L-2 ATTCH PAST PERFORMANCE.docx

ATTACHMENT L-2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire no later than 4:00PM CDT, 4 June 2010 to krissy.hackstadt@ustranscom.mil. Thank you.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

CAGE Code:

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

FAX Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

C. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

Fax Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) See the scale at the end of the questions for ratings and definitions.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship.

· Exceptional

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Comments:

B. Effective Project Management.

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables, including the Administrative Aspects of Performance.

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Project Cost.

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Comments:

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interests.

· Exceptional

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

F. Contractually established Operational Readiness rate is met. i.e., Aircraft were availabe to fly missions as required.

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

G. Overall capability of the Contractor's team. Did the contractor's personnel demonstrate the appropriate education, relevant experience, security clearances, levels of skill, and expertise for the tasks required?

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

H. Overall Satisfaction.

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

I. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

J. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

· Yes

· No

If “no”, why?:

K. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past service contract efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

DoD uses a common DoD assessment rating system to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Ratings range from “Unsatisfactory” to “Exceptional.”

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

PLEASE NOTE: When completed, please send electronically via email to Krissy Hackstadt, krissy.hackstadt@ustranscom.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.