PB-X_Draft_RFP_QandA_02-17-17.pdf

N00024‐17‐R‐2209 DRAFT RFP

PB‐X Questions and Answers Updated February 17, 2017

No. Reference Question Answer

1 Reference documents

Kindly provide a source or copy for the documents referenced in the attached.

The Government will provide Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Tech memos.

The Offeror will be responsible for acquiring all other documents.

2 Section J Is it possible to receive Attachment J-3 and J-4 pertaining to GFE as noted in item 400?

These attachments will be posted to fed biz ops once they are available.

3 Section L Do you want Draft-RFP questions submitted on Attachment L-1, Question Submittal Form? If so, can you post the attachment to FBO?

Draft RFP related questions can be submitted via email in accordance with the instructions provided in the synopsis. Att. L- 1 is not required at this time.

4 General Could you please site me in the below solicitation where I can find response date and time?

Response due date and time for the solicitation will be provided once the official RFP is released.

5 General When/how do we express interest in below Sources Sought? Your email will suffice. Please refer to the FBO posting under the subject solicitation for additional details related to the upcoming Industry Day and draft RFP documents...

6 0 – General Guidance

Does the USG anticipate establishing any overriding Key Performance Parameters (KPP) that must be met?

The Government will not define KPP’s in the RFP. All minimum craft requirements will be defined in the Specification.

7 0 – General Guidance

How will the offeror be evaluated on meeting the specifications in Attachment 3? Will a statement of compliance (will comply) per line item suffice? This evaluation is directly related to the level of design effort is done to support the proposal.

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with sections L&M of the RFP. The Government is available to answer questions about the draft RFP including Sections L & M and the draft Specification.

8 042 - General Administrative Requirements

Will PB-X be required to transport a Navy VBSS team and equipment? All necessary payload (including personnel and equipment) is fully defined in the Specification. See section 070 for required loads

9 050-2 – Craft Performance Objectives

Do all range, speed, and draft requirements need to be met in fresh water? Yes.

10 050-2 – Craft Performance Objectives

Are passengers expected to be in shock mitigating seating or can they be seated in temporary/jump seats?

There is no seating requirement for passengers. Offerors shall provide hand rails per section 612-2 of the Specification for passengers to transit on the aft deck.

11 073-2 - Sound

Attenuating Materials

Does the “interior hull structure” include decks and bulkheads? Yes.

12 078-1 - Structural Material/Aluminu m

Can 5083 for high-stress/high-strength applications be added?

As general practice, no. Specific applications for high strength fittings may be considered after award through request for deviation for the Gov’t approval.

13 078-2 - Fiber Reinforced Plastic

Is composite (FRP) an acceptable material for the hull structure?

The Specification is open to allow for either aluminum or FRP hull construction.

14 078-2 - Fiber Reinforced Plastic

Is mixed construction (i.e. aluminum hull structure and composite cabin) allowable?

Mixed construction is acceptable as long as any potential corrosion issues (i.e. carbon fiber) are addressed appropriately.

15 084-1 - Air Transport

Please clarify the maximum height limit for air transport. Furthermore, is this height measured when on a standard trailer or an air-transport trailer?

Additional maximum height information is available in: MIL-STD-1366E (Table 25, Figure 27).

The requirement is for a standard trailer capable of loading the craft into a C-17.

16 084-2 - Road Transport

Please verify that there is no off-road transport/handling requirement. PB-X has no off-road transportation requirement. Road surfaces are expected to include High Quality Paved and Loose Gravel with Washboard and Potholes.

084-3 - Marine Transport, Launch and Recovery

Para (b) mentions Hoisting at Sea Launch and Recovery. Please specify each ship the USG intends on using to launch and recover the PB-X, to include the crane lifting specifications for each.

All hoisting at sea requirements are inherent to the Specification. Compliance with specific requirements of the Specification will ensure ability to lift on USN ships of interest.

18 084-3 - Marine Transport, Launch and Recovery

Under which load conditions should the boat be launched/recovered from ship's crane?

Load conditions for lifting are as defined in Spec section 611-3 and 070-2.

19 100-1 - General Structural Requirements

Do first principles calculations include direct analysis such as FEA?

In structural design and analysis, are all welding requirements for the selected standard assumed to be invoked? Please state this clearly in the contract if

so. "Metal structure shall be of generally welded construction" is not an adequate specification without further statements regarding intended review and inspection standard.

Yes. FEA analysis is acceptable; however, it is the responsibility of the Offeror to provide all information necessary to prove the analysis was performed correctly.

Yes. Welding requirements for selected structural standard are to be followed.

20 169-3 - Aft Deck

Overhead Canopy

Is there an on board stowage requirement for the canopy? The canopy shall be capable of being secured in the lowered position. No additional stowage is required.

21 233-1 - Inboard Diesel Performance

Is the Offeror’s proposed craft required to meet the performance requirements while burning alternative fuels?

Desire is for craft to meet all speed requirements using all listed fuel types. If JP-8 fuel imposes a constraint on proposed boat ability to meet speed requirements, the Government requests that the respondent provide an explanation of performance limitations and other design implications imposed by JP-8 requirement.

22 313-4 - Shore Power Battery Charger

Is there any requirement for an externally visible battery charger indicator? No.

23 320-5 - Shore Power System

Are the shore power cords to be included in Light Ship?

No. The shore power cords are not to be included in Light Ship.

24 320-5 - Shore Power System

Is there a requirement for supporting shore power from non-US power sources?

Shore power requirements are fully captured in the Specification.

25 400-1 - Command, Control, Communications , Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

(C4ISR)

Systems

Will GFE space, weight, power and HVAC requirements be provided as part of the RFP? If listed by component, please provide component general location (e.g. Rack, Pilot House, or Rooftop/Arch)? Alternatively, weight allowance per space will be acceptable for design development (e.g. XX lbs.

Rack, YY lbs. Pilot House, ZZ lbs. roof/arch).

GFE space, weight and power will be provided with RFP. HVAC requirements will need to be derived from provided load analysis.

26 400-1 - Command, Control, Communications , Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

(C4ISR)

Systems

Will there be cyber security testing requirements for the builder? No. the Systems Operations Verification and Testing procedures Systems Operational Verification Test (SOVT) provided with the formal RFP will fully define builder required testing of the tactical electronics system.

27 400-2 -

Communications Rack and Power Provisions

Can the builder propose alternative rack dimensions, while still complying with the overall rack dimensions? For example, two 36-inch tall racks vice a single 72-inch tall rack.

The Offeror’s proposal must comply with the specification.

Currently, the specification requires “two (2) A&J Manufacturing Co. p/n 72-A1-1002, 19" W x 26”D x 72”H equipment racks” *** see answer to question X below for update***

28 421-2 - Storage

Please clarify “charts”? Does the USG anticipate carrying paper charts on board the PB-X? If so, what's the anticipated quantity?

Yes, chart quantities vary based on duty location.

29 450-3 - Electro- Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) Imaging System

Is there a required arc of visibility of the EO/IR sensor? Finalization of top side arrangement will occur during the design reviews as described in the SOW.

30 450-4 - Video Distribution System

Is there a requirement for audio (cabin/radio/VIC) recordings for event reconstruction?

This is not a Specification requirement.

31 470-1 Long Range Hailing Device Provisions

Is power needed to support port and starboard LRADs simultaneously? No.

32 512-4 - Heavy Duty Cabin Heat and Air Conditioning

Are the heating and cooling systems expected to be operated pierside using shore power?

No. Heating and cooling systems will not be expected to operate pier side using shore power.

33 561-1 - Hydraulic Steering

Is an electro-hydraulic steering system acceptable? It depends on the details of the proposed system.

34 582-3 - Towing Hawser

There is not enough information in this specification or in the reference towing guidance to determine the appropriate length of the hawser.

For the final RFP, the Specification will be updated with hawser length guidance.

35 600-1 - Onboard Spares

Please clarify what the USG means by "custom storage containers"? For example, are COTS items allowable?

All onboard spares shall have dedicated stowage. Yes, COTS items are allowable.

36 602-2 - Label Plates (General)

There is precedent on US Navy small craft for attachment of placards with government approved adhesive. Can this be considered for PB-X?

Yes, for interior locations.

37 611-2 - Heavy Duty Fendering

Is there any special requirement for bow-mounted fendering (flat nose/push knees)?

No.

38 630-2 - Draft Please provide more definition of draft marks - spacing, size, permanent weld The exact nature of the design waterline

Marks marking requirements, etc? mark depends on the hull material (FRP/aluminum). There are no other requirements.

39 630-3 - Topside Paint

Please clarify topside paint requirements - if the topside is aluminum, is it required to be bead blasted, and FRP painted haze grey, or can aluminum topsides be painted haze grey?

The requirement is as stated in the Specification, either bead blasted or haze gray.

40 630-3 - Topside Paint

Is the builder restricted to haze grey exterior paint scheme? The Specification allows for either aluminum bead blasted top side or haze grey top side paint.

41 630-6 - Anti- Fatigue Matting

Is the requirement for full-height Skydex matting, or is half-height acceptable? Either is fine, or an equivalent alternative.

42 662-1 - Seating- Crew

Will individual weights of all GFE components in Pilot House be provided for use in determining required load rating of seat mounted tables/trays?

All GFE weights will be provided with the formal RFP. If seat mounted equipment is proposed it will be dependent on console arrangements worked during the design reviews described in the SOW. Seats should specify allowable/maximum equipment load.

43 670-1 - Stowage (General)

Please provide part/model numbers for all items to be stowed to allow for proper design of stowage spaces.

Section 670-1 of the Specification talks specifically to items provided by the Offeror.

These items are defined throughout the Specification.

44 700-2 - Remote Weapons System Provisions

Is there an anticipated mounting location or height expectation? Will weapon require blow back distances (e.g., for missile or rocket type weapon)?

No and No. It is desired for the system to be mounted to achieve the greatest visibility while working with in other Specification requirements.

45 Part 1 – General Statement of Work

Part 1 – General Statement of Work, states the acquisition of up to sixty (60) Patrol Boat-Xs (PB-X). However, the Quantities paragraph states a maximum IDIQ limit of forty (40) boats. Please clarify the anticipated ceiling for the first 5-year contract.

Final quantities are currently under examination and will be in the final RFP. We anticipate it to be in the 40-60 range.

46 Part 1 - Data Part 1, Data, suggests that a significant level of design work will be required by the contractor at the time of proposal submittal. Has the USG made any considerations to more fully define the level of design expected at the time of proposal submittal, versus that which will be paid for? A suggestion may be for the USG to establish a Technology Readiness Level (TRL).

Section L clearly defines the data to be submitted at time of proposals. The design review sections of the SOW define the items expected to be defined as part of CLIN 001.

47 CLIN 0001 –

PB-X Design

What level of design work is required at the time of proposal submittal? See Section L for data to be submitted at time of proposal.

48 CLIN 0003 – Does the Government intend to define the Production Level Data Package in No and No. The production level data

Rights and Production Level Data Package terms of an industry standard such as DOD-D-1000, MIL-DTL-31000, or AMSE Y14.100? Specifically, does the Government intend to define the required deliverable Production Level Data Package as a Level 3 or Production Drawing Package?

package is as described in the SOW section C-3.085-12.

49 CLIN 0003 –

Production Level Data Package

Does the USG have an estimated cost for this part of the work? It is the responsibility of the Offeror to provide the cost associated with CLIN 0003 and submit this estimate in their proposal.

50 CLIN 0003 –

Data and Production Level Data Package

Will the vendor retain the rights to use data for other purposes (i.e.

Commercial)?

Data rights are as described in SOW section C-3.085-11.

51 CLIN 0003 –

Data and Production Level Data Package

How will the Government determine the adequacy or acceptability of the Production Level Drawing Package as defined in the SOW? Does the Government intend to perform a (or multiple) physical configuration audits or production process and configuration audits to ensure that the Production Level Drawing Package is adequate? If so, how is the contractor compensated for supporting these Government audits?

Acceptance of the data will be based on acceptance inspections. Offeror’s are free to include the estimated cost of these inspections as part of CLIN 0003.

52 CLIN 0007 –

PB-X

Removable Well Deck Kickstand

What is the USG’s intent for using separate CLIN for this item as opposed to including the item per boat under CLIN 0005?

PB-X may not be required to operate out of Well Decks in all duty locations. As a result, kickstands may not be ordered on a per boat basis, but rather a certain number per operational location.

53 CLIN 0013 and 0016 - Training Aids

Is the USG’s intention to purchase these training aids as opposed to renting them from the engine and waterjet OEMs for the training periods?

This is correct.

54 CLIN 0024 –

Display Models

Are there any ITAR restrictions on using overseas model suppliers? Standard ITAR restrictions apply.

55 CLIN 0024 –

Display Models

Typically, the USG purchases more than one model. Is more than one model anticipated for this program? If so, what is the anticipated number of models?

Notional Quantities will be in the final RFP.

Note- this is an IDIQ contract.

56 Table C-1 It appears that the government expects the design period up to and including PRR to be 7 months; again, what level of design work is to be completed during this period?

The design work to be completed is defined in SOW section C-3.042-2 (PDR, CDR and

PRR)

57 C-3.042-5 - Management Reports

Level of reporting and management requires a significant Program Management effort – does the government expect to allow PM line item as a cost of doing business on this type of contract?

No. CLIN’s are already provided for data charges.

58 C-3.042-7 - Contractor’s Warranty, (b)

Please explain what is meant by this paragraph. Is the Government referring to a warranty that may be offered by a supplier of a component or system of the vessel that is greater than the base vessel warranty of 1-year?

Yes.

Extension of Warranty

59 C-3.042-8 - Purchase Orders

Does the USG expect this to be a requirement for every boat produced? Yes

60 C-3.042-8 - Purchase Orders

Does the USG expect cost data to be included on the purchase orders? Yes

61 C3.042-9 - Operational Security

A Change 2 to the NISPOM was implemented in May 2016. Will this be included in the contract?

Yes

62 C-3.092-2 Para. D references ABYC H-24.18.5 - This standard is for gasoline powered boats. ABYC H-33 is for diesel craft. Please verify which ABYC standard should be used.

In general H-33 is applicable; however, Specification section 541-1 requires a burn test from ABYC H-24.5.7 because of the use of J-8 as a fuel which has a lower flashpoint. The SOW/Specification will be clarified.

63 L.1.2.1.3.1 Detail Design and Engineering Approach

The level of design and analysis detail described for delivery during the proposal (Section L) suggests a significant amount of work to be accomplished by the contractor prior to proposal delivery and ultimately the PDR & CDR – this overlap seems to reduce the work that should be done during PDR & CDR.

Please provide more explicit instructions on Technology Readiness Level (TRL) or design data required at proposal to reduce contract cost and IP ownership restrictions.

TRL designation is not applicable. There is a detailed listing of preliminary information to be provided with the proposal in Section L. There is a detailed listing of design products required during the design review phase in the SOW section 042-2.

64 L.1.2.1.4.3 (a) Facilities

Is the government suggesting that the contractor have some level of dedicated facilities for the production of PB-X?

No, the Government is requesting information on all facilities that will be used in the production of the PB-X. The government is requesting estimations of current and projected work that may compete for the use of these facilities. If the contractor’s facility/workforce is not currently capable of executing this workload the contractor shall outline their plan for completing all work.

65 L.5 - 52.216-1 Type of Contract

If PDR/CDR/PRR work is to be FFP, how will the government be organized to manage the contractual changes needed during this phase in a timely

The Navy will be organized and staffed to manage the program requirements and manner? changes in a timely manner.

66 L.10 – Facility

Security Clearance

L.10 states that at the time of award the contractor must meet the NISPOM requirements for Secret Facility Clearance. Will this be for data/document storage only, or will there be equipment storage required as well. Depending on the government’s approach these could be two very different applications and level of effort to implement at a small business facility.

Data/document storage only is envisioned.

Note: L.10 also states “The Government is not obligated to delay award pending security clearance of any offeror.”

67 Spec 164 Can you clarify ballistic trajectory from Specification Section 164 Addendum? There was a typographical error in the draft.

A new draft has been posted to FBO.gov.

Questions and Answers Received after 30 November 2016 (Includes Industry Day Questions)

SOW/CLINs Would the Navy consider a design competition - then after design finalization, have a separate build to print competition?

It was considered but the current strategy was selected with the following considerations in min. If the Navy commissioned a design, it'd likely go to a design firm, not a builder, and then contract for a build to print. In that case, the builder would have no rights to market the boat to other customers, nor opportunity to influence the design. The strategy with a combined design/build strategy (used very frequently in the MSC ship contracts) provided mutual benefit to the builder and the Navy.

The schedule to compete one contract for design, and wait until work was completely executed and then start another contract for building would possibly add 1-2 years to the program schedule.

69 Spec - General

Some specs name a vendor. When other potential vendors approach the prime it is hard to persuade them to explore alternatives. "The spec says 'X'.

Why should we explore options?"

The PB-X has made little use of ‘brand name’ specifications. Where used, most include “or equal” and the criteria for “or equal” is included in Spec section 042-4.

Instances where the “or equal” has been omitted are typically due to extensive market research, and existing training and logistics support that may preclude cost effective item substitution in service. The Final RFP will include any updated specification/requirements and will be posted to FBO once available.

70 Specification

Why isn't there an objective speed above 35kts to secure and fight the future coastal maritime environment and adversaries that will operate at 50kt speeds in 2017 and beyond?

The threshold speeds are the minimum required to conduct the missions. More aggressive threats would be engaged with onboard weaponry once hostile intent is established. The Final RFP will include any updated specification/requirements and will be posted to FBO once available.

71 Specification general / Section L/M

No make and models have been identified on large equipment.

- What if any benefit will be identified by offering equipment which is currently in the Navy logistics system and currently supported?

Total ownership cost considerations that will be considered during award are described in Sections L and M of the draft RFP.

Proposing equipment with current support in the Navy logistics system should be identified in the offerors response to the TOC factor of Section L/M. The Final RFP will include any updated L&M instructions/evaluation criteria and will be posted to FBO once available.

72 General Are the specs for the 34' PB and the 25' PB available for review? The navy will look into providing those.

73 Specification sect 200

Would the Navy consider a 3 engine/jet solution?

Yes, however, early feasibility assessments by the Navy indicated potential issues with a 3 jet solution being able to get over hump speed. Additionally, the maintenance and fuel burn costs would be accessed with all engines The Final RFP will include any updated specifications/requirements and will be posted to FBO once available.

After initial design and first boat is built, during the "pause", will any changes or MODs desired be an ECP?

It is anticipated that post testing configuration changes will be needed.

Guidance for Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) is provided in the draft RFP, Section C. The Final RFP will include any updated specifications/requirements and will be posted to FBO once available.

75 Specification sect 042-4

Is "or equal" justification included in page count?

Section L only applies page count limits to certain sections of the Technical proposal.

“Or equal” information to address requirements of Spec section 042-4 would be submitted in a section with no page count limit. The Final RFP will include any updated L&M instructions/evaluation criteria and will be posted to FBO once available.

Spec - general

What payload systems and unmanned systems do you contemplate launching and recovering from PB-X?

There are no Specification requirements for launch and recovery of payload or unmanned systems. The Final RFP will include any updated specifications/requirements and will be posted to FBO once available.

77 Section L Can a builder submit multiple proposals: one in aluminum and one in GRP or

FRP?

78 DRL DI-006 We understand there is a purchase order requirement for every boat delivered. Since this is a firm-fixed price contract, will the government accept price redacted purchase orders?

Yes. Specific requirements for purchase are described in the DRL DI-006.

79 SOW – Data Rights You want government purpose rights to potentially allow others to build boats on later contracts.

Will a "new" awardee be limited in their use of data beyond meeting user requirements?

Yes. Data will be available for reproduction for Government contract use only.

Solicitation provisions regarding data rights are included in the draft RFP and any changes will be provided in the final RFP release.

80 Clauses What percent of OEM is US built?

Please refer to DFARS 252.225-7001 referenced in Section I of the draft RFP.

Full text can be found at http://farsite.hill.af.mil.

81 Section L/M – Price volume

Price Evaluation:

- How detailed?

- Priced Build of Material?

- Quotes from Vendors on major equipment?

- Worksheet showing cost, GNA and profit?

Section M, evaluation criteria were included in the draft RFP posted on 9 November 2016. Any changes to section M will be included in the final RFP release.

82 DD254 What should companies do to prepare to obtain a security clearance in Read the requirements in the DD254 and NISPOM and ensure adequate pricing is anticipation of winning the contract? included in the proposal to reflect the effort.

The Navy intends to award and then process the clearance requirements. An updated DD254 has been included in updated draft RFP posted on 17 Feb 2017.

83 Section M

Will this contract be LPTA or Best Value?

The draft Section M provided on 9 November 2016 describes the award basis as Best Value – Tradeoff. Any updates/changes to Section M will be provided in the final RFP release.

84 SOW C-3.085-

Will the government have the right to provide the production data package to another builder?

Yes. The intent is to provide the Production Data Package to the successful Offeror on the follow on contract.

85 Spec section 164 Does the government have a preferred armor?

Armor specifications are included in the Specification Section 164 Addendum. Any updates/changes will be included in the final RFP release.

86 Section L – Past Performance Why Does the government force the bidder to aggravate their customers?

As Government employees who often fill out past performance questionnaire’s ourselves, it is considered part of normal duty.

Will accessories like electronic gauges and monitors (displays) be purchased by the boat builder that wins the contract?

And will they only purchase enough to outfit the ships built per year? (4/year)

Yes. With the exception of few GFE components, all material and equipment for the boat will be purchased by the builder.

Any updates/changes to requirements will be included in the final RFP release.

88 Spec section 100 Is there a preference between aluminum and FRP. Which material will have the advantage? "Not politically correct answer"

The Specification allows either aluminum or fiberglass hull material. Neither material will be more favorably than the other. Any updates/changes to requirements will be included in the final RFP release.

89 RFP

Could you please recap the schedule for the following milestones?

1) RFP Release

2) Award of DD&C Contract

3) Delivery of 1st boat/set of boats

4) Award of 1st follow-on contract

The ‘notional’ schedule is:

1) Government intends to release the final RFP prior to the end of the 2nd quarter FY2017

2) Award by 4th quarter FY2017

3) See Attachment J-11 for notional delivery schedule

4) To be determined

90 To what extent are small businesses allowed to subcontract or team with large businesses?

Please see FAR 52.219-14 for the limitation of subcontracting for small business set-aside procurements.

91 SOW C-3.085-1

DI-016-09

Is there an electrical load analysis (ELA) for this project? Will need to spec alternators with no genset.

An electrical load analysis is a requirement of the SOW/DRL’s during the design phase.

The load analysis for the GFE will be provided for inclusion in the builders calculations with the solicitation. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

92 Spec section

Has the requirement for "operation in debris cluttered conditions" been removed?

Current overseas operations are conducted in harbors with floating trash that accumulates around moored boats. Current SOP’s are to remove the trash/debris prior to engaging waterjets. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

93 Spec section 050 As a multi-function vessel, is there a bollard pull thrust requirement?

There is no bollard thrust requirement. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

94 Spec section 420-1

The ECDIS/navigation system listed in the RFP is a FURUNO NavNet TZ touch system. Why not list out stringent criteria in the specs and opt for a vendor agnostic/best in class solution vs. mandate one vendor (FURUNO)?

What division/department dictates this decision, and how can other ECDIS providers influence future methodologies for how navigation solutions are procured/selected?

The ECDIS system is not the Furuno system but a Navy owned software system that will be on a tactical laptop embarked as

GFE.

Future use of commercial navigation systems can be discussed with the Navy’s technical engineering group at the Combatant Craft Division. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

95 Spec section 430-1

With the VIC-5 Program ending in 2019 and no intention to extend, is the Navy look for a new communication system for the RFP?

The Navy procures the VIC-5 intercom system from the Army program office.

Selection of the replacement system will be in accordance with their future solicitation.

Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

96 Spec section

Glazing.

We assume there will be a ballistic rating.

- What level?

- Is there light weight requirements?

- Will there be an emergency release system required for window system?

- Pressure load rating (i.e. Wave or bluewater impact)

- Is there "Buy America"?

The ballistic requirements are in a limited distribution document available upon request from the contracting office.

See instructions on FBO to request this information.

Egress requirements are in the Specification.

Pressure load rating will depend on builders proposed design.

Yes, Buy America Act applies pursuant to DFARS 252.225-7001 in Section I of the draft RFP. Any updates/changes to the solicitation provision/contract clauses will be provided in the final RFP.

Requirements for length, beam, draft, waterplane area, and weight limits point to missing displacement. Do you prefer catamaran tunnel or cathedral hulls over deep-vee hull forms?

The Navy has conducted feasibility designs and RFI’s to indicate the requirements are feasible, there is no displacement requirement. There is no preference for hulls forms, but transport height and seakeeping requirements may restrict. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP.

98 Spec section 070-2 Can you please clarify the nomenclature regarding lightship/deadweight/payload to rewrite with definitions in NAVSEA Weight Management Guide. Road conditions required for stability and performance criteria are potentially confusing.

Specific load condition definitions for the PB-X program are included in the Specification and the payload is clearly defined. Please follow up with a more specific question regarding the confusing areas.

99 Spec - General Are there any signature requirements? No.

100 Spec section 630-3 Do you have a camouflage preference?

There is no camouflage requirement. Finish color of boat to be bead blasted aluminum or Haze Gray per the Specification. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP.

101 Spec section 611-2

Change from collared boat to fender?

The boat is required to conduct alongside operations. The fendering requirement is in the Spec. There is no callout for either collar or fender. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP

102 SOW - General Do you have to recompete after 5 years? Yes. Current regulations limit contract length to 5 years.

103 Spec Section 042 Operational envelope?

The operational envelop is defined in the Specification. Any updates/changes to the solicitation/requirements will be provided in the final RFP.

104 Will there be a low range and high range in the RFP? Please provide clarification on what type of ranges you are referring to.

105 RFP Is it a single award? Yes. The intent is to award to a single Offeror.

106 Section L

Can past performance be pulled from CPARS instead of having to go back to the customers?

Guidance regarding past performance was provided in the draft Section L posted on 9 November 2016. The Government can pull bidder past performance information from CPARS. Further guidance will be provided in Section L of the final RFP once released.

107 SOW 3.042-2 Will there be a requirement for OEM(s) to participate in system integration design?

Yes. Minimally, The Contractor’s ballistics integration agent, design agent (if used), and the Noise Control Consultant (if used) shall attend both design reviews. The OEM’s for the Propulsion Engine and Waterjet shall attend the Critical Design Review and are optional for the Preliminary Design Review. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

108 SOW 3.085-7,

092-1, 092-2 and DRL

Same question regarding overall system, commissioning and design evolution?

Yes. Minimally, the SOW and DRL’s require OEM certification of installation for select major equipment/components and first and each boat test certifications. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

109 SOW 3.085-7,

092-1, 092-2 and DRL DI-022

Will OEM certification of installation be required on “every” boat, first boat of delivery order, or something else?

Answer varies with system. Engines/jets will require commissioning cert by OEM authorized rep, other systems OEM cert requirements will be clearly defined in the final SOW and DRL’s. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

110 662-1 Seating- Crew

Please confirm the following statement:

As set out in the draft right now, the seats should only be tested vertically at Threshold Level 4 (6.12g impacts) with a duration of 0.1s with 5th, 50th 95th percentile Male and Female. Measured at 512hz and filtered with a low-pass 4-pole Butterworth filter with a 20-Hz cut-off frequency.

Impacts shall have a duration of 0.1s or larger that fits within the envelope defined in the report. Testing shall be conducted three times at each severity level up to and including test severity Threshold Level 4 (Military Class 4-1) Test weights are defined in section 662-1 of the specification.

Samples shall be collected at a minimum of 512 samples per second. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP.

111 662-1 Seating- Crew

Do the impact characteristics such as rise time and duration in the Level 4 envelope correspond to the forces of the PB-X spec craft?

The impact characteristics of the level 4 envelope are representative of historical craft that are of comparable speed, weight, length and operation environment to that called out in the PB-X specification. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

112 662-1 Seating- Crew

Are all 5 seats to be equipped with a work table? Is there an equipment matrix available for each seat?

No. The government envisions 2-3 seat work stations will be required to satisfy the specification. The specification does not require that these work stations be integral to the seat. Console workstation arrangements will be defined during the 113design phase after award. If a seat mounted work station is proposed the rating of that workstation and seat should be provided as part of the critical equipment list data.(example give E.G. the seat is rating for up to 250 lb occupant while 15lb of equipment payload is mounted on the workstation). Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

113 662-1 Seating-

What are the expectations for testing; self or third party independent? The government will be willing to accept either. At this time the government does not intend to conduct or fund a 3rd party test to compare all proposed seats. Any updates/changes to the

114 662-1 Seating-

Seating competition; OEM or NAVSEA to select seat? Builders will select the seat they intend to propose with their bid. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

115 662-1 Seating- Crew

What is the preference for suspended work station height adjustment? A) Adjust work table independent of seat height B) move with seat adjust C) non-adjust?

Workstations shall be designed/arranged to be fully functional in both the seated and standing position. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

116 662-1 Seating- Crew

Are the MARK VI seating requirements available? No.

117 Att. 3.

Section 670-2

Please provide required cu. ft. of space for crew gear stowage. The components required to be stowed are listed in 670-2. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

118 Att. 3.

Section 313-4

Will the USG consider a combination charger/inverter option (i.e. Victron Quattro Series)?

In the final RFP components called out with “or equal” may be replaced with suitable alternatives that meet the requirements outlined in section 042-4 “Alternate Items” of the specification. Any updates/changes to the specifications/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

119 Att. 3

Section 313-1

Will alternative battery solutions be considered for the house batteries to conserve space/weight (i.e. lithium ion)?

No. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

120 Att. 3

Section 233-1

What percentage of the vessel’s operational profile (lifecycle) will be operated on JP-5 and/or JP-8 (e.g. 75% DFM, 20% JP-5, 5% JP-8)?

JP fuels shall only be used when diesel fuel is unavailable. It is estimated that over the life of the boat JP fuels will account for 5% of the fuel usage. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

121 Att. 3

Section 150-1

This section specified “watertight” windows. However, 625-1 specified “weathertight” windows. ABYC H-3 has defined testing standards for both weathertight and watertight windows. Please clarify whether the USG requires weathertight or watertight windows.

PB-X shall be equipped with watertight window. The “weathertight” windows called out in section 625-1 is a typographical error.

Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

122 Att. 3

Section 700-2

The coverage specification is unclear. Does the USG require 360-degree overlapping coverage from the three crew-served weapons or is “maximum coverage” allowable by the vessel’s configuration acceptable?

The crew served weapons (excluding the Remote Weapons system) shall provide 360 degree coverage of the boat. The remote weapons system provisions shall be located to provide the remote weapon with a maximized coverage. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

123 Att. 3

Section 070-1

If using ABS for structural rules, do we use the wave heights specified in Section 070-1 or do we use the rule set established wave height in ABS HSNC 3.2.2 Table 1 for establishing vertical acceleration and center of gravity?

If using ABS structural rules wave heights called out in section 070-1 shall be used to determine the accelerations at the center of gravity. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

124 Att. 3

Section 070-2

Are the kickstands to be included in lightship or are they considered a payload trade-off?

Kickstands shall be included in light ship weight. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided

125 Att. 1. ABYC E-11.8.1.1.2 requires the largest connected intermittent load to be The inverter feeds five individual

Section C- 3.085-1 applied to the continuous load analysis. Can we exclude the inverter from this calculation to reduce the number of batteries required to meet the 2-hour power requirement?

receptacles. For the purpose of the Electrical Load Analysis treat each receptacle as an individual 500 W load (i.e.

do not treat the inverter as a single load).

Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

126 Section L.

L.1.1.1

IMS is limited to 15 pages. However, Section L 1.2.1.4.2, Integrated Master Schedule, has no discussion of page limitations. Which is correct?

L.1.1.1 is correct with a 15 page limit. This will be added to Section L 1.2.1.4.2 of the final RFP once released.

127 Section L

L.1.2.1.3.1

Detailed Design and engineering Overview, paragraph (g) is a duplicate of paragraph (f)

Comment unclear, the paragraphs contain different content.

128 Section M

M.2.1.1.2 Factor

The second paragraph is a duplicate of the first paragraph. Comment unclear, the paragraphs contain different content.

129 Att. 3

Section 420-2

This specification does not specify the quantity of TZTTouch 14” MFDs.

However, the crew seating requirement indicates a “coxswain” and “navigator” seat which would suggest more than one TZTTouch needed for effective piloting/navigation duties. Please confirm that only one TZTTouch 14” MFDs is required.

Confirmed, there is only one TZTTouch 14" MFD required for the designed system. This will be better explained in the drawings released with the final RFP. There will also be two "slave" displays, each of which is capable of duplicating the display shown on the TZTTouch. For navigation purposes, only the "navigator" will have control over the TZTTouch, while the "Coxswain" would have the ability to view, but not control, what is on the TZTTouch display. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

130 Att. 3

Section 662-1

How will the laboratory test results for the seating systems be evaluated? Evaluation will be conducted in accordance with Section M. Seat performance will be one of many factors considered in determining best value of an offer. Any updates/changes to the

131 Att. 2

Section 262-1

The specification calls for a Reverso FLOCS manifold (VA p/n 07-0574-01) coupled to a 24 Vdc pump gear pump with On-Off switch (GP-311S-24 p/n 28-2209). Will the Government accept the Oil Change System (p/n 44-2407) as an acceptable alternate, since it is a combined assembly?

Yes, the government is open to comparable systems with combined assemblies as long as the gear pump can be replaced independently of the manifold in case of a failure and the systems meets the requirements defined in section 042-4 “Alternate Items” of the specification. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

132 Att. 3 Section 625-2

Will the government specify straight line or pendulum/pantograph wipers? The government will be willing to accept either. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

133 Att. 3 Section 625-2

Is wiper heat required? No. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

134 Att. 3 Section 625-2

Is wiper spray required? Per the Specification the craft shall be equipped with a wiper/washer system. The system shall be fully functional at all craft speeds and operating conditions. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

135 Att. 3 Section 300

What is electrical input? Electrical system requirements are outlined in section 300 of the Specification. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

136 Att. 3 Section 625-2

Will wiper motor be mounted inside or outside the bulkhead? The government will be willing to accept either. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

137 Att. 3 Section 625-2

Is there a minimum window coverage requirement? It is the responsibility of the OEM to propose an arrangement that optimizes visibility from the cabin. Acceptable window coverage may vary based off factors such as window size, placement and seating layout. Any updates/changes to the in the final RFP release.

138 Att. 3 Section 625-2

Will wipers be top or bottom mounted? The government will be willing to accept either. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

139 Att. 3 Section 625-2

What does "greater than 45° off centerline" mean? All windows that face forward or are rotated 45 degrees or less from forward shall be equipped with a windshield wiper. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

140 Att. 3 Section 625-2

How many forward facing windows are there? The OEM is responsible for proposing the general arrangements of the craft (including windows) with their proposal. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

141 Att. 3 Section 662-2

What seat adjustments are required? Seats shall be adjustable for to adhere to MIL-STD-1427 for use by both male and female occupants. If seats meet specification without adjustment no additional adjustment is required. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

142 Att. 3 Section 662-2

What is the spacing in front of each seat? This question is in reference to the requirement that the occupant be able to operate in either the sitting or standing position. Will the seat have to fold up to allow this?

The government will not define seat spacing in the RFP however workstations/seats shall be fully functional in both the standing and seated position. The government is willing to accept either folding or rigid seats as long as the workstations remain fully functional in both standing and seated positions. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided

143 Transport Kickstand: Please provide more detailed description or Current Navy craft are equipped with a photos/drawings of a current system being used. variety of types of kickstands. Older craft have a single piece kickstand with a leg on the port and starboard sides of the transom connected by a support beam. Recent craft have been equipped with separate port and starboard kickstands that deploy at the transom. The port and starboard kickstands can be deployed independently of one another. The government is impartial to the type of kickstand proposed. The government desires a kickstand that is easy for the crew to operate and will not hinder the performance of the craft in the stowed position. The government intends to only install kickstand on craft conducting missions were it is required. The kickstands should be easy to remove and install with the use of tools normally carried on the boat. At the current time the government only has pictures of single piece kickstands available for public release and only in the stowed position. Pictures can be found at the following links:

http://www.navy.mil/view_image.asp?id=29 http://www.navy.mil/view_image.asp?id=11 http://www.navy.mil/view_image.asp?id=11 http://www.navy.mil/view_image.asp?id=11 Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

144 Are all 5 seats to be equipped with a work table? Is there an equipment matrix available for each seat?

No. The government envisions 2-3 seat work stations will be required to satisfy the specification. The specification does not require that these work stations be integral to the seat. Console workstation arrangements will be defined during the design phase after award. If a seat mounted work station is proposed the rating of that workstation and seat should be provided as part of the critical equipment list data.(example give e.g. the seat is rating for up to 250 lb occupant while 15lb of equipment payload is mounted on the workstation). Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

145 What are the expectations for testing; self or third party independent? The government will be willing to accept either. At this time the government does not intend to conduct or fund a 3rd party test to compare all proposed seats. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

146 Seating competition; OEM or NAVSEA to select seat? Builders will select the seat they intend to propose with their bid. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

147 What is the preference for suspended work station height adjustment? A) Adjust work table independent of seat height B) move with seat adjust C) non-adjust?

Any type of adjustment is acceptable as long as workstations provide full functionality in both the seated and standing positions. Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided in the final RFP release.

148 Are the MARK VI seating requirements available? No.

149 On the PB-X specifications on page 13/54, 070-2 (f.), there is a weight for "mission gear" (3,310 lbs). Is this amount stipulated or is it derived from some part of the payload table? It seems to me to be an arbitrary amount, not related directly to any other weights.

Section 050-1.f. defines the payload as 4,210 lbs including 5 crew at 285 lbs each.

Since the crew won't be riding in the boat when it is on the trailer, but they will leave their gear onboard the weight of "mission gear" (3,310 lbs) in 070-2 (f.) is derived from taking 5 crew at a dressed body weight of

180 lbs each (900 lbs) and deducting that from the payload number (4,210 - 900 = 3,310). Any updates/changes to the specification/requirements will be provided

Is the Ballistic Spec document available for vendors to access?