Attachment 9- Past Performance Questionnaire and Cover Letter - GSM-O.doc

DOC document 95 KB Posted

Attached to
Cancel Presolicitation HC1028-10-R-2001
Solicitation number
HC1028-10-R-2001
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 9 - GSM-ETI Past Performance Questionnaire and Cover Letter

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
GSM-ETI QAs 150-161.doc DOC document
DD254_GSM-ETI.doc DOC document
Questions and Answer for GSM-ETI - 04 March 2011.doc DOC document
Questions and Answers for GSM-ETI 03 Sep.doc DOC document
Sop310-85-01-Rev1.doc DOC document
SOP100-55-01 GNSC TMS —
2 - DISN Processes_v3 Read-Only .pdf PDF
A - PM GSM AoS Discussion v3 Read-Only .pdf PDF
7 - NS4_Voice Networks Read-Only .pdf PDF
8 - FSO_Net Assurance_v4 Read-Only .pdf PDF
9 - NS6_DISN Maintenance Support_v2 Read-Only .pdf PDF
GSM Pre-Solicitation Conference Agenda.pdf PDF
4- OSS- NS8 Industry Day Presentation Slides 20100625 Read-Only .pdf PDF
3- GO_NetOps_v5_25June10 Read-Only .pdf PDF
B- KO Pre-Solicitation Briefing Slides 28 jun 10.pdf PDF
1 - CTO_DISN Evolution Read-Only .pdf PDF
6 - DISN Transport - GSM Pre-Sol Conf 28-6-10 —
5 - NS1_Data Services Read-Only .pdf PDF
GSM Interested Parties List - 28 June 2010.doc DOC document
SIMILAR CORPORATE EXPERIENCE.doc DOC document
dc3101301_basic.pdf PDF
857001p.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - GSM ETI Sample Task Order v6 05-12-2010.doc DOC document
dod850002I.pdf PDF
DRSN OM Guide 28May08.doc DOC document
DISA CONUS SOP.doc DOC document
6510_01.pdf PDF
fed continuity directive.pdf PDF
dc310651_basic.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix.doc DOC document
Attachment 6- Past Performance Information - GSM-ETI.doc DOC document
Tech_Guide_for_Installation_Info_Infrastructure_Architecture 1 1 .pdf PDF
Sop310-85-01.doc DOC document
522022ms1front.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - GSM-ETI SOO Final Draft v10 06-01-2010.doc DOC document
DISAEC_310-195-2_QA_Installation.pdf PDF
dc3101302.pdf PDF
dc310551.pdf PDF
851001p.pdf PDF
DRSN Network Security Guide 2008 dm —
Attachment 8 - Subcontractor_Teaming Partner Consent Ltr - GSM-O.doc DOC document
DISN_OSS_ProgPlan-v0.3-29Feb08.doc DOC document
SKMBT_C25310051321180.pdf PDF
Sop100-55-04 GNSC Ops and DCCC.doc DOC document
Attachment 7 Client Authorization Letter - GSM-O.doc DOC document
DoDI 8410 02p.pdf PDF
SOP100-55-02 —
6215_01.pdf PDF
850001p.pdf PDF
di310-65-2v1.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 58 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 9 – HC1028-10-R-2001

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(This questionnaire is intended as a sample. Tailor the questionnaire to your technical/management subfactors/cost/price to solicit the information your PCAG will need to make their Performance Confidence Assessment. This questionnaire should be accompanied by a transmittal letter explaining its purpose.)

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________

J. Description of service provided:______________________________________________________________

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

B
P
G
Y
R
N

Technical Performance

T1 Quality of delivering end-to-end telecommunications engineering, installation and operations services worldwide.

T2 Quality of the use of ITIL, eTOM, or similar processes on Government contracts for delivery of installation services.

T3 Quality of Experience in collaborating with other firms to provide integrated solutions.

T4 Quality of experience in Design, Service Transition and Service Operations

T5 Quality of delivering performance based services using IDIQ fixed prices and cost reimbursable contract types.

Program Management

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

B
P
G
Y
R
N

Employee Retention/Attraction

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Cost Performance

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

Or FAX to:

SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

LETTERHEAD

(Date)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Department of Information Systems Agency, Network Services (NS) Directorate is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Global Information Grid (GIG) Services Management-Operations (GSM-O) program. The GSM AoS includes support services needed to operate, defend and sustain information networks used by the nation’s warfighters.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. As discussed in our initial phone contact with your office, our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than 15 calendar days after your receipt of this letter.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and "faxed" to XXXXX-XXXX (Attention: ______________) or you can email your completed questionnaire to ___________.

Please call _______________at XXXXX-XXXX prior to fax transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official contract file.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Signature

1 Atch

Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .