N00024-17-R-2217_Amend_0003.pdf
PDF 179 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Workboat Large
- Solicitation number
- N00024-17-R-2217
About this file
RFP Amendment 0003
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N0002417NR53019
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
See continuation page(s).
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 10
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 13-Jun-2017
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002417R2217
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
26-May-2017
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
13-Jun-2017
CODE
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)
1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2020
N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N0002417R2217
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following items are applicable to this modification:
The purpose of this amendment is to:
Update Attachment 1- Workboat Large Specification from Rev A to Rev B
Update the due date in Section L, Section 2 Content (b) Table Volume from 16 June 2017 to 06 July 2017.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
(1) Terms and conditions
(a) Offerors shall submit the proposal by 1400 Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 06 July 2017 to either of the point of contacts (POCs) listed in paragraph (b ) below. The quantities of hard and electronic copies of the proposal are identified in paragraph (2) below. The electronic copies shall be submitted on CD-ROM disk(s) in Microsoft Office products for PC applications, or Adobe Acrobat .pdf files. When mailing the proposal or proposal amendments, the outside shipping container shall be marked with “RFP N00024-17-
R-2217” and mailed to the address listed in paragraph (b) below.
(b) The point of contact for this solicitation to address for any questions, concerns, or requests for clarification, is as follows:
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
Attn: Samantha Rye, SEA 02224 AND Eboné Neal, SEA 02223
1333 Isaac Hull Ave, SE
Washington, DC 20376
Telephone number: (202) 781-1395 and (202) 781-1923
E-mail: samantha.rye@navy.mil and ebone.m.neal@navy.mil
(c) It is the Offeror’s responsibility to draft a logical, practical, clear and concise proposal that contains all pertinent information in sufficient detail so that the government evaluators are able to meaningfully evaluate the Offeror’s proposed approach and cost / price without discussions. An Offeror’s proposal must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and associated risks; is able, willing, and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet the requirement; and has valid and practical solutions for all requirements. The Offeror must include any data necessary to illustrate the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. In presenting material in this proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Offerors must use quantitative terms whenever possible and avoid qualitative and subjective terms to the maximum extent practicable. Proposal volumes must be consistent internally.
(d) The Government may reject as unacceptable any proposal that does not comply with terms and conditions of the solicitation to that includes unreasonable pricing or unbalanced pricing, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.
(e) The Government may judge a proposal to be unacceptable if the proposal contains statements that do not clearly reveal the Offeror’s proposed approach; statements that the Offeror will comply with the RFP or provide a particular feature or objective without explaining how the feature or objective will be met.
(f) If the solicitation is amended, then all other terms and conditions that are not amended shall remain unchanged. Offerors shall monitor the FBO website frequently to ensure all amendments are captured in the submitting proposal before the RFP closing date and time.
(g) Any data previously submitted in response to another solicitation will be assumed to be unavailable to the government during this proposal evaluation and source selection process. Proposal data shall not be incorporated into the proposal by referring to another proposal or other instrument.
(h) If a discrepancy exists between the original paper copy of the proposal and the electronic copy, the paper copy will take precedence.
(i) The Government reserves the right to seek clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306 after receipt of the
Offeror’s responses to the RFP.
(j) Proposals are to be based on the requirements contained in the solicitation Schedule, Specification, and other attachments and exhibits.
(k) Offerors are advised that proposals shall be accepted only from those Offerors proposing as potential prime contractors. Such Offerors shall be responsible for submitting complete proposal packages containing all components of the proposal inclusive of any team member or subcontract proposal information. Pricing data, or other information which may be considered proprietary to team members or subcontractors, shall be submitted with the prime contractor’s proposal in a separate sealed envelope.
(l) Submission of e-mail, facsimile or telegraphic offers is NOT authorized for this solicitation.
(m) If an Offeror believes that the requirements and/or instructions in the RFP contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror should timely notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale within five (5) days after release of this RFP on http://www.fbo.gov.
(n) Prior to using an appointed agent to communicate with the Government on matters concerning this RFP or any resulting contract, the Offeror shall send written notification to the Contracting Officer outlining the time period and conditions when the appointed agent is authorized to act or communicate on the offeror's behalf. The Offeror shall identify in its response to this solicitation the name of any agent, consultant or third party it used in preparing its offer.
(o) Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of this requirement via email. Any clarifying information issued by the Government will be provided to all prospective offerors. Proprietary data, if so noted, will be protected. All questions regarding to the RFP must be submitted five (5) business days prior to the closing date of the RFP. Questions regarding this RFP are to be directed to all of the following and each question shall include the document name, document date, specific page, paragraph, clause or other definitive citation requiring clarification. Telephone inquiries will not be accepted.
Samantha Rye – samantha.rye@navy.mil AND Eboné Neal – ebone.m.neal@navy.mil
AND Matthew Warncke – matthew.warncke@navy.mil
(p) Hand Carried Offers (See Clause HQ L-2-0013)
(q) Proposal in response to this solicitation must be valid for a minimum of 120 calendar days.
(r) Offerors are cautioned that, in accordance with the “Instruction to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition” clause (FAR 52.215-1), the Government intends to award a contract on the basis of initial proposals received, without discussions. Therefore, each proposal shall contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost and technical standpoint.
(2) Content
(a) An Offeror’s proposal shall consist of two (2) separate volumes as noted in the table below. Paper copies of Volume I must contain one (1) original and one (1) copy. Paper copy for Volume II must contain one (1) original.
(b) Cover pages, title pages, table of contents, cross reference tables, dividers, index tabs, etc. will not be counted as part of the page count limitation so long as they are inserted solely for the purpose of reading ease and locating sections of the proposal. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted. Any supporting documentation including but not limited to drawings, analysis, and calculations will not be counted.
VOL.
VOL. TITLE
# OF
COPIES
DUE DATE PAGE LIMIT
I Section 1(a): Technical - Specification
Response Matrix
Section 1(b): Technical - Supporting
Tech Data for Work Boat Large
Section 1(c): Technical - Supporting
Data for Statement of Work
Compliance
Section 2: Past Performance
2 Paper, 2 Electronic*
06 July 2017 Section 1(a): None
Section 1(b): None
Section 1(c): None
Section 2: 10
II Pricing Volume
1 Paper
2 Electronic*
06 July 2017 None
* Electronic = CD ROM
(3) Format
(a) The written portions of the proposal shall use no smaller than industry standard word processor 10-point proportional font. If both sides of sheets of paper are used, each sheet will be counted as two pages.
Volumes shall be printed on 8-1/2 x 11-inch paper. Tables or figures may be printed on fold out sheets..
Fold out pages may be used for diagrams, charts or graphic material only and may not exceed 11 inches by
17 inches. Fold out pages will be counted as two pages. Fold out pages may only include narrative sufficient to describe the diagram, chart or graphic material. Every paragraph, figure, and table shall be numbered. Font size for tables and figures shall be no smaller than 8-point. If proposal volumes/sections exceed the limitations set forth herein, excess text will be removed from the back of that volume/section and not evaluated. Use at least 1-inch margins on the top and bottom of the pages and ¾ inch side margins.
Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.
(b) Each volume shall be submitted in standard size 3-ring binders that will facilitate the insertion of change pages and additional information provided during the source selection process.
(c) All printed pages shall contain the phrase: “SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE” (printed or stamped).
No price information, (i.e. dollar values and/or hourly rates) shall be included in any volume other than the Price Volume (Volume II).
(d) An Offeror’s proposal shall include a transmittal letter that includes the following: solicitation number and closing date and time; Government issuing office identification; full official name and address of firm;
name and phone number of the individual designated as the responsible contact for the firm; reference to the enclosures or volume numbers and quantities being provided of each; any exceptions taken to the terms of the RFP; and the date of the enclosures or volumes if different from the date of an Offeror’s proposal.
The proposal shall also contain a statement indicating that the proposal is valid for a minimum of 120 days from closing date of RFP. An authorized official of the Offeror shall sign the transmittal letter.
(e) Each volume should contain the following (unless otherwise noted):
Cover and Title Page – The cover and title page shall identify the following:
Title of proposal
RFP number
Proposal volume
Section numbers
Serial number/copy number
DUNS or DUNS+4 number that identifies the offeror’s name and address exactly as stated in the offer
Offeror’s name
Table of Contents – The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements.
(f) Proposal Content Requirements
In addition to a completed and signed Standard Form 1449, the proposal must consist of Volumes I - II.
Volume I shall contain proposal information addressing the following technical and past performance information. Volume II shall contain proposed pricing information. All spreadsheets or mathematical computations shall be in Microsoft Excel 2007 (or newer) format and shall be working versions, including formulas and computations. Note, submission of locked spreadsheets will not be acceptable.
All text shall be in Microsoft Word 2007 or searchable Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF).
Electronic copies for Volumes 1 and 2 shall be provided on separate disks.
(g) Proposal Content Checklist
The below checklist has been provided to identify the information required for a successful proposal submission. Offerors should use this table as a guide prior to submitting to ensure the proposed information is complete and ready for evaluation. Any information missing from the list below may result in a non-compliant submission which may not be evaluated.
REFERENCE DESCRIPTION FORMAT
□ Vol. I, Note Proposal Technical Data Index Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(a) Specification Response Matrix Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Outboard Plan Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Outboard Profile Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Inboard Plan Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Inboard Profile Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Outboard Section Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(i) Drawing: Fendering Detail Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(ii) Drawing: Transport Dimensions Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iii) Analysis: Proof of Stability & Supporting data Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Lightship MS Excel
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Loads MS Excel
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Load Conditions MS Excel
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Margins MS Excel
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(iv) Weight Estimate: Origin MS Excel
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Scale Weight Report Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Photographs Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Specifications Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(b)(v) Similar Craft Design: Modifications to meet Workboat
Large requirements
Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(i) SOW: Technical Data Rights declarations Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Engineering & Design Capability overview Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Production Capability overview Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Build Schedule Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(ii) SOW: Delivery Schedule MS Excel
□ Vol. I, Sec. (1)(c)(iii) SOW: Warranty Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (2) Executive Summary company history, teaming agreements
Adobe PDF
□ Vol. I, Sec. (2) 3 recent references (within 5 years) Adobe PDF /
MS Word
□ Vol. I, Sec. (2) Past Performance Questionnaire Adobe PDF
□ Vol. II, Sec. (1) Signed Standard Form 1449 Cover Page and all
Amendments
Adobe PDF
□ Vol. II, Sec. (2) CLIN Pricing Chart MS Excel
□ Vol. II, Sec. (3) Vendor Provided Spare Parts List MS Excel
□ Vol. II, Sec. (4) Extra pricing information Adobe PDF /
MS Word
□ Vol. II, Sec. (5) Section K of solicitation Adobe PDF /
MS Word
VOLUME I: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (NON-PRICE FACTORS)
Note: Volume I shall include a list/index of all attachments, technical documents, drawings, datasheets, etc. that are submitted.
(1) Factor 1: Technical Approach
(a) Specification Response Matrix (Attachment 2): The Specification is provided in Section J. Offeror shall complete the Specification Response Matrix (Attachment 2) and submit in Vol. I Section 1(a), indicating the capability of the Offeror to meet the minimum requirements listed in the Specification. As a minimum, Offeror shall respond in Attachment 2 to all parameters of the Workboat Large
Specification (Attachment 1) identified in red text (an example response is provided within Attachment
2 for reference). Where the Specification identifies required supporting documentation/data/drawings, the specific supporting data shall be included in the Offeror’s technical proposal in Vol. I Section 1(b).
The Specification is intended to convey the Government’s minimum requirements for this solicitation.
If the Offeror takes exception to any requirement in the Specification, such item(s) shall be identified in the “Offeror’s Notes” section of Attachment 2. Each exception shall list the Specification section, the specific rationale for non-compliance with the section, and a proposed alternative approach. Any proposed alternative approach must meet the minimum requirement of the Specification to the
Government's satisfaction. Description of Offeror's alternative approach shall include the detailed approach to achieving the minimum Specification requirement; applicable material specifications, make and model numbers for all parts/components; compliance with any requisite commercial or military standard, or associated “best practice”; and shall include any supporting product performance, test data, or other empirical evidence for the proposed product or service capability where applicable. The
Government reserves the right to reject (without discussion) any proposed alternative which is incomplete or fails to meet minimum requirements of the Specification.
(b) Feasibility and Practicability of the Proposed Design: To support Government assessment of the feasibility and practicability of the proposed design and technical approach, Offeror shall provide supporting technical data, including drawings, technical specifications, key performance characteristics, analysis, calculations, and any other technical information for the proposed boat to describe the proposed boat’s ability to meet the requirements of this solicitation. As a minimum, Offeror shall provide the following supporting technical data items (drawings in PDF format, calculations in MS
Excel format) to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements of the proposed boats.
Data shall be submitted in Vol. I, Section 1(b):
(i) General Arrangement Drawings (inboard and outboard plan and profiles, outboard section view looking aft at bow, and overall dimensions of the boat) that depict the configuration of the proposed boat and illustrate incorporation of all the major features and equipment required by the
Specification. Drawings shall be drawn to scale and features/equipment shall be clearly depicted, to include the following (as a minimum): hull, cabin, fendering, pusher knees, forward and aft towbitts, winches, capstan, chocks, shoulder and quarter h-bitts, roller chocks, taffrail, davit, transom swim platform, hoisting fittings, propulsion equipment and shafting, steering and flanking rudders, fuel tank(s). Boat dimensions shall include hull length (bow to transom), length overall, beam overall, forward and aft freeboard (deck edge to waterline), draft (waterline to lowest extremity), height of fixed structure (above waterline). A fendering detail shall be included that includes outboard profile and section view from the bow of the workboat against a notional submarine with diameter and draft dimensions identified in the Workboat Large Specification
(Attachment 1) Section 611-2.
(ii) Transport Dimensions Drawing (over the road), dimensions provided to include: ready-for-transport hull and cabin heights, ready-for-transport hull width, trailered height on notional transport trailer(s), trailered width on notional transport trailer(s), and overall length on notional transport trailer(s);
(iii) Proof of Stability of the vessel (and supporting data) for specific conditions identified in applicable Specification Item 079. Stability analysis to include supporting hydrostatic tables/curves (righting and heeling arm and moments, static heel values), summary of applicable loads (full load and minimum operation (10% fuel, no cargo, 2 persons at 220 lbs) conditions with weights, LCG and VCG indicated), craft geometry information (wind heel area, downflooding points considered, door openings, etc), all assumptions (wind speed, roll back,) and comparison of results versus criteria.
(iv) Detailed Weight Estimate to include:
a. Lightship condition: a detailed listing and summation of the material and equipment/items, their units, quantities, weights and center of gravities (longitudinal and vertical) that comprise the Lightship condition of the proposed boat. Alternatively, the data from a scale weighing, inclining or dead weight survey of the parent craft and a detailed list of the specific variances/changes (including units, weights, and CG’s) required to meet this solicitation from the weighed craft);
b. Loads: a detailed listing and summation of the load items, their units, quantities, weights and center of gravities (longitudinal and vertical) that comprise the various loads on the craft;
c. Load Conditions: a detailed listing and summation of weights and center of gravities which is comprised of the sum of Lightship and the various Loads as defined in the specification;
d. Margins: clear identification/notation of any assumed or applied margins (design, build, service life, other) to the Lightship, Loads and Vessel Conditions summations. If using low margins builders shall justify these with historical production data, scale weighings, or by some other means;
e. Origin: Clear definition of the reference origin and coordinate system (e.g. origin is the transom keel intersection with forward as positive in the longitudinal and starboard is positive in the athwartships).
(v) Documentation that the proposed designs are based upon similar craft design(s) which has been built and demonstrated to be safe and suitable in actual service in a comparable mission profile in military or heavy duty commercial applications. Similar craft design documentation to include the following: weight report or scale weighing of actual parent craft with Longitudinal Center of
Gravity (LCG); photograph(s) of previous craft; product specification sheet listing vital characteristics for similar craft (providing minimum characteristics listed in Specification Item
070-1); a detailed list of modifications to the previous craft design required to achieve the requirements of this solicitation;
Note: The Government will use the Offeror’s submitted drawings and technical data only for the purpose of evaluating the Offeror’s proposal.
(c) Statement of Work Compliance: To support Government evaluation of Offeror’s ability to successfully execute the Statement of Work (SOW), Offeror shall provide the following in Vol. I
Section 1(c):
(i) Rights in Technical Data: The Offeror shall address the noncommercial and commercial technical data rights and computer software rights requirements contained in Section C-3.085-2 of this RFP.
For all noncommercial technical data and computer software to be delivered under the contract, the Offeror shall complete the Noncommercial Technical Data Rights Assertions (Attachment 6)
(fill in “None” if it is not applicable). For all commercial technical data and computer software to be delivered under the contract, the Offeror shall complete the Commercial Technical Data Rights
Assertions (Attachment 7) (fill in “None” if it is not applicable). Failure to complete and submit
Attachment 6 and Attachment 7 may result in the Offeror’s proposal being non-responsive. The completed Attachments 6 And Attachment 7 will become part of any resulting contract award.
(ii) Boat Design, Production and Delivery: To support Government evaluation of the Offeror’s ability to design and produce the proposed boat to meet the minimum required delivery schedule in
Section F, Offeror shall provide the following in Vol. I Section 1(c):
a. An overview of the Offeror’s engineering and design capability for execution of the SOW, including boat design and configuration management. The overview shall include (but not be limited to) a description of the engineering personnel supporting the project and associated technical capabilities (software, modeling, simulation, etc.) to be used in design of the proposed boats.
b. An overview of the Offeror’s production capability that will be used to produce and test proposed boats. The overview shall include (but not be limited to) a description of shop industrial facilities and personnel for fabrication, metal work, electrical / mechanical / rigging, quality assurance and testing of the boat, based upon similar use in production of similar craft; description of welding qualification program for steel and aluminum fabrication, including description of weld procedure and personnel qualification testing; quantity of boats of the similar craft design that have been built at the Offeror’s production facility (over how many years);
quantity of boats of the similar craft design currently in service (with average time in service).
c. A build schedule for the base order and option years, as specified in the
SOW, in Offeror’s desired format, outlining major events of the build process, and including (as a minimum) start date, completion date, builder trials, PDIT, and delivery dates for the first boat and subsequent boats in
Days After Receipt of Order (DARO).
d. Delivery Schedule for base boat and option years as specified in the
Delivery Schedule (Attachment 4). Offeror shall provide written rationale if the proposed delivery dates vary from the notional dates contained in
Attachment 4.
(iii) Warranty: To support Government evaluation of the Offeror’s ability to provide the minimum acceptable builder’s warranty for the proposed boats as required by Section C-3.042-4, Offeror shall provide a description of the proposed builder’s warranty in Vol. I Section 1(c).
(2) Factor 2: Past Performance and Experience (PP&E)
Offerors shall provide three (3) past performance references on same or similar work as required by this RFP, completed within the past five (5) years. Offerors shall use the Past Performance & Experience (Attachment
5) to list these references and explain the relevance of each contract to the current requirement. Offerors shall verify that the references provided are current, available, and will be responsive to Government inquiries. If the offeror will not be the Builder for the proposed boat (more than 50% of the boat will be built by a subcontractor or more than 50% of the boat will be built at a subcontractor’s facility), the offeror shall include one (1) past performance reference for the Subcontractor and shall state the Subcontractor’s name, project manager’s name, street address, phone number, and e-mail address on a separate attachment to be included with the offeror’s proposal. The Subcontractor’s past performance reference will be included in the maximum number of three (3) past performance references. The concern shall perform work for at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing the supplies, not including the cost of materials. Offerors are responsible to submit the Past Performance Form as part of the technical proposal. The Government will utilize Past
Performance Reference Forms received and other resources to gather Past Performance and Experience information on the Offerors.
For those references that are not entered into the Contract Performance Assessment Report System
(CPARS) or the Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting (PPIRS-SR), provide a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 10) to each reference the Offeror elects to use to demonstrate acceptability and quality of the work performed. If several contracts are with the same
Government activity or company, references from at least two different contracts from the same Government activity or company may be used. The Government reserves the right to contact any person or entity regarding the Offeror’s past performance, whether or not listed in the proposal as a reference or point of contact, and whether or not a questionnaire was received from that person or entity.
It is the Offeror's responsibility to ensure that these questionnaires, for both prime contractor and subcontractors, when completed, are in the Contracting Officer's possession on or before the required proposal due date. These questionnaires shall either be e-mailed or mailed. Scanning and e-mailing completed questionnaires is the preferred method of delivery. Delivery in any of the aforementioned forms shall be done to the following persons:
E-MAIL: samantha.rye@navy.mil and ebone.m.neal@navy.mil
Required subject line in the e-mail transmitting the completed questionnaire:
WB LARGE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
STANDARD MAIL OR OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
COMMANDER NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND
ATTN: SAMANTHA RYE, 5W1139
1333 ISAAC HULL AVENUE SE STOP 2020
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20375-2020
These questionnaires when filled out by the selected references must be sent by the reference directly to the
Contracting Officer. The questionnaires shall not be sent via the Offeror to any other party besides the reference him/herself.
The Past Performance & Experience (Attachment 5) shall identify which of the listed contacts for whom the
Offeror performed work was sent a questionnaire. This will let the Contracting Officer know whether she has received questionnaires from all of the Offeror’s references.
Offerors may inquire as to the status of receipt of these questionnaires using the e-mail address shown above.
It is the Offeror's responsibility to ensure that these questionnaires when completed are in the Contracting
Officer's possession on or before the required proposal due date. Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date will be late and might not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The
Government, at its discretion will determine whether or not references received after the proposal due date will be considered.
VOLUME II: PRICE PROPOSAL
Factor 3: Price: The following items shall be completed and included in the Price Volume of the offeror's proposal:
(1) Signed Standard Form 1449 and any amendment(s).
(2) Completed CLIN Pricing Sheet (Attachment 9) with workable formulas. Supplemental spreadsheets with relevant supporting data are allowable. See the Delivery Schedule (Attachment 4) for the notional delivery schedule of each boat. Offerors should price the out year optional CLINs accordingly as this contract is Firm
Fixed Price (FFP).
(3) Pricing shall be submitted on the Spare Parts List (Attachment 3) with workable formulas.
(4) Provide general pricing information or other basis for which proposed pricing was derived.
(5) Offerors must complete Section K of the solicitation (Certifications, Representations, and Other Statements).
The reps and certs are in addition to the information in SAM.gov.
Offerors are required to provide sufficient supporting data to enable the Government to understand how the proposed FFP amounts were developed and to determine the reasonableness of the proposed price.
Clarity and completeness of the Price volume are of the utmost importance. Offerors should check for calculation errors to ensure the total prices are derived from the units and unit prices in Section B of the solicitation. The Price volume must be internally consistent or the price proposal may be considered unacceptable.
The CLIN Pricing Sheet (Attachment 9) includes: PDIT’s, Spares, Delivery Locations, TDP, Training, Cold
Weather Package, Transom Swim Platform, Capstan and Diagnostic laptop and software. It should be understood that the Government intends to purchase boat configurations in general as a set, with the intention being to purchase complete boats utilizing various configurations.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .