0 FA8811-19-R-0002 0002 Phase 2 LSP Amendment 2.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

See Block #2

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

(If other than Item 6) CODECODE FA8811 7. ADMINISTERED BY 6. ISSUED BY SMC/ECLK

SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER

483 N. AVIATION BLVD.

EL SEGUNDO, CA 90254-2808

ASHLEY P. FELDMAN 310-653-0970

ASHLEY.FELDMAN.2@US.AF.MIL

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA8811-19-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers X is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X ) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: ( ) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. ITEM

10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor X is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Receipt of Offers has henceforth been extended to NLT 10:00 am (1000) PST, 5 February 2020. See Summary of Changes for FA8811-19-R-0002 0002 description.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print).

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA ConWrite Version 7.0.7.66 FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 Created 07 Sep 2018 4:58 PM

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) DAVID SHARP, Contracting Officer

20 December 2019

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH (NSSL) RFP

FA8811-19-R-0002 0002 Amendment 2

1. Model Contract:

a. CLINs 0001(c), 0002(d), 0003(b), 0004(d), 0005(c), 0006(e), 0007(c), 0010(d):

i. Added “The Government can unilaterally exercise all proposed pricing incorporated in the contract.”

b. CLINs 0002(c) and 0010(c):

i. Added “As needed, these Mission Unique Services will be identified by the

Government at the time of the Launch Service order. Mission Unique items H and AB will be ordered at the time of the Launch Service order. Mission Unique items S.0, T.0, and U.0 will be ordered NLT L-18 months. The Government reserves the right to order all other additional unique services for a specific mission until L-12 months for that mission.”

c. Clause 52.212-04 Addendum (ff):

i. Was: Contractor may not enter into a subcontract valued in excess of $3,000,000 or five percent of the task order value, whichever is lesser, with a contractor included on the Space and Missile Systems Center Contractor Responsibility Watch List without first obtaining the consent of the Procuring Contracting Officer.

ii. Is: Consent to Subcontract with contractors on the Contractor Responsibility Watch List (CRWL) - Consent to subcontract is required for each subcontract with an anticipated value in excess of $3,000,000 or five percent of the prime contract value, whichever is lesser, when the prospective subcontractor is listed on the Air Force Space Contractor Responsibility Watch List in accordance with SMCI 64- 101 and the FY18 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 1612.

2. Exhibit A, CDRLs:

a. CDRL Distribution List: Added CDRL A047, “Technical Report – EIS Technical

Analysis Report.”

b. CDRL A039 Block 5: Removed PWS paragraphs 3.9.1.1, 3.9.1.2, 3.9.3.1, 3.9.3.2, 3.9.3.3, 3.9.3.4, 3.9.3.5, 3.9.4.1, and 3.9.4.3.

c. CDRL A045 Block 5: Removed PWS paragraph 3.9.

d. CDRL A046 Block 5: Added PWS paragraph 3.9.

e. CDRL A047: Added new EIS CDRL.

3. Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement:

a. Paragraph 3.1.12: Added “Per AFSPC AFSS Implementation memo, dated 13

November 2019, AFSS implementation is required by 1 October 2025.”

b. Paragraph 3.9: Updated CDRL reference from A045 to A046.

c. Paragraphs 3.9.1.1, 3.9.1.2, 3.9.3.1, 3.9.3.2, 3.9.3.3, 3.9.3.4, 3.9.3.5, 3.9.4.1, and 3.9.4.3: Updated CDRL references from A039 to A047 in each paragraph.

d. Paragraph 3.9.1.3: Added requirement for Contractor to support EIS Meetings and Reviews.

e. Paragraph 3.9.1.4: Added requirement for Contractor to support EIS Support Planning.

f. Appendix D: Reference Documents, Table D-1: Added AFSS memo, dated 13

November 2019.

4. Attachment 2, DD254:

a. Block 9: Removed specific mission callouts.

b. Block 10.k: Checked box and added “See SCI/SAP addendums and additional comments in Block 13.”

c. Blocks 12, 13, 14, 16, 17.c, 18.f: Updated organization name and office symbol.

d. Block 13: Clarified investigation levels for different access requirements.

e. Block 13: Updated personnel access requirements per ITAR.

5. Instructions to Offerors:

a. Paragraph 6.5.1.1.2:

i. Was: The Offeror shall describe its approach to providing mechanical interfaces to the SV-provided MSE as described in SIS Rev C, Appendix A, paragraph A.8 and Phase 2 GEO 2 IRD, paragraphs 3.1.6 and 3.2.3.2. The Offeror shall describe analysis demonstrating that the mechanical interface is able to withstand launch and ascent loads while maintaining adequate positive clearance between the retracted MSE and the SV during all applicable flight events. The Offeror shall describe its approach to facilitate MSE installation by the Launch Service Integration Contractor (LSIC) during the encapsulation process. The Offeror shall describe its capability to issue the MSE arm and fire discrete commands, including timing of MSE firing commands to support MSE release.

ii. Is: The Offeror shall describe its approach to providing mechanical interfaces to either the SV-provided MSE as described in SIS Rev C, Appendix A, paragraph A.8 and Phase 2 GEO 2 IRD, paragraphs 3.1.6 and 3.2.3.2, or an LV-provided solution to the MSE described in the respective SIS and IRD paragraphs previously cited. The Offeror shall describe analysis demonstrating that the mechanical interface is able to withstand launch and ascent loads while maintaining adequate positive clearance between the retracted MSE and the SV during all applicable flight events. The Offeror shall describe its approach to facilitate MSE installation by the Launch Service Integration Contractor (LSIC) during the encapsulation process. The Offeror shall describe its capability to issue the MSE arm and fire discrete commands, including timing of MSE firing commands to support MSE release.

6. Attachment 6 Evaluation Criteria:

a. Paragraph 2, Basis for Contract Award:

i. Was: This is a best value tradeoff source selection conducted IAW FAR subpart 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS), and Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures dated 31 March 2016. The Government will select for award the two Offerors that, when combined, represent the overall best value to the Government. Of these two Offerors, the one who provides the overall best value to the Government will be awarded the requirements contract for “Requirement 1.” The other Offeror will be awarded the requirements contract for “Requirement 2.”

The “Requirement 1” or “Requirement 2” launch service distributions are described in Table 1 in 52.212-4 (z) Ordering, in the model contract.

The Offerors will need to be deemed responsible IAW FAR subpart 9.1, as supplemented by DFARS and AFFARS, and proposals must conform to the solicitation's requirements to be eligible for award. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity in its evaluations, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective, and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

ii. Is: This is a best value tradeoff source selection conducted in accordance with FAR subpart 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS), and Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures dated 31 March 2016. The Government intends to award two requirement contracts as a result of this competition, using a best value basis. The Offeror determined to be the best value to the Government will be designated the “Requirement 1” provider. The Offeror determined to be the next best value to the Government will be designated as the “Requirement 2” provider. The Offerors will need to be deemed responsible in accordance with FAR subpart 9.1, as supplemented by DFARS and AFFARS, and proposals must conform to the solicitation's requirements to be eligible for award. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity in its evaluations, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective, and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. Each Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated independently, on its own merit, according to the evaluation criteria stated in the

RFP.

The “Requirement 1” or “Requirement 2” launch service distributions are described in Table 1 in 52.212-4 (z) Ordering, in the model contract.

7. Polar 2 Interface Requirements Document [In Bidder's Library]

a. Paragraph 3.1.6.1.5.4

i. Was: (U) [SVIRD02612] Prior to SV/LV separation, the SV Auxiliary Antenna shall be pointing at a ground location of 23.095 deg latitude, 134.946 deg longitude for orbit inclination between 76-99 deg and remain in an inertial hold until deactivation of the attitude control system.

ii. Is: (U) [SVIRD02612] Prior to SV/LV separation, the SV Auxiliary Antenna shall be pointing at a ground location of -23.10 degN latitude, 225.05 degE longitude for orbit inclination between 76-99 deg and remain in an inertial hold until deactivation of the attitude control system.

Attachments:

1. Model Contract

2. Exhibit A, CDRLs

3. Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement

4. Attachment 2, DD254

5. Attachment 5, Instructions to Offerors

6. Attachment 6, Evaluation Criteria

7. Polar 2 Interface Requirements Document [In Bidder's Library]