Laser_Eye_Protection_-_DRAFT_LEP_SOW_19_Mar_15_(FBO).pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR

LASER EYE PROTECTION (LEP) THREAT SPECTACLES

ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT (EMD) AND

PRODUCTION PROGRAM

Revision: Draft

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution limited to DoD and DoD Contractors only; Critical

Technology: To protect information and technical data that advance current technology or describe new technology in an area of significant or potentially significant military application or that relate to a specific military deficiency of a potential adversary. Information of this type may be classified or unclassified; when unclassified, it is export-controlled and subject to the provisions of DOD Directive

5230.25. Other requests for this document shall be referred to Commander, Naval Air Systems

Command (PMA202), 21491 Great Mills Road Suite 202, Lexington Park, MD 20653-1394.

SOLICITATION NUMBER:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

1.0 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the effort required for engineering development, manufacture, test and production of Laser Eye Protection (LEP) Threat Spectacles for the

Engineering Development Model (EDM) and Production quantities of LEP Spectacles.

This SOW includes the requirements for associated program management, systems engineering, testing and logistics support and production.

1.1 Background.

The purpose of LEP is to reduce the possibility of damage to the eye from a variety of laser threats. Threats to aircrew come from both unintentional friendly and unfriendly sources.

Aircraft and pilot lasing incidents are increasing, with the majority of the incidents occurring at night during aircraft takeoff and landing. The Navy has been tasked to design, produce and deploy a multiple wavelength spectacle to address the needs of fixed and rotary wing aircrew in fixed multiple wavelength laser threat environments.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 General.

The following documents are applicable to this SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the text of this SOW and the references cited herein, the SOW shall take precedence. Nothing in the SOW supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specified exemption has been obtained. Unless otherwise specified, the versions of these documents are those cited in the solicitation or contract.

SPECIFICATIONS

PMA202-11001/R-0 Performance Specification for the LEP Threat Spectacles

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARDS/HANDBOOKS AND REGULATIONS

MIL-HDBK-502A Military Handbook: Acquisition Logistics

8 Mar 2013

MIL-STD-882E Department of Defense Standard Practice: System Safety

11 May 2012

NAVAIRINST 4355.19D Systems Engineering Technical Review Process

OPNAVINST 3432.1 Operations Security

4 Aug 2011

GEIA-HB-0007B Logistics Product Data Handbook

10 Feb 2014

DoD 5220.22-M National Industrial Security Program Operating

28 Mar 2013 Manual (NISPOM)

DoDM 5200.01 DoD Information Security Program

24 Feb 2012

DoDI 5230.24 Distribution Statements on Technical Documents

23 Aug 2012

FAR Part 42 Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 42.5

PMA202 DOCUMENTS

Risk Management Plan Risk Management Plan for NAVAIR Aircrew

September 2013, Rev 3 Systems Program Office (PMA202)

Configuration Management Configuration Management Plan for Aircrew

Plan 2013, Rev 2 Systems (PMA202)

Non-Government standards and other publications.

ISO 9001:2008 International Organization for Standardization Quality

Management Systems

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General.

The work required by this contract shall be performed in accordance with this SOW. The

Contractor shall provide engineering, testing and production to meet the performance criteria specified by the Performance Specification, PMA202-11001/R-0 and in accordance with the detailed requirements below.

3.2 Program Management.

The Contractor shall establish and maintain management and operations that include: program planning and control, cost and scheduling, subcontractor control, financial management, data management, systems engineering management, risk and configuration management. The

Contractor shall ensure that subcontractors and major suppliers comply with all established and maintained management operations to provide a seamless integration environment.

3.2.1 Contractor Integrated Master Schedule (CIMS).

The Contractor shall develop, maintain and manage a CIMS that depicts all activities from contract award to contract closing. The CIMS shall be used as the primary document for tracking all major program milestones. The CIMS shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval in accordance with in accordance with

(CDRL XXXX).

3.2.2 Post Award Conference.

The Contractor shall host a post award meeting between Contractor and Government contracts and management personnel, no later than 30 working days after contract award at the Contractor’s facility. The post award meeting shall be no more than 2 working days and there will be no more than 10 Government attendees. The meeting shall cover the topics as set forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 42.5.

3.2.3 Integrated Product Team (IPT) Meetings.

The Contractor shall conduct weekly IPT meetings with the Government via teleconference to review program/engineering performance. At a minimum, the

Contractor shall present the following information at each weekly review:

a. Completed Tasks

b. Tasks in progress, including problems being encountered

c. Upcoming tasks, including potential roadblocks

d. Schedule status and compliance

3.2.4 Risk Management (RM).

The Contractor shall support the PMA202 Risk Management Plan (Attachment X) and shall participate with Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), via teleconference, in both monthly Risk Working Group (RWG) meetings and monthly NAVAIR Risk

Management Boards (RMBs). The Contractor responsibilities shall include identifying risks, formulating risk mitigation plans, completing risk mitigation steps and providing the status of all risk-related activities (CDRL XXXX).

3.2.5 Reserved.

3.2.6 Configuration Management (CM).

The Contractor shall adhere to the PMA202 Configuration Management Plan

(Attachment X). The Contractor shall notify the Government of all design/drawing changes after completion of Critical Design Review (CDR) until formal Engineering

Change Proposal (ECP) controls are implemented. Upon successful completion of the

Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) the Government will take responsibility for configuration control.

3.2.7 Government Meetings and Program Management Reviews (PMRs).

The Contractor shall conduct an annual PMR with Government participation at the

Contractor’s facility. The PMR shall be no more than 2 working days and there will be no more than 10 Government attendees. PMRs may be conducted in conjunction with other scheduled meetings (i.e., System Engineering Technical Review (SETR) events).

PMR topics will include, at a minimum, cost, schedule, performance, risks and issues impacting the overall program. Status of action items from previous PMRs shall be presented. Agendas and briefs will be provided to the PMA/PMO no later than 2 weeks prior to the event; minutes no later than 14 working days following the event. The

Contractor shall provide meeting agendas, briefs and minutes in accordance with

CDRL XXXX.

3.3 System Engineering.

3.3.1 Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs).

The Contractor shall conduct the following Systems Engineering Technical Reviews

(SETRs) and Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs), as described in NAVAIRINST

4355.19D, in accordance with the approved Systems Engineering Management Plan

(SEMP) and schedule them in accordance with the approved CIMS. The Contractor shall meet the tailored entrance criteria for each review as described in Sections 3.3.2 thru 3.3.10. The Contractor shall provide the required documentation, material, and analyses regarding the requirements in advance of the scheduled event to allow sufficient time to examine the information in detail. provide presentations for SETRs

(CDRL XXXX). The Contractor shall support closing of Requests for Action (RFAs);

Requests for Information (RFIs) and Action Items (AIs) initiated at reviews to include planned corrective actions and estimated closure dates. SETR events will be considered complete when all RFAs are signed off by the Government. After the completion of the SETR event, the Contractor shall prepare and distribute meeting minutes, to include final presentation materials and action items (CDRL XXXX).

3.3.2 System Requirements Review II (SRR-II).

The Contractor shall participate, prepare, and support technical discussions with the

Government in the SRR-II conducted at Patuxent River Naval Air Station (NAS) in accordance with the Government Integrated Master Schedule, (Attachment X). The

Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to SRR-II entry:

a. Preliminary physical system description, including conceptual design drawings/models

b. Preliminary Verification and Validation Methodology defined for all specification requirements

c. Test and evaluation strategy (brief/slides)

d. Risk Management Plan

e. Updated risk assessment

f. Updated SEMP

g. Logistics documentation due at Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

h. Plan for managing security of classified data

i. Updated CIMS

j. SRR-II checklist completed

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through j at SRR-II shall be in accordance with CDRLs XXXX, XXXX, XXXX)

3.3.3 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) TIM.

The Contractor shall host the PDR TIM conducted at the Contractor’s facility in accordance with the Government IMS to assess the initial design. The Contractor shall ensure that the proposed configurations meet or exceed the requirements as defined by

Performance Specification, PMA202-11001/R-0. The Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to PDR/TIM entry:

a. Preliminary technical data package

b. Analysis to show compliance with Safety, Security, and Performance requirements

c. Current risk assessment

d. SEMP changes (if any)

e. Draft logistics documentation in Section 3.5

f. Updated CIMS

g. Draft Reliability and Maintainability Program Plan

h. Draft Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System

(FRACAS)

i. Test and evaluation strategy brief/slides updated

j. Draft Manufacturing plan to support prototype

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through j at PDR TIM shall be in accordance with CDRLs XXXX, XXXX, XXXX)

3.3.4 Prototype Evaluation TIM#1.

The Contractor shall host the Prototype Evaluation TIM #1 conducted at the contractor’s facility in accordance with the Government IMS to assess the initial design. The primary focus of this event will be aircrew feedback and assessment of the initial design. Prior to this event, aircrew will assess visual compatibility, visual acuity, color balancing and the initial design of the prescription capability. The proposed configurations shall meet or exceed the requirements as defined by Performance

Specification, PMA202-11001/R-0. The Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to Evaluation TIM#1 entry:

a. Laser Protection, Optical Quality and Luminous Transmittance Test reports

b. Response to Government feedback on physical compatibility, anthropometrics, visual compatibility, visual acuity, color balancing and prescription capability documented

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a and b at Prototype

Evaluation TIM#1 shall be in accordance with CDRLs XXXX, XXXX, XXXX)

3.3.5 Prototype Evaluation TIM#2.

If required by the Government, the Contractor shall conduct Prototype Evaluation

TIM#2 at the contractor’s facility. This may be required in the event that negative feedback is received from the Government or if design changes occur after Prototype

Evaluation TIM#1 event.

3.3.6 Critical Design Review (CDR).

The Contractor shall conduct the CDR at the Contractor’s facility in accordance with the CIMS and demonstrate to the Government’s satisfaction that the LEP Threat

Spectacles are developed, and the Contractor can proceed into manufacture of test articles, and can establish the initial product baseline. The proposed configurations shall meet the requirements as defined by Performance Specification, PMA202-

11001/R-0. The Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to CDR entry:

a. Updates to the technical data package

b. Current risk assessment

c. SEMP changes (if any)

d. Logistics analysis complete and plans established

e. Updated CIMS

f. Test plans are complete

g. Test procedures are complete

h. Verification Traceability Matrix showing traceability of requirements to test plans complete;

i. Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) program plan and FRACAS

j. Manufacturing Plan

k. Quality Assurance Plan

l. Safety Assessment Report

m. Requirements Traceability and Analyses Report

n. Operations Security Plans reviewed

o. All classified information protected and handled correctly

p. CDR checklist completed

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through p at CDR shall be

3.3.7 Test Readiness Review (TRR).

The Contractor shall participate in the TRR conducted at Patuxent River NAS thirty

(30) working days prior to the start of on-aircraft Government testing. The TRR assesses prior unit level and system integration testing adequacy, test planning, test objectives, test methods and procedures, scope of tests, and determines if required test resources have been properly identified and coordinated to support planned tests. The

Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to TRR entry:

a. TDP update (if needed)

b. Test assets are in the proper configuration and shall be available for the testing

c. Qualification Test report

d. Current risk assessment

e. Updated CIMS

f. Maintenance Demonstration planning

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through f at TRR shall be in accordance with CDRLs XXXX, XXXX, XXXX)

3.3.8 Incremental Production Readiness Review (IPRR).

The Contractor shall support an IPRR in advance of a formal System Verification

Review (SVR)/ Production Readiness Review (PRR). The IPRR is an on-site assessment of industrial resources, production operations and planning, quality assurance and material and purchased parts. This review is conducted at the Contractor facility to ensure production readiness. A preliminary agenda will be provided to the

Contractor 30 working days prior to IPRR. The Contractor shall provide the following information and inputs to the PRR checklist prior to IPRR entry:

a. The Manufacturing Plan, Quality Assurance Plan and Technical Data

Package

b. PRR checklist of functional areas completed and reviewed by audit members (CDRL-agenda)

c. Manufacturing, Producibility and Quality requirements addressed during the design/development phase

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through c at IPRR shall be

3.3.9 System Verification Review (SVR)/Production Readiness Review (PRR).

The Government shall conduct the SVR/PRR at a Government designated facility after the successful completion of Qualification Testing. The purpose of the SVR/PRR is to assess that the final product, as evidenced in its production configuration, meets all of the requirements of the Performance Specification and product baseline. This event also assesses production readiness. The Contractor shall participate in the SVR/PRR. The

Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to SVR/PRR entry:

a. Results of the IPRRs conducted at the major suppliers

b. Work instructions and processes have been updated based on IPRR results

c. Updated CIMS

d. Government approved completed Manufacturing Plan

e. Change control process has been established and the customer has approved the production configuration baseline.

f. Manufacturing and quality requirements have been addressed during the development phase

g. Provisioning parts list

h. All performance specification qualification test requirements have been successfully completed

i. Drawings finalized and traced to manufacturing processes

j. Current risk assessment ascertained

k. Maintenance Plans

l. All test reports delivered and accepted by the Government

m. Verification traceability matrix has been completed

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through m at PRR shall be

3.3.10 Physical Configuration Audit (PCA).

The Contractor shall support the joint Government/Contractor PCA to validate that the

Contractor’s final data package accurately describes the as-built product configuration and provides sufficient information to produce the LEP spectacles, and to establish the final Product Baseline. The PCA shall be conducted at the Contractor’s facility when initial production units are available. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing the hardware to be audited, facilities and equipment, personnel, documentation

(including all engineering drawings and associated lists), and other support as required.

The Contractor shall correct all documented audit discrepancies to the satisfaction of the Government's program representative. The Contractor shall provide, at a minimum the following prior to PCA entry:

a. Final maintenance plan

b. Current risk assessment ascertained

c. Hardware design complete (exception: Shortages/Waivers/Deviations)

d. List of shortages/Deviations/Waivers/ECP Status

e. product drawings & associated lists complete and available

f. drawing Tree complete with all child/parent relationships

g. PCA checklist is completed

h. PCA products have been made available to the cognizant PCA participants prior to the review

1. Results of the PCAs conducted at the major suppliers

2. Manufacturing Plan

3. PCA Plan

4. Quality Assurance Plan

5. Production Lot Acceptance Test Report

6. Submittal and acceptance of PCA agenda

i. All SVR/PRR action items have been responded to (if applicable)

(Information provided by the Contractor for items a through i at PCA shall be in accordance with CDRLs XXXX, XXXX, XXXX)

3.3.11 Design, Engineering, Fabrication and Test.

The Contractor shall deliver LEP spectacles that meet the requirements and criteria of the LEP Threat Spectacles Performance Specification, PMA202-11001/R-0. The

Contractor shall furnish the personnel, services, facilities, equipment, and materials necessary to perform engineering, management, manufacturing tasks to support fabrication, test and evaluation for the program.

3.3.12 System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP).

The Contractor shall provide the government with their System Engineering

Management Plan (SEMP) for technical review and compliance with CDRLXXXX.

The SEMP shall define a structured systems engineering approach to meeting the requirements of the Performance Specification, (PMA202-11001/R-0) and this SOW.

The Contractor shall maintain the SEMP and make updates when there is a change in the structured systems engineering approach, processes, or methodologies (CDRL

XXXX).

3.3.13 System Safety.

The Contractor shall design and integrate the system to lower or eliminate all system safety hazards as defined in MIL-STD 882E.

3.3.14 Manufacturing Plan.

The Contractor shall deliver a Manufacturing Plan to specifically address the LEP spectacles manufacturing effort. The plan shall describe the manufacturing and assembly processes, installation, test procedures, and tooling requirements to produce and deliver both prototype and production LEP Threat Spectacles (CDRL XXXX).

3.3.15 Quality Assurance (QA) Program.

The Contractor shall maintain a QA Program that specifically addresses the LEP

Threat Spectacles quality effort. The program shall align with ISO 9001:2008, AS9100 or Government approved functional equivalent for quality assurance in design/development and production. The Contractor shall maintain a quality program acceptable to the Government for the timely investigation and development of corrective actions to quality deficiencies. The Contractor shall investigate all quality deficiency reports as well as take corrective action to prevent recurrence. The QA

Program shall be addressed as a part of the SEMP as defined in section 3.3.12.

3.3.16 Reliability Program Plan.

The Contractor shall provide the Government with a LEP Spectacle Reliability and

Maintainability (R&M) program plan for technical review and compliance.

Component testing shall be conducted to demonstrate a service life of 5 years in accordance with the LEP Performance Specification, PMA202-11001/R-0. The

Contractor shall provide and maintain a R&M Program plan. Within the R&M program plan, the contractor shall include failure definitions and Scoring Criteria, and a Failure

Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) (CDRL XXXX).

3.3.17 Maintainability.

The Contractor shall provide maintainability predictions and allocations for the LEP

Threat Spectacles. To support the prediction process, existing predictions on existing equipment may be used if the assumptions employed are consistent with this program.

The maintainability predictions report shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.3.18 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS).

The FRACAS shall be implemented to monitor all anomalies and failures occurring during LEP Spectacle testing. The Contractor shall analyze and determine the cause of any anomaly/failure and subsequently track and document corrective actions taken.

The Contractor shall maintain these records in a FRACAS database and provide

FRACAS Reports to the Government for review and approval in accordance with

CDRL XXXX.

3.3.19 Reserved.

3.3.20 Requirements Traceability and Analysis.

The Contractor shall provide a Requirements Traceability Matrix (CDRL XXXX) tracing the LEP Performance Specification, PMA202-11001/R-0, requirements to the

Contractor’s analysis and test documentation showing how each requirement shall be met.

3.4 Verification

3.4.1 Prototype Evaluation.

The Contractor shall conduct testing to verify the Physical Compatibility and

Anthropometrics, Laser Protection, Optical Quality and Luminous Transmittance requirements as defined in PMA202-11001/R-0 in support of Prototype Evaluation

TIM#1. The Contractor shall support Government verification of the Visual

Compatibility requirement. The Government intends to collect user feedback on visual compatibility of spectacles with Helmet Mounted Displays (HMDs), Heads Up

Displays (HUDs), and Night Vision Goggles (NVGs) both in the lab and in aircraft simulators as a preliminary assessment of LEP spectacle impact on mission performance.

3.4.2 Qualification Test Plan and Test Procedure.

The Contractor shall prepare qualification test plans and procedures for Government review and approval in accordance with CDRL XXXX. The test plans shall encompass all testing to be conducted (except ground and flight testing) and shall include the plan for test asset control and sequencing. An individual test plan shall be prepared for laser protection, compatibility, optical quality, luminous transmittance, environmental and mechanical testing.

3.4.2.1 Qualification Test (DT-B2).

The Contractor shall conduct Qualification testing in accordance with Government approved test plans and procedures. At the Government’s discretion, the Contractor shall host Government representatives to witness Qualification tests. The Contractor shall provide Government notification of the start date of Qualification testing 30 working days prior to the start of testing.

3.4.2.2 Qualification Test Report.

The Contractor shall prepare Qualification Test Reports following each

Qualification testing event. The test reports shall include all testing conducted per the Contractor’s Government approved test plan. The test reports shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval in accordance with CDRL

XXXX.

3.4.3 LEP Prototype Units.

The Contractor shall provide prototype units prior to Prototype Evaluation TIM#1 in the quantities outlined in Section B of the contract for the Government to conduct testing.

3.4.4 Qualification Test Units.

The Contractor shall provide test articles in the Product Baseline configuration approved at the conclusion of CDR using production tooling in the quantities outlined in Section B of the contract.

3.4.5 Conformance Inspection Test Plan.

The Contractor shall propose and deliver test requirements to be included in the

Conformance Test Plan in accordance with CDRL XXXX. At a minimum, Conformance Test shall consist of the inspections/tests identified in the LEP

Performance Specification, PMA202-11001/XX.

3.4.6 Conformance Testing.

The Contractor shall conduct Conformance Testing in accordance with the LEP Threat

Spectacle Specification, PMA202-110001/XX for the production units provided under

Option CLIN XXXX.

3.4.7 Inspection Lot Test Plan (ATP).

The Contractor shall propose and deliver test requirements to be included in the

Inspection Lot Test Plan in accordance with CDRL XXXX. At a minimum, Inspection

Lot Test shall consist of the inspections/tests identified in the LEP Performance

Specification. The Contractor shall propose a definition for what constitutes a lot in the test plan.

3.4.8 Inspection Lot Testing.

The Contractor shall perform inspection lot testing on each lot. The lot test shall utilize a sampling plan in accordance with American National Standard ANSI/ASQC Z1.4.

The Contractor shall utilize a sampling plan with an Acceptance Quality Limit (AQL) of 0.40 at level 1 for visual inspections. Optical quality testing shall be conducted with an AQL of 0.40 at the S-3 level. However, if a lot fails to meet the acceptance criteria, 100% inspection (visual inspection for a visual inspection failure and optical quality test for an optical quality failure) of the failed lot shall be required and the FRACAS shall document, report and provide corrective action for each failed unit.

3.4.9 Production Units.

The Contractor shall provide the personnel, material and facilities necessary to successfully perform the tasks required for the production, quality assurance, acceptance, and delivery of LEP Threat Spectacles. The Contractor shall manufacture the LEP Threat Spectacles following the completion of the PCA, per section 3.3.10.

3.4.10 Option CLIN XXXX.

The Contractor shall produce and deliver the required number of LEP Threat Spectacles as identified by the Option CLIN XXXX of the contract in Section B.

3.4.11 Option CLIN XXXX.

The Contractor shall produce and deliver the required number of LEP Threat Spectacles as identified by the Option CLIN XXXX of the contract in Section B.

3.5 Logistics

3.5.1 Planning and Management.

The Contractor shall conduct an Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) management and technical effort to provide for life cycle support for the LEP Threat Spectacles. The

Contractor shall use guidance provided by, MIL-HDBK-502A and GEIA-STD-0007.

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a logistics database to support the Logistics

Product Description (LPD) process. Any existing contractor documents that shall be used to satisfy the Government requirements defined in this SOW shall be reviewed using GEIA-STD-0007 for content and accuracy.

3.5.2 Logistics Product Data Summaries.

Logistics Product Data Summaries are a wide range of related analyses that should be conducted within the systems engineering process. The Contractor shall provide analysis summaries for the following logistics areas:

a. Maintenance Planning

b. Repair Analysis

c. Supply Support

d. Manpower and Personnel and Training

e. Facilities to include storage requirements

f. Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportation (PHS&T)

g. Post Production Support

The Logistics Product Data Summaries shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.3 Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA).

The Contractor shall provide the Government with a MTA for the LEP Threat

Spectacles Program. The MTA is the identification of the steps, spares and materials, tools, support equipment, personnel skill levels as well as any facility issues that must be considered for a given repair task. Also included in the MTA are elapsed times required for the performance of each task. MTAs cover both corrective and preventative maintenance tasks and, when complete, identify all physical resources required to support a system. The MTA shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.4 Maintenance Support Plan.

The Contractor shall develop a Maintenance Support Plan for the LEP Threat

Spectacles that identify the operations and maintenance tasks and the support system resources, e.g., tools, test equipment, publications, parts and personnel, etc., required to https://home.navair.navy.mil/air66wiki/(definition)%20Maintenance%20Planning.ashx https://home.navair.navy.mil/air66wiki/(definition)%20Supply%20Support%20(SS).ashx https://home.navair.navy.mil/air66wiki/Manpower%20and%20Personnel.ashx https://home.navair.navy.mil/air66wiki/(definition)%20Facilities%20(F).ashx https://home.navair.navy.mil/air66wiki/(definition)%20Packaging%2c%20Handling%2c%20Storage%2c%20and%20Transportation.ashx accomplish tasks at prescribed maintenance levels. The Maintenance Support Plan shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.5 Technical Manual Source Data with Illustrations/Drawings.

The Contractor shall provide its most current LEP manuals to the Government for technical review. Source data shall include data required to accomplish repair actions at each level of authorized maintenance, to include, theory of operation, troubleshooting, fault isolation, preventive maintenance, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and parts breakdown with illustrations and/or drawings of the system and its components suitable for use in Government technical manuals and Naval Aviation

Training and Operating Procedures Standardization (NATOPS). If no technical manuals exist, the Contractor shall provide source data for the LEP Threat Spectacles for development and/or integration into existing technical manuals (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.6 Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportation (PHS&T).

The Contractor shall identify any existing or new requirements for specialized containers that will require development to meet the transportation and storage requirements identified in the Performance Specification, PMA202-11001-XX. The

PHS&T specialized container requirements shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.7 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Material Shortage (DMSMS).

The Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) forecasting source data is essential information that will enable the identification, forecasting and management of piece part obsolescence impacts and mitigations as a part of the

Department of Defense (DoD) Program Managers’ Total System Life Cycle

Management responsibilities. The Contractor shall provide the Government with its

DMSMS program documentation for technical review and compliance for the LEP

Threat Spectacles. If no program is currently in effect, the Contractor shall develop and maintain an active DMSMS Management Program. The Contractor shall submit the

DMSMS forecasting source data information to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.8 Provisioning.

The Contractor shall provide all provisioning data required to ensure future supply support determined by the Naval Supply (NAVSUP) system (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.9 Provisioning Parts List (PPL).

The Contractor shall provide a PPL that include all items (prime, vendors, U.S.

Government Standards and Industry Standards) contained in the LEP equipment. The

PPL shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.10 Interim Support Items List (ISIL).

The Contractor shall develop and submit information to support the ISIL, with revisions (if required). The ISIL is used to support the recommended items and quantities determined to be required for removal and replacement between the Initial

Operational Capability (IOC) date and Material Support Date (MSD). The Government shall assign National Stock Numbers (NSNs) to ISIL approved items not previously assigned NSN’s or new peculiar items to the end item. ISIL information shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval in accordance with CDRL

XXXX.

3.5.11 Reserved.

3.5.12 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA).

The Contractor shall provide a Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) report for LEP Threat

Spectacles. The LORA report shall be submitted to the Government for review and approval (CDRL XXXX).

3.5.13 Data Rights.

The Contractor shall provide identification and assertion of restrictions on the

Government’s use, release, and disclosure of technical data in accordance with applicable contract clauses. Full and complete identification and disclosure, initially via contract predetermination of rights listing, and subsequently, via modification to sanctioned data rights contract attachment, is required for all technical data and tiers of suppliers/subcontractors/vendors. The Integrated Data-Decision Environment (IDE) shall also support this disclosure process. The Contractor shall provide exit strategies, which shall permit the Government access to all technical data at all tiers of suppliers, vendors, and subcontractors, ramp-ups for contingency operations such as war, natural or man-made disasters, adverse labor actions, or should the Contractor go out of business, discontinue production, and/or fail to perform to point of default on the contract. Any use of Independent Research and Development (IRAD) or proprietary technologies shall be identified to the Government prior to its use.

3.5.14 Operations Security (OPSEC).

The Contractor shall implement and maintain an OPSEC program to protect controlled unclassified and classified activities, information, equipment, and material used or developed by the Contractor and any subcontractor during performance of the contract.

The Contractor shall be responsible for the subcontractor implementation of the

OPSEC requirements. This program may include Information Assurance (IA) and

Communications Security (COMSEC). The OPSEC program shall be in accordance with National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 298 and OPNAVINST 3432.1 series, and at a minimum shall include:

a. Assignment of responsibility for OPSEC direction and implementation.

b. Issuance of procedures and planning guidance for the use of OPSEC techniques to identify vulnerabilities and apply applicable countermeasures.

c. Establishment of OPSEC education and awareness training.

d. Provisions for management, annual review, and evaluation of OPSEC programs.

4.0 ACRONYMS

ATP Acceptance Test Plan

CAI Critical Application Items

CCB Configuration Control Boards

CDR Critical Design Review

CDRL Contract Data Requirements List

CIMS Contractor Integrated Master Schedule

CM Configuration Management

CSI Critical Safety Item

DMSMS Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & material Shortages

DoD Department of Defense

ECP Engineering Change Proposal

EDM Engineering Development Model

EMD Engineering and Manufacturing Development

FEMCA Failure Modes Effects, and Criticality Analysis

FRACAS Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System

IAW In accordance with

IDE Integrated Data/Decision Environment

ILS Integrated Logistics Support

IMS Integrated Master Schedule

IOC Initial Operational Capability

IPRR Incremental Production Readiness Review

IPT Integrated Product Team

IRAD Independent Research and Development

ISIL Interim Support Items List

JPEG Joint Photographic Experts Group

KPP Key Performance Parameters

KSA Key System Attributes

LAT Lot Acceptance Test

LEP Laser Eye Protection

LORA Level of Repair Analysis

LPD Logistics Product Description

MSD Material Support Date

MTA Maintenance Task Analysis

NAS Naval Air Station

NAVAIR Naval Air Systems Command

NAVSUP Naval Supply

NSN National Stock Number

OPSEC Operations Security Plan

PCA Physical Configuration Audit

PDR Preliminary Design Review

PHS&T Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportation

PPL Provisioning Parts List

PRR Production Readiness Review

QA Quality Assurance

RCM Reliability-Centered Maintenance

RFA Request for Action

RFI Request for Information

RM Risk Management

RMB Risk Management Board

RWG Risk Working Group

SAR Safety Assessment Report

SEMP System Engineering Management Plan

SEP Systems Engineering Plan

SETR Systems Engineering Technical Review

SOW Statement of Work

SRR System Requirement Review

SVR System Verification Review

TDP Technical Data Package

TIMs Technical Interchange Meetings

TRR Test Readiness Review

TRR Test Readiness Review