N00024-18-R-4407-0007.pdf

N0002418FR93065

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 15

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002418R4407

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Aug-2018

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002418R4407

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

Amendment Description:

Removed CLINs 0011 and 0037 since WI 992-11-015 was removed in Errata 1.

Added CLIN 0011 Work Item 643-11-001 Berthing Habitability Project (BENL-S6307 and HENL-S6308) HQ C-2-0020 Dock Trials and Fast Cruise revised to reference Attachment J-3 vice Work Item 982-31-001 Updated Note B, Item 7 total of hours to 263,129 to reflect removal of CLIN 0037 Updated Note F, to include the accurate small dollar value change quantity that is in J-4 and change the small dollar value change amount Section J:

Attachment J-1: Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG86-NWRMC19-CN01 (Errata 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and Addendum 1) is updated to Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG86-NWRMC19-CN01 (Errata 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Addendum 1)

Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook:

o Removed CLIN 0037 o Removed Work Item 643-11-001 from CLIN 0001 and created a new CLIN 0011 for Work Item

643-11-001 o Revised the Small Dollar Value Change amount under Tab “Labor&Mat & Growth Res”

Section L Revised Factor 3, Pier/ Dock Physical Resource capacity

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0011

The CLIN description has changed from Waterborne Security Barge; provide to Work Item 643-11-001 Berthing Habitabili.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall prepare for and accomplish repair and modernization during the DEPOT MODERNIZATION PERIOD (DMP) onboard USS SHOUP (DDG 86) as specified in the statement of work provided herein and in accordance with standard items, work item specification package drawings, test procedures, and other detailed data as included in Attachments J-1 and J-2.See Note B.

To:

Work Item 643-11-001 Berthing Habitability Project (BENL-S6307 and HENL-S6308)

CLIN 0037

The CLIN description has changed from Growth associated with CLIN 0011 to Reserved.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Growth associated with CLIN 0011. See Attachment J-4. See Notes A, B and D.

Reserved The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 1.00 from 1.00 to 0.00.

The following have been modified:

NOTE B: FIXED SHIP REPAIR LABOR AND MATERIAL BURDEN RATES FOR GROWTH AND NEW

WORK

SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)

1. The Contractor’s fully loaded ship repair labor rate will be used for negotiating growth and new work to be performed under this contract. The contractor agrees that the number of man hours included in its price proposal for contract modifications shall include only direct production man hours. For these purposes, direct production man-hours are for skilled labor at the journeyman level expended in direct production including but not limited to the following functions:

Abrasive cleaning/blasting Fire Watch Welding Burning Brazing Carpentry Machinists (inside and outside) Electrical Work Electronic Work Engineering Design Support Lagging Ship-fitting Boiler-making Painting Sheet-metal Work Pipefitting Rigging General Labor Staging/Scaffolding Diesel Mechanics

2. The fully burdened ship repair labor rate proposed by the contractor listed in paragraph 7 below shall include all costs associated with support functions (whether charged directly or indirectly by the offeror’s accounting systems) provided in support of the direct production man hour functions listed in paragraph 1 above. Support functions shall be considered to be included in the offeror’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate for direct production man hours. Labor hours for the below support functions shall not be separately proposed in any circumstance, including in support of subcontractors. Support functions include, and are not limited to, those types listed below:

Testing Quality Assurance Execution Planning Cleaning (except tank cleaning) Supervision Security Surveying Administration Transportation Purchasing Staff Lofting Other indirect support handling & Warehousing Safety/Environmental

3. The fully burdened ship repair labor rate is a fixed hourly rate that includes all wages, overhead, all other indirect costs, general and administrative expenses, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) and profit.

The fully burdened ship repair labor rate represents a blended rate including labor transferred between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the contractor under a common control.

4. Consumable materials are goods used in the ordinary course of work performance such as office supplies, paper, rags, vehicle or equipment fuel costs, cleaning chemicals, disposable tools, welding rods, paint buckets, paint brushes, protective clothing, etc. that are consumed/used in the process of repair and do not become an integral part of the repaired vessel. Consumable material shall be included in the contractor’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate and not separately priced.

5. Physical materials are goods that become an integral part of the repaired vessel in the course of the repair, such as equipment, replacement steel, pipes, paint, and fasteners. The material burden rates apply to physical materials but not to consumable materials. The material burden rate will be applied to the actual cost of the physical material. Actual cost does not include handling charges, general and administrative cost, overhead, profit, or any other indirect cost.

6. For contract changes involving subcontractors, subcontractor quotes will be treated as Other Direct Costs

(ODCs) and will be subject to the contract material burden rate shown in paragraph (7) below. Subcontractor quotes must be competitively acquired and submitted with the contractor’s Change Order Price Analysis (COPA) in response to Request for Contract Changes (RCCs) and Reservation Task Requests (RTRs) issued by the Contracting Officer. At no time will the proposed total to be performed by the prime contractor combined with subcontractor quote, material quote, and applicable burdens be allowed to cost more than it would have, had the prime contractor directly provided all material and labor. The proposed total pricing restriction addressed in the preceding sentence does not apply in any case where the work is required to be performed by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Government directed subcontractors, Government authorized vendors, or any other work at the sole discretion of the Administrative Contracting Officer. RCCs and RTRs that are subcontracted for material only (no associated labor required within the RCC) shall not be subject to the Material Burden Rate.

7. The contract fixed fully burdened ship repair labor rate and material burden rate are shown below. These fixed rates shall be used for negotiating growth and new work during the entire availability up to a total of

263,129 man hours and $7,049,114 of materials of growth and new work under this contract. This number is comprised of the growth reservation for labor hours and material dollars to complete growth work provided in Note A, paragraph (1) in addition to 78,151 man hours and $2,196,085 of materials to complete historically based new work.

Fully burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate TBD Material Burden Rate TBD

SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR CHANGES

NOTE F: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR CHANGES WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS

1. To make administration of small dollar value changes more efficient, both parties agree to pre-price contract scope changes with an estimated price of $25,000 or less.

2. The amount included in this Contract for the Changes described above shall be equal to a quantity of 91 Changes for growth computed at a firm fixed price of $8,699 per Change, as associated with the following CLINs: 0002, 0004, 0006, and 0034-0059.

3. A Waterfront Circuit Team comprised of a small group of Contractor and Government representatives will administer the Special Agreement for Changes with a Price of $25,000 or Less (“the Program”). The Contractor and the Navy shall establish a group of empowered representatives to be located in close proximity to the ship during the availability period. These individuals will interact and administer the Program. Specific arrangements for the Waterfront Circuit Team shall be mutually agreed between the Contractor and the RMC.

It is expected that changes under this term will not have schedule impacts. For any changes that the Government or the Contractor determine affect the critical path, internal milestones, or require lead times (i.e., material) may require adjudication under the other change terms and conditions of the contract.

4. The Contractor shall continue to report proposed Changes through the normal CFR process in accordance with Contract terms. The Contractor shall use the description block of the CFR to describe the problem and cite the corrective action required.

5. For those Changes that the Waterfront Circuit Team identifies a price of $25,000 or less, within 24 hours of the final approved change, the Waterfront Circuit Team shall use commercially reasonable efforts to confirm the Contractor's estimated price and document the agreed-to scope of work.

6. Once the Waterfront Circuit Team reaches agreement that the price of the Change is $25,000 or less and on the scope of the Change, the Contracting Officer shall authorize the Change. Authorized Changes will be followed by documentation to appropriately reflect specification revisions. No work on the Change shall commence until authorized by the Contracting Officer.

7. Multiple work items shall not be addressed under a single RCC. For the purposes of this Small Value Change clause, the value of each RCC shall be based on an individual Condition Found Report. Conversely, Condition Found Reports shall not be broken into smaller parts for the purposes of breaking up the requirement.

8. The 4-E specification change document will be provided, as necessary, prior to the approval of the change.

9. If the Waterfront Circuit Team is not able to reach agreement that the price of the Change is $25,000 or less and/or with regard to the scope of the Change, then it will be administered and adjudicated through the normal Contract change process as if the price of the Change was more than $25,000.

10. The Contractor and the Contracting Officer will maintain a work authorization tracker to identify and record the number of Changes authorized under this clause.

11. If the total number of Changes specified in paragraph B is depleted, the Contractor and the Contracting Officer may mutually agree to increase the quantity and contract price by applying the firm fixed price per Change in paragraph B to the number of additional Changes mutually agreed upon.

12. Within thirty (30) days after the end of the availability period of performance, the Contractor and Contracting Officer, utilizing the work authorization tracker, will determine the number of pre-priced changes not authorized under this Contract. This number shall be determined by subtracting from the number of changes identified in paragraph B, as amended, the number of pre-priced changes approved. Thereafter, the Contracting Officer will decrease the contract price by an amount calculated by multiplying the remaining number of changes by the pre-established firm fixed price per change.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

HQ C-2-0020 DOCK TRIALS AND FAST CRUISE (NAVSEA) (MAY 1993)

(a) Dock Trials. The purpose of this trial is to conduct preliminary tests necessary to ensure that the ship is ready for operating at sea. Ship's personnel will conduct all tests and perform all operational functions; however, Contractor personnel will observe tests, record data, and make minor repairs and adjustments as necessary. The dock trial shall be scheduled in accordance with Work Item Attachment J-3. Contractor personnel are not to interfere with functions of ship's personnel.

(b) Fast Cruise. The "fast cruise" is a simulated underway period. The purpose of fast cruise is to test to the maximum extent possible, the ship's material and operational readiness condition. This includes normal watch stations and engineering casualty control procedures. Contractor personnel will not be allowed onboard during this period unless specifically requested by the Supervisor. Fast cruise shall be scheduled after dock trials and prior to sea trials as cited in Specification Item Attachment J-3.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0037 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

02-MAR-2020 1 N/A

FOB: Destination

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

02-MAR-2020 0 N/A

FOB: Destination

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document Attachment S-1 Reserved Attachment S-2 Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form Attachment S-4 Past Performance References Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

No. Document Attachment J-1 Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG86-NWRMC19-CN01(Errata 1, 2 3, 4, 5, 6, and

Addendum 1) Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook (Revised) Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-7 Schedule Model Review

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012; A014 (Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract for the FY19 Depot Modernization Period (DMP) for USS SHOUP (DDG 86). The Government anticipates awarding a single contract through a best value source selection process. The Government expects the best value to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price and will use the Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2.

ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Martha Bello Contracting Officer and Kurt Boyles Contract Specialist at martha.bello@navy.mil and kurt.boyles@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror requests for information (RFIs) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 23 July 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.

Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making a single award on or around 5 November 2018.

Offerors must provide a period of 120 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 4 September 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

Proposal Submission:

Proposals shall be sent to:

Eric Niemann (C400 RMC) Northwest Regional Maintenance Center (NWRMC) BLDG 2200, Code 400

NAVAL STATION EVERETT

2000 W Marine View Dr Everett, WA 98207 In care of Martha Bello, Naval Sea Systems Command

Proposals Hand Carried: All hand carried proposals must be delivered by the Contractor’s representative to Eric Niemann, Northwest Regional Maintenance of NWRMC, 2000 West Marine View Dr. Bldg. 2200, Everett, WA 98207 at Naval Station Everett. Please call Eric Niemann at 425-304-5522 (desk), 360-340-6632 (mobile) to coordinate delivery.

Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO Code 400”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

Offerors shall submit:

Volume Title Number of Paper Originals (See Note 1)

Number of Paper Copies

Number of CDs (See Notes 2 &3)

I Price Proposal 1 1 2 II Technical Proposal 1 4 4

Note 1: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses.

The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in Microsoft Office Suite 2007 or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Ship Checks: Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) from 07 June – 20 July 2018, at NAVSTA Everett. Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change. To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Martha Bello and Kurt Boyles at martha.bello@navy.mil and kurt.boyles@navy.mil respectively. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Northwest Regional Maintenance Center (NWRMC) and ship’s Commanding Officers.

Specifications and associated reference documentation: The Government will provide, upon request, CD/DVDs including Attachment J-1 Work Items and Work Item References not already in the possession of the offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, or available through the following websites:

https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

Offerors may request a CD/DVD by contacting Kurt Boyles at kurt.boyles@navy.mil.

Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. Proposals which do not follow this direction may be rejected as non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”.

Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.

Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section

5.0 where required.

Page Limits:

The cover letter is limited to three (3) pages.

There are no other page limitations.

5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT

VOLUME I

a. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

b. Cover Letter,

c. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

d. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

e. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

f. Completed Section B carrying forward information from Attachment J-4, and

g. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for

Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material Burden New Work Rates & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4)

h. DDG86 FY 19 DMP Schedule Milestones (Attachment J-3)

Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal, CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor, Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications.

Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

For any WI with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in Attachment J-4, provide an explanation as to why. In addition to, if applicable:

- For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

- For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation.

Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

Subcontracting Plan: A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

Provide rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than the statutory requirements identified at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling.

Address FAR 52.219-9 and all of the subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-

9(d): subparagraphs(12),(13),(14), and (15).

Completed Section B and Attachment J-4 : Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs), complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIER SIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.

The contractor must submit a complete DDG86 FY19 DMP Schedule Milestones (Attachment J-3) containing Execution Milestones, HM&E Turnover, CS Space Release and P-ERL.

The contractor must submit prices for the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Labor & Material Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”.

The Daily Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIER SIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B clause rates shall govern.

For Attachment J-4, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.

Inter-port Differential - The inter-port differential must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel.

The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” as proposed in Attachment J-3. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” as proposed in Attachment J-3:

Location*

Differential

Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” stated in Attachment J-3

Portland, OR $5,177,287 -$20,260 San Diego, CA $4,697,860 -$18,132 Seattle, WA $2,437,324 -$19,065

Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) Schedule Adjustment The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should the USS Shoup FY19 DMP Availability complete before its no-later-than completion date. Therefore, the Navy has included a VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation. The VATEP schedule adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying “Days Completed Early” value found in Attachment J-3 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$133,640 per day.

Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) Dry-Docking Adjustment The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of schedule risk reduction for the USS SHOUP FY19 DMP and additional dry-dock availability to complete other Navy requirements, should the USS SHOUP FY19 DMP Availability compress the time required to complete its dry-dock requirements into fewer days than estimated by the Navy. Therefore, the Navy has included a VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation. The VATEP schedule adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying “Days of Dry-Dock Compression” value found in Attachment J-3 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$20,000 per day.

VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of four factors, as follows:

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility:

Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) with the top portion filled out.

A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) and a dry-dock capable of docking the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) at time of contract award. Evidence must be provided to prove the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock in performance of this contract.

Evidence the offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency to demonstrate capability.

MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).

To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1300, local time, Washington DC on 6 July 2018. Requests shall be sent to Martha Bello and Kurt Boyles at martha.bello@navy.mil and kurt.boyles@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility. All inspections will be completed by a representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC). All offerors requesting equivalency inspections will receive a copy of the final inspection report prior to the date of contract award. The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts;

regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Factor 2 – Past Performance: The Government requires relevant performance information on all Offerors based on the past and present efforts provided by the Offeror and data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance as a prime contractor. In the investigation of an Offeror’s past performance, the Government reserves the right to contact former customers and Government agencies and other private and public sources of information.

Offerors with recent and relevant past performance shall submit information concerning contracts which offerors consider relevant in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. Offerors shall identify portions of the contracts that are relevant. Offerors are requested to provide information up to five (5) previous contracts where the effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.

“Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation. If the offeror has not completed up to five (5) contracts within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

“Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the Solicitation Section C Statement of Work.

Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation; a detailed description of the work performed for the contract. Offerors are responsible for the accuracy of all data provided.

An offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the Government to consider.

In addition, the offeror shall provide for all Past Performance References included in Attachment S-4, a short description of the work performed and why the offeror considers it relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

Government may validate past performance information with the source regardless of whether it is provided under a CPAR reference or a PPQ.

The Offeror’s proposal shall identify the customer point of contact and which of the listed contacts that each questionnaire was sent to be completed. This will let the Contracting Officer know whether all questionnaires from all of the Offeror’s references were received.

Regarding Past performance information that is documented as a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) and available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the offeror may list it in Past Performance References, Attachment S-4. Attachment S-4 shall be used to identify the source of Past Performance information (e.g., CPARs, PPQs). For Past Performance information that does not have a current CPAR associated with it, the offeror may submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment S-2 to its customer to complete. Each proposal shall include no more than a total of five (5) PPQs, one per contract identified. The offeror will complete Part A of the Questionnaire. Separately, the offeror shall provide the entire Past Performance Questionnaire, with Part A completed, to each customer for them to complete Parts B and C. Customer evaluation will not be included as part of the page count in this volume submitted by the offeror. The offeror shall instruct their customers to complete the Past Performance Questionnaires and return them before the closing date of this solicitation.

E-mail to:

Martha Bello, Contracting Officer, Martha.Bello@navy.mil and

Kurt Boyles, Contract Specialist, kurt.boyles@navy.mil

Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date/time may be considered as late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered.

In addition, the offeror shall provide for all Past Performance References included in Attachment S-4, a short description of the work performed and why the offeror considers it relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

Government may validate past performance information with the source regardless of whether it is provided under a CPAR reference or a PPQ.

All offerors (including small business offerors) are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) in a separate narrative. In addition, large businesses are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative. Attachments to these narratives, including any eSRS information, is not included in the page limits.

Factor 3 – Schedule & Resource Capacity: Offerors shall provide Integrated Production Schedule (IPS) documentation for the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) FY19 DMP inclusive of the “Initial IPS” elements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 as well as the Manpower Curves (Total) and the Manpower Curves (Trades) associated with the 009-60 “Schedule of Record” aligning with the offerors proposed attachment J-3 schedule.. Offerors shall provide the documentation in accordance with format requirements of FY19 (CH-2) NAVSEA Standard Item 009-

60. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required by FY19 (CH-2) 009-60 and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the Work Package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy Intermediate-Level schedules.

Manpower Curves (Total) and Manpower Curves (Trade) – In addition to the requirements of 009-60, the offerors shall provide Total and Trade Manpower Curves including the following information:

The total and trade manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the offeror during the Availability period of performance.

The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance.

The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other expected requirements during the Availability period of performance.

Offerors shall provide a narrative affirming that the offeror has the manpower resources, by craft/trade/supervisor/support, available to complete the requirements of the availability, accounting for manpower resource required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract and manpower resources required to complete outstanding proposals and any other expected requirements during the Availability period. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement.

Pier / Dock Physical Resource Capacity- In addition to the requirements above for Manpower Curves, the offerors shall provide the Physical Capacity availability to support the proposed requirement:

The total physical resources currently in working capacity and expected to be in working capacity during the Availability period of performance

The total physical resources committed to complete previously awarded requirements as well as the additional resources committed to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals expected during the Availability period of performance. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offer shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime’s facility and the physical resources that will be provided by the subcontractor.

A chart showing the offeror's berthing plan for DDG 86 during the DDG 86's period of performance.

Berthing plan should outline all piers and/or drydocks being utilized for work the offeror currently has under contract, as well as piers/drydocks identified for all outstanding proposals, inclusive of DDG 86.

Offeror shall provide a narrative affirming that the offeror has the physical pier/dock requirements available to complete the requirements of the availability, accounting for physical resources required to complete work the offeror currently has under contract and additional resources required to complete outstanding proposals during the availability period. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offer shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the primes facility and the physical resources that will be provided by the subcontractor.

There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

(End of Summary of Changes)