Attachment_5_-_Revised_PPQ_-_Amend_0004.pdf

M67854-18-R-2003

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 “UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY” - when filled in

“UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY” when filled in

Attachment 5

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

1. Past Performance Assessment. In the distributed Past Performance Questionnaire, there was a discrepancy between the Performance Assessment Ratings (definitions) under Paragraph 4 and the ratings available for selection for the six elements in Paragraph 5. The Government is seeking updated ratings for the Assessment Elements under paragraph 5 (a-f) based on the revised selection ratings. These ratings align with the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

Please provide updated selections for Paragraphs (5)(a) – (5)(f); the appropriate subsections have been highlighted for your convenience. These updated selections will be filed with, and will augment, the previously submitted Past Performance Questionnaire;

therefore, information in remaining sections does not need to be completed again. We apologize for the inconvenience and greatly appreciate your assistance.

Your response is needed no later than 1:00 pm, Eastern Time, Tuesday, 24 April 2018.

If you have any questions, please contact the Contract Specialist via E-Mail.

Ms. Megan Brady, Contract Specialist E-Mail: megan.brady@usmc.mil

(Continued) mailto:megan.brady@usmc.mil

2. Customer Assessor and Contract Information.

Customer Assessor.

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Contract Information.

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Contractor:

Total Period of Performance (including available options/award terms):

Total Contract Value at Award (including available options/award terms):

Customer (agency, company, etc.) name, location and principal mission:

(Continued)

3. Contract Relevancy. To assist our comparison of the contract identified in Section 2 with the size, scope and complexity of the CES Albany acquisition, please complete the following:

(a) Annual contract dollars for the effort, on average, or by performance period (identify the performance period used): $__________________.

(b) Type(s) of Support: Place an X in each applicable box.

Acquisition and Contract Management Support

Business and Financial Management Support

Communications Support

Equipment Fielding Support

Logistics Management Support

Manpower and Training Support

Planning Support

Production Management Support

Program Management Support

Technical Management Support

Test and Evaluation Management Support

Other Support (please describe: _________________________)

4. Performance Assessment Ratings. Please use these definitions when rating elements of performance in Section 5.

Exceptional. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory. Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

Marginal. Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective.

5. Assessment Elements. Please enter the appropriate performance assessment rating for each item below and provide supporting comments/narrative.

a. Mission Requirements. Please rate whether the contractor provided a product or service that met your mission requirements. Place an X in the applicable box and provide supporting/illustrating comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Comments:

b. Business Relations. Please rate how well the contractor integrated and coordinated all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, and corrective action plans, as well as the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and whether it submitted accurate invoices in a timely manner. Place an X in the applicable box and provide supporting/illustrating comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Satisfactory

c. Quality. Please rate the contractor’s performance in providing a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance with respect to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.). Place an X in the applicable box and provide supporting/illustrating comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Satisfactory

d. Schedule. Please rate how well the contractor delivered according to the agreed-to schedule.

What were the causes of any schedule variances? Place an X in the applicable box and provide supporting/illustrating comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

e. Management of Key Personnel. Please rate the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel. Place an X in the applicable box and provide supporting/illustrating comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Satisfactory

f. Subcontract Management. Please rate the contractor’s performance in meeting the goals of the subcontracting plan, and whether the contractor made timely awards and effectively managed subcontracts. Place an X in the applicable box and provide supporting/illustrating comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

6. Recommendation. Would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts of similar size, scope and complexity?

Yes

No

7. Other References. As appropriate, please identify any other customer point of contact familiar with the Offeror’s performance of the assessed contract whom we may contact for additional inputs on the Offeror’s performance.

Name:

Organization:

Phone: