HSCG85-14-R-P45453_PSTAR_DD14_PP_Questionnaire.doc

DoD Form DOC document 60 KB Posted

Attached to
POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING AND REPAIRS
Solicitation number
HSCG85-14-R-P45453
Issued by

About this file

HSCG85-14-R-P45453 PSTAR DD14 PP Questionnaire

View the file

Other versions and copies of DD Form 14

File Revision Posted Attached to
dd14-1409 final foa 03.26.14 amendment i.pdf Mar 26, 2014 —
dd14-1408 final type ii comp cont 01.31.14.pdf Jan 31, 2014 —
cdc-rfa-dd14-140303cont16-final 02 24 16.docx Revision not stated —
CDC-RFA-DD14-140503CONT16 FINAL 02 11 16.pdf Revision not stated —
CDC-RFA-DD14-140603CON16 FINAL 02 10 16.pdf Revision not stated —
CDC-RFA-DD14-140203CONT16 FINAL 02 05 16.docx Revision not stated —
HSCG85-14-R-P45C85_PSTAR_DD14_Schedule_of_Supplies.xls Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45C85_PSTAR_DD14_Clarification_Request_Form.doc Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45C85_PSTAR_DD14_PP_Questionnaire.doc Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45C85_PSTAR_DD14_Specification.pdf Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
dd14-001 amendment ii 02 25 14.pdf Revision not stated —
dd14-003 amendment ii 2 25 14.pdf Revision not stated —
HSCG85-14-R-P45453_PSTAR_DD14_Specification.doc Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING AND REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45453_PSTAR_DD14_Clarification_Request_Form.doc Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING AND REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45453_PSTAR_DD14_Schedule_of_Supplies.xls Revision not stated POLAR STAR FY14 DRYDOCKING AND REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45004_Kukui_DD14_Schedule_of_Supplies_(AMD_0010).xls Revision not stated CGC KUKUI FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45004_Kukui_DD14_Specification.pdf Revision not stated CGC KUKUI FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45004_Kukui_DD14_Clarification_Request_Form.doc Revision not stated CGC KUKUI FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45004_Kukui_DD14_PP_Questionnaire.doc Same revision and size as this file Revision not stated CGC KUKUI FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
HSCG85-14-R-P45004_Kukui_DD14_Schedule_of_Supplies.xls Revision not stated CGC KUKUI FY14 DRYDOCKING & REPAIRS
Show all 20

Who attaches DD Form 14

Other files

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire(s): Source selection will be heavily weighted in favor of completed, official federal past performance reports (e.g. CPS, CPARS, APARS) with report completion dates no earlier than 3 years prior to the solicitation issue date. Offerors shall not submit any such completed federal past performance reports as they are already retrievable from a Government-wide database.

However, in the event that your firm has not been officially evaluated by a federal agency (for instance, contracts exceeding $150,000 with states, commercial firms, local governments), you are invited to have those customers submit information to the individual in Block 7 of the cover page (SF1449) through the attached questionnaire. Fill out the first 2 blocks and submit to customers to complete, utilizing the attached Rating Guidelines. Have your customer send his/her questionnaire response directly via email to the individual in Block 7 of the cover page (SF1449). Offerors are advised that incomplete or poorly supported information will automatically be considered non-relevant in the evaluation process. Respondents are responsible for ensuring that questionnaires reach the intended destination through confirmation with customers. Respondents shall not seek confirmation of receipt from the Government. Furthermore, respondents shall not ask customers to supply completed questionnaires on projects for which a report already exists in the federal system. SFLC will discard such (duplicative) questionnaires.

PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRE

HSCG85-14-R-P45453

(2 pages)

1.

OFFEROR FIRM/ORGANIZATION: (enter your shipyard’s name)

2.

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (from)

(to)

CONTRACTING OFFICE:

CONTRACT NUMBER: TASK NO:

CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION:

CUSTOMER POC:

CUSTOMER PHONE NO.

ADDRESS:

CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

CONTRACT AWARD DATE:

CONTRACT VALUE (final value): $

TYPE OF CONTRACT:

DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT (Title):

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: (Rating ___) Additional Comments on Rating:

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: (Rating ___) Additional Comments on Rating:

BUSINESS RELATIONS: (Rating ___) Additional Comments on Rating:

Signature (Customer)

RATING GUIDELINES FOR CUSTOMERS

Summarize contractor performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of

0 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Poor) 2 (Fair)

3 (Good) 4 (Excellent)

5 (Outstanding)

Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations.

Criteria:
Quality of Product or Service
Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations

· Compliance with contract requirements

· Accuracy of reports

· Effectiveness of personnel

· Technical excellence

· Met interim milestones

· Reliability

· Responsive to technical direction

· Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration

· Met delivery schedules

· No liquidated damages assessed

· Effective management, including subcontracts

· Reasonable/cooperative behavior

· Responsive to contract requirements

· Notification of problems

· Flexibility

· Pro-active vs reactive

0 – Unsatisfactory
Nonconformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Customer resources
Delays are jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of Customer resources
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
1 – Poor
Overall compliance requires major Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Delays require major Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective
2 - Fair
Overall compliance requires minor Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Delays require minor Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
3 - Good
Overall compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements
Delays do not impact achievement of contract requirements
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
4 - Excellent
There are no quality problems
There are no delays
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is always effective

5 - Outstanding - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above three categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .