Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Package.docx

M67004-18-R-0014

Past Performance Questionnaire Template

To: Contractor References (Assessor):

The United States Marine Corps is in the process of selecting contractors for award under the Marine Corps Prepositioning Program (MCPP) Services Contract. In general terms, this contract shall provide for long-term logistics support services for the United States Marine Corps’ three strategic crisis response combat capability sets (Maritime Prepositioning Ships (MPS) Program, the Marine Corps Prepositioning Program Norway (MCPP-N), and the Marine Expeditionary Unit Augmentation Program – Kuwait (MAP-K)). The requirement calls for the full spectrum of logistics services on over 36 million pieces of prepositioned equipment and supplies that consists of everything that a Marine combat unit requires to fight and sustain itself for 30 days of expeditionary operations. The dynamic complexity of the effort is compounded by the sheer volume of the materiel and exceedingly tight turnaround time lines. The length of this contract will be eight years. The Government wants to be confident that the contractors selected will be able to successfully accomplish our requirements.

One of the ways the Government intends to evaluate each offeror is through the verification of the offeror's past and present performance on other contracts. For this, we must depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with the offeror.

We have tried to make our questionnaire as quick and simple to complete as possible. General contractor information was provided by the offeror in Part I. Please answer the questions that follow in Part II. We would greatly appreciate your comments describing why you rated a particular question the way you did. We ask that you complete and return by scanning and emailing to nicholas.vonbargen@usmc.mil no later than 25 June 2018.

Please do not return or e-mail the questionnaires back to the offeror or contractor. Completed questionnaires are source selection information and must be protected. They will not be released to the offeror.

If you have any questions or difficulty completing the questionnaire, please contact Nicholas VonBargen at (904)696- 5066.

Thank you for your valuable comments and time.

Isl

PATRICIA E. SOLBERG

Contracting Officer

Consent Letter (Example Format for Past Performance Consent Letter)

Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to an Offeror without the subcontractor's or teaming partner's consent. In an effort to assist the Government's Performance Evaluation Team (PET) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent form be completed by the subcontractors identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms shall be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.

SUBCONTRACTOR CONSENT FORM FOR THE RELEASE OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR Consent Letter (Example Format for Client Authorization Letter)

To Whom It May Concern, We are currently participating as a __________________ (subcontractor/teaming partner) with ___________________________ (Prime contractor or name of entity providing the proposal) in responding to the Request for Proposal M67004-18-R-0014 for Marine Corps Prepositioning Program Logistics Services.

We understand the government is placing great emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, we are signing this authorization letter in order to allow the Past Performance Evaluation Team to discuss Present/Past performance information with the previous commercial customers during the source selection process. This letter authorizes release to the government of requested information on the Teaming partners' performance.

Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company:

Name & Title

Signature

Company Name:

Address:

Cage Code:

Phone Number and Fax Number:

Instructions:

For the offeror/major subcontractor.

1. Complete Sections I and II.

2. Forward to the contractor reference/Government assessor that has experience with your company on a previous relevant contract.

For the Contractor reference/Government assessor:

1. Complete Sections II through VII.

2. E-Mail to: Nicholas VonBargen, Contract Specialist, at nicholas.vonbargen@usmc.mil.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is correct or incorrect.

(Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly)

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Attachment #4

III. Contractor Reference/Assessor Information (Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor)

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Program Manager

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)

Quality Assurance Specialist

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas assessed have been accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas assessed have been accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor's corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE

(NIA)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

V. Performance Evaluation (Sections V through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor)

1. Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor's management performance?

Management

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor's management performance in the following areas.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination, communication, and risk management practices.

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS

Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, responsiveness to emergency and/or surge requirements, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork and customer satisfaction.

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL

Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government's requirements within schedule and budget.

PROCESS MANAGEMENT

Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/ phasing in resources; ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

SUBCONTRACT

MANAGEMENT

Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

(All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.)

2. Technical Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor's ability to meet the technical requirements?

Technical Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor's technical performance in the following areas for same or similar items.

Ordnance Equipment Maintenance Tanks, AAVs, howitzers, etc.

Motor Transport Maintenance Trucks: 7 ton, fire, dump etc.

Communications/Electronics Maintenance Radios, etc.

Engineer Equipment Maintenance Cranes, forklifts, generators, bulldozers, etc.

Organic Equipment Maintenance Container handlers, buses, yard hustlers, etc.

Supply Chain Management

Inventory Management:

Fill rate, inventory accuracy, location verification

Relationship with suppliers

Spare Parts Acquisition:

Timeliness, cost effectiveness

Ability to surge personnel in support of OCONUS contingency operations

Ability to perform logistics functions in austere environments

Shipboard operations; working from/on ship

Shipyard operations; working from/in shipyards

Military Watercraft/Lighterage Maintenance; Organizational, Intermediate and Depot level

Military Watercraft/Lighterage Movement; towing, portage, berthing, drydocking, launching/recovery

Corrosion Control: Military Watercraft/Lighterage

Military Watercraft/Lighterage Repair: OCONUS contracting/husbanding

Weight Handling Equipment: Transporters, Mobile Boat Hoist, Crawler Crane

Other Logistics Services (explain below)

(All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory)

c. If metrics were used, please identify those metrics and provide comments on the contractor's performance relative to these metrics.

3. Cost Performance/Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor's ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Cost Management

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor's cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL

Travel

Labor

Purchasing

COST REPORTING DATA

Accuracy

Timeliness

NOTIFICATIONS-Contractor's notifications of costs as required by the Limitation of Cost/Funds Clauses

Timeliness

RESOLUTION OF COST PROBLEMS

Commitment to resolve issues

ADHERENCE TO COST TARGETS

Establishing realistic targets

Meeting cost targets

SUBCONTRACT COST MANAGEMENT- Ability to forecast, negotiate, and control subcontract costs

Ability to forecast and negotiate cost agreements

Control of Subcontract Costs

Timely payment to subcontractors

(All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory)

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor's performance (management, technical, schedule, and cost) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments:

Assessor's Signature Date image1.png