Attachment 18_Instructional Rating Form.pdf
PDF 244 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M0026421R0016
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains an instructional rating form and details of a federal contract opportunity with the United States Marine Corps. The instructional rating form provides a template for students to evaluate instructors and course content on various criteria including instructor knowledge, communication skills, lesson pacing, safety procedures, and methods of instruction. It also collects information on students' pre-and post-course knowledge levels.
The federal contract opportunity solicitation involves providing academic support services to the Marine Corps Civil-Military Operations School, including instruction, curriculum development, scenario design, and academic analysis. The training covers subjects required for the Civil-Military Operations Specialty MOS, as well as courses in Civil-Military Operations, Civil Affairs Operations, the Stability Assessment Framework, the Marine Civil Information Management System, and G9 staff actions. Services will support training Marines for civil-military roles at various levels from battalion to joint commands.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2017 Version
INSTRUCTIONAL RATING
One way instruction is improved is by sampling student reaction to the instruction. To assist in improving this lesson, plea se answer the following questions. This will assist the school in improving our courses.
Instructor: Date:
Course (circle one): Civil Affairs / CMO Planner / CAIC Lesson:
INSTRUCTIONS: Circle the answer that indicates your level of agreement or disagreement as follows: Strongly Disagree = 1, Disagree=2, Agree=3, and Strongly Agree=4. Please explain in the section labeled comments any ratings of 1 or 2. If the question is not applicable, then circle NA.
1. INSTRUCTOR
Strongly Disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
NA
a. The instructor showed a thorough knowledge of the lesson material. 1 2 3 4 NA
b. The instructor communicated the lesson material in a way that could be easily understood.
1 2 3 4 NA
c. The instructor gave precise instructions concerning in-class exercises. 1 2 3 4 NA
d. The instructor encouraged student participation. 1 2 3 4 NA
e. Student’s questions were answered in a professional (not demeaning to the student) manner.
1 2 3 4 NA
2. LESSON CONTENT
a. The content was presented at the right pace. 1 2 3 4 NA
b. The student outline aided my understanding of the content covered. 1 2 3 4 NA
c. The environment of the class was interactive. 1 2 3 4 NA
3. SAFETY
a. Lesson related safety to job performance. 1 2 3 4 NA
b. Cease Training procedures were adequately explained. 1 2 3 4 NA
c. Safety precautions were reemphasized prior to commencing tasks. 1 2 3 4 NA
d. Safety was paramount at all times. 1 2 3 4 NA
e. Equipment/material was safe for use. 1 2 3 4 NA
4. METHODS/MEDIA:
a. The in-class exercises required in the course were worthwhile learning experiences.
1 2 3 4 NA
b. The way that the class material was presented enhanced my ability to learn/perform the concept/task.
I especially liked the ___________________________ method.
1 2 3 4 NA
c. The media complemented instruction. 1 2 3 4 NA
5. STUDENT: Circle the answer that best describes your knowledge level.
a. My knowledge of the content prior to this class was None Very Little
Average Above
Average Expert
b. My knowledge of the content after completing the class is None Very Little
Average Above
Average Expert
Name____________________________________________ Team: ____________________________________
Overall Comments/Suggestions for the Class (use back of form if more space is needed):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .