HC102819R0037-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to ensure the proposal due date and time reflect May 1, 2019 at 1pm CST throughout the RFP. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Apr-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HC102819R0037

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Apr-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Apr-2019

CODE

DISA/DITCO-SCOTT-PL83

2300 EAST DRIVE, BUILDING 3600

SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5406

HC1028 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HC102819R0037

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

RFP INFORMATION SHEET

1. This request for proposal (RFP) is to support the Workforce Services Directorate’s (WSD) requirement to purchase and install a raised access floor, replace existing CRAH units, install new CRAH units, install new PDU’s and install a new gaseous fire suppression system.

The specifics are as follows:

Tracking Number HC102818R0037 Task/Delivery Order Title WSD SAT CR3 Upgrade Small Business Set Aside No- Full and Open Order Type Firm Fixed Price (FFP) with Cost CLINs

NAICS

333415

Period of Performance The resultant contract will be awarded with a 1-year Period of Performance (PoP). The anticipated start date of this requirement is June 13, 2019.

Incumbent Contractor No Section 508 Applicable No Method of Evaluation Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Performance Based Yes DD254 Required No Proposal due date May 1, 2019 at 1:00pm CST

2. Offerors are requested to submit a written technical and price proposal in response to the Performance Work Statement (PWS) embedded in HC102819R0037 and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)(Attachment 3). Further information on submission of technical and price proposals is provided throughout this document.

a. IAW with DISA Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DARS) 52.209-9000, each offeror shall specifically identify in its proposal, whether or not any potential or actual Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest (OCCI) as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5 exists for this procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on this procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the proposal, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided.

b. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do not apply to this requirement.

c. The following administrative requirements apply to the offerors’ proposals in response to the RFP. The technical portion of the proposal shall include information regarding the offeror’s ability to conform to all required terms and conditions in the solicitation. The offerors’ proposals shall address all aspects of the PWS. Page limitations are identified below under each evaluation factor and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the proposal. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, and OCCI mitigation plans. In the event any evaluation notices are issued, page limitations may also be placed on those. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1 inch margin using no smaller than an 11 point Ariel, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text to include any text contained in a table. The price proposal spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical proposal and shall be submitted in MS Excel 2007 format. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The total size of each email (including all attachments) shall not exceed 20MB. Email attachments shall not be submitted in a .zip file format. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered as part of a proposal. The Government reserves the right not to consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFP.

d. This requirement is being solicited to all contractors.

3. Evaluation Factors and Basis for Award Determination:

a. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government using an LPTA evaluation process. The evaluation factors and subfactors identified in paragraph 3c(1) below will be used in the determination of technical acceptability.

b. After receipt of proposals, the Government will first evaluate the lowest price proposal. If the lowest price proposal is determined to be technically acceptable and otherwise properly awardable, no further evaluations will be conducted, and award will be made. If, however, the lowest price proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable and/or otherwise not properly awardable, further evaluations will be conducted.

c. The standards for determining technical acceptability are below, as well as information concerning price proposals.

Technical/Management Approach Factor: The Technical/Management Subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order for a proposal to be

(1) Rated overall Technically Acceptable, each of the following subfactors must be rated Acceptable. Technical/ management proposals should not exceed 20 pages.

Subfactor 1: PWS Paragraph 6.1.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, provide a draft executable schedule for equipment installation to demonstrate project completion within the stated Period of Performance of 365 calendar days after award with a descriptive method on how the floor will be replaced with live equipment with no outages.

Subfactor 2: PWS Paragraph 6.2; 6.3; 6.5; 6.6. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable provide specific equipment or material information sheets for the raised floor system, Computer Room Air Handlers (CRAHs), BAS Controls systems and Power Distribution Units (PDU’s) that are expected to be used to meet the project specifications.

Subfactor 3: PWS Paragraph 6.7. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, provide installation plan for the Clean Agent Fire Protection System, Nitrogen Filled Double Interlocked Pre-Action Fire Sprinkler System and VESDA Systems in a data center and provide specific equipment or material information sheets for a Clean Agent Fire Protection System to be used to meet the project specifications.

(2) Past Performance Factor:

Offerors will be evaluated on performance under existing and prior contracts for similar products or services with the past performance being rated as "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable." In order to be rated Acceptable, the Government must determine that based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or that the offeror’s performance record is unknown. The contractor shall provide documented experience that demonstrates successful completion of projects in the replacement of computer room floors in an operating data center environment and the installation of Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems. For the past performance efforts cites, the contractor shall be the prime contractor on at least two of the efforts or have a partnering arrangement with a sub that shows this experience. This factor will be rated Unacceptable if, based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Past performance efforts cited must be for similar services, as outlined in the PWS, with satisfactory performance, and must have occurred within the last 5 years. A minimum of 2, but maximum of 5 past performance efforts may be submitted, and each past performance effort submitted shall not exceed 2 pages. The Government must be able to determine experience with all 5 areas in order to be rated acceptable. The Government reserves the right to obtain information relative to present and past performance on its own, in addition to that provided by the offeror. Past performance information may be obtained through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System, through interviews with program managers on past efforts, or any other sources known to the Government.

(3) Price Factor:

(a) The Government will determine completeness of the offeror’s proposal by verifying that all solicitation requirements have been priced, figures are correctly calculated, and costs are presented in a clear and useful format. The offeror shall submit pricing for the scope of work requested for the 1-year PoP. The total evaluated price will consist of the contractor’s proposed price for the work requested.

(b) Offerors should ensure price proposals include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, travel, incidental equipment, contract access fees, etc.). Again, the price proposal spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical/management proposal.

(c) Each contractor must also complete Attachment 1, Payment Plan. Offerors should ensure the figures correctly calculate after providing the amounts in each area of the spreadsheet.

Table 1. Technical/Management Ratings

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal/quotation clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal/quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Table 2. Past Performance Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

4. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions or seek clarifications if the Contracting Officer (KO) determines they are necessary. In the event issues pertaining to a proposed task cannot be resolved to the KO’s satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to withdraw and cancel the proposed contract. In such an event, offerors will be notified in writing. In the event a competitive range is established and the KO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the KO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition.

5. In response to this RFP, no terms, conditions, or assumptions will be entertained. If terms, conditions, or assumptions are included in a proposal, the proposal may be excluded on grounds that it failed to comply with the RFP’s instructions.

6. An offeror agrees that if its offer is accepted within 60 calendar days from the date of receipt of proposals (unless a different period is stated in the proposal), it will furnish the items and/or services identified in its proposal at the price offered to the designated point(s) within the time specified in the contract.

7. Portions of the successful offeror’s proposal may be incorporated into the contract.

8. Questions should be addressed to sharon.e.brace.civ@mail.mil. Please provide any questions, in writing, no later than April 9, 2010 at 2:00pm (CST). The Government reserves the right to not answer questions submitted after this time.

9. Proposals are due no later than May 1, 2019 at 1:00pm (CST) and should be submitted electronically to sharon.e.brace.civ@mail.mil. The Government will not accept proposals that are not submitted electronically (i.e., through e-mail).

Attachments:

Attachment 1_ Payment Plan Attachment 2_ Site Visit Request Form Attachment 3_ Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

The PWS includes reference to various appendices. CONTRACTOR’S INTERESTED IN

PROPOSING THIS EFFORT SHOULD REQUEST COPIES OF THE APPENDICES FROM

MR. SHAWN SHIFLETT at shawn.w.shiflett.civ@mail.mil.

Appendix A – Concept Drawings, Floor Plan Appendix B – 09 69 00 Raised Access Flooring Specification Appendix C – BACnet DDC Specifiction Appendix D – Sample MOP Detail Appendix E – Consolidated Closeout and Commissioning Procedures Appendix F – BAS System Div. 25 Integrated Automation 6 June 13 rev 1 Appendix G – CRAH Specification Appendix H – SEC Inventory Format (excel spreadsheet) Appendix I – Labeling Standard Appendix J – PDU Specification Appendix K – SRG Specification Appendix L – Electrical Safety Program (ESP) Appendix M – Non Disclosure Agreement Appendix N – MIL-STD-188-124B 18Dec2000 (SRG)

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:kali.r.clement.civ@mail.mil