GRSM 14(3)121(1)ETC_BIP_STR 5460-041P.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000021
About this file
This solicitation is for the rehabilitation of nine bridges located in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee. Sealed bids from certified Small Business Concerns will be accepted for projects including asphalt wearing course removal, scour protection, installation of new concrete decks, replacement of nail-laminated timber decking, cleaning and repointing of masonry joints, and repaving of bridge approaches and other miscellaneous work. The projects will be split into multiple work schedules and contract options, with total costs expected to range from $1,000,000 to $5,000,000. Construction must be completed by March 26, 2022. Bid documents will be issued on June 17, 2020, with bid due date and location specified in Block 13a of the solicitation. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the agency issuing this solicitation for rehabilitation work to be conducted in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #2 INSPECTION DATE: 6/19/18
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 283.0 FT (86.3 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 109.0 FT (33.2 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.3 FT (8.6 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A14, 15A28 / 4123 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 15 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-SOUTHEAST PARAPET EXTENDED, COMPRESSION SEALS INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK
EXPANSION JOINTS. 2012-APPROACHES REPAVED, ROADWAY RESTRIPED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 2.59 (KM PT 4.17)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 10
(NEWFOUND GAP ROAD). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BYPASS
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SKI MOUNTAIN ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete box girder bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main problem is the widespread cracking of the deck surface and damage to the west bridge rail. Other problems include erosion of the south abutment slope;
deterioration of the sidewalk and approach parapet joint material; erosion along the south side of the underpass roadway; damage to the west underpass approach railing; a lack of reflective object markers at the approach parapet ends; and deterioration of the deck surface roadway striping.
An interior inspection of the box girder is recommended during the next routine inspection. The last documented snooper inspection is from 1991.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. PARRISH, P. SWANN (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JESSE PARRISH, E.I., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
61.4 REMOVE TREES AND DEBRIS FROM CHANNEL. REMOVE TREE GROWTH
ENCROACHING BRIDGE EDGES.
1 LS
58.10 RESTRIPE DECK SURFACE. 1 LS
222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE
SEALANT.
1 LS
58.6 REPLACE SECTION OF DAMAGED BRIDGE RAILING. 1 LS
222.9 FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF UNDERPASS
ROADWAY WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP. REPLACE DAMAGED
SECTIONS OF UNDERPASS APPROACH RAILING.
1 LS
60.9 REPAIR EROSION AT SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH ENGINEERED
RIPRAP.
1 LS
222.3 REPLACE SIDEWALK JOINT MATERIAL. INSTALL SIDEWALK AND
APPROACH PARAPET JOINT MATERIAL.
1 LS
59.2 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER
ABOVE SOUTH ABUTMENT.
1 LS
CONTRACT COST FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN,
AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(STRIPING)
G F N N N G N N G
F G
(TREES)
G N G N N G G N F G N
G(VEGETATION)
G N G N G G N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1 MINOR ABRASION WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE AND MINOR
DETERIORATION THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE. HEAVY DENSITY
MINOR TO MODERATE MAP, TRANSVERSE, AND LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE; SOME EFFLORESCENCE
ON DECK UNDERSIDE (UNABLE TO VERIFY DUE TO INABILITY TO
ACCESS BOX GIRDER INTERIOR). MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF
DECK SURFACE AT BRIDGE CORNERS; MODERATE AT SOUTHEAST
CORNER. MINOR CRACKING OF PATCHED AREAS THROUGHOUT
DECK SURFACE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH LIGHT
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK OVERHANGS.
58.2 SLIDING PLATE JOINTS AT BRIDGE ENDS. MINOR SNOW PLOW
DAMAGE TO JOINT ARMOUR. MINOR RUSTING OF STEEL PLATE
JOINTS, PRIMARILY AT ENDS. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT
JOINT ENDS; MODERATE AT WEST END OF SOUTH JOINT.
58.6 MODERATE DAMAGE TO WEST RAIL IN NORTH SPAN BETWEEN
POSTS #8 AND #9 FROM NORTH END.
58.7, 60.9 SEVERE EROSION (40' L X 8' W X 6' D) OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE
BENEATH SOUTHEAST DECK DRAIN. AREAS OF MINOR DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE AND DECK DRAINS.
58.10, 222.9 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF CENTERLINE STRIPING.
59.1 MINOR CRACKING AND BULGING OF EXPOSED ABUTMENT
ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS. SEVERE DETERIORATION OF JOINT
FILLER PROTECTING BEARING PADS.
59.2 UNABLE TO ACCESS INTERIOR FROM GROUND DUE TO HEIGHT OF
ACCESS HATCHES.
MINOR CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING AND MINOR SPALLING WITH
EXPOSED REBAR WITH MODERATE SECTION LOSS ON BOTTOM
SLAB BOLSTER ABOVE FIRST STEP OF SOUTH ABUTMENT;
LEAKAGE FROM SAME LOCATION.
59.11 MODERATE TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING BRIDGE EDGES.
N G G F G N
F
G
G
F
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61. CHANNEL 7
1. ALIGNMENT G
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS F
5. OTHER N
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF
7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 96 FT.
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
ROCK, SAND, STONES
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (STRIPING/UNDERPASS)
N N G G G G N G F
223. RETAINING WALL 8
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G N N G G N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.1 MODERATE STAINING AND EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS FROM BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER JOINT. MINOR
WATER LEAKAGE ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AT STEPS. MINOR
VERTICAL CRACKING OF BEARING SEATS STARTING FROM STEP UP
CORNERS.
60.7 MINOR AMOUNT OF FILL MATERIAL COMING OUT OF ABUTMENT
WEEP HOLES.
60.12 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.
60.13, 223 RETAINING WALL AT BASE OF NORTH PIER; MINOR VINE GROWTH
ON RETAINING WALL AND NORTH PIER.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN TREES ACROSS CHANNEL.
222.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF SOUTH APPROACH
SIDEWALKS. MODERATE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF APPROACH
SIDEWALKS AT ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINTS. SEVERE
DETERIORATION OF JOINT MATERIAL BETWEEN APPROACH
PARAPETS AND SIDEWALKS. MODERATE ADHESION FAILURE OF
JOINT MATERIAL AND DEBRIS IMPACTION BETWEEN BRIDGE AND
APPROACH SIDEWALKS.
SOUTHEAST APPROACH PARAPET EXTENDED AND CURBS
REPAIRED IN 1996. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH
PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR TO MODERATE
DETERIORATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH OF APPROACH
PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT.
222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT APPROACH
PARAPET ENDS.
222.9 AREAS OF MODERATE EROSION, UP TO 15' L X 6' W X 2.5' D WITH 11"
OF UNDERMINING, ALONG SOUTH EDGE OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY
PAVEMENT.
MODERATE TO SEVERE DAMAGE TO UNDERPASS RAILING WEST OF
BRIDGE; RAILING DETACHED FROM SPACER BLOCK.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 44 40 73 66
HS 52 47 88 80
TYPE 3 49 44 83 75
TYPE 3S2 65 59 109 99
TYPE 3-3 76 69 127 115
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 12/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SUPERSTRUCTURE
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-041P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 12 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SKI MOUNTAIN ROAD
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........041P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BYPASS
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460041P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................15A14, 15A28 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.59 (KM PT 4.17)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 4123 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
109.0 FT (33.2 M)
283.0 FT (86.3 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 52.0 TONS (47.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 88.0 TONS (79.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°42'22.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°32'00.30"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
28.3 FT (8.6 M)
36.0 FT (11.0 M)
32.0 FT (9.8 M)
26.0 FT (7.9 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
15 °
NO
28.3 FT (8.6 M)
2.6 FT (0.8 M)
2.6 FT (0.8 M)
2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
6 - ALUMINUM
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
3.42 FT (1.04 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
76.50 FT (23.32 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1000
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1996-SOUTHEAST PARAPET EXTENDED, COMPRESSION SEALS INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINTS. 2012-APPROACHES
REPAVED, ROADWAY RESTRIPED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
UBIV REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS TO BOX GIRDER, BUT SUPERELEVATION TOO GREAT FOR SAFE OPERATION OF UBIV.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://83�32'00.30 https://35�42'22.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-041P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NPS ROUTE 10; NOTE OBJECT
MARKERS NOT PROVIDED
PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE
DETERIORATION OF CENTERLINE STRIPING
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING
NORTH
PHOTO #5 - CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AT SOUTHEAST CORNER
PHOTO #6 - DAMAGE TO SOUTH ABUTMENT JOINT; NOTE RUSTING
AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL PATCHED AREAS ON DECK SURFACE, CENTER
SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF PATCHED AREAS ON DECK
SURFACE
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE
PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK
SURFACE; NOTE SPALLING AND DETERIORATION
PHOTO #11 - DAMAGE TO WEST RAIL IN NORTH SPAN
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN WEST DECK DRAINS
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPET
MASONRY JOINTS; NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SIDEWALK AND APPROACH
PARAPET JOINT MATERIAL, NORTHWEST BRIDGE CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING OF APPROACH
SIDEWALKS; NOTE ABUTMENT JOINT RUSTING AND DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION, SOUTHWEST BRIDGE CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #17 - EROSION BENEATH EAST DECK DRAIN AT SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING AND SPALLING OF
BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER AT SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE EXPOSED
REBAR WITH SECTION LOSS, LEAKAGE, AND JOINT FILLER
PHOTO #19 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER DEFECTS
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
OVERHANGS, EAST OVERHANG AT NORTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF HATCHES, HATCH IN NORTH SPAN
SHOWN; NOTE GROUND INACCESSIBILITY
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL
LEAKAGE FROM BOTTOM SLAB BOLSTER JOINT
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE FROM WINGWALL MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS, NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL
VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #24 - EROSION SOUTH OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY PAVEMENT
BENEATH CENTER SPAN OF BRIDGE
PHOTO #25 - UNDERMINING ON SOUTH EDGE OF UNDERPASS
ROADWAY PAVEMENT BENEATH CENTER SPAN OF BRIDGE; NOTE
EROSION
PHOTO #26 - DAMAGE TO WEST UNDERPASS ROADWAY GUARDRAIL;
NOTE RAILING DETACHMENT AND TYPICAL EROSION ALONG
ROADWAY PAVEMENT
PHOTO #27 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE TYPICAL TREES FALLEN
ACROSS CHANNEL
PHOTO #28 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE TYPICAL DRIFT AND
DEBRIS IN CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .