Laser_Eye_Protection_-_Questions_from_Gov't_to_Vendors_12_June_2015.pdf

PDF 150 KB Posted

Attached to
Laser Eye Protection Threat Spectacles
Solicitation number
N00019-15-P1-PMA202-0006
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Laser_Eye_Protection_-_DRAFT_SPS_Contract_A-M_FINAL_Amendment_Post_26_Sept_2017.pdf PDF
Laser_Eye_Protection_-_FINAL_SPS_Sections_A-M_6-15-17.docx DOCX document
A006_Presentation_Mod_20170605_FH.doc DOC document
Laser_Eye_Protection_-_FINAL_SPS_Sections_A-M_1-12-2017.docx DOCX document
LEP_RFP_Industry_Questions_10_January_2017.pdf PDF
A008_CM_Plan.doc DOC document
A013_Systems_Eng_Mgmt_Plan.doc DOC document
Attachment_J-1_-_LEP_SOW_-_2_Dec_2016.docx DOCX document
A015_Prod_Drawi_Models.doc DOC document
Attachment_J-5_-_LEP_SEP_(draft_v0.97.5)_-_8_Dec_2016.pdf PDF
A004_Contractor's_Risk_Management_Plan.doc DOC document
Attachment_L-5,_Vol_4_Cost-Price_-_9_Dec_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_L-4_Vol_3__PP-1_PP_Con_Data_-_8_Dec_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A011_Haz_Mat_Mgmt_Prog_Rpt.doc DOC document
A023_Data_Accession_List.doc DOC document
A016_-_OT-16-20052.pdf PDF
A021_Manufacturing_Plan.doc DOC document
A014_Design_Specification.doc DOC document
A016_Test_Plan_and_Proced.doc DOC document
Attachment_L-1_Vol_1_ES_Tables_-_8_Dec_2016_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A002_Program_Management_Plan.doc DOC document
A015_Att_1_Encl_1_CDEX.pdf PDF
A022_FRACAS.doc DOC document
A015_Att_1_Encl_2_DFISv1.0.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A007_Minute_Minutes.doc DOC document
A012_-_OT-16-20002.pdf PDF
A018_FEMCA.doc DOC document
Attachment_J-4_-_LEP_Program_DD254_signed_-_8_Dec_2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-3_-_Risk_Management_Plan_-_8_Dec_2016.pdf PDF
A003_Integ_Prog_Mgmt__IMS.doc DOC document
A012_RTVM_Performance_Spec.doc DOC document
A006_Presentation.doc DOC document
A010_Haz_Mat_Mgmt_Prog_Plan.doc DOC document
A017_-_OT-16-20001.pdf PDF
Laser_Eye_Protection_-_FINAL_SPS_Sections_A_thru_M_12-13-2016.docx DOCX document
A019_Test-Inspection_Report.doc DOC document
A001_Contracto_Progress_Statu.doc DOC document
Attachment_J-6_-_SECDEF_TRA_Guidance_(Apr_2011)_-_8_Dec_2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-2_-_LEP_Performace_Specification_PMA202-11001_R-0.pdf PDF
A020_QA_Program_Plan.doc DOC document
A017_RTVM_Design_Spec.doc DOC document
Attachment_L-7_Vol_2_T-1_Technical_Cross_Reference_Matrix_-_8_Dec_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_L-2_Vol_2_T-2_SB_Goals_-_8_Dec_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A011_-_OT-17-20019-_Laser_Eye_Protection_(LEP)_HMMP_Report.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-8_-_LEP_Cross_Ref_Matrix_-_12_Dec_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_L-3_Vol_3_PPQ_-_12_Dec_2016.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-7_-_LEP_GFP_Worksheet_-_8_Dec_2016.pdf PDF
A009_OPSEC_Plan.doc DOC document
Attachment_L-6_TMSA_-_8_Dec_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A015_Att_1_LEP_TDP_Option_Selection_Worksheet-15Nov2016.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 104 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Question Item Spec Section Questions

Q1 OD 3.4 Could you achieve significantly better results with regards to higher transmission and better color balancing if protection levels were only required in the central 45° cone angle?

Q2 Eyestrain 3.5.2.2 How does your company test Eyestrain/comfort over long periods of use?

Q3 Color Metric 3.5.2.3 The Navy desires a metric that will ensure a high degree of confidence in compatibility with color displays. Do you use any metrics for color perception/display compatibility that you think would be valuable to the Government? If so please provide details.

Q4 Off Axis Optics 3.6.1 What kind of optical quality, (e.g., prism, spherical power, etc.), can the Government expect outside the central 15° viewing cone angle, when measured?

Q5 Environmental 3.8 What metrics does your company utilize to predict Service/Storage life of your products?

Q6 High Mass Impact

3.9.4 The intent is to have a metric that will ensure that the spectacles, with Rx solution included, will not break apart into two pieces during flight. This method was described in ANSI Z87.1 as a method of ensuring RX inserts will remain secure. Can you tell us about a metric or the method your company uses to test the retention strength of a prescription component?

Q7 RX

Methodology

4.5.1 The Government is interested in learning about the

manner in which your company handles Rx capability.

What organization produces the Rx lenses? How are they implemented into your LEP solution? What metrics are used to gauge user acceptance?

Q8 Visual compatibility

4.7.2 How does your organization gauge visual compatibility?

Through visual acuity charts, color charts, computer models, or some other method?

Q9 Lens Coating and Adhesion

4.11.3 What method does your organization use to measure

coating adhesion strength? Is there a standard document?

Q10 Abrasion Resistance

4.11.1 4.11.2

What method does your organization use to measure abrasion resistance? Is there a standard document?

Q11

Photopic /Scotopic

3.7.1 3.7.2 4.9.1 4.9.2

What are the maximum Photopic (Illuminant E) and Scotopic (Illuminant E) your company is able to achieve currently? How much development would be required to increase those values?

Q12 Optical Density 3.4 Do your products differ significantly in terms of color balance, higher PLT transmission, etc., depending on whether you use a single OD or use one OD within a foveo-centric cone angle of plus or minus 25 degrees and a different OD outside that central cone angle? If you were to develop a new design, do you anticipate that using either a single OD or two OD’s would have a significant impact on other characteristics?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .