N00024-20-R-4417 RFP Amendment 0003.pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

N0002420FR62042

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of Amendment 0003 is to make the follow ing changes:

1) Provide answ ers to Bidder's Questions 40 - 114

2) Provide Section J, Attachment J-1 Errata 2

3) Update Section J, Attachment J-4 REV3

4) Update Section J, Attachment J-8 REV2

5) Update Section A and Section L to extend the proposal due date to 28 July 2020

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 15

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002420R4417

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-May-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Jul-2020

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002420R4417

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

The purpose of Amendment 0003 is to make the following changes:

1) Provide answers to Bidder's Questions 40 - 114

2) Provide Section J, Attachment J-1 Errata 2

3) Update Section J, Attachment J-4 REV3

4) Update Section J, Attachment J-8 REV2

5) Update Section A and Section L to extend the proposal due date from 21 July 2020 to 28 July 2020

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document

Attachment S-1 RESERVED

Attachment S-2 Past Performance CPARS References

Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form

Attachment S-4 Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet REV1

Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet

Attachment S-6 Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Reduction Tables

Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment

Attachment S-8 Pier and Dry-dock Graphical Representation Template

Attachment S-9 Past Performance Questionnaire

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

No. Document

Attachment J-1 Specification Package TPPC-LPD21-MARMCN20- Errata 2

Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings and Other References

Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates REV1

Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook REV3

Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award)

Attachment J-7 Schedule Model Review

Attachment J-8 Government Furnished Material (GFM) List REV2

Attachment J-9 Compartment Closeout List (NSI 009-81)

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012;

A014-A016

(Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013)

Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009

Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

I. INTRODUCTION

A. This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Firm-Fixed-Price contract to complete the USS NEW YORK (LPD 21) DOCKING SELECTED RESTRICTED

AVAILABILITY (DSRA).

B. The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the Offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government, after evaluation in accordance with Section M of this solicitation.

C. ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Dan Magrino, Contracting Officer, Jacqueline Black, Contract Specialist and Brian Romano, Contract Specialist, at daniel.magrino@navy.mil, jacqueline.black@navy.mil, and brian.romano2@navy.mil respectively.

To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to Offeror pre-proposal information

(PPI) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 22 June 2020 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Government reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, Offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. Solicitation questions should reference the solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal

Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.

D. Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making an award in November 2020.

E. Potential Prime Offeror’s Negative Response: The Government requests a negative response from any potential Prime Offeror who, after reviewing this solicitation, does not intend on submitting a proposal.

Negative responses are to be delivered to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist listed above NLT two (2) weeks prior to the proposal due date, (i.e. NLT 07 July 2020).

II. INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

A. Proposal Due Date:

1. All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 28 July 2020 at 10:00 am, local time, Washington DC. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, electronic submittal of proposals will be accepted as an alternate to mailing proposals.

Offerors shall notify the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist regarding whether proposals will be submitted electronically or mailed no later than three (3) business days prior to the proposal deadline. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

mailto:daniel.magrino@navy.mil mailto:jacqueline.black@navy.mil

a) Offerors must provide a proposal valid for at least 140 calendar days from the proposal due date.

(Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

B. Proposal Submission:

1. Proposals shall be sent to:

Naval Sea Systems Command HQ

Attn: Daniel Magrino

SEA 02441

1333 Isaac Hull Ave SE

Washington Navy Yard, DC 20736

2. Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD

UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO SEA0244”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the

Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

Volume Title

Number of Paper

Originals (See Note 1)

Number of

Paper Copies

Number of CDs (See

Notes 2 &3)

I Price Proposal 0 0 2

II Technical

Proposal

1* 0 4

a) Note 1:* Hard copy of technical proposal shall be submitted for Gantt Charts only. In the event the hard copy of the Gantt Chart conflicts with an offeror’s electronic technical proposal, the electronic version marked “ORIGINAL” shall take precedence. Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, one electronic copy shall be clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE

PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

b) Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses. The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

c) Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat, as applicable. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious.

No fields shall be password protected by offerors. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

3. Option for Electronic Submission of Proposals:

a) Due to ongoing restrictions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic, hand delivery of proposals is not possible at this time to the Washington Navy Yard. Offerors are instructed to submit their proposal electronically via the DoD SAFE application located at https://safe.apps.mil.

b) Offerors wishing to submit a proposal in response to this notification shall notify the

Contracting Officer and Contracts Specialist noted as points of contact on this solicitation no later than three business days prior to the proposal deadline of this solicitation and no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the proposal deadline. The Offeror shall provide their name and e-mail as contact information so the Government can generate a pick-up request from the DoD SAFE application to be sent to the Offeror, which is valid for 14 calendar days.

c) Offerors shall address their package with the RFP number and Offeror’s company name.

Offerors shall click the “Confirm Delivery” button within the DoD SAFE app in order to receive a confirmation of pick up by the Government. The DoD SAFE system records the time that files are submitted for transmission. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that they drop-off their proposal and generate a drop-off time prior to the proposal submission date and time. In the event of a dispute of proposal time submission, the pick-up e-mail with the system generated drop off time within the body of the e-mail shall serve as the official time that the proposal was submitted to the

Government. Late proposal submissions will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

d) Proposals must be submitted as one .zip file, formatted so that the Volume I Price Proposal and

Volume II Technical Proposal are submitted in separate file folders clearly marked. Each Volume shall be formatted with separate files submitted for each Factor and Emphasis Area.

e) All files uploaded must be scanned to ensure that there are no computer viruses within the file.

The files shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal, if submitted. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the electronic copy shall take precedence. The proposal shall have separate files. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious and traceable. No fields or documents shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

III. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Ship Checks:

1. The USS NEW YORK (LPD 21) will not be available for ship check prior to the proposal submission due date. Potential Offerors may inspect sister ship, the USS MESA VERDE (LPD 19) in Norfolk, VA, from 21 May 2020 to 8 June 2020.

2. To schedule a ship check, Offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Daniel Magrino, Jacqueline Black, and Brian Romano at daniel.magrino@navy.mil, jacqueline.black@navy.mil, and brian.romano2@navy.mil, respectively. Due to the ship location, additional information will be provided upon request.

3. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Mid-

Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center (MARMC) and ship’s Commanding Officers. Contractors conducting MARMC related work efforts must visit MARMC security website for latest forms and instructions at:

a) http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/MARMC/Visitor-Information/

b) https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrma/installations/ns_norfolk/om/pass_and_id.html

B. Specifications and associated reference documentation:

1. Upon request, the Government will provide the Specification Package Work Items and Work Item

References.

2. Offerors may request solicitation attachments by submitting a request to:

a) Daniel Magrino at daniel.magrino@navy.mil,

b) Jacqueline Black at jacqueline.black@navy.mil, and

c) Brian Romano at brian.romano2@navy.mil

3. Additional work item references not already in the possession of the Offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, are available through the following websites:

a) https://jedmics.net/

b) https://mfom.sscno.nmci.navy.mil/MFOM/DoDStatement.aspx

c) https://nsedr.nnsy.navy.mil//

C. Alteration of Solicitation mailto:jacqueline.black@navy.mil http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/MARMC/Visitor-Information/ https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrma/installations/ns_norfolk/om/pass_and_id.html mailto:daniel.magrino@navy.mil mailto:jacqueline.black@navy.mil mailto:brian.romano2@navy.mil https://jedmics.net/ https://mfom.sscno.nmci.navy.mil/MFOM/DoDStatement.aspx https://nsedr.nnsy.navy.mil/

1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

D. Proposal Information

1. Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, Offerors are advised conclusory statements regarding an offeror’s experience such as: “the Offeror understands”, “the Offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors shall provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

E. Amendments

1. The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an Offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the beta.SAM.gov website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

F. Teaming Arrangements

1. Proposals must be submitted by one (1) Prime Contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a Prime Contractor with a unique

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), Offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

G. One-bid Situation

1. If the Government receives only one bid for solicitation N00024-20-R-4417, the Government reserves the right to require Certified Cost and Pricing Data in accordance with DFARS 252.215-7008.

IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT

A. To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. PROPOSALS

WHICH DO NOT FOLLOW THIS DIRECTION MAY BE REJECTED AS NON-RESPONSIVE

AND THUS INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD. NON-RESPONSIVE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

EVALAUTED.

B. Electronic Proposals

1. All proposals shall be submitted via CD as outlined above. In addition, the Government requires offerors submit hard copies of Gantt charts generated in response to Non-Price Factor 2 (Schedule &

Resource Capacity). Pages, except the Integrated Master Schedule and Gantt charts, shall be formatted to 8.5 x 11 inch paper with one point margins. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum of 12 point font. Any type contained on the Gantt charts and/or graphics shall not be smaller than 10-point font and shall be legible and readable. Any revisions to offerors’ proposals (if required) shall be submitted in two (2) forms: (1) a final clean revised document; and (2) a redlined document outlining the offeror’s changes.The Contracting Officer reserves the right to provide any additional instructions regarding revisions to offerors’ proposals via letter. Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section V where required.

C. Page Limits:

1. Volume I has no page limit with the exception of the cover letter which shall not exceed three (3) pages.

2. Volume II

a) Factor 1 Eligibility Factor: No page limitation

b) Factor 2 Schedule and Resource Capacity:

(1) Emphasis Area A (1): No page limitation

(2) Emphasis Area A (2): No page limitation

(3) Emphasis Area A (3): No page limitation

(4) Emphasis Area A (4): Shall not exceed 25 pages

(5) Emphasis Area B (1): Shall not exceed 10 pages

(6) Emphasis Area C (1): No page limitation

(7) Emphasis Area C (2): No page limitation

V. PROPOSAL CONTENT

A. VOLUME I

1. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a) Cover Letter,

b) Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

c) Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

d) Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

e) NSI 009-72 narrative and supporting documentation,

f) Completed Attachment J-4 and Solicitation Section B carrying forward information from the Pricing

Workbook Spreadsheet, Attachment J-4, as applicable, containing:

(1) Work Item Pricing,

(2) Daily Extension Rates,

(3) Inter-port Differential (IPD),

(4) IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early,

(5) Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Reduction (if applicable),

(6) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor & Material Burden Rate, New Work & Growth Reservation,

(7) Pricing for all Option items, and

(8) NSI 009-72 Deduction (if applicable).

g) Completed Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Attachment J-3).

h) Completed Proposal Assessment (Attachment S-7).

2. Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the

Offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

a) Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,

b) CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime Contractor,

c) Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

d) Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

e) For any work item (WI) with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in the Pricing Workbook

(Attachment J-4) provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

(1) For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

(2) For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

3. Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the Offeror shall submit the completed

SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for

ALL APPLICABLE CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the

Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

4. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP):

a) An offeror shall submit a SBSP outlining its strategy for maintaining compliance with FAR 52.219-9 for the duration of the availability. The SBSP shall include a subcontracting goal of 23 percent of an offeror’s total contract dollars utilizing small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, and

HUB-Zone small businesses. Note, the 23 percent goal is inclusive of the congressionally mandated five percent (5%) goal for small disadvantaged business concerns.

b) Offerors must provide rationale for any proposed plan which does not meet the following percentage thresholds as applied to total contract dollars:

(1) 23 percent for small businesses, including:

(2) Five percent (5%) women-owned small businesses

(3) Five percent (5%) small disadvantaged businesses

(4) Three percent (3%) HUBZone small businesses

(5) Three percent (3%) service disabled veteran owned small businesses

c) In addition, offerors must provide explanation for any SBSP, which fails address all requirements outlined in FAR 52.219-9.

d) Note, a SBSP is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

5. Completed Solicitation Section B and Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4):

a) Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs) including all base and option CLINs, complete Section B “NOTE B: SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR

RATE (FULLY BURDENED),” complete Section B “NOTE D: SCHEDULE OF DAILY RATES

FOR PIERSIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED) FOR PURPOSES OF A

COMPENSABLE EXTENSION TO THE DRY-DOCKING OR DELIVERY DATE,” and complete all tabs of Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.

b) The Contractor must submit prices using the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) containing Work

Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD, IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early, VATEP, and

Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between Section B and the J-4, the

Section B CLIN price shall govern. The Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) Fully Burdened Ship

Repair Labor Rate and Material Burden Rate must match the rates provided in the Section B “NOTE

B: SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED).”

If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate and Material Burden Rate shall govern.

c) Offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields in the pricing workbook (Attachment J-4).

6. VATEP Schedule Acceleration (USS NEW YORK (LPD 21) FY21 DSRA) (Attachment S-6):

a) The Government would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should the contract complete before its no-later-than Contract Complete date. If an Offeror chooses to apply a

VATEP schedule acceleration, it will be evaluated in the Volume I price evaluation and be incorporated in the resultant contract via Section F delivery dates and Attachment J-3. Offerors are to propose any VATEP schedule acceleration in attachment J-3. The Government will apply a Total

Evaluated Price reduction based on the values shown in Attachment S-6 using the proposed number of

“Days Completed Early” in Attachment J-3. Any proposed VATEP acceleration shall be inclusive of growth work and documented as such within Attachment J-3.

7. Inter-port Differential (IPD)

a) The IPD applicable to the USS NEW YORK (LPD 21) FY21 DSRA must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the Contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all Offerors’ price proposals to determine the Offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, an Inter-port Differential Reduction is available for any VATEP “Days Completed Early” proposed in the

Execution Milestones and Key Events (Attachment J-3). This reduction value is to be applied per day for any VATEP schedule acceleration proposed.

Location* Differential

Inter-port Differential Reduction for

“Days Completed Early” stated in

Attachment J-3

Norfolk, VA $57,682 -$0

Philadelphia, PA $4,305,590 -$5,494

Pascagoula, MS $2,779,258 -$5,883

b) Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above Government provided port differential tables shall submit a bidder’s question requesting a Government provided port differential be calculated for the

Offeror’s proposed location for the USS NEW YORK (LPD 21) FY21 DSRA.

8. 009-72 Reduction

a) Offeror must provide a narrative as well as other than certified cost and pricing data in accordance with

FAR 15.403-3, supporting the impact of SI 009-72 Security Measures for Surface Combatants and

Amphibious ships use of a water barrier, numbered Fleet Commander-approved barge or other physical barrier approved by the numbered Fleet Commander.

B. VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of three factors, as follows:

1. Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility for Award (There is no page limit associated with this Factor):

a) Provide a completed Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) that identifies the specific pier and dock intended to be used for the proposed availability and indicates that the pier and dock meet the minimum characteristics identified in Attachment S-5.

b) Provide a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier capable of berthing and a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel during the applicable period in accordance with the Execution

Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the Offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources

(pier or dry-dock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to the proposed pier & dry-docks is required. The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. The proposed pier and dry-dock facilities, whether owned by the Offeror or subcontractor, must be accessible by the USS NEW YORK without any modification to the vessel.

c) Provide a copy of the Offeror's current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), MSRA number, or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirement of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. To be eligible for award, a prospective Contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71

Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection.

All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1:00 pm, local time, Washington DC on 8 June 2020. Requests shall be sent to Daniel Magrino, Jacqueline Black, and

Brian Romano at daniel.magrino@navy.mil, jacqueline.black@navy.mil, and brian.romano2@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of Offeror eligibility.

d) In accordance with the most current version of MIL-STD-1625D, provide a current dry-dock certification applicable to the dry-dock proposed for the Availability. Certifications shall demonstrate the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock. If the proposed dry-dock is currently uncertified, or if the certification will expire prior to the end of the Offeror's proposed docking period, the Offeror shall provide a detailed plan and schedule to certify or re-certify the dry-dock in order to remain certified throughout the proposed docking period in the Execution

Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). Recertification plan shall include:

a. Timeline to complete the requirements of MIL-STD-1625D prior to certification expiration, including:

i. Contractor Navy Audit request,

ii. Contractor preparation of facility spaces to be inspected. Contractor shall describe when they expect these facilities to be available to complete necessary inspections and any risks to their availability.

iii. Navy examination of the facility, facility certification report, maintenance program documentation, and operational records

iv. Navy observation of a docking or undocking operation, whenever possible. In the case of a floating dry dock, this operation shall include a submergence test to the maximum dock draft.

v. Navy evaluation of the control inspection, operating, and maintenance procedures.

vi. Navy preparation of exit brief and formalized in a written report

vii. Contractor actions to resolve any identified deficiencies. Contractor shall explain the time allotted to deficiency resolution and any associated risks,

viii. Navy examination of actions to resolve deficiencies.

2. Factor 2 –Resource Capacity & Schedule:

Offerors shall demonstrate their ability to provide the manpower resources, the physical resource capacity, and executable integrated schedule to complete the USS NEW YORK (LPD 21) FY21 DSRA requirements as proposed, by addressing the following three (3) Emphasis Areas:

a) Emphasis Area A - Manpower

(1) Manpower Performance Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4)

(a) Provide a completed Manpower Performance Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4) in Microsoft

Excel in the format provided in this solicitation for all projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, that are completed, on-going or proposed (including the proposal for the USS NEW YORK) between the first week identified in Attachment S-4 and the Contract Complete Date of this solicitation. This shall capture all work within the shipyard and the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport fleet concentration area.

i. For each project, provide the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) information requested on a week-by-week basis (week-ending) over each project’s duration, from the Avail Start and Actual / Forecast Start Dates to the Contract

Completion and Actual / Forecast Completion Dates.

Data shall be current as of the last date identified in Attachment S-4. Remaining growth work options must also be represented (by project) and clearly distinguished from currently authorized work. The S-4 project data for this solicitation shall align to CDRL A012 submission. The Offeror shall provide the calculations and data necessary to convert the FTE information included in the curves into man-hours. The Offeror shall also provide calculation and data necessary to convert FTE into Actual Employees (assumed absentee rates, overtime, etc.), if applicable. Performance information for subcontractors can be estimated based on mailto:daniel.magrino@navy.mil mailto:jacqueline.black@navy.mil mailto:brian.romano2@navy.mil

Prime Contractor budgets and the Prime’s actual outlays to subcontractors. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft Excel. Data shall be provided in accordance with the following definitions:

i. Contract Start Date – The contractually agreed start of Contractor project execution.

ii. Contract Completion Date - The contractually agreed Contractor completion dateActual / Forecast Start Date – The date the project started (if the project started prior to the last date identified in Attachment S-4) or the Contractor’s estimated start date (if expected to occur after the last date identified in Attachment S-4)

iii. Actual / Forecast Start Date – The date the project started (if the project started prior to the last date identified in Attachment S-4) or the Contractor’s estimated start date (if expected to occur after the last date identified in Attachment S-4)

iv. Actual / Forecast Completion Date - The date the project completed (if project completed prior to last date identified in Attachment S-4) or the Contractor’s currently estimated completion date.

v. Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS) - The sum of the FTE budgets for all work

(prime and subcontractor), scheduled to be accomplished within each weekly given time period.

vi. Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) - A measurement of the work completed, BCWP is the value of work performed, or “earned,” by both prime and subcontractor within a given time period.

vii. Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) - The FTE actually incurred and recorded, prime and subcontractor, for work completed within a given time period. Actual subcontracting FTE may be estimated based on prime contractor outlays.

viii. Estimate to Complete (ETC) – The estimate of time-phased resources required to complete the remaining authorized work.

ix. Estimate at Complete (EAC) – The sum of the contract’s cumulative to-date ACWP plus the estimate of time-phased resources required to complete the remaining authorized work.

x. Full Time Equivalents (FTE) – The number of hours within a given period divided by the sum of the number of working days within the period, multiplied by 8 (to represent the standard work day).

xi. Remaining Growth Options – The number of unused and unexercised growth hours, time phased over usage rates prescribed in Section B Note F, paragraph 3.

(2) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (Project in FTE) representing the EAC and

Actual / Forecasted Start & Completion Dates of each project represented in Attachment S-4, as described herein. Offerors shall clearly delineate prime and subcontractor FTE, even though this is not a requirement of Attachment S-4. Remaining options must also be represented and clearly distinguished from currently authorized work. Growth options shall be totaled for each set of project curves required and displayed as a single curve within each chart. The offeror shall provide horizontal lines across each curve to identify the FTE employed by the offeror, the FTE provided through subcontractors and the FTE provided through temporary labor. The three (3) Manpower

Curves (Project) are as follows:

i. The total FTE resources required to complete the proposed availability.

ii. The total FTE resources required to complete 1) this proposed Availability plus 2) work the Offeror currently has under contract. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number.

iii. The total FTE resources required for all projects completed, awarded, on-going, or proposed, as provided in Attachment S-4. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual availability. Each ship’s availability shall be labeled by hull number.

(3) Offerors shall provide a narrative, not to exceed 25 pages:

(a) That supports the extent to which the Offeror has provided the planned FTE, both prime and subcontractor, necessary to complete all their current projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, completed within their proposed shipyard and within the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport area of fleet concentration area. As part of their narrative, Offerors shall provide:

(i) A root cause analysis of any shortfalls in the completion of production FTE to schedule and inefficiencies in the amount of FTE actually required to complete the FTE budgeted for that work, as identified in the data submitted in Attachment S-4. “Shortfalls” are defined as cumulative actual FTE completed (ACWP) less than the cumulative baseline

FTE planned (BCWS). “Inefficiencies” are defined as cumulative actual FTE completed

(ACWP) greater than the cumulative baseline FTE budget for that work completed

(BCWP).

(ii) An explanation of the mitigations implemented and planned to resolve those shortfalls and inefficiencies on the solicited availability, a timeline of their implementation, and a quantified explanation of their observed or expected effectiveness.

(iii) An explanation of how the Offeror will provide the proposed manpower resources to complete the solicited availability, accounting for:

a. the Offeror’s current and projected manpower resourcing performance as shown in the Offeror’s current Attachment S-4 Manpower Performance Data Sheet.

(b) Corresponding to the curves (total), provided in response to Factor 2, Emphasis Area A, Manpower, paragraph (2), outline how the Offeror will achieve proposed FTE levels via overtime, additional hiring actions, utilization of subcontractors, or the utilization of temporary labor (if applicable). Outline the state of the Offeror’s current workforce (Factor 2, Emphasis Area A, paragraph (4)) in relationship to the proposed Availability, and ensure the following areas are addressed:

(i) Should the Offeror propose to utilize overtime for the proposed availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the overtime from “Avail Start” through

“Contract Complete” dates, as outlined in Attachment J-3, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.” Offerors shall include in their narrative an explanation of how they will manage and mitigate the following potential risks:

a. Degraded Safety

b. Decreased Productivity

c. Increased workforce absenteeism and turnover

(ii) Should the Offeror propose to hire additional personnel for the proposed Availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the additional personnel from “Avail

Start” through “Contract Complete,” plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

(iii) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources for the proposed

Availability, the Offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and duration of each subcontract requirement. The

Government considers the use of subcontractors in excess of 45% of production labor to increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. The Offeror shall include in its narrative a plan to manage the subcontractor manning levels included from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete,” plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

(iv) Should the Offeror propose to utilize temporary labor for the proposed availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the temporary labor from “Avail

Start” through “Contract Complete” dates, as outlined in Attachment J-3, plus work the

Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail

Start” through “Contract Complete.” Offerors shall include in their narrative an explanation of how they will manage and mitigate the following potential risks:

a. Degraded Safety

b. Decreased Productivity

b) Emphasis Area B – Physical Resource Capacity

(1) The Offeror shall provide a narrative and a graphical representation (in the format of the Pier and Dry-dock Graphical Representation Template (Attachment S-8)) that demonstrates that the

Offeror has the pier and dry-dock available to complete the requirements of the proposed

Availability. The graphical representation shall show the pier and dry-dock expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” date in

Attachment J-3, and the awarded and outstanding work utilizing those resources by month. The narrative shall not exceed 10 pages, and the narrative and graphical representation shall address the following:

(a) The pier and dry-dock required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedule. Additionally, identify the total pier and dry-dock currently in working capacity, and expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” datein Attachment J-3.

(b) The pier and dry-dock required to complete all outstanding proposals, per proposed schedules. Identify the pier and dry-dock committed to previously awarded requirements, as well as the proposed use of resources to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals (including this proposal).

(c) The pier and dry-dock required to complete any other anticipated requirements (including but not limited to non-navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades, maintenance or dredging).

(d) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted pier or dry-dock, the Offeror shall include an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime's facility and the pier and dry-dock that will be provided by the subcontractor.

(e) The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry-dock resource conflicts as a result of the award of other outstanding proposals, pier and dry-dock shall not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without reasonable explanation.

(f) In the event the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven (7) days between the undocking date of other requirements and the proposed docking date of this Availability, and/or a proposed docking date within the first seven (7) days of the Availability, then the narrative shall detail the necessary steps to accomplish.

c) Emphasis Area C - Integrated Production Schedule (IPS)

(1) The Offeror shall provide documentation for the proposed Availability inclusive of the resource loaded Initial Integrated Production Schedule elements (inclusive of the modifications and clarifications contained in CDRL A012.) A Resource Loaded Schedule is a project-related schedule that consists of a timeline with details on allocated resources, planned activities and preset milestones. It is a time management document that explains how project manpower resources are to be consumed throughout scheduled project time. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the

Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the work package, including all base and option items. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Government Intermediate-Level schedules. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

(2) The Offeror shall provide a narrative to explain their Integrated Production Schedule. The narrative shall address the following:

(a) Demonstrate how the Offeror has scheduled the performance of all work items included in the

Availability work package (including both Base and Option items) so as to permit the contract scope increases described in Section B, Note F (all growth work identified in this solicitation) without causing delay or disruption to the work required by the aforementioned work items, to any other Government contract, or to any other work in progress for the Government.

(b) Review their schedule in accordance with the Schedule Metrics provided in Defense Contract

Management Agency (DCMA) Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Program

Analysis Pamphlet (PAP) DCMA-EA PAM 200.1, October 2012, Section 4.0. In accordance with the DCMA instruction, the Contractor shall calculate the 14 required metrics and explain any flags or areas of concern.

3. Factor 3 –Past Performance:

Offerors may provide past performance information for up to five (5) previous contracts. If the offeror has not completed any contracts as a prime Contractor, within three (3) years of the date of the initial solicitation’s posting to beta.SAM.gov, information regarding the offeror’s performance with regard to subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted. Offerors shall complete Attachment S-2 Past Performance

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) References for each of the contracts provided where CPARS contract data is available. If CPARS data is not available for a contract, Offerors shall provide Attachment S-9 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

Offerors shall demonstrate within either Attachment S-2 or Attachment S-9 that the referenced contracts are recent and relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Offerors shall also address unfavorable reports of past performance and their response, or lack thereof, will be taken into consideration.

“Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation.

“Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements set forth in this solicitation.

o Scope: The measure of the similarity in work item requirements as set forth in

Attachment J-1 Work Specification Package, and J-2 Plans, Drawings and Supporting

References, and other requirements of this solicitation.

o Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

o Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

An offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the Government to consider.

If the Offeror does not have CPARS and is required to submit Attachment S-9, the Offeror shall instruct their customers to complete the Past Performance Questionnaires and return them before the closing date of this solicitation.

E-mail to:

Daniel Magrino, Contracting Officer, daniel.magrino@navy.mil

Jacqueline Black, Contract Specialist, jacqueline.black@navy.mil and

Brian Romano, Contract Specialist, brian.romano2@navy.mil

Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date/time may be considered as late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered.

All Offerors that are large businesses shall also address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR

Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business

Subcontracting Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. eSRS information attached to the narrative is not included in the page limits.

(End of Summary of Changes) file:///C:/Users/jordan.nannah/Desktop/Shared%20Drive%20Docs/USS%20Wasp%20FY%2021%20DSRA/SSP/jacqueline.black@navy.mil