RFP_3.4.2022_Base_Solicitation.pdf PDF
CDRL37_40 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J17 Fire Extinguisher Log.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 12 Dehumidification.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT J9 VEHICLES.xls.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL13-16 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
CDRL25-28 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J16 Security Report.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT J4 SAFE STOWAGE CHECK OFF LISTS.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 10 Tools and Materials Pearl Harbor (1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT J8 GFE from Navy ERP.xls.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL09_12 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
CDRL41_44 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J6 History Folder Index (1).docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT J11 Cathodic Protection.docx DOCX document
CDRL45-48 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J7 Janitorial Task and Frequency Chart.xlsx.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT J22 INACTSHIPMAINTO Pearl Harbor Organizational Chart.docx DOCX document
CDRL33_36 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
CDRL01_04 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J5 RRWO.docx DOCX document
CDRL21-24 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
CDRL49-52 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J19 PCB Inventory.doc DOC document
Exhbt B - Past Performance Data.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT J3 VESSELS.xls.xls XLS spreadsheet
CDRL29-32 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J18 Mooring_Security.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL17-20 Pearl Harbor.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J13 FIRE FLOOD INS.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT J-23 List of Key Personnel.docx DOCX document
Show all 47

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

SOURCE SELECTION

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS TO EVALUATORS

The evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance is essential and integral to our source selection process. Accordingly, we respectfully request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials. Please do not provide completed questionnaires to the Offeror.

Please ensure that the completed questionnaire is provided to the following email addresses before the closing date of the solicitation:

E-mail: victoria.m.hill20.civ@us.navy.mil

E-mail: alex.j.sanders12.civ@us.navy.mil

Handwritten responses are acceptable. All responses must relate solely to the Contractor and the contract, task, or order identified. Please answer each question by checking the box located beside the appropriate rating. In addition, please provide supporting comments for each rating, including supporting comments to highlight the Contractor’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets, if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “Contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the above address. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Solicitation # N00024-21-R-4204

Exhibit C

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION ONCE COMPLETED

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR:

ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

TASK ORDER NUMBER (if applicable): CONTRACT TYPE:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT VALUE:

CURRENT CONTRACT VALUE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:

DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF EFFORT:

POC NAME: ADDRESS:

TELEPHONE NUMBER:

FASCIMILE NUMBER: METHOD SENT TO POC: DATE SENT TO POC:

(To be completed by Evaluator)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND CRITERIA

NOTE: Evaluation of the Contractor’s performance shall be based on “objective” data and MUST INCLUDE SUPPORTING RATIONALE when ANY of the following ratings are used. Relate significant events to sub-factors where possible. Rationale should identify “HOW” the contractor met the sub-factor criteria under evaluation.

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the factor or sub-factor being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the factor or sub-factor being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factor or sub-factor contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factor or sub-factor being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the factor or sub-factor contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Choose the letter that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance on the contract listed in the attached pages. Please note that “E” represents Exceptional, “V” means Very Good, “S” stands for Satisfactory, “M” means Marginal, and “U” indicates Unsatisfactory. Choose “N/A” if the question is not applicable.

1. Overall Contract Outcome: E V S M U N/A

Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to the customer requirements, standards of good workmanship, safe practices, compliance with contractual terms and conditions, responsiveness to procuring activity changes and ability to overcome program difficulties.

Comments:

2. Conclusion:

Would you award similar contracts to the Contractor in the future? YES NO Comments:

What role did you play? Length of time spent performing that role? (e.g. COR, Contract Specialist, ACO?)

NAME (Printed)/Phone SIGNATURE DATE

Please transmit in accordance with the instructions on the first page of this questionnaire.

Thank you for your participation!

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .