Form_6_-_Reference_Check.pdf
PDF 122 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 26-0082MC
- Issued by
- Lee County, Fort Lauderdale City, Florida
About this file
This is a Proposer Reference Check form (Form 6) for RFP 26-0082MC issued by the Lee County Port Authority in Florida for an Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) F3 Foam Transition project. The form serves as a reference evaluation tool to be completed by individuals or organizations who have previously worked with proposers bidding on this contract. The reference check is due by November 5, 2026, and should be submitted to Matthew Catoe, the procurement agent, via email at mscatoe@flylcpa.com or phone at 239-590-4565.
The reference form contains eleven evaluation questions designed to assess proposer performance across multiple dimensions, including job responsibilities during prior contracts, quality and scope of services provided, resource responsiveness, team collaboration, on-time and on-budget performance, communication speed, demonstrated strengths, issue resolution capabilities, accountability, and willingness to rehire. References are required to provide their name, title, company affiliation, email, and phone number, allowing the procurement authority to verify responses directly if needed. This standard evaluation mechanism enables the Lee County Port Authority to conduct due diligence on bidder qualifications before awarding the contract for the transition of ARFF vehicles and equipment from aqueous film-forming foam to synthetic fluorine-free foam across Station 91 at Page Field (FMY) and Station 92 at Southwest Florida International Airport (RSW).
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 26-0082MC: Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) F3 Foam Transition
FORM 6: PROPOSER REFERENCE CHECK (Please Print Legibly) Section 1 Reference Information
(To be filled out by Proposer) Please complete and return to:
Proposer Name: Procurement Agent: Matthew Catoe Due Date: November 5, 2026 Total # Pages: ________________ Phone: 239-590-4565 Email: mscatoe@flylcpa.com
Description of Services Provided
You or your firm has been requested to provide a reference for the Proposer and project listed above.
Please complete Sections 2 and 3
Section 2 Reference Information (To be filled out by person providing reference)
Name & Title:
Company:
Email:
Phone:
Section 3 PROPOSER REFERENCE QUESTIONS
1. What was your job title and role during the referenced work/contract?
2. Describe the services provided by the proposer.
3. How responsive was the proposer in providing necessary resources to fulfill this work/contract?
4. How was the relationship between this proposer and other team members? Explain.
5. Were assignments consistently completed on time and on budget?
6. How quickly did the proposer respond to questions from your company about the work/contract?
7. In your opinion, what was a strength exhibited by the proposer?
8. Was the proposer proactive in resolving issues?
9. Was the proposer accountable for mistakes that were brought to their attention?
10. Would you hire the proposer again?
11. Additional comments or feedback.
Rev: 7.10.2026 Page 49 of 51 mailto:mscatoe@flylcpa.com
| Reference Information To be filled out by ProposerProposer Name: |
| Reference Information To be filled out by ProposerDescription of Services Provided: |
| Reference Information To be filled out by person providing referenceName Title: |
| Reference Information To be filled out by person providing referenceCompany: |
| Reference Information To be filled out by person providing referenceEmail: |
| Reference Information To be filled out by person providing referencePhone: |
| 1 What was your job title and role during the referenced workcontractRow1: |
| 2 Describe the services provided by the proposerRow1: |
| 3 How responsive was the proposer in providing necessary resources to fulfill this workcontractRow1: |
| 4 How was the relationship between this proposer and other team members ExplainRow1: |
| 5 Were assignments consistently completed on time and on budgetRow1: |
| 6 How quickly did the proposer respond to questions from your company about the workcontractRow1: |
| 7 In your opinion what was a strength exhibited by the proposerRow1: |
| 8 Was the proposer proactive in resolving issuesRow1: |
| 9 Was the proposer accountable for mistakes that were brought to their attentionRow1: |
| 10 Would you hire the proposer againRow1: |
| 11 Additional comments or feedbackRow1: |
| Text26: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .