Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire (Update).docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HC104725R0005
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Defense Information Systems Agency's (DISA) Spectrum Information System (SIS) Sustainment and Enhancement procurement. The questionnaire is designed to gather detailed performance feedback from previous customers about potential contractors, covering key evaluation areas including technical performance, program management, transition, staff retention, and cost performance. Evaluators are asked to rate contractors on aspects such as meeting technical requirements, workforce quality, cost management, and overall performance using a five-tier rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.
The associated federal contract opportunity seeks services to sustain and enhance the Global Electromagnetic Spectrum Information System (GEMSIS), a National Security System used by the Department of Defense. The requirement involves maintaining and expanding software architecture, data storage, and analytics capabilities across multiple network environments (Stratus, NIPRNet, SIPRNet, and JWICS). The solicitation is structured in two phases, with Phase One proposals due by 12:00 PM ET on 1 April 2025, and the Phase Two proposal date to be determined based on Phase One results. The primary objective is to improve spectrum-related data systems, support electromagnetic spectrum operations, and enhance data visualization and analysis tools for strategic and tactical planning.
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104
Attachment 3: Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Spectrum Information System (SIS) Sustainment and Enhancement requirement.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.
Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Your written response to the questionnaire is requested no later than the time of RFP Proposal Submission.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire should be completed electronically and emailed to Quin Conerly-Anderson at quin.s.conerly-anderson.civ@mail.mil and Ramona Lin at ramona.y.lin.civ@mail.mil.
Your completed questionnaire will be considered SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 and will become a part of the official contract file.
Your help is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.
Respectfully, Ramona Y. Lin Contracting Officer
ATTACHMENT 3
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION I: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________
2. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
3. Contract number: _______________________________________
4. Contract type (e.g., firm fixed price, cost plus, etc.): _____________________________
5. Was this a competitively awarded contract? Yes _____ No _____
6. Period of performance: __________________________________________________
7. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
8. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
9. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract cost:
10. Description of products/service provided:________________________________________
11. Geographic description of services under this contract, e.g., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands, etc.:_______________________________________________________
SECTION II. EVALUATOR AND AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Agency (customer) name: __________________________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's name and title: ____________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's phone number and email address: __________________________________________________________________________
SECTION III. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS/EVALUATION
(Circle your response, and/or provide written responses, when applicable.)
1. Technical Performance
a. Did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the Performance Work Statement?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. What was the overall quality of the contractor’s performance? _____________________
2. Program Management
a. Did the contractor effectively manage and direct the contract?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Did the contractor maintain good business relations with the agency?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Transition/Phase-In
Did the contractor smoothly transition its resources and personnel?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Employee Staff and Retention
a. Did the contractor recruit, hire, train and retain a qualified workforce with the appropriate skill levels during the term of the contract, and maintain a low turnover rate?
Yes No If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Did the contractor replace departing personnel with employees of the same quality and skills and do so with minimal disruption to contract performance?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Cost Performance
a. Did the contractor effectively forecast, manage and control costs? Did it alert the agency of unforeseen costs before they occurred?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?
Yes No
If no, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
For question number 6, please use ONE of the following performance levels to answer the question:
EXCEPTIONAL (E) (Blue) - During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD (VG) (Purple) - During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective SATISFACTORY(S) (Green) – During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL (M) (Yellow) – During the contract period, contractor performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY (U) (Red) – During the contract period, contractor performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery in a timely manner is not likely. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
6. What is your OVERALL level of satisfaction with the contractor’s performance?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
SECTION IV. RETURN OF COMPLETED FORM
Please return your completed form via email to the following:
Ramona Lin ramona.y.lin.civ@mail.mil (KO)
Quin Conerly-Anderson quin.s.conerly-anderson.civ@mail.mil (CS)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .