GRSM 14(3)121(1)ETC_BIP_STR 5460-048P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000021
About this file
This federal solicitation requests sealed bids for the rehabilitation of nine bridges located in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee. The project consists of asphalt wearing course removal, scour protection, installation of new concrete decks, replacement of nail-laminated timber decking, cleaning and repointing of masonry joints, repaving of bridge approaches, rail repairs, and other miscellaneous work. The work will be split into multiple schedules and contract options with a total estimated cost between $1 million to $5 million. Construction must be completed by March 26, 2022. Certified small businesses can submit bids due on a date specified in the solicitation. The solicitation was issued on June 17, 2020 by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for rehabilitation work benefiting the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
ELKMONT CAMPGROUND BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/20/18
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
BITUMINOUS
SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
CONCRETE
000000000000 / 3318B
3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
120.0 FT (36.6 M)
60.0 FT (18.3 M)
27.3 FT (8.3 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
N/A
20 °
NO
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.07 (KM PT 0.11)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.1 MILES FROM NPS ROUTE 18
(ELKMONT ROAD). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ ELKMONT CAMPGROUND ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LITTLE RIVER
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This precast concrete channel beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem with this structure is scour at the west pier, exposing the entire length of the footing. In addition, undermining up to 14" has occurred at this pier on the upstream end at the east side.
Other problems include clogged and improperly sized deck drains; an undermined tree at the south upstream island;
exposed rebar on Channel Beams #4 and #6; soil and debris accumulation in the curblines; efflorescence with rust staining and leaking between beams; missing reflective object markers at the bridge corners; and vegetation and tree growth overhanging the bridge edges.
Additional elements which should receive attention in the near future include the wearing surface; approach pavement; and expansion joints over both abutments.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. PARRISH, P. SWANN (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JESSE PARRISH, E.I., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.10, 61.2 REMOVE UNDERMINED TREE FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL. REMOVE VEGETATION
AND TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING BRIDGE EDGES.
1 LS
222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH RAIL ENDS. 4 E
58.7 REMOVE SOIL ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM CURBLINES. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.3 SEAL CHANNEL BEAM JOINTS AND REPLACE ASPHALT WEARING
SURFACE WITH RIGID OVERLAY.
1 LS
60.17 FILL AND STABILIZE UNDERMINED AREA OF WEST PIER FOOTING
AND PROTECT WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
1 LS
222.4 REPAVE APPROACHES. 1 LS
58.7 MODIFY DECK DRAINS TO IMPROVE DRAINAGE CAPACITY.
PERIODICALLY CLEAN DECK DRAINS.
1 LS
58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL DECK JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS. 1 LS
59.2 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON CHANNEL BEAMS #4 AND #6 AND SEAL
WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(VEGETATION/ TREES)
G F N N N G N N G
G G
(GRAFFITI)
G N G F G G G N G G N
G(VEGETATION/GRAFFITI)
G N G F F G
G(GRAFFITI)
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
(SPREAD FTG)
(SPREAD FTG)
58.1, 59.2 DECK ELEMENT COMPRISED OF CONCRETE KEYS AND TOP FLANGE
OF CHANNEL BEAMS; SEE 58.3.
MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE AND CHANNEL BEAM STEMS IN ISOLATED AREAS.
MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE, SOME WITH ACTIVE
LEAKAGE, BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAM STEMS THROUGHOUT.
TWO AREAS OF EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER
WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS; (APPROXIMATELY 18" L) ON
UNDERSIDE OF RIGHT STEM FOR CHANNEL BEAM #4 NEAR WEST
PIER IN WEST SPAN; AND (APPROXIMATELY 30" L) ON SOUTH FACE
OF RIGHT STEM FOR CHANNEL BEAM #6 NEAR WEST PIER IN
CENTER SPAN.
58.2 ASPHALT PATCHING COVERS ABUTMENT AND PIER JOINTS.
58.3 MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE
BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAM JOINTS IN CENTER SPAN.
MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE. POTHOLE IN
EASTBOUND LANE OVER WEST PIER HAS BEEN PATCHED.
58.5 WIDESPREAD MINOR CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE,
AND SCALING OF NORTH CURB AND SOUTH SIDEWALK.
AREA OF MINOR DETERIORATION ON SOUTH SIDEWALK IN WEST
SPAN. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF PATCHED
AREAS.
58.7 HOLES IN PLATES OVER DECK DRAINS NOT ADEQUATELY SIZED;
MOST ARE CLOGGED. MINOR SOIL ACCUMULATION AND
VEGETATION GROWTH IN CURBLINES.
58.8 10" UTILITY LINE IS IN GOOD CONDITION AND MOUNTED TO NORTH
FACE OF CURB.
58.10 VEGETATION GROWTH OVERHANGS BRIDGE EDGES IN SEVERAL
LOCATIONS. TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING AND OVERHANGING
BRIDGE EDGES.
F G G G P G
F
P
G
F
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
G F N G
F(TIDAL GAUGE)
HIGH
SUFF
9 FT.
ROCK, SAND, STONES
222. APPROACHES 6
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N G F G F N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON
DIAPHRAGMS; MINOR DELAMINATION IN ISOLATED AREAS.
59.11, 60.12,19
GRAFFITI THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE.
60.1,3 MINOR CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON BOTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF
RETAINER BLOCKS.
LEAKAGE AND MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE THROUGH
CHANNEL BEAM JOINTS ONTO BEARING SEATS AND BREASTWALLS.
60.4 MINOR TO MODERATE SPALLING ON TOP FACE OF ABUTMENT
BACKWALLS HAVE BEEN PATCHED AND FILLED WITH ASPHALT;
MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AND MINOR LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING ON TOP FACE OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
60.5,9 WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING EXPOSED FOR FULL LENGTH ALONG
BREASTWALL AND SOUTH WINGWALLS, UP TO 4'-7" HIGH
(PREVIOUSLY 5' HIGH).
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH
SIDE OF WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING; MINOR SPALL AT TOP. SMALL
TREE GROWING OUT OF WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING UNDER
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
60.6,9 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS, SOME WITH
EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR EROSION ALONG ALL WINGWALLS.
60.13,15 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST FACE
OF EAST PIER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON WEST FACE OF
EAST PIER WITH SOME AREAS OF MINOR DELAMINATION.
MODERATE SCALING WITH A LOSS OF AGGREGATE ON EAST PIER
WALL AT WATERLINE, PRIMARILY AT SOUTH END.
LEAKAGE AND HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE THROUGH CHANNEL BEAM
JOINTS ONTO BEARING SEATS AND PIER WALLS.
MINOR CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON RETAINER
BLOCKS.
60.16,17 MODERATE SCOUR, UP TO 6" BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING, AT
WEST PIER; ENTIRE FOOTING EXPOSED WITH MINOR
UNDERMINING (14" UNDER AT UPSTREAM END, EAST SIDE).
MODERATE TO HEAVY SCALING WITH LOSS OF AGGREGATE ON
FOOTING.
61.2 SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM ISLAND WITH LARGE TREE
UNDERMINED; TREE IS LEANING TOWARD STRUCTURE AND COULD
CAUSE DAMAGE IF IT WERE TO FALL.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61.5 WATER LEVEL GAUGE ON DOWNSTREAM END OF WEST PIER WALL CRACKED AND BROKEN.
222.4,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT. MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE OF EAST APPROACH. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT
ALONG NORTH CURB.
MINOR TO MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING OF WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR RUTTING IN WHEEL PATHS OF WEST APPROACH. MODERATE SETTLEMENT, UP TO 1", OF WEST APPROACH WITH EVIDENCE OF WATER
PONDING IN NORTH SHOULDER AND ROADWAY.
222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT APPROACH RAIL ENDS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 18 16 31 28
TYPE 3 17 15 29 26
TYPE 3S2 24 22 40 36
TYPE 3-3 29 26 49 44
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR
BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE). SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... ELKMONT CAMPGROUND BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-048P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 506 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LITTLE RIVER
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........048P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. ELKMONT CAMPGROUND RO
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460048P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES FROM NPS ROUTE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................0.07 (KM PT 0.11)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3318B (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
60.0 FT (18.3 M)
120.0 FT (36.6 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 18.0 TONS (16.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.0 TONS (28.1 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°39'35.50"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°35'04.60"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
27.3 FT (8.3 M)
27.0 FT (8.2 M)
23.0 FT (7.0 M)
2.0 FT (0.6 M)
2.0 FT (0.6 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
20 °
NO
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
0.9 FT (0.3 M)
4.3 FT (1.3 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
8 - TIMBER/OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
3.96 FT (1.21 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
4 - Stable; action required to pro
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
C - MODERATE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://83�35'04.60 https://35�39'35.50
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-048P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD AMPHITHEATER; NOTE
VEGETATION AND TREE GROWTH OVERHANGING STRUCTURE
PHOTO #2 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST; NOTE
VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING
WEST
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE CHANNEL
BEAM JOINTS IN CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE, WEST SPAN
SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - DETERIORATION OF SOUTH SIDEWALK IN WEST SPAN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL PATCHING OF NORTH CURB; NOTE CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO #9 - PATCHING OF SOUTH SIDEWALK; NOTE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ENCROACHING AND
OVERHANGING BRIDGE EDGES, SOUTHEAST BRIDGE CORNER
SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT JOINT; NOTE
SPALLING ON TOP FACE OF BACKWALL
PHOTO #12 - CRACKING OF WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT, EASTBOUND
LANE SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - SETTLEMENT OF WEST APPROACH; NOTE PONDING
PHOTO #14 - SCOUR AND UNDERMINING OF WEST PIER FOOTING,
SOUTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL SCALING OF WEST PIER FOOTING; NOTE LOSS
OF AGGREGATE
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST PIER LOOKING WEST; NOTE
EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE AND CHANNEL BEAM STEMS
PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER,
RIGHT STEM FOR CHANNEL BEAM #6 SHOWN
PHOTO #19 - SCALING WITH LOSS OF AGGREGATE ON EAST PIER
WALL, SOUTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAM
STEMS, EAST SPAN SHOWN; NOTE ACTIVE LEAKAGE
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE LEAKAGE
AND GRAFFITI
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE BETWEEN
DIAPHRAGM AND BEAM INTERFACES, EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE
TYPICAL CRACKING OF RETAINER BLOCKS
PHOTO #23 - SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM ISLAND CHANNEL BANK;
NOTE UNDERMINED TREE
PHOTO #24 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
PHOTO #25 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .