GRSM 14(3)121(1)ETC_BIP_STR 5460-048P.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-20-B-000021
Issued by

About this file

This federal solicitation requests sealed bids for the rehabilitation of nine bridges located in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee. The project consists of asphalt wearing course removal, scour protection, installation of new concrete decks, replacement of nail-laminated timber decking, cleaning and repointing of masonry joints, repaving of bridge approaches, rail repairs, and other miscellaneous work. The work will be split into multiple schedules and contract options with a total estimated cost between $1 million to $5 million. Construction must be completed by March 26, 2022. Certified small businesses can submit bids due on a date specified in the solicitation. The solicitation was issued on June 17, 2020 by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for rehabilitation work benefiting the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

ELKMONT CAMPGROUND BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/20/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

CONCRETE

000000000000 / 3318B

3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

120.0 FT (36.6 M)

60.0 FT (18.3 M)

27.3 FT (8.3 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

N/A

20 °

NO

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.07 (KM PT 0.11)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.1 MILES FROM NPS ROUTE 18

(ELKMONT ROAD). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ ELKMONT CAMPGROUND ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LITTLE RIVER

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This precast concrete channel beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem with this structure is scour at the west pier, exposing the entire length of the footing. In addition, undermining up to 14" has occurred at this pier on the upstream end at the east side.

Other problems include clogged and improperly sized deck drains; an undermined tree at the south upstream island;

exposed rebar on Channel Beams #4 and #6; soil and debris accumulation in the curblines; efflorescence with rust staining and leaking between beams; missing reflective object markers at the bridge corners; and vegetation and tree growth overhanging the bridge edges.

Additional elements which should receive attention in the near future include the wearing surface; approach pavement; and expansion joints over both abutments.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. PARRISH, P. SWANN (VOLKERT, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JESSE PARRISH, E.I., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.10, 61.2 REMOVE UNDERMINED TREE FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL. REMOVE VEGETATION

AND TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING BRIDGE EDGES.

1 LS

222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH RAIL ENDS. 4 E

58.7 REMOVE SOIL ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM CURBLINES. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.3 SEAL CHANNEL BEAM JOINTS AND REPLACE ASPHALT WEARING

SURFACE WITH RIGID OVERLAY.

1 LS

60.17 FILL AND STABILIZE UNDERMINED AREA OF WEST PIER FOOTING

AND PROTECT WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP.

1 LS

222.4 REPAVE APPROACHES. 1 LS

58.7 MODIFY DECK DRAINS TO IMPROVE DRAINAGE CAPACITY.

PERIODICALLY CLEAN DECK DRAINS.

1 LS

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL DECK JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS. 1 LS

59.2 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON CHANNEL BEAMS #4 AND #6 AND SEAL

WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(VEGETATION/ TREES)

G F N N N G N N G

G G

(GRAFFITI)

G N G F G G G N G G N

G(VEGETATION/GRAFFITI)

G N G F F G

G(GRAFFITI)

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(SPREAD FTG)

(SPREAD FTG)

58.1, 59.2 DECK ELEMENT COMPRISED OF CONCRETE KEYS AND TOP FLANGE

OF CHANNEL BEAMS; SEE 58.3.

MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE AND CHANNEL BEAM STEMS IN ISOLATED AREAS.

MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE, SOME WITH ACTIVE

LEAKAGE, BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAM STEMS THROUGHOUT.

TWO AREAS OF EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER

WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS; (APPROXIMATELY 18" L) ON

UNDERSIDE OF RIGHT STEM FOR CHANNEL BEAM #4 NEAR WEST

PIER IN WEST SPAN; AND (APPROXIMATELY 30" L) ON SOUTH FACE

OF RIGHT STEM FOR CHANNEL BEAM #6 NEAR WEST PIER IN

CENTER SPAN.

58.2 ASPHALT PATCHING COVERS ABUTMENT AND PIER JOINTS.

58.3 MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE

BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAM JOINTS IN CENTER SPAN.

MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE. POTHOLE IN

EASTBOUND LANE OVER WEST PIER HAS BEEN PATCHED.

58.5 WIDESPREAD MINOR CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE,

AND SCALING OF NORTH CURB AND SOUTH SIDEWALK.

AREA OF MINOR DETERIORATION ON SOUTH SIDEWALK IN WEST

SPAN. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF PATCHED

AREAS.

58.7 HOLES IN PLATES OVER DECK DRAINS NOT ADEQUATELY SIZED;

MOST ARE CLOGGED. MINOR SOIL ACCUMULATION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES.

58.8 10" UTILITY LINE IS IN GOOD CONDITION AND MOUNTED TO NORTH

FACE OF CURB.

58.10 VEGETATION GROWTH OVERHANGS BRIDGE EDGES IN SEVERAL

LOCATIONS. TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING AND OVERHANGING

BRIDGE EDGES.

F G G G P G

F

P

G

F

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G F N G

F(TIDAL GAUGE)

HIGH

SUFF

9 FT.

ROCK, SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 6

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N G F G F N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON

DIAPHRAGMS; MINOR DELAMINATION IN ISOLATED AREAS.

59.11, 60.12,19

GRAFFITI THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE.

60.1,3 MINOR CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON BOTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF

RETAINER BLOCKS.

LEAKAGE AND MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE THROUGH

CHANNEL BEAM JOINTS ONTO BEARING SEATS AND BREASTWALLS.

60.4 MINOR TO MODERATE SPALLING ON TOP FACE OF ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS HAVE BEEN PATCHED AND FILLED WITH ASPHALT;

MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AND MINOR LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING ON TOP FACE OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.

60.5,9 WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING EXPOSED FOR FULL LENGTH ALONG

BREASTWALL AND SOUTH WINGWALLS, UP TO 4'-7" HIGH

(PREVIOUSLY 5' HIGH).

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH

SIDE OF WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING; MINOR SPALL AT TOP. SMALL

TREE GROWING OUT OF WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING UNDER

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.6,9 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS, SOME WITH

EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR EROSION ALONG ALL WINGWALLS.

60.13,15 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST FACE

OF EAST PIER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON WEST FACE OF

EAST PIER WITH SOME AREAS OF MINOR DELAMINATION.

MODERATE SCALING WITH A LOSS OF AGGREGATE ON EAST PIER

WALL AT WATERLINE, PRIMARILY AT SOUTH END.

LEAKAGE AND HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE THROUGH CHANNEL BEAM

JOINTS ONTO BEARING SEATS AND PIER WALLS.

MINOR CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON RETAINER

BLOCKS.

60.16,17 MODERATE SCOUR, UP TO 6" BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING, AT

WEST PIER; ENTIRE FOOTING EXPOSED WITH MINOR

UNDERMINING (14" UNDER AT UPSTREAM END, EAST SIDE).

MODERATE TO HEAVY SCALING WITH LOSS OF AGGREGATE ON

FOOTING.

61.2 SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM ISLAND WITH LARGE TREE

UNDERMINED; TREE IS LEANING TOWARD STRUCTURE AND COULD

CAUSE DAMAGE IF IT WERE TO FALL.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.5 WATER LEVEL GAUGE ON DOWNSTREAM END OF WEST PIER WALL CRACKED AND BROKEN.

222.4,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT. MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE OF EAST APPROACH. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT

ALONG NORTH CURB.

MINOR TO MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING OF WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR RUTTING IN WHEEL PATHS OF WEST APPROACH. MODERATE SETTLEMENT, UP TO 1", OF WEST APPROACH WITH EVIDENCE OF WATER

PONDING IN NORTH SHOULDER AND ROADWAY.

222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT APPROACH RAIL ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 18 16 31 28

TYPE 3 17 15 29 26

TYPE 3S2 24 22 40 36

TYPE 3-3 29 26 49 44

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR

BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE). SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... ELKMONT CAMPGROUND BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-048P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 506 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LITTLE RIVER

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........048P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. ELKMONT CAMPGROUND RO

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460048P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES FROM NPS ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................0.07 (KM PT 0.11)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3318B (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

60.0 FT (18.3 M)

120.0 FT (36.6 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 18.0 TONS (16.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.0 TONS (28.1 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°39'35.50"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°35'04.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

27.3 FT (8.3 M)

27.0 FT (8.2 M)

23.0 FT (7.0 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

2.0 FT (0.6 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

20 °

NO

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

0.9 FT (0.3 M)

4.3 FT (1.3 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

8 - TIMBER/OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

3.96 FT (1.21 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://83�35'04.60 https://35�39'35.50

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD AMPHITHEATER; NOTE

VEGETATION AND TREE GROWTH OVERHANGING STRUCTURE

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST; NOTE

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE CHANNEL

BEAM JOINTS IN CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE, WEST SPAN

SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - DETERIORATION OF SOUTH SIDEWALK IN WEST SPAN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL PATCHING OF NORTH CURB; NOTE CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #9 - PATCHING OF SOUTH SIDEWALK; NOTE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ENCROACHING AND

OVERHANGING BRIDGE EDGES, SOUTHEAST BRIDGE CORNER

SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT JOINT; NOTE

SPALLING ON TOP FACE OF BACKWALL

PHOTO #12 - CRACKING OF WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT, EASTBOUND

LANE SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - SETTLEMENT OF WEST APPROACH; NOTE PONDING

PHOTO #14 - SCOUR AND UNDERMINING OF WEST PIER FOOTING,

SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL SCALING OF WEST PIER FOOTING; NOTE LOSS

OF AGGREGATE

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST PIER LOOKING WEST; NOTE

EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE AND CHANNEL BEAM STEMS

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER,

RIGHT STEM FOR CHANNEL BEAM #6 SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - SCALING WITH LOSS OF AGGREGATE ON EAST PIER

WALL, SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAM

STEMS, EAST SPAN SHOWN; NOTE ACTIVE LEAKAGE

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE LEAKAGE

AND GRAFFITI

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE BETWEEN

DIAPHRAGM AND BEAM INTERFACES, EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE

TYPICAL CRACKING OF RETAINER BLOCKS

PHOTO #23 - SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM ISLAND CHANNEL BANK;

NOTE UNDERMINED TREE

PHOTO #24 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK

PHOTO #25 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .