L2 Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 73 KB Posted

Attached to
Directorate for Test Resources (DTR) Instrumentation Support Contract (DISC) Draft RFP
Solicitation number
HQ0855-21-R-0004
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a draft request for proposal and related federal contract opportunity notice. The Missile Defense Agency is seeking proposals for a Directorate for Test Resources Instrumentation Support Contract. This will be a single award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity cost-plus-award-fee, cost-plus-incentive-fee, firm-fixed-price and cost reimbursable contract with a five year base period and five one-year options. The North American Industry Classification System code is 541715. Proposals are due May 10, 2021 and award is anticipated by January 19, 2022. The contract is designated as a 100% small business set-aside to provide instrumentation support services. Offerors should monitor the beta.sam.gov website for amendments and submit any questions by January 25, 2021. Virtual industry days, site visits and one-on-one meetings will be held in January and February 2021 to facilitate proposal preparation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
L15 Draft_MEDDS Task Order.docx DOCX document
L10 Q_A Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L18 DISC CYBER Task Order PWS_12022020.docx DOCX document
L17 Draft_Cyber Task Order.docx DOCX document
L3 PPQ_Info_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Offerors Library.zip ZIP file
L16 DISC MEDDS Task Order PWS_12022020.docx DOCX document
Section M DISC DRAFT 4 Dec 20.docx DOCX document
Draft RFP HQ085521R0004 11172020.pdf PDF
J5C FY20 GFP Cyber.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J5E FY20 GFP XTR.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L9 Accounting_System_Checklist.doc DOC document
L14 DISC XTR-1 Task Order PWS_11092020.docx DOCX document
DISC Exhibit A.pdf PDF
Exhibit A1 A004 DD Form 2794 DISC_CSDR_Plan.xls XLS spreadsheet
L11 Draft_PCRSS Task Order.docx DOCX document
L12 DISC PCRSS Task Order PWS_11092020.docx DOCX document
J5B FY20 GFP MD3S.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J2 DISC DD-254 (HQ085521R0004) Redacted.pdf PDF
Section L DISC DRAFT 11 Dec 20.docx DOCX document
J3 Labor Categories.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L8 DRAFT DISC Excel Pricing Workbook 20201102 TH v3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L4 Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter.docx DOCX document
L1 OCI_Disclosure_Form.pdf PDF
L13 Draft_XTR Task Order.docx DOCX document
J1 DISC PWS _12022020.docx DOCX document
L6 PP_Client_Authorization_Letter.docx DOCX document
J5A FY20 GFP ASI Template (1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J5D FY20 GFP PCRSS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L5 PP_Sample_ Subcontractor_ Consent_Letter.docx DOCX document
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY

MDA DISC

Past Performance Questionnaire

HQ0855-21-R-0004 Attachment L2

E PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ____________________________

J. Description of service provided: ________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VG VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.

Technical Performance
E
VG
S
M
U
N

T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T6 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management
E
VG
S
M
U
N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in
E
VG
S
M
U
N

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction
E
VG
S
M
U
N

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
E
VG
S
M
U
N

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance
E
VG
S
M
U
N

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___Default___Convenience___Pending Terminations___
No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

MDADISC@MDA.Mil image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .