Attachment 9- Past Performance Questionnaire and Cover Letter - GSM-O.doc
DOC document 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cancel Presolicitation HC1028-10-R-2001
- Solicitation number
- HC1028-10-R-2001
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
Attachment 9 - GSM-ETI Past Performance Questionnaire and Cover Letter
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 58 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 9 – HC1028-10-R-2001
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(This questionnaire is intended as a sample. Tailor the questionnaire to your technical/management subfactors/cost/price to solicit the information your PCAG will need to make their Performance Confidence Assessment. This questionnaire should be accompanied by a transmittal letter explaining its purpose.)
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
C. Contract number: _______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________
J. Description of service provided:______________________________________________________________
SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Technical Performance
T1 Quality of delivering end-to-end telecommunications engineering, installation and operations services worldwide.
T2 Quality of the use of ITIL, eTOM, or similar processes on Government contracts for delivery of installation services.
T3 Quality of Experience in collaborating with other firms to provide integrated solutions.
T4 Quality of experience in Design, Service Transition and Service Operations
T5 Quality of delivering performance based services using IDIQ fixed prices and cost reimbursable contract types.
Program Management
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Employee Retention/Attraction
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
Cost Performance
C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature
Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
Or FAX to:
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER
LETTERHEAD
(Date)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
The Department of Information Systems Agency, Network Services (NS) Directorate is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Global Information Grid (GIG) Services Management-Operations (GSM-O) program. The GSM AoS includes support services needed to operate, defend and sustain information networks used by the nation’s warfighters.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.
Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. As discussed in our initial phone contact with your office, our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than 15 calendar days after your receipt of this letter.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and "faxed" to XXXXX-XXXX (Attention: ______________) or you can email your completed questionnaire to ___________.
Please call _______________at XXXXX-XXXX prior to fax transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official contract file.
Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
Signature
1 Atch
Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .