Attachments 2 - L-1 and L-2.pdf

HDTRA1-09-R-0025

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM

ON-SITE INSPECTION DIRECTORATE PROGRAM SUPPORT

SOLICITATION NUMBER: HDTRA1-09-R-0025

Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described.

Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify.

Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of past efforts submitted. (See Section L, Paragraph L.4.1 of the RFP.)

1. Offeror Name (Company/Division): __________________________________________

CAGE Code: __________________________________________

DUNS Number: __________________________________________

2. Program Title: __________________________________________

3. Contract Specifics:

a. Contracting Agency or Customer __________________________________________

b. Contract Number __________________________________________

c. Contract Type __________________________________________

d. Role (check one) Prime_______ Sub_______

e. Period of Performance __________________________________________

f. Original Contract $ Value ________________ (Do not include unexercised options)

g. Current Contract $ Value ________________ (Do not include unexercised options)

h. Total Contract $ Value ________________ (Include unexercised options)

i. If amounts for (f) and (g) above are different, provide a brief description of the reason:

4. Primary Customer Points of Contact:

(For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)

a. Program Manager:

Name __________________________________________

Office __________________________________________

Address __________________________________________

Telephone __________________________________________

E-mail __________________________________________

b. Contracting Officer:

Name __________________________________________

Office __________________________________________

Address __________________________________________

Telephone __________________________________________

E-mail __________________________________________

c. Administrative Contracting Officer (if applicable):

Name __________________________________________

Office __________________________________________

Address __________________________________________

Telephone __________________________________________

E-mail __________________________________________

5. Brief Description of Effort.

6. Illustrate how your experience on this referenced contract/program relates to the scope of your proposed effort on this solicitation.

7. Include relevant information concerning your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, on the contract you are identifying.

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPPQ)

ON-SITE INSPECTION DIRECTORATE PROGRAM SUPPORT

SOLICITATION NUMBER: HDTRA1-09-R-0025

Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages or write on the back. However, include only relevant information. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. This information shall be submitted no later than the proposal due date.

Mail the completed questionnaire to: Defense Threat Reduction Agency ATTN: DTRA Contracts (BE-BCOO/Tiffani Harris) 8725 John J. Kingman Rd. Stop 6201 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201

Background Information (for person filling out the survey):

Name: Rank and Service, if Military:

Title: Organization:

Phone (commercial, not DSN): FAX:

E-mail Address: Dates of Involvement

From: To:

Mailing Address:

Contract Information (for the contract involved):

Company Being Rated:

Contract Number:

Division, if any: Total Contract Value: $ Brief Description of Work: Complete

Ongoing

Award date: Period of Performance:

Negotiated price or cost at award

Current estimated contract dollar amount

Cost: Below

Estimate

On Target

Above Estimate by

Schedule: Behind

On

Ahead by months

Signature:

Date:

Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following topics. Only performance in the past five years is relevant. (Please check the appropriate rating and comment on all responses other than those rated Satisfactory or N/A)

Rating Definitions

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many requirements and many requirements to the Government’s benefit.

Area of evaluation contains few minor problems for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor appear/were highly effective

Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some requirements to the Government’s benefit. Area of evaluation contains few minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor appear/were effective

Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements. The area of evaluation contains some minor problems for which the corrective actions taken by the contractor appear/were satisfactory

Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements. The area of evaluation contains serious problem(s) for which corrective actions to be taken by the contractor has/have not yet been identified, or appear only marginally effective, or have not been fully implemented

Indicates the contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The area of evaluation contains serious problems for which the corrective actions either taken or to be taken by the contractor appear ineffective

Performance is this area is not applicable to the assessed effort. Unable to provide a score.

A. MANAGEMENT

1. Ability of the contractor to manage its teaming and subcontractor relationships

Exceptional (Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not Applicable

Comment:

2. Effectiveness of the contractor’s business relationships with customers and other official participants in a task

(Please Comment) Very Good

(Please Comment) Satisfactory Marginal (Please

Comment) Unsatisfactory

(Please Comment) Not

3. Ability of the contractor to plan and implement a cost effective personnel plan that provides the optimal mix of highly qualified personnel.

Exceptional

(Please Comment) Very Good

(Please Comment) Satisfactory Marginal (Please

Comment) Unsatisfactory

(Please Comment) Not

4. Ability to implement appropriate initial and sustaining training and logistics required to accomplish the project.

(Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not

5. Ability of the contractor to identify risks, solve problems and incorporate lessons learned.

(Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not

6. Ability of the contractor to rapidly adapt to unforeseen circumstances, i.e., loss of personnel or exercising of options (more work).

(Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not

7. Ability of the contractor to complete work according to the agreed-to schedule or identify, correct, and communicate causes of any schedule variances.

Exceptional (Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not

B. COST

1. Ability of the contractor to complete work within the negotiated price/cost. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes) Exceptional

(Please Comment) Very Good

(Please Comment) Satisfactory Marginal (Please

Comment) Unsatisfactory

(Please Comment) Not

2 Ability of the contractor to achieve cost reductions in on-going projects.

(Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not

3. Ability of the contractor to deliver accurate and timely cost reporting.

(Please Comment)

Very Good (Please Comment)

Satisfactory Marginal (Please Comment)

Unsatisfactory (Please Comment)

Not

Performance Survey

The foregoing inquiry should have allowed you to provide us with a reasonable assessment of the way in which the subject contractor has performed on recent contracts. The following questions are intended to allow you an opportunity to expand on your evaluation and provide us with a more comprehensive understanding of company performance.

PROGRAM EXECUTION

1. Was the Contractor responsive to requests for proposed task orders?

2. If changes were required, what were the reasons and how did it affect cost?

OVERALL

1. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

2. Knowing what you do today, would you award this contract to this contractor again?

Yes No

3. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses.

4. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract, program, and point of contact.

5. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, phone number, or email address.

6. If you have any other comments that you would like to make (e.g. especially noteworthy performance, how to improve this survey, etc.)

include them here also. Continue on another sheet, if necessary.

Performance Survey