N00024-17-R-2217_Amendment_0002.pdf

N0002417NR53019

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See continuation page(s).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Jun-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002417R2217

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-May-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Jun-2017

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2020

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002417R2217

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

The purpose of this amendment is to:

Extended the solicitation response date from 26-Jun-2017 02:00 PM to 06-Jul-2017 02:00 PM.

Provide Navy responses to bidder questions about the RFP;

Revise the titles for CLINs X003 and X007 to reflect CAX and NNSYSSPORTSVA consistency throughout RFP;

Remove CLINS XX19 CREWFAM - NSFDIEGOGARCIA and revise to RESERVED

Revise the CLIN Pricing Sheet (Attachment 9) to change the titles for CLINs XX19 CREWFAM -

NSFDIEGOGARCIA to RESERVED;

Revised Section C-3.089 BOAT CREW-FAMILIARIZATION

Updated Location Section headings in SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE and SECTION

F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

Updated Contracting Officer from Derek Sopp to Samantha Rye in SECTION G - CONTRACT

ADMINISTRATION DATA and SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO

BIDDERS

BIDDER QUESTIONS & NAVY RESPONSES

QUESTION 1: When will you be providing the above documents?

NAVY RESPONSE 1: The government documents listed may be obtained by e-mailing the RFP POC.

The ABYC references may be obtained directly from ABYC.

QUESTION 2: Will you provide an extension based on the date you provide these documents since they are required to complete the stability analysis?

NAVY RESPONSE 2: The NAVY is extending the proposal date to 06 July 2017.

QUESTION 3: The references lists ABYC documents issued July 2014-2015, however, one document referenced in the Spec seems to be outside that time period – is that the correct document?

NAVY RESPONSE 3: The list of references in Attachment 1, Specification Section 042-2 have been updated in Rev B of the Attachment 1 Specification. Regarding ABYC Standards, the ABYC Standards effective in July 2016 have been incorporated. Per RFP Clause HQ-C-2-0059, the use of updated standards may be requested upon contract award.

QUESTION 4: The references lists ABYC documents issued July 2014-2015, however, 070-5 says the boat shall meet ABYC in every respect. Does that mean:

A. Complying with the ABYC documents referenced elsewhere in the Spec, or

B. Complying with everything ABYC published from July 2014 – 2015, or

C. Something else?

NAVY RESPONSE 4: The boat shall comply with all of the ABYC standards effective in July 2016. Per

RFP Clause HQ-C-2-0059, the use of updated standards may be requested upon contract award.

QUESTION 5: Spec Section 169-2 - Do the skegs have to extend from the stern to the pusher knees for two points of contact with the submarine or is it acceptable to have the skegs extend from the stern to a point near the shoulder (adequate for drydocking and transporting) but only have the keel (wrapped with heavy duty fendering) in contact with the submarine for a single point of contact?

NAVY RESPONSE 5: The described configuration is acceptable so long as the installed heavy duty fendering complies with Attachment 1, Specification Section 611-2.

QUESTION 6: According to Section 070-2 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) the boat is to be capable of operation in air temperatures up to 110 degrees F. This contrasts with 95 degrees F described in Section 2.1 of SNAME T & R Bulletin 4-16 and 90 degrees F described in Section 070c of General

Specification for Ships of the United States Navy. The extraordinarily high assumed ambient air temperature has the following consequences:

a. Engine room air supply volume increases by a factor of 2.25 times, compared to the SNAME standard design practice.

b. Fan diameters and duct cross sectional areas increase, impacting useful space available for other functions.

c. Fan noise increases.

d. Fan electrical demand increases significantly. This is expected to be a significant challenge, given the electrical supply described by Part 313.2 of the Specifications.

e. Air velocities, in the engine room will be high enough to be extremely uncomfortable.

f. The above comments focus on the impact to engine room ventilation, please note that other air conditioned and mechanically ventilated spaces will be impacted.

Is 110 degree F ambient air the final requirement?

NAVY RESPONSE 6: The maximum ambient air temperature has been revised to 95 degrees F in Rev B of the Attachment 1, Specification Section 070-2. Rev B of Attachment 1, Specification Section 512-2, has also been revised to provide additional design guidance for Engine room ventilation requirements.

QUESTION 7: According to Section 070-2 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) the boat is to be capable of operation in water temperatures up to 95 degrees F. This contrasts with 85 degrees F described in Section 2.1 of SNAME T & R Bulletin 4-16 and Section 070c of General Specification for Ships of the

United States Navy. Standard water temperature rating for the Cummins main engines specified in

Section 233-1 of Specifications are engineered for 85 degrees F seawater. They may be able to offer alternate heat exchangers, at additional cost, but that could complicate availability of cooling system parts.

NAVY RESPONSE 7: The maximum water temperature has been revised to 85 degrees F in Rev B of the Attachment 1, Specification Section 070-2.

QUESTION 8: Section 233-1 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) describes each main engines with

“raw water cooling system.” Is heat exchanger cooling with attached sea water pump and attached heat exchangers for each engine intended?

NAVY RESPONSE 8: Yes

QUESTION 9: Section 512-5 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) requires that the air conditioning system compressor will be connected to the front of the engine. Consideration of the conditioned space’s needs to be understood if the engines are not running that air conditioning will not be available. This could be problematic in some operational spaces. Another important thing to consider is that the engines are powering the following: air conditioning, hydraulic steering, hydraulic winches and capstans, Alternators (probably large ones), engine room emergency bilge pumps. Is it intended that these systems only be available when the engines are running?

NAVY RESPONSE 9: Yes

QUESTION 10: Are hydraulic pumps, winches, and capstan to be operable at all engine speeds?

NAVY RESPONSE 10: Yes

QUESTION 11: Section 078-1 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) requires aluminum extrusions, for welded applications, to be 5086-H111. Extrusions are generally available only as 6061-T6. Can 6061-T6 extrusions be considered with structural calculations based on the welded strength?

NAVY RESPONSE 11: The use of 6061-T6 materials will be considered for structural purposes using a welded yield strength of 8 ksi (the strength of fully annealed material). Navy approval after contract award will be required for each proposed structural component.

QUESTION 12: Section 505-2 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) indicates “Mechanically crimped or swaged tubing/piping connections shall not be used.” Does this prohibit use of USCG/ABS approved flare fittings, where appropriate?

NAVY RESPONSE 12: No. USCG/ABS approved flare fittings are acceptable.

QUESTION 13: Section 529-2 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) requires the fixed manual bilge pump to be located in the engine room. Please consider if it would be suitable to locate this pump where the operator would not be required to go into the engine room.

NAVY RESPONSE 13: The manual bilge pump shall be installed in the Engine Room as required by

Attachment 1, Specification Section 529-2.

QUESTION 14: Section 582-4 of Specifications (Rev -, 21 April 2017) describes hydraulic pumps for deck machinery.

a. Are clutches required for the hydraulic pumps?

NAVY RESPONSE 14: A clutch or other unloading feature operable from the coxswain station is required for the winch hydraulic system. Attachment 1, Specification Section 582-4, requires a control switch to engage the winch hydraulic system at the coxswain station.

QUESTION 15: Will the Government accept Caterpillar engines as an acceptable equivalent for the main engines?

NAVY RESPONSE 15: Where components or equipment are specified by brand name or manufacturer and model number, such identification is intended to be descriptive, not restrictive, and is intended to indicate the required characteristics of the product. Offeror's may propose alternative items provided they prove they meet the general requirements for determining the equivalence of alternate products in the

Specification Section 042-3 and the specific requirements of Specification Section 233-1.

QUESTION 16: Will the Government accept glued-in windows?

NAVY RESPONSE 16: Yes. Installation and materials must be suitable for the marine environment.

QUESTION 17: Will the Government allow a crimp pipe system instead of an all welded pipe system?

NAVY RESPONSE 17: No.

QUESTION 18: Vessel transportation companies have indicated there is no US flagged shipping service to Rota Spain or Sasebo Japan.

Will the Government allow shipping of the WBLs on a foreign flag vessel to those locations?

NAVY RESPONSE 18: DFARS clause 252.247-7023 requires transportation by U.S.-flag vessels and contains waiver procedures for shipment via foreign-flag vessel if certain conditions apply.

QUESTION 19: Vessel transportation companies have indicated that cargo of the WBL width exceeds the road capacities in Japan and cannot be transported by road. Will the Government accept deliveries of the vessels afloat?

NAVY RESPONSE 19: When delivery to end user locations is ordered, Section C-3.080-3 requires delivery in water, fully assembled and operational.

QUESTION 20: Is it the Government's expectation that the vessels be fully assembled when delivered at the specified destinations?

NAVY RESPONSE 20: When delivery to end user locations is ordered, Section C-3.080-3 requires delivery in water, fully assembled and operational. When delivery to CAX or DDDC is ordered, the vessel cabin shall be delivered with cabin removed and reusable waterproof cover installed.

QUESTION 21: We note under CLIN XX19 there is training called out at Diego Garcia. Currently there is not a CLIN requiring Delivery of a vessel to this location. Please verify a training session is required at this location.

NAVY RESPONSE 21: The CREWFAM (1019, 2019, 3019, 4019, and 5019) CLINs for Diego Garcia are RESERVED and will be removed prior to contract award. Please do not price these CLINs.

QUESTION 22: If training is required at Diego Garcia will Government Accommodations/ Meals/ travel be available on the island, If so what rates should be budgeted in the CLIN.

NAVY RESPONSE 22: The CREWFAM (1019, 2019, 3019, 4019, and 5019) CLINs for Diego Garcia

QUESTION 23: Will the US Navy handle clearances for entry and travel arrangements for the Training personnel to Diego Garcia, as Access to Diego Garcia is limited by the Government of Britain..

NAVY RESPONSE 23: The CREWFAM (1019, 2019, 3019, 4019, and 5019) CLINs for Diego Garcia

QUESTION 24: Background: CLINs XX19 require pricing of training sessions in Diego Garcia. This contractor is having trouble pricing the travel to Diego Garcia. The only information we can find is from the website at http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/nctsfedetdg/Pages/WelcomeAboard.aspx

<http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/nctsfedetdg/Pages/WelcomeAboard.aspx> , which refers to transportation by “Air Mobility Command (AMC) aircraft or government contracted commercial jet.”

Reference is also made to BEQ and BOQ for lodging.

Will the Government provide guidance on how to price the travel expenses to and from Diego Garcia?

NAVY RESPONSE 24: The CREWFAM (1019, 2019, 3019, 4019, and 5019) CLINs for Diego Garcia

QUESTION 25: I may have missed it in the Spec, regarding N00024-17-R-2217, I did not see what the requirement is for EPA emissions certification for the main propulsion engines. 233-1 indicates inboard twin Cummins QSM11-455 or equal. The QSM11 and equal/similar engines, could include a variety of

EPA or non-EPA certified engines.

If you could please clarify the EPA requirement for the main propulsion engines, or direct me to the location in spec or solicitation documentation with that information, it would be appreciated. Thank you.

NAVY RESPONSE 25: Engines shall be EPA Tier 3.

QUESTION 26: The Proposal Content Checklist indicates that information be provided in the proposal relating to an "Executive Summary company history, teaming agreements," and provides a reference of

Vol. I, Sec. (2). However, a requirement for providing this information could not be located in the reference.

Is information required to be provided in the proposal relating to the "Executive Summary company history, teaming agreements"? If so, will a description of the information required be provided?

NAVY RESPONSE 26: Yes, information is required to be submitted with the proposal relating to the

"Executive Summary company history, teaming agreements". Each Offeror is required to provide an executive summary of their company along with company history. If there are any teaming agreements with other companies, please provide information for the teaming company along with the work they intend to do.

QUESTION 27: In addition to Attachment 9 (CLIN Pricing Chart), are Offerors required to complete

Section B of the solicitation?

NAVY RESPONSE 27: Yes, Offerors are required to complete Section B.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 26-Jun-2017 02:00 PM to 06-Jul-

2017 02:00 PM.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 1003

The CLIN description has changed from Delivery - FISC, Cheatham Annex to Delivery - FISC, CAX.

CLIN 1007

The CLIN description has changed from Delivery - Naval Station Norfolk to Delivery -

NNSYSSPORTSVA.

CLIN 1019

The CLIN description has changed from CREWFAM - NSFDIEGOGARCIA to RESERVED.

The CLIN extended description has changed From: Crew Training & Familiarization To: RESERVED

CLIN 2003

CLIN 2007

CLIN 2019

CLIN 3003

CLIN 3007

CLIN 3019

The CLIN extended description has changed From:Crew Training & Familiarization To: RESERVED

CLIN 4003

CLIN 4007

CLIN 4019

CLIN 5003

CLIN 5007

CLIN 5019

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

C-3.089 BOAT CREW-FAMILIARIZATION

The Contractor shall provide basic familiarization and training at the Builder’s or End User’s location. End User locations are defined in Section F. Crew familiarization shall include boat assembly, boat operations, main equipment operations and repairs and maintenance. This training shall include builder and/or OEM training and component change out procedures on Engines, Air Conditioners, Electrical Systems (DC and AC), reduction gears, propellers, rudders, hydraulic systems, and Navigation System. Underway operations shall include but not be limited to: maneuvering, towing (alongside and astern) and pushing. Training (at minimum) shall be three (3) days at

Builder or End User’s location, as ordered, for up to ten (10) students. Contractor shall provide all training materials.

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Receipt inspection and final acceptance to be performed as described below. The contractor’s “Delivery Ticket” or

“Bill of Lading” is to be used as confirmation of delivery and condition of delivery. Acceptance of delivery is performed by Jack Mathias or an appointed agent. Receipt inspection primarily consists of the Government noting apparent shipping damage and/or apparent shortages.

Upon receipt, an acceptance inspection is performed and the contractor is notified of any discrepancies in a Post-

Delivery Inspection Report (PDIR) typically within 30 work days (i.e., exclusive of weekends and Federal holidays) of receipt. Contractor is to document correction or plan of action for resolution of discrepancies in response to the

PDIR. Final acceptance is dependent upon delivery in accordance with Section F, acceptance inspection, and Post-

Delivery discrepancy resolution notification (i.e., correction or acceptable plan of action).

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT BY

CAX Naval Support Fleet Logistics

Center, Cheatham Annex

(NAVSUPFLC CAX)

Williamsburg, VA

Mr. Jack Mathias Designee

BIM Cert Review (follow-on boats): Mr. Brian Mishoe brian.mishoe@navy.mil

PMS 325

DDDC Defense Logistics Agency

Defense Distribution Depot

Center (DDDC)

San Diego, CA

Mr. Jack Mathias Designee

BIM Cert Review (follow-on boats): Mr. Brian Mishoe brian.mishoe@navy.mil

PMS 325

CFASASEBO Commander, Fleet Activities

Sasebo

Port Operations Department

Bldg 100

Hirase-cho, Sasebo City, Nagasuki

Prefecture, Japan 857-0056

Mr. Jack Mathias Designee

BIM Cert Review (follow-on boats): Mr. Brian Mishoe brian.mishoe@navy.mil

PMS 325

CFAYOKOSUKA US Naval Base Yokosuka

CFAY Port Operations

Bldg#5203

1 Banchi Tomari-Cho

Yokosuka, Kanagawa-Ken

Japan 238-0001

Mr. Jack Mathias Designee

BIM Cert Review (follow-on boats): Mr. Brian Mishoe brian.mishoe@navy.mil

PMS 325

NNSYSSPORTSVA Norfolk Naval Shipyard

1980 Dillingham, Bldg. W-7

Norfolk, VA 23511-2988

Mr. Jack Mathias Designee

BIM Cert Review (follow-on boats): Mr. Brian Mishoe brian.mishoe@navy.mil

PMS 325

NSAPNSYPORTSNH Commander

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard

Seavey Island

Kittery, ME 03904

Mr. Jack Mathias Designee

BIM Cert Review (follow-on boats): Mr. Brian Mishoe brian.mishoe@navy.mil

PMS 325

NBPOINTLOMA NAVBASE COR

2004 QUAY ROAD

San Diego, CA 92135

Mr. Brian L. Lehmkuhler

CIV

CNRSW Port Ops Marine

Maintenance Manager

Ph. (619) 556-6790

Brian.Lehmkuhler@navy.mil

PMS 325

NSROTA NAVSTA Rota, Spain

Port Operations

3rd Street & Enriquez Street

Quarter Deck Building 1

Rota (Cadiz), Spain 09645

Mr. John Dunham

Port Operations

Maintenance Officer

John.dunham@eu.navy.mil

956-82-2397

PMS 325

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

mailto:brian.mishoe@navy.mil mailto:brian.mishoe@navy.mil mailto:brian.mishoe@navy.mil mailto:brian.mishoe@navy.mil mailto:brian.mishoe@navy.mil mailto:Brian.Lehmkuhler@navy.mil mailto:John.dunham@eu.navy.mil

DELIVERY:

All items shall be delivered FOB Destination to the following addresses:

SHIP TO ADDRESS:

CAX

Naval Support Fleet Logistic Center, Cheatham Annex

(NAVSUPFLC CAX)

Warehouse 11, C Street

Williamsburg, VA 23187

DDDC

Defense Logistics Agency

Defense Distribution Depot Center (DDDC)

2680 Wooden Street

San Diego, CA 92136-5491

CFASASEBO

Commander, Fleet Activities Sasebo

Port Operations Department

Bldg 100

Hirase-cho, Sasebo City, Nagasuki

Prefecture, Japan 857-0056

CFAYOKOSUKA

Receiving Officer

US NAVAL BASE YOKOSUKA

CFAY PORT OPERATIONS BLDG#5203

1 BANCHI TOMARI-CHO

YOKOSUKA, KANAGAWA-KEN

JAPAN 238-0001

NNSYSSPORTSVA

Naval Station Norfolk

1980 Dillingham, Bldg. W-7

Norfolk, VA 23511-2988

NSAPNSYPORTSNH

Commander

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard

Seavey Island

Kittery, Maine 03904

NBPOINTLOMA

NAVBASE COR

2004 QUAY ROAD

San Diego, CA 92135

NSROTA

NAVSTA Rota, Spain

Port Operations

3rd Street & Enriquez Street

Quarter Deck Building 1

Rota (Cadiz), Spain 09645

The Contractor shall be responsible for the condition of the boat(s) until receipt inspection and final acceptance at destination is completed.

Note: Earlier delivery of the above item is acceptable and encouraged. Advance notice in writing of a minimum of

15 days is required for any proposed early delivery. The notice must be provided to the inspector identified in

Section E.

Boats delivered under CLIN 1001 and if exercised, option CLINs 2001, 3001, 4001 and 5001 shall be delivered, with transportation charges prepaid by the Contractor to the location specified above. Transportation charges for boats are included in CLINs 1003-1010 and if exercised, option CLINs 2003-2010, 3003-3010, 4003-4010, and

5003-5010.

FISC:

Physical location of Boat Lot at NAVSUPFLC CAX: Warehouse 11, C St (off of Sanda Ave) - Naval Weapons

Station Yorktown - Cheatham Annex

Notification shall be provided to Mr. Brian Mishoe at least 5 business days prior to arrival.

Receiving POC Info:

Mr. Brian Mishoe

Email: brian.mishoe@navy.mil

Fax: (757) 462-2844

Office: (757) 887-7323

Note: If Mr. Mishoe is unavailable, contact Warehouse 1 (receiving) at (757) 887-7323

Base Access: Accessibility to FISC is subject to change due to security and operational conditions and requirements.

Drivers must carry proper identification and paperwork in order to be allowed inside the facility for deliveries.

Drivers should contact Mr. Mishoe prior to arrival to obtain current base access procedures. Drivers may be required to proceed to the NWS Yorktown Pass Office upon arrival.

Directions to NWS Yorktown Pass Office: On I-64, take Lee Hall exit (Exit 247) West to Jefferson Ave. At the first traffic light, turn left on Jefferson Ave. The pass office is approximately 1 mile on the right. Phone (757) 887-7971.

Delivery Times: Normal delivery hours are 0800-1430. Deliveries between 0700 and 0800 may be permitted depending on availability of CAX staff and boat size. Deliveries between 1430 and 1600 may be permitted if boats are towed on trailers that can be quickly disconnected and placed in the warehouse. Late deliveries are NOT permitted for boats requiring crane services. CAX will provide crane service to offload boat hulls and cabins at delivery.

DDDC:

Notification shall be provided to Mr. Darnell Ransome at least 5 business days prior to arrival.

Mr. Darnell Ransome

Email: darnell.ransome.ctr@dla.mil

Cell: (619) 608-5857

Fax: (619) 556-7898

Note: If Mr. Ransome is unavailable, contact Mr. Brian Mishoe at Email: brian.mishoe@navy.mil or phone: (757)

462-2844.

Base Access: Accessibility to DDDC, San Diego is subject to change due to security and operational conditions and requirements. Drivers must carry proper identification and paperwork in order to be allowed inside the facility for deliveries. Drivers should contact Mr. Ransome prior to arrival to obtain current base access procedures. Drivers may be required to proceed to the Naval Base San Diego Pass Office upon arrival.

mailto:darnell.ransome.ctr@dla.mil

Directions to Naval Base San Diego Pass Office: The pass office is located on Harbor Dr. near the intersection of nd

St. Telephone number (619) 556-1651.

Delivery Times: Normal delivery hours are 0600-1330 (excluding Federal Holidays and weekends).

Boats delivered under CLIN 1001 and if exercised, option CLINs 2001, 3001, 4001 and 5001 shall be delivered, with transportation charges prepaid by the Contractor to the location specified above. DDDC will provide crane service to offload boat hulls and cabins at delivery. Please note that crane service may only be available between

Tuesday and Thursday. Transportation charges for boats are included in CLINs 1003-1010 and if exercised, CLINs

2003-2010, 3003-3010, 4003-4010, and 5003-5010.

CFASASEBO/CFAYOKOSUKA:

POC: Mike Weatherford

Email: Michael.Weatherford1@fe.navy.mil

TEL: 080-3307-1722 (cell)

NNSYNSSPORTSVA:

POC: John Schmeckenbecher

Email: john.schmeckenbecher@navy.mil

TEL: 757-396-1215

NSAPNSYPORTSNH:

POC: Mike Campbell

Email: michael.l.campbell2@navy.mil

TEL: 207-438-1100

NSROTA:

POC: John Dunham

Port Operations

Maintenance Officer

Email: John.dunham@eu.navy.mil

956-82-2397

NBPOINTLOMA:

POC: Mr. Brian L. Lehmkuhler CIV

CNRSW Port Ops Marine Maintenance Manager

Ph. (619) 556-6790

Email: Brian.Lehmkuhler@navy.mil

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

mailto:Michael.Weatherford1@fe.navy.mil mailto:john.schmeckenbecher@navy.mil mailto:michael.l.campbell2@navy.mil mailto:John.dunham@eu.navy.mil mailto:Brian.Lehmkuhler@navy.mil

HQ G-2-0004 PURCHASING OFFICE REPRESENTATIVE

COMMANDER

ATTN: SAMANTHA D. RYE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

1333 ISAAC HULL AVENUE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376

PHONE: (202) 781-1395

E-MAIL samantha.rye@navy.mil

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

(1) Terms and conditions

(a) Offerors shall submit the proposal by 1400 Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 06 July 2017 to either of the point of contacts (POCs) listed in paragraph (b ) below. The quantities of hard and electronic copies of the proposal are identified in paragraph (2) below. The electronic copies shall be submitted on CD-ROM disk(s) in Microsoft Office products for PC applications, or Adobe Acrobat .pdf files. When mailing the proposal or proposal amendments, the outside shipping container shall be marked with “RFP N00024-17-

R-2217” and mailed to the address listed in paragraph (b) below.

(b) The point of contact for this solicitation to address for any questions, concerns, or requests for clarification, is as follows:

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)

Attn: Samantha Rye, SEA 02224 AND Eboné Neal, SEA 02223

1333 Isaac Hull Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20376

Telephone number: (202) 781-1395 and (202) 781-1923

E-mail: samantha.rye@navy.mil and ebone.m.neal@navy.mil

(c) It is the Offeror’s responsibility to draft a logical, practical, clear and concise proposal that contains all pertinent information in sufficient detail so that the government evaluators are able to meaningfully evaluate the Offeror’s proposed approach and cost / price without discussions. An Offeror’s proposal must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and associated risks; is able, willing, and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet the requirement; and has valid and practical solutions for all requirements. The Offeror must include any data necessary to illustrate the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. In presenting material in this proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Offerors must use quantitative terms whenever possible and avoid qualitative and subjective terms to the maximum extent practicable. Proposal volumes must be consistent internally.

(d) The Government may reject as unacceptable any proposal that does not comply with terms and conditions of the solicitation to that includes unreasonable pricing or unbalanced pricing, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

(e) The Government may judge a proposal to be unacceptable if the proposal contains statements that do not clearly reveal the Offeror’s proposed approach; statements that the Offeror will comply with the RFP or provide a particular feature or objective without explaining how the feature or objective will be met.

(f) If the solicitation is amended, then all other terms and conditions that are not amended shall remain unchanged. Offerors shall monitor the FBO website frequently to ensure all amendments are captured in the submitting proposal before the RFP closing date and time.

(g) Any data previously submitted in response to another solicitation will be assumed to be unavailable to the government during this proposal evaluation and source selection process. Proposal data shall not be incorporated into the proposal by referring to another proposal or other instrument.

(h) If a discrepancy exists between the original paper copy of the proposal and the electronic copy, the paper copy will take precedence.

(i) The Government reserves the right to seek clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306 after receipt of the

Offeror’s responses to the RFP.

(j) Proposals are to be based on the requirements contained in the solicitation Schedule, Specification, and other attachments and exhibits.

(k) Offerors are advised that proposals shall be accepted only from those Offerors proposing as potential prime contractors. Such Offerors shall be responsible for submitting complete proposal packages containing all components of the proposal inclusive of any team member or subcontract proposal information. Pricing data, or other information which may be considered proprietary to team members or subcontractors, shall be submitted with the prime contractor’s proposal in a separate sealed envelope.

(l) Submission of e-mail, facsimile or telegraphic offers is NOT authorized for this solicitation.

(m) If an Offeror believes that the requirements and/or instructions in the RFP contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror should timely notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale within five (5) days after release of this RFP on http://www.fbo.gov.

(n) Prior to using an appointed agent to communicate with the Government on matters concerning this RFP or any resulting contract, the Offeror shall send written notification to the Contracting Officer outlining the time period and conditions when the appointed agent is authorized to act or communicate on the offeror's behalf. The Offeror shall identify in its response to this solicitation the name of any agent, consultant or third party it used in preparing its offer.

(o) Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of this requirement via email. Any clarifying information issued by the Government will be provided to all prospective offerors. Proprietary data, if so noted, will be protected. All questions regarding to the RFP must be submitted five (5) business days prior to the closing date of the RFP. Questions regarding this RFP are to be directed to all of the following and each question shall include the document name, document date, specific page, paragraph, clause or other definitive citation requiring clarification. Telephone inquiries will not be accepted.

Samantha Rye – samantha.rye@navy.mil AND Eboné Neal – ebone.m.neal@navy.mil

AND Matthew Warncke – matthew.warncke@navy.mil

(p) Hand Carried Offers (See Clause HQ L-2-0013)

(q) Proposal in response to this solicitation must be valid for a minimum of 120 calendar days.

(r) Offerors are cautioned that, in accordance with the “Instruction to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition” clause (FAR 52.215-1), the Government intends to award a contract on the basis of initial proposals received, without discussions. Therefore, each proposal shall contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost and technical standpoint.

(2) Content

(a) An Offeror’s proposal shall consist of two (2) separate volumes as noted in the table below. Paper copies of Volume I must contain one (1) original and one (1) copy. Paper copy for Volume II must contain one (1) original.

(b) Cover pages, title pages, table of contents, cross reference tables, dividers, index tabs, etc. will not be counted as part of the page count limitation so long as they are inserted solely for the purpose of reading ease and locating sections of the proposal. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted. Any supporting documentation including but not limited to drawings, analysis, and calculations will not be counted.

VOL.

VOL. TITLE

# OF

COPIES

DUE DATE PAGE LIMIT

I Section 1(a): Technical - Specification

Response Matrix

Section 1(b): Technical - Supporting

Tech Data for Work Boat Large

Section 1(c): Technical - Supporting

Data for Statement of Work

Compliance

Section 2: Past Performance

2 Paper, 2 Electronic*

16 June 2017 Section 1(a): None

Section 1(b): None

Section 1(c): None

Section 2: 10

II Pricing Volume

1 Paper

2 Electronic*

16 June 2017 None

* Electronic = CD ROM

(3) Format

(a) The written portions of the proposal shall use no smaller than industry standard word processor 10-point proportional font. If both sides of sheets of paper are used, each sheet will be counted as two pages.

Volumes shall be printed on 8-1/2 x 11-inch paper. Tables or figures may be printed on fold out sheets..

Fold out pages may be used for diagrams, charts or graphic material only and may not exceed 11 inches by

17 inches. Fold out pages will be counted as two pages. Fold out pages may only include narrative sufficient to describe the diagram, chart or graphic material. Every paragraph, figure, and table shall be numbered. Font size for tables and figures shall be no smaller than 8-point. If proposal volumes/sections exceed the limitations set forth herein, excess text will be removed from the back of that volume/section and not evaluated. Use at least 1-inch margins on the top and bottom of the pages and ¾ inch side margins.

Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.

(b) Each volume shall be submitted in standard size 3-ring binders that will facilitate the insertion of change pages and additional information provided during the source selection process.

(c) All printed pages shall contain the phrase: “SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE” (printed or stamped).

No price information, (i.e. dollar values and/or hourly rates) shall be included in any volume other than the Price Volume (Volume II).

(d) An Offeror’s proposal shall include a transmittal letter that includes the following: solicitation number and closing date and time; Government issuing office identification; full official name and address of firm;

name and phone number of the individual designated as the responsible contact for the firm; reference to the enclosures or volume numbers and quantities being provided of each; any exceptions taken to the terms of the RFP; and the date of the enclosures or volumes if different from the date of an Offeror’s proposal.

The proposal shall also contain a statement indicating that the proposal is valid for a minimum of 120 days from closing date of RFP. An authorized official of the Offeror shall sign the transmittal letter.

(e) Each volume should contain the following (unless otherwise noted):

Cover and Title Page – The cover and title page shall identify the following:

Title of proposal

RFP number

Proposal volume

Section numbers

Serial number/copy number

DUNS or DUNS+4 number that identifies the offeror’s name and address exactly as stated in the offer

Offeror’s name

Table of Contents – The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements.

(f) Proposal Content Requirements

In addition to a completed and signed Standard Form 1449, the proposal must consist of Volumes I - II.

Volume I shall contain proposal information addressing the following technical and past performance information. Volume II shall contain proposed pricing information. All spreadsheets or mathematical computations shall be in Microsoft Excel 2007 (or newer) format and shall be working versions, including formulas and computations. Note, submission of locked spreadsheets will not be acceptable.

All text shall be in Microsoft Word 2007 or searchable Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF).

Electronic copies for Volumes 1 and 2 shall be provided on separate disks.

(g) Proposal Content Checklist

The below checklist has been provided to identify the information required for a successful proposal submission. Offerors should use this table as a guide prior to submitting to ensure the proposed information is complete and ready for evaluation. Any information missing from the list below may result in a non-compliant submission which may not be evaluated.

REFERENCE DESCRIPTION FORMAT

□ Vol. I, Note Proposal Technical Data Index Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(a) Specification Response Matrix Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Outboard Plan Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Outboard Profile Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Inboard Plan Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Inboard Profile Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Outboard Section Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Fendering Detail Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(ii) Drawing: Transport Dimensions Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iii) Analysis: Proof of Stability & Supporting data Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Lightship MS Excel

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Loads MS Excel

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Load Conditions MS Excel

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Margins MS Excel

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Origin MS Excel

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Scale Weight Report Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Photographs Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Specifications Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Modifications to meet Workboat

Large requirements

Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(i) SOW: Technical Data Rights declarations Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Engineering & Design Capability overview Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Production Capability overview Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Build Schedule Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Delivery Schedule MS Excel

□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(iii) SOW: Warranty Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (2) Executive Summary company history, teaming agreements

Adobe PDF

□ Vol. I, Sec. (2) 3 recent references (within 5 years) Adobe PDF /

MS Word

□ Vol. I, Sec. (2) Past Performance Questionnaire Adobe PDF

□ Vol. II, Sec. (1) Signed Standard Form 1449 Cover Page and all

Amendments

Adobe PDF

□ Vol. II, Sec. (2) CLIN Pricing Chart MS Excel

□ Vol. II, Sec. (3) Vendor Provided Spare Parts List MS Excel

□ Vol. II, Sec. (4) Extra pricing information Adobe PDF /

MS Word

□ Vol. II, Sec. (5) Section K of solicitation Adobe PDF /

MS Word

VOLUME I: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (NON-PRICE FACTORS)

Note: Volume I shall include a list/index of all attachments, technical documents, drawings, datasheets, etc. that are submitted.

(1) Factor 1: Technical Approach

(a) Specification Response Matrix (Attachment 2): The Specification is provided in Section J. Offeror shall complete the Specification Response Matrix (Attachment 2) and submit in Vol. I Section 1(a), indicating the capability of the Offeror to meet the minimum requirements listed in the Specification. As a minimum, Offeror shall respond in Attachment 2 to all parameters of the Workboat Large

Specification (Attachment 1) identified in red text (an example response is provided within Attachment

2 for reference). Where the Specification identifies required supporting documentation/data/drawings, the specific supporting data shall be included in the Offeror’s technical proposal in Vol. I Section 1(b).

The Specification is intended to convey the Government’s minimum requirements for this solicitation.

If the Offeror takes exception to any requirement in the Specification, such item(s) shall be identified in the “Offeror’s Notes” section of Attachment 2. Each exception shall list the Specification section, the specific rationale for non-compliance with the section, and a proposed alternative approach. Any proposed alternative approach must meet the minimum requirement of the Specification to the

Government's satisfaction. Description of Offeror's alternative approach shall include the detailed approach to achieving the minimum Specification requirement; applicable material specifications, make and model numbers for all parts/components; compliance with any requisite commercial or military standard, or associated “best practice”; and shall include any supporting product performance, test data, or other empirical evidence for the proposed product or service capability where applicable. The

Government reserves the right to reject (without discussion) any proposed alternative which is incomplete or fails to meet minimum requirements of the Specification.

(b) Feasibility and Practicability of the Proposed Design: To support Government assessment of the feasibility and practicability of the proposed design and technical approach, Offeror shall provide supporting technical data, including drawings, technical specifications, key performance characteristics, analysis, calculations, and any other technical information for the proposed boat to describe the proposed boat’s ability to meet the requirements of this solicitation. As a minimum, Offeror shall provide the following supporting technical data items (drawings in PDF format, calculations in MS

Excel format) to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements of the proposed boats.

Data shall be submitted in Vol. I, Section 1(b):

(i) General Arrangement Drawings (inboard and outboard plan and profiles, outboard section view looking aft at bow, and overall dimensions of the boat) that depict the configuration of the proposed boat and illustrate incorporation of all the major features and equipment required by the

Specification. Drawings shall be drawn to scale and features/equipment shall be clearly depicted, to include the following (as a minimum): hull, cabin, fendering, pusher knees, forward and aft towbitts, winches, capstan, chocks, shoulder and quarter h-bitts, roller chocks, taffrail, davit, transom swim platform, hoisting fittings, propulsion equipment and shafting, steering and flanking rudders, fuel tank(s). Boat dimensions shall include hull length (bow to transom), length overall, beam overall, forward and aft freeboard (deck edge to waterline), draft (waterline to lowest extremity), height of fixed structure (above waterline). A fendering detail shall be included that includes outboard profile and section view from the bow of the workboat against a notional submarine with diameter and draft dimensions identified in the Workboat Large Specification

(Attachment 1) Section 611-2.

(ii) Transport Dimensions Drawing (over the road), dimensions provided to include: ready-for-transport hull and cabin heights, ready-for-transport hull width, trailered height on notional transport trailer(s), trailered width on notional transport trailer(s), and overall length on notional transport trailer(s);

(iii) Proof of Stability of the vessel (and supporting data) for specific conditions identified in applicable Specification Item 079. Stability analysis to include supporting hydrostatic tables/curves (righting and heeling arm and moments, static heel values), summary of applicable loads (full load and minimum operation (10% fuel, no cargo, 2 persons at 220 lbs) conditions with weights, LCG and VCG indicated), craft geometry information (wind heel area, downflooding points considered, door openings, etc), all assumptions (wind speed, roll back,) and comparison of results versus criteria.

(iv) Detailed Weight Estimate to include:

a. Lightship condition: a detailed listing and summation of the material and equipment/items, their units, quantities, weights and center of gravities (longitudinal and vertical) that comprise the Lightship condition of the proposed boat. Alternatively, the data from a scale weighing, inclining or dead weight survey of the parent craft and a detailed list of the specific variances/changes (including units, weights, and CG’s) required to meet this solicitation from the weighed craft);

b. Loads: a detailed listing and summation of the load items, their units, quantities, weights and center of gravities (longitudinal and vertical) that comprise the various loads on the craft;

c. Load Conditions: a detailed listing and summation of weights and center of gravities which is comprised of the sum of Lightship and the various Loads as defined in the specification;

d. Margins: clear identification/notation of any assumed or applied margins (design, build, service life, other) to the Lightship, Loads and Vessel Conditions summations. If using low margins builders shall justify these with historical production data, scale weighings, or by some other means;

e. Origin: Clear definition of the reference origin and coordinate system (e.g. origin is the transom keel intersection with forward as positive in the longitudinal and starboard is positive in the athwartships).

(v) Documentation that the proposed designs are based upon similar craft design(s) which has been built and demonstrated to be safe and suitable in actual service in a comparable mission profile in military or heavy duty commercial applications. Similar craft design documentation to include the following: weight report or scale weighing of actual parent craft with Longitudinal Center of

Gravity (LCG); photograph(s) of previous craft; product specification sheet listing vital characteristics for similar craft (providing minimum characteristics listed in Specification Item

070-1); a detailed list of modifications to the previous craft design required to achieve the requirements of this solicitation;

Note: The Government will use the Offeror’s submitted drawings and technical data only for the purpose of evaluating the Offeror’s proposal.

(c) Statement of Work Compliance: To support Government evaluation of Offeror’s ability to successfully execute the Statement of Work (SOW), Offeror shall provide the following in Vol. I

Section 1(c):

(i) Rights in Technical Data: The Offeror shall address the noncommercial and commercial technical data rights and computer software rights requirements contained in Section C-3.085-2 of this RFP.

For all noncommercial technical data and computer software to be delivered under the contract, the Offeror shall complete the Noncommercial Technical Data Rights Assertions (Attachment 6)

(fill in “None” if it is not applicable). For all commercial technical data and computer software to be delivered under the contract, the Offeror shall complete the Commercial Technical Data Rights

Assertions (Attachment 7) (fill in “None” if it is not applicable). Failure to complete and submit

Attachment 6 and Attachment 7 may result in the Offeror’s proposal being non-responsive. The completed Attachments 6 And Attachment 7 will become part of any resulting contract award.

(ii) Boat Design, Production and Delivery: To support Government evaluation of the Offeror’s ability to design and produce the proposed boat to meet the minimum required delivery schedule in

Section F, Offeror shall provide the following in Vol. I Section 1(c):

a. An overview of the Offeror’s engineering and design capability for execution of the SOW, including boat design and configuration management. The overview shall include (but not be limited to) a description of the engineering personnel supporting the project and associated technical capabilities (software, modeling, simulation, etc.) to be used in design of the proposed boats.

b. An overview of the Offeror’s production capability that will be used to produce and test proposed boats. The overview shall include (but not be limited to) a description of shop industrial facilities and personnel for fabrication, metal work, electrical / mechanical / rigging, quality assurance and testing of the boat, based upon similar use in production of similar craft; description of welding qualification program for steel and aluminum fabrication, including description of weld procedure and personnel qualification testing; quantity of boats of the similar craft design that have been built at the Offeror’s production facility (over how many years); quantity of boats of the similar craft design currently in service (with average time in service).

c. A build schedule for the base order and option years, as specified in the SOW, in

Offeror’s desired format, outlining major events of the build process, and including (as a minimum) start date, completion date, builder trials, PDIT, and delivery dates for the first boat and subsequent boats in Days After Receipt of

Order (DARO).

d. Delivery Schedule for base boat and option years as specified in the Delivery

Schedule (Attachment 4). Offeror shall provide written rationale if the proposed…