Q&A_3_(05.11.17).pdf

PDF 8 KB Posted

Attached to
Workboat Large
Solicitation number
N00024-17-R-2217
Issued by

About this file

Q&A (05.11.17)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00024-17-R-2217_Amendment_06.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-2217-0005.pdf PDF
Att_1_-_WBL_Specification_Rev_C_20June2017.pdf PDF
Att_4_-_WBL_Delivery_Schedule_Rev1.xls XLS spreadsheet
N00024-17-R-2217-0004.pdf PDF
Att_1_-_WBL_Specification_Rev_C_20June2017.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-2217_Amend_0003.pdf PDF
Att_1_-_WBL_Specification_Rev_B_07June2017.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-2217_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Att_9_-_CLIN_Pricing_Chart_(Rev_06.12.17).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-17-R-2217 Conformed RFP Redline —
Att 9 - CLIN Pricing Chart —
N00024-17-R-2217 Amend 0001.docx DOCX document
Att 6 - ID of Noncommercial Data.doc DOC document
Att 3 - WBL Vendor Provided Spare Parts List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att 1 - WBL Specification.pdf PDF
N00024-17-R-2217_Workboat_Large.pdf PDF
Att 2 - WBL Spec Response Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att 4 - WBL Delivery Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
Att 9 - CLIN Pricing Chart.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att 8 - Unique Item Identification.doc DOC document
Att 10 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Att 11 - WBL Sketch.pdf PDF
Att 7 - ID of Commercial Data Rights.doc DOC document
Att 5 - Past Performance Information.doc DOC document
Att_11_WB_Large_Sketch.pdf PDF
Q&A_2_(05.08.17)_Rev.pdf PDF
Q&A_2_(05.08.17).pdf PDF
N0002417R2217_-_WBL_-_Q&A_1_(05.01.17).pdf PDF
DRAFT_Workboat_Large_Specification.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Workboat Large – N00024-17-R-2217 Pre-Solicitation Synopsis Questions & Navy Responses

(05/11/2017)

QUESTION 7: Referring to Section 042-2 it is not clear to us what the list of reference documents actual means to the bidder. The list includes potentially conflicting references. Examples include:

a) Structure: Both references "ABS, Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels Under 90 Meters in Length, 2015" and "ISO 12215-6, Small craft. Hull construction and scantlings. Structural arrangements and details, 30 May 2008" refer to hull scantlings design.

b) Mechanical systems: Both references "ABS, Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels Under 90 Meters in Length, 2015" and "ABYC, Standards and Technical Information Reports for Small Craft, July 2014-2015" have requirements for the design and installation of shipboard mechanical systems (shafting, piping, fire protection).

c) Electrical: References "IEEE 45, Recommended Practice for Electric Installations on Shipboard, 2002" and "ABYC, Standards and Technical Information Reports for Small Craft, July 2014- 2015" and "NSWCCD-23-TM-2009/58 Rev B, U.S. Navy Boat Electrical Practices " all have requirements for the design and installation of electrical systems"

NAVY RESPONSE 7: The Attachment 1 Specification 042-2 Referenced Documents section is provided as a summary of the references that are called out throughout the remainder of the Attachment 1 Specification. Individual specification sections will identify the extent to which the referenced documents apply.

QUESTION 8: Where there are conflicts between these documents is one standard preferred over another? If there is a conflict, which standard takes precedence? Does the basic Navy Specification take precedence over all these references?

NAVY RESPONSE 8: Generally, the Attachment 1 Specification takes precedence over the referenced documents. Other conflicts will be addressed individually.

QUESTION 9: Is the builder free to choose a different reference for different parts of the design? i.e.

ABS for hull structure and ABYC standards for mechanical systems?

NAVY RESPONSE 9: Not entirely. Generally, individual specification sections identify areas where the referenced documents apply. Otherwise, where individual specification sections in the Attachment 1 Specification are silent, the Offeror may select appropriate references.

QUESTION 10: Are any ABS Class notations required? If so, what are they?

NAVY RESPONSE 10: No.

QUESTION 11: Is the vessel design to be reviewed and approved by ABS?

NAVY RESPONSE 11: No.

QUESTION 12: Can the vessel be fitted with azimuthing Z-drives to improve maneuvering instead of conventional propellers, if the draft limits are respected?

NAVY RESPONSE 12: No.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .