N00024-18-R-4407_0004.pdf

N0002418FR93065

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002418R4407

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Aug-2018

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002418R4407

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

CHANGES

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment to N00024-18-R-4407 is to:

Section B:

Note F - updated to reflect 91 small dollar value changes.

Section I:

Revised 52.211-11 Liquidated Damages Table for “KTR Contract Complete” totals.

Section J:

J-1: Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG86-NWRMC19-CN01 (Errata 1, 2, and 3 and Addendum 1) is updated to Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG86-NWRMC19-CN01 (Errata 1, 2,3 and 4 and

Addendum 1).

J-4 - 1. updated to reflect the sum of 91 small dollar value changes as outlined in RFP Note F. The sum of the Small Dollar value changes from CLIN 0002, 0004, 0006, 0034, 0036, 0039, and 0042 equal 91. 2.

Updated to add WI 625-11-001 from Addendum 1.

Section L:

Revised Factor 3 to include Attachment J-3.

Revised Inter-port Differentials

Section M :

Revised Inter-port Differentials

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been modified:

SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR CHANGES

NOTE F: SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR CHANGES WITH A PRICE OF $25,000 OR LESS

1. To make administration of small dollar value changes more efficient, both parties agree to pre-price contract scope changes with an estimated price of $25,000 or less.

2. The amount included in this Contract for the Changes described above shall be equal to a quantity of 113

Changes for growth computed at a firm fixed price of $11,089 per Change, as associated with the following

CLINs: 0002, 0004, 0006, and 0034-0059.

3. A Waterfront Circuit Team comprised of a small group of Contractor and Government representatives will administer the Special Agreement for Changes with a Price of $25,000 or Less (“the Program”). The

Contractor and the Navy shall establish a group of empowered representatives to be located in close proximity to the ship during the availability period. These individuals will interact and administer the Program. Specific arrangements for the Waterfront Circuit Team shall be mutually agreed between the Contractor and the RMC.

It is expected that changes under this term will not have schedule impacts. For any changes that the

Government or the Contractor determine affect the critical path, internal milestones, or require lead times (i.e., material) may require adjudication under the other change terms and conditions of the contract.

4. The Contractor shall continue to report proposed Changes through the normal CFR process in accordance with

Contract terms. The Contractor shall use the description block of the CFR to describe the problem and cite the corrective action required.

5. For those Changes that the Waterfront Circuit Team identifies a price of $25,000 or less, within 24 hours of the final approved change, the Waterfront Circuit Team shall use commercially reasonable efforts to confirm the

Contractor's estimated price and document the agreed-to scope of work.

6. Once the Waterfront Circuit Team reaches agreement that the price of the Change is $25,000 or less and on the scope of the Change, the Contracting Officer shall authorize the Change. Authorized Changes will be followed by documentation to appropriately reflect specification revisions. No work on the Change shall commence until authorized by the Contracting Officer.

7. Multiple work items shall not be addressed under a single RCC. For the purposes of this Small Value Change clause, the value of each RCC shall be based on an individual Condition Found Report. Conversely, Condition

Found Reports shall not be broken into smaller parts for the purposes of breaking up the requirement.

8. The 4-E specification change document will be provided, as necessary, prior to the approval of the change.

9. If the Waterfront Circuit Team is not able to reach agreement that the price of the Change is $25,000 or less and/or with regard to the scope of the Change, then it will be administered and adjudicated through the normal

Contract change process as if the price of the Change was more than $25,000.

10. The Contractor and the Contracting Officer will maintain a work authorization tracker to identify and record the number of Changes authorized under this clause.

11. If the total number of Changes specified in paragraph B is depleted, the Contractor and the Contracting Officer may mutually agree to increase the quantity and contract price by applying the firm fixed price per Change in paragraph B to the number of additional Changes mutually agreed upon.

12. Within thirty (30) days after the end of the availability period of performance, the Contractor and Contracting

Officer, utilizing the work authorization tracker, will determine the number of pre-priced changes not authorized under this Contract. This number shall be determined by subtracting from the number of changes identified in paragraph B, as amended, the number of pre-priced changes approved. Thereafter, the Contracting

Officer will decrease the contract price by an amount calculated by multiplying the remaining number of changes by the pre-established firm fixed price per change.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-11 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--SUPPLIES, SERVICES, OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SEP

2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages, as described in the table below, per calendar day of delay.

The sum of liquidated damages, across all milestones in the table below, shall not exceed 10% of the awarded price of the Availability, including all Base and Option Items.

Milestone Liquidated Damage incurred per Day

Maximum Liquidated Damage associated with each Milestone

HM&E TURNOVER 1

$5,455 $21,820

HM&E TURNOVER 2

$5,455 $21,820

HM&E TURNOVER 3

$6,545 $26,180

HM&E TURNOVER 4

$4,364 $17,456

HM&E TURNOVER 5

$5,455 $21,820

HM&E TURNOVER 6

$8,182 $32,728

HM&E TURNOVER 7

$1,364 $5,456

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 1 A

$2,647 $58,234

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 1 B

$375 $2,250

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 2

$23,625 $141,750

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 3

$13,438 $80,628

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 4

$2,000 $12,000

COMBAT SYSTEMS

TURNOVER 5

$2,000 $12,000

ALO $7,222

$426,098

PCD $7,347

$257,145

KTR Contract Complete

(Execution in Seattle/Everett WA) $19,065

Up to total maximum liquidated damage

KTR Contract Complete

(Execution in Portland, OR) $20,260

Up to total maximum liquidated damage

KTR Contract Complete

(Execution in San Diego, CA) $18,132

Up to total maximum liquidated damage

END OF AVAIL - Mission Ready

Vessel Redelivered to Fleet*

$133,640 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

(b) If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Default--Fixed-

Price Supply and Service clause, the Contractor is liable for liquidated damages accruing until the Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the

Termination clause.

(c) The Contractor will not be charged with liquidated damages when the delay in delivery or performance is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor as defined in the Default--Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause in this contract.

*In regard to the milestone “END OF AVAIL- Mission Ready Vessel Redelivered to Fleet”, if the

Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, such that their failure delays the completion of work that may be outside of the scope of the

Contractor’s contract, such as AIT & 3rd Party Trade efforts and Government & 3rd Party test and trials, and this failure delays the Navy’s ability to return the vessel to the fleet at the milestone “END OF

AVAIL - Mission Ready Vessel Redelivered to Fleet” the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages, as described in the table below, per calendar day of delay.

(End of clause)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document

Attachment S-1 Reserved

Attachment S-2 Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form

Attachment S-4 Past Performance References

Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

No. Document

Attachment J-1 Specification Package No. TPPC-DDG86-NWRMC19-CN01(Errata 1, 2 3, 4 and

Addendum 1)

Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References

Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates

Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook (Revised)

Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award)

Attachment J-7 Schedule Model Review

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012; A014

(Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013)

Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009

Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract for the

FY19 Depot Modernization Period (DMP) for USS SHOUP (DDG 86). The Government anticipates awarding a single contract through a best value source selection process. The Government expects the best value to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price and will use the Value Adjusted

Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2.

ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Martha Bello Contracting Officer and Kurt Boyles

Contract Specialist at martha.bello@navy.mil and kurt.boyles@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror requests for information (RFIs) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 23 July 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.

Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making a single award on or around 5 November 2018.

Offerors must provide a period of 120 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 21 August 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

Proposal Submission:

Proposals shall be sent to:

Eric Niemann (C400 RMC)

Northwest Regional Maintenance Center (NWRMC)

BLDG 2200, Code 400

NAVAL STATION EVERETT

2000 W Marine View Dr

Everett, WA 98207

In care of Martha Bello, Naval Sea Systems Command

Proposals Hand Carried: All hand carried proposals must be delivered by the Contractor’s representative to Eric

Niemann, Northwest Regional Maintenance of NWRMC, 2000 West Marine View Dr. Bldg. 2200, Everett, WA

98207 at Naval Station Everett. Please call Eric Niemann at 425-304-5522 (desk), 360-340-6632 (mobile) to coordinate delivery.

Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED

DIRECTLY TO Code 400”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

Offerors shall submit:

Volume Title

Number of Paper

Originals (See Note 1)

Number of

Paper Copies

Number of CDs

(See Notes 2 &3)

I Price Proposal 1 1 2

II Technical Proposal 1 4 4

Note 1: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses.

The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in Microsoft

Office Suite 2007 or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Ship Checks: Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) from 07 June –

20 July 2018, at NAVSTA Everett. Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change. To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Martha Bello and Kurt Boyles at martha.bello@navy.mil and kurt.boyles@navy.mil respectively. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Northwest Regional Maintenance Center (NWRMC) and ship’s Commanding Officers.

Specifications and associated reference documentation: The Government will provide, upon request, CD/DVDs including Attachment J-1 Work Items and Work Item References not already in the possession of the offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, or available through the following websites:

https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

Offerors may request a CD/DVD by contacting Kurt Boyles at kurt.boyles@navy.mil.

Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation

(except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror mailto:martha.bello@navy.mil mailto:kurt.boyles@navy.mil has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint

Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. Proposals which do not follow this direction may be rejected as non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”.

Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.

Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section

5.0 where required.

Page Limits:

The cover letter is limited to three (3) pages.

There are no other page limitations.

5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT

VOLUME I

a. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

b. Cover Letter,

c. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

d. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

e. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

f. Completed Section B carrying forward information from Attachment J-4, and

g. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for

Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material Burden New Work Rates & Growth Reservation (Attachment

J-4)

h. DDG86 FY 19 DMP Schedule Milestones (Attachment J-3)

Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal, CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor, Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications.

Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

For any WI with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in Attachment J-4, provide an explanation as to why. In addition to, if applicable:

- For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

- For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation.

Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

Subcontracting Plan: A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

Provide rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than the statutory requirements identified at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling.

Address FAR 52.219-9 and all of the subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-

9(d): subparagraphs(12),(13),(14), and (15).

Completed Section B and Attachment J-4 : Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs), complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in

Section B, complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIER SIDE

AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for Day Completed Early, and Labor &

Material & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.

The contractor must submit a complete DDG86 FY19 DMP Schedule Milestones (Attachment J-3) containing

Execution Milestones, HM&E Turnover, CS Space Release and P-ERL.

The contractor must submit prices for the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily

Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material & Growth Reservation

(Attachment J-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Labor & Material Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section

B clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”.

The Daily Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES /

RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIER SIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B clause rates shall govern.

For Attachment J-4, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.

Inter-port Differential - The inter-port differential must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel.

The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed

Early” as proposed in Attachment J-3. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for

“Days Completed Early” as proposed in Attachment J-3:

http://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling

Location*

Differential

Inter-port Differential Reduction for

“Days Completed Early” stated in

Attachment J-3

Portland, OR $5,177,287 -$20,260

San Diego, CA $4,697,860 -$18,132

Seattle, WA $2,437,324 -$19,065

Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) Schedule Adjustment

The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should the USS Shoup

FY19 DMP Availability complete before its no-later-than completion date. Therefore, the Navy has included a

VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation. The VATEP schedule adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying “Days Completed Early” value found in Attachment J-3 by the

VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$133,640 per day.

Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) Dry-Docking Adjustment

The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of schedule risk reduction for the USS SHOUP FY19 DMP and additional dry-dock availability to complete other Navy requirements, should the USS SHOUP FY19 DMP

Availability compress the time required to complete its dry-dock requirements into fewer days than estimated by the

Navy. Therefore, the Navy has included a VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation. The VATEP schedule adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying “Days of Dry-Dock Compression” value found in Attachment J-3 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$20,000 per day.

VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of four factors, as follows:

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility:

Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) with the top portion filled out.

A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) and a dry-dock capable of docking the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) at time of contract award. Evidence must be provided to prove the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock in performance of this contract.

Evidence the offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency to demonstrate capability.

MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit

MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).

To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master

Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a

MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1300, local time, Washington DC on 6 July 2018. Requests shall be sent to Martha Bello and

Kurt Boyles at martha.bello@navy.mil and kurt.boyles@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility. All inspections will be completed by a mailto:martha.bello@navy.mil representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC). All offerors requesting equivalency inspections will receive a copy of the final inspection report prior to the date of contract award. The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts;

regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Factor 2 – Past Performance: The Government requires relevant performance information on all Offerors based on the past and present efforts provided by the Offeror and data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance as a prime contractor. In the investigation of an Offeror’s past performance, the Government reserves the right to contact former customers and

Government agencies and other private and public sources of information.

Offerors with recent and relevant past performance shall submit information concerning contracts which offerors consider relevant in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. Offerors shall identify portions of the contracts that are relevant. Offerors are requested to provide information up to five (5) previous contracts where the effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.

“Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation. If the offeror has not completed up to five (5) contracts within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

“Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the Solicitation Section C Statement of Work.

Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation; a detailed description of the work performed for the contract. Offerors are responsible for the accuracy of all data provided.

An offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the Government to consider.

In addition, the offeror shall provide for all Past Performance References included in Attachment S-4, a short description of the work performed and why the offeror considers it relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

Government may validate past performance information with the source regardless of whether it is provided under a

CPAR reference or a PPQ.

The Offeror’s proposal shall identify the customer point of contact and which of the listed contacts that each questionnaire was sent to be completed. This will let the Contracting Officer know whether all questionnaires from all of the Offeror’s references were received.

Regarding Past performance information that is documented as a Contractor Performance Assessment Report

(CPAR) and available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the offeror may list it in Past

Performance References, Attachment S-4. Attachment S-4 shall be used to identify the source of Past Performance information (e.g., CPARs, PPQs). For Past Performance information that does not have a current CPAR associated with it, the offeror may submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment S-2 to its customer to complete. Each proposal shall include no more than a total of five (5) PPQs, one per contract identified. The offeror will complete Part A of the Questionnaire. Separately, the offeror shall provide the entire Past Performance

Questionnaire, with Part A completed, to each customer for them to complete Parts B and C. Customer evaluation will not be included as part of the page count in this volume submitted by the offeror. The offeror shall instruct their customers to complete the Past Performance Questionnaires and return them before the closing date of this solicitation.

E-mail to:

Martha Bello, Contracting Officer, Martha.Bello@navy.mil and

Kurt Boyles, Contract Specialist, kurt.boyles@navy.mil

Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date/time may be considered as late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered.

In addition, the offeror shall provide for all Past Performance References included in Attachment S-4, a short description of the work performed and why the offeror considers it relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

Government may validate past performance information with the source regardless of whether it is provided under a

CPAR reference or a PPQ.

All offerors (including small business offerors) are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) in a separate narrative. In addition, large businesses are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business

Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative. Attachments to these narratives, including any eSRS information, is not included in the page limits.

Factor 3 – Schedule & Resource Capacity: Offerors shall provide Integrated Production Schedule (IPS) documentation for the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) FY19 DMP inclusive of the “Initial IPS” elements of NAVSEA

Standard Item 009-60 as well as the Manpower Curves (Total) and the Manpower Curves (Trades) associated with the 009-60 “Schedule of Record” aligning with the offerors proposed attachment J-3 schedule.. Offerors shall provide the documentation in accordance with format requirements of FY19 (CH-2) NAVSEA Standard Item 009-

60. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required by FY19 (CH-2) 009-60 and in paper

(hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the Work Package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team

(AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy

Intermediate-Level schedules.

Manpower Curves (Total) and Manpower Curves (Trade) – In addition to the requirements of 009-60, the offerors shall provide Total and Trade Manpower Curves including the following information:

The total and trade manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the offeror during the Availability period of performance.

The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance.

mailto:Martha.Bello@navy.mil

The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other expected requirements during the Availability period of performance.

Offerors shall provide a narrative affirming that the offeror has the manpower resources, by craft/trade/supervisor/support, available to complete the requirements of the availability, accounting for manpower resource required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract and manpower resources required to complete outstanding proposals and any other expected requirements during the Availability period. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement.

Pier / Dock Physical Resource Capacity- In addition to the requirements above for Manpower Curves, the offerors shall provide the Physical Capacity availability to support the proposed requirement:

The total physical resources currently in working capacity and expected to be in working capacity during the Availability period of performance

The total physical resources committed to complete previously awarded requirements as well as the additional resources committed to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals expected during the

Availability period of performance.

Offeror shall provide a narrative affirming that the offeror has the physical pier/dock requirements available to complete the requirements of the availability, accounting for physical resources required to complete work the offeror currently has under contract and additional resources required to complete outstanding proposals during the availability period. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offer shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the primes facility and the physical resources that will be provided by the subcontractor.

There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

1.0 GENERAL

The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the offeror whose proposal represents the Best

Value to the Government after evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors below. The USS SHOUP (DDG

86) FY19 DMP shall be competed on a coast-wide basis (West Coast).

Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (see paragraph (f)(4) of FAR 52.215-1). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price, technical and past performance standpoint. Statements and representations made in the Offeror’s proposal may be subject to verification by other sources or through an onsite survey by Navy evaluators.

Offerors are advised that except for past performance information, the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal. Letters of transmittal and/or cover letters that forward the proposal to the Government are not considered part of the body of the proposal.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Government will make a source selection using the Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) approach. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offeror, who is deemed responsible in accordance with

FAR 9.104, who offers the lowest evaluated price proposal.

In order to make a Best Value determination, the Government will evaluate the three (3) non-price factors for acceptability and the offeror’s total evaluated price as described in FAR 15.404. The factors are:

Non- Price Factors

Factor 1: Eligibility Factor

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Schedule & Resource Capacity

Price Factor

Factor 4: Price

EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Basis of Evaluation - The objective of this factor is to determine whether the offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) at time of contract award.

The Government will assess the offeror’s eligibility using the Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet provided in Attachment

S-5 of the solicitation.

In order to be considered eligible for award, the offeror must:

Have a letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) and a dry-dock capable of docking the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) at time of contract award.

Evidence that offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or submit documentation for MSRA

Equivalency.

Factor 2 – Past Performance:

The Government will measure how well an offeror has performed on relevant contracts in the past as an indicator of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements and an indicator of the successful performance on the current requirement.

To develop the overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant contract information to the requirements of this solicitation submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal including the Past Performance

Questionnaires (Attachment S-2) as well as other sources of information. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, an offeror’s past performance information from the Past

Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Report System (eSRS), as well as any other sources reasonably available to the Government.

For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8

(Utilization of Small Business Concerns). For large businesses, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9.

Assessment of past performance will be a subjective assessment based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. The Government is seeking to determine whether the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of quality goods and services at fair and reasonable prices.

If discussions are required, offerors will be given an opportunity to address unfavorable reports of past performance and the offeror's response, or lack thereof, will be taken into consideration. In particular, recent contracts will be examined to ensure that corrective measures have been put in place to prevent the reoccurrence of past performance problems. Prompt actions taken to correct performance problems will be a reflection of management concern for customer satisfaction; however, such action may not mitigate all negative performance trends.

The Government’s past performance evaluation will focus on the following areas:

Cost Control

Schedule

Technical Performance

Subcontract Management

In accordance with FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. If an offeror lacks relevant past performance information, the evaluators will assign a Neutral rating.

In terms of Acceptable / Unacceptable, a Neutral rating is considered Acceptable.

Factor 3 – Schedule & Resource Capacity:

1. The objective of this factor is to evaluate the offeror's response to the Section L requirements for this factor in order to:

Assess the offeror’s understanding of what resources are required to successfully complete the highly complex USS SHOUP (DDG 86) FY19 DMP maintenance and modernization requirements. The

Offeror’s response will be evaluated to assess whether the offeror conveys a detailed and complete picture of how it plans to complete the technical requirements in accordance with the offerors proposed schedule;

and

Assess the offeror’s resource capabilities as they pertain to the requirements of Section L of this solicitation. The offeror will be evaluated on the sufficiency of the personnel and facility resources that it proposes to satisfy the requirements of the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) FY19 DMP in accordance with the offerors proposed schedule. The offeror must clearly demonstrate that it has access to the required facilities and manpower required to execute the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) FY19 DMP.

Additionally, the offeror will be evaluated on its ability to resolve resource issues as a result of schedule or requirements changes.

Ratings

The ratings will be based on what is contained or referenced in the proposal, not on information obtained from other sources, with the exception of past performance information. Standards have been established to provide the same set of values for all evaluators. The objectives of using these standards are to promote uniformity in evaluation and to aid in the comparison and understanding of the evaluation results. The standards are set as follows:

Factors 1 & 3 –

For Factors 1 & 3, the adjectival rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to Factors 1 & 3 meet or do not meet the minimum requirements through an assessment of the proposal. The evaluation will identify any deficiencies in offeror’s proposals. Adjectival ratings for Factors 1 & 3 are as follows:

Adjectival Ratings for Factors 1 & 3

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Factor 2 – Past Performance

For Past Performance, the adjectival rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to the Factor 2 meets or does not meet the minimum past performance requirements. Adjectival ratings for Factor 2 are as follows:

Adjectival Ratings for Factor 2

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Factor 4 - Price

The Government will analyze price proposals in accordance with FAR 15.404 using the information contained in

Attachment J-4. Although award will be made based on an offeror’s total evaluated price, a price proposal that is found unreasonable and/or unbalanced may be rejected. The Government will review the offeror’s CLIN and Work

Item prices for the USS SHOUP (DDG 86) DMP to identify any significant disparities that may indicate a lack of understanding of contract requirements.

Total evaluated price shall be calculated by adding:

The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total price of all work items), The price of all option CLINs, The price of all Growth Reservation CLINS (Base and Option), The evaluated price of the Extension day Rates and Labor Rate and Material Burden Rates

If applicable, the Value Adjusted Trade Off schedule adjustment, If applicable, the Value Adjusted Trade Off dry-dock management adjustment, and

If applicable, the value of the inter-port differential (as identified in Section L of this solicitation)

The Growth Reservation CLINs price, Evaluated Extension day price, Labor and Material Burden Rate New Work

Evaluated Price shall be calculated in the following manner:

Growth Reservation CLINs (Base and Option)

1. Multiply the proposed labor rate in Cell B3 by the number of hours associated with the specific Growth

Reservation CLIN in attachment J-4 to yield the total labor price for that CLIN.

2. Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material associated with the specific Growth

Reservation CLIN in attachment J-4 to yield the burdened material price for that CLIN.

3. Attachment J-4 will add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the total price for each Growth

Reservation CLIN.

Evaluated Extension Day Price

1. Multiply the proposed daily rate by the number of days associated with that rate (for each extension type included in attachment J-4) to yield the evaluated price for that daily extension type.

2. Attachment J-4 will add the sum of daily extension price types to…