Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire for AE IDIQdocx.pdf

Architecture and Engineering IDIQ

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT # 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

The 412th Civil Engineering Group of Edwards AFB (EAFB), CA, Air Force Material Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a a Single-Award, Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract to provide multi-discipline Architect- Engineer (A-E) services.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

Our schedule is extremely tight and we desire your written response to be submitted along with your proposal package.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to adam.confer.2@us.af.mil. Please call Adam R. Confer at (661) 277-3932 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Adam R. Confer Contracting Officer

1 Atch:

Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:adam.confer.2@us.af.mil

SECTION L ATTACHMENT

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number:

Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: *

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount: *

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: * Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Email Address:

C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Adam R. Confer adam.confer.2@us.af.mil and Lucas Jochem Lucas.jochem@us.af.mil mailto:adam.confer.2@us.af.mil mailto:Lucas.jochem@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

E. EVALUATION CRITERIA: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

1. Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

The contractor: E G S M U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Remarks:

2. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations

No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Adam R. Confer adam.confer.2@us.af.mil and Lucas Jochem lucas.jochem@us.af.mil mailto:amber.lauderdale@us.af.mil mailto:lucas.jochem@us.af.mil