GRSM 14(3)121(1)ETC_BIP_STR 5460-041P.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-20-B-000021
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for the rehabilitation of nine bridges located in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee. Sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns will be accepted for projects including asphalt wearing course removal, scour protection, installation of new concrete decks, replacement of nail-laminated timber decking, cleaning and repointing of masonry joints, and repaving of bridge approaches and other miscellaneous work. The projects will be split into multiple work schedules and contract options, with total costs expected to range from $1,000,000 to $5,000,000. Construction must be completed by March 26, 2022. Bid documents will be issued on June 17, 2020, with bid due date and location specified in Block 13a of the solicitation. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the agency issuing this solicitation for rehabilitation work to be conducted in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #2 INSPECTION DATE: 6/19/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 283.0 FT (86.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 109.0 FT (33.2 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.3 FT (8.6 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A14, 15A28 / 4123 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 15 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-SOUTHEAST PARAPET EXTENDED, COMPRESSION SEALS INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK

EXPANSION JOINTS. 2012-APPROACHES REPAVED, ROADWAY RESTRIPED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.59 (KM PT 4.17)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 10

(NEWFOUND GAP ROAD). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BYPASS

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SKI MOUNTAIN ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main problem is the widespread cracking of the deck surface and damage to the west bridge rail. Other problems include erosion of the south abutment slope;

deterioration of the sidewalk and approach parapet joint material; erosion along the south side of the underpass roadway; damage to the west underpass approach railing; a lack of reflective object markers at the approach parapet ends; and deterioration of the deck surface roadway striping.

An interior inspection of the box girder is recommended during the next routine inspection. The last documented snooper inspection is from 1991.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. PARRISH, P. SWANN (VOLKERT, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JESSE PARRISH, E.I., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

61.4 REMOVE TREES AND DEBRIS FROM CHANNEL. REMOVE TREE GROWTH

ENCROACHING BRIDGE EDGES.

1 LS

58.10 RESTRIPE DECK SURFACE. 1 LS

222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE

SEALANT.

1 LS

58.6 REPLACE SECTION OF DAMAGED BRIDGE RAILING. 1 LS

222.9 FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF UNDERPASS

ROADWAY WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP. REPLACE DAMAGED

SECTIONS OF UNDERPASS APPROACH RAILING.

1 LS

60.9 REPAIR EROSION AT SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH ENGINEERED

RIPRAP.

1 LS

222.3 REPLACE SIDEWALK JOINT MATERIAL. INSTALL SIDEWALK AND

APPROACH PARAPET JOINT MATERIAL.

1 LS

59.2 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER

ABOVE SOUTH ABUTMENT.

1 LS

CONTRACT COST FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN,

AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(STRIPING)

G F N N N G N N G

F G

(TREES)

G N G N N G G N F G N

G(VEGETATION)

G N G N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE AND MINOR

DETERIORATION THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE. HEAVY DENSITY

MINOR TO MODERATE MAP, TRANSVERSE, AND LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE; SOME EFFLORESCENCE

ON DECK UNDERSIDE (UNABLE TO VERIFY DUE TO INABILITY TO

ACCESS BOX GIRDER INTERIOR). MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF

DECK SURFACE AT BRIDGE CORNERS; MODERATE AT SOUTHEAST

CORNER. MINOR CRACKING OF PATCHED AREAS THROUGHOUT

DECK SURFACE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH LIGHT

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK OVERHANGS.

58.2 SLIDING PLATE JOINTS AT BRIDGE ENDS. MINOR SNOW PLOW

DAMAGE TO JOINT ARMOUR. MINOR RUSTING OF STEEL PLATE

JOINTS, PRIMARILY AT ENDS. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT

JOINT ENDS; MODERATE AT WEST END OF SOUTH JOINT.

58.6 MODERATE DAMAGE TO WEST RAIL IN NORTH SPAN BETWEEN

POSTS #8 AND #9 FROM NORTH END.

58.7, 60.9 SEVERE EROSION (40' L X 8' W X 6' D) OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

BENEATH SOUTHEAST DECK DRAIN. AREAS OF MINOR DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE AND DECK DRAINS.

58.10, 222.9 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF CENTERLINE STRIPING.

59.1 MINOR CRACKING AND BULGING OF EXPOSED ABUTMENT

ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS. SEVERE DETERIORATION OF JOINT

FILLER PROTECTING BEARING PADS.

59.2 UNABLE TO ACCESS INTERIOR FROM GROUND DUE TO HEIGHT OF

ACCESS HATCHES.

MINOR CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING AND MINOR SPALLING WITH

EXPOSED REBAR WITH MODERATE SECTION LOSS ON BOTTOM

SLAB BOLSTER ABOVE FIRST STEP OF SOUTH ABUTMENT;

LEAKAGE FROM SAME LOCATION.

59.11 MODERATE TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING BRIDGE EDGES.

N G G F G N

F

G

G

F

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 7

1. ALIGNMENT G

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS F

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 96 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

ROCK, SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (STRIPING/UNDERPASS)

N N G G G G N G F

223. RETAINING WALL 8

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G N N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.1 MODERATE STAINING AND EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS FROM BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER JOINT. MINOR

WATER LEAKAGE ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AT STEPS. MINOR

VERTICAL CRACKING OF BEARING SEATS STARTING FROM STEP UP

CORNERS.

60.7 MINOR AMOUNT OF FILL MATERIAL COMING OUT OF ABUTMENT

WEEP HOLES.

60.12 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.13, 223 RETAINING WALL AT BASE OF NORTH PIER; MINOR VINE GROWTH

ON RETAINING WALL AND NORTH PIER.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN TREES ACROSS CHANNEL.

222.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF SOUTH APPROACH

SIDEWALKS. MODERATE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF APPROACH

SIDEWALKS AT ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINTS. SEVERE

DETERIORATION OF JOINT MATERIAL BETWEEN APPROACH

PARAPETS AND SIDEWALKS. MODERATE ADHESION FAILURE OF

JOINT MATERIAL AND DEBRIS IMPACTION BETWEEN BRIDGE AND

APPROACH SIDEWALKS.

SOUTHEAST APPROACH PARAPET EXTENDED AND CURBS

REPAIRED IN 1996. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH

PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR TO MODERATE

DETERIORATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH OF APPROACH

PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT.

222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT APPROACH

PARAPET ENDS.

222.9 AREAS OF MODERATE EROSION, UP TO 15' L X 6' W X 2.5' D WITH 11"

OF UNDERMINING, ALONG SOUTH EDGE OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY

PAVEMENT.

MODERATE TO SEVERE DAMAGE TO UNDERPASS RAILING WEST OF

BRIDGE; RAILING DETACHED FROM SPACER BLOCK.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 44 40 73 66

HS 52 47 88 80

TYPE 3 49 44 83 75

TYPE 3S2 65 59 109 99

TYPE 3-3 76 69 127 115

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 12/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SUPERSTRUCTURE

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-041P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 12 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SKI MOUNTAIN ROAD

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........041P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BYPASS

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460041P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................15A14, 15A28 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.59 (KM PT 4.17)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 4123 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

109.0 FT (33.2 M)

283.0 FT (86.3 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 52.0 TONS (47.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 88.0 TONS (79.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°42'22.30"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°32'00.30"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

28.3 FT (8.6 M)

36.0 FT (11.0 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

3.0 FT (0.9 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

15 °

NO

28.3 FT (8.6 M)

2.6 FT (0.8 M)

2.6 FT (0.8 M)

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

6 - ALUMINUM

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

3.42 FT (1.04 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

76.50 FT (23.32 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1000

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1996-SOUTHEAST PARAPET EXTENDED, COMPRESSION SEALS INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINTS. 2012-APPROACHES

REPAVED, ROADWAY RESTRIPED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

UBIV REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS TO BOX GIRDER, BUT SUPERELEVATION TOO GREAT FOR SAFE OPERATION OF UBIV.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://83�32'00.30 https://35�42'22.30

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NPS ROUTE 10; NOTE OBJECT

MARKERS NOT PROVIDED

PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE

DETERIORATION OF CENTERLINE STRIPING

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #5 - CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #6 - DAMAGE TO SOUTH ABUTMENT JOINT; NOTE RUSTING

AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL PATCHED AREAS ON DECK SURFACE, CENTER

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF PATCHED AREAS ON DECK

SURFACE

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK

SURFACE; NOTE SPALLING AND DETERIORATION

PHOTO #11 - DAMAGE TO WEST RAIL IN NORTH SPAN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN WEST DECK DRAINS

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPET

MASONRY JOINTS; NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SIDEWALK AND APPROACH

PARAPET JOINT MATERIAL, NORTHWEST BRIDGE CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING OF APPROACH

SIDEWALKS; NOTE ABUTMENT JOINT RUSTING AND DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION, SOUTHWEST BRIDGE CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #17 - EROSION BENEATH EAST DECK DRAIN AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING AND SPALLING OF

BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER AT SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE EXPOSED

REBAR WITH SECTION LOSS, LEAKAGE, AND JOINT FILLER

PHOTO #19 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER DEFECTS

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

OVERHANGS, EAST OVERHANG AT NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF HATCHES, HATCH IN NORTH SPAN

SHOWN; NOTE GROUND INACCESSIBILITY

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL

LEAKAGE FROM BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER JOINT

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE FROM WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS, NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #24 - EROSION SOUTH OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY PAVEMENT

BENEATH CENTER SPAN OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #25 - UNDERMINING ON SOUTH EDGE OF UNDERPASS

ROADWAY PAVEMENT BENEATH CENTER SPAN OF BRIDGE; NOTE

EROSION

PHOTO #26 - DAMAGE TO WEST UNDERPASS ROADWAY GUARDRAIL;

NOTE RAILING DETACHMENT AND TYPICAL EROSION ALONG

ROADWAY PAVEMENT

PHOTO #27 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE TYPICAL TREES FALLEN

ACROSS CHANNEL

PHOTO #28 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE TYPICAL DRIFT AND

DEBRIS IN CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .