New Attachment L-6 - 25 Aug 2010.doc
DOC document 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 0002
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-10-R-0046
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
New Attachment L-6
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 60 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CORPORATE EXPERIENCE MATRIX
TASK ORDER 2
Offeror must complete the following:
Performance Work Statement Main Task Areas
Contractor / Project
(Title, Dollar value and Support base) 5.1
Program
Management 5.2
Design & Planning 5.3
Engineering Support 5.4
Application & Development 5.5.
Test & Development Network Management 5.6
VTC Collaboration 5.7
Configuration Management 5.8
Desktop Engineering 5.9
Mission Application Support
EXAMPLE: Contractor A
$6.6M, 2200 users (please delete the example and fill in this block
| P |
| P |
| S |
| N/A |
| S |
| P |
EXAMPLE: Subcontract 1
$3.6M, 200 users (please delete the example and fill in this block
| S |
| P |
| S |
| P |
| S |
| P |
NOTES:
· Contractor /Project column should include (Contractor, Project Title, and dollar value and approx number of users)
· The Offeror should mark the main function areas with the letters: P, S or NA
· P- indicates the proposed team member was a prime contractor for that specified project.
· S - indicates the proposed team member was a subcontractor for that specified project.
· N/A- indicates the proposed team does not have experience in the specific main function area.
· The matrix should identify corporate experience in performing any main task area (e.g., 5.1, 5.2, 5.3) by any or all team members
· There is NO limit on the number of projects for this matrix
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .