GAP_CIE_DRAFT_RFP_Q A_(2_May_13).docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
GLOBAL ADAPTIVE PLANNING COLLABORATIVE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (GAP CIE) SUSTAINMENT & ENHANCEMENTS
Solicitation number
FA8707-12-R-0014
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Word_Copy_of_SF33.doc DOC document
Attachment_17_-_DO_001.doc DOC document
Post_RFP_Q A_(17_Jun_13).docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_-_Past_Performance_Client_Authorization_Ltr_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_17_-_DO_001.doc DOC document
Attachment_07_-_GAP_CIE_Cost_Model_(Final).xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_10_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_09_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_08_-_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet_(Final).doc DOC document
RFP_Ltr__-_GAP_CIE.pdf PDF
Attachment_16_-_GAP_CIE_Section_M_v3_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_01_-_GAP_CIE_Sustainment_SOW_v.2_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_05_-_GAP_CIE_Sustainment_WBS_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_03_-_GAP_CIE_DD254_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_04_-_GAP_CIE_Incentive_Fee_Plan_v2_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_14_-_DOL _EEOC_Clearance_Request_Information_Form.doc DOC document
Attachment_06_-_Transition_SOO_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_12_-_Past_Performance_Subcontractor_Consent_Ltr_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_02_-_GAP_CIE_Joint_Requirements-Development_Process_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_15_-_GAP-CIE_Section_L_v4_(Final).pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_-_GAP_CIE_CDRLs_(Final).pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_Past_Performance_Tracking_Record_(Final).doc DOC document
Final_RFP_-_SF33.pdf PDF
GAP_CIE_Draft_RFP_Q A_(_31_May_13).docx DOCX document
Attachment_15_-_DRAFT_GAP-CIE_Section_L_v1.pdf PDF
Attachment_06_-_Transition_SOO_v3.docx DOCX document
Attachment_12_-_Past_Performance_Subcontractor_Consent_Ltr_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_08_-_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_10_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_13_-_Past_Performance_Client_Authorization_Ltr_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_11_-_Past_Performance_Tracking_Record_(Final).doc DOC document
Attachment_09_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter_(Final).doc DOC document
DRAFT_Exhibit_A_-_GAP_CIE_CDRLs.pdf PDF
GAP_CIE_Draft_RFP_Question_ _Responses.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Model_Contract.pdf PDF
DEMO_Day_-_Attendance_Sheet.pdf PDF
DEMO_Day_-_DR_Briefing.pdf PDF
DEMO_Day_-_Intro_Briefing.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Attachment_5_GAP_CIE_WBS.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Attachment_4_GAP_CIE_CPIF_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_GAP_CIE_Cost_Model.xls XLS spreadsheet
DRAFT_Attachment_6_GAP_CIE_Transition_SOO.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Attachment_15_GAP-CIE_Section_L.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Attachment_16_GAP_CIE_Section_M.pdf PDF
Notice_to_Offerors_-_Draft_Documents _Bidder's_Library _OCI.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Attachment_1_GAP_CIE_Sustainment_SOW.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Attachment_2_GAP_CIE_Joint_Requirements__Development_Process.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Attachment_3__GAP_CIE_DD254.pdf PDF
GAP_CIE_Demonstration_-_Update_1.doc DOC document
GAP_CIE_Demonstration_Notification.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 51 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1) Small Business Subcontracting Goals:

Question: We expect to present a detailed explanation of our subcontracting plans and small business objectives in Technical Vol II Subfactors 3 (Staffing) and 5 (Extent of Participation of Small Business Concerns). Does the Prime/Sub skillmix loaded in the Cost Model need to match the small business ratios described in Technical Vol II?

Government response: It is reasonable to expect subcontracting strategies to be included under the Staffing Subfactor. However, I recommend you review the criteria under Subfactor 5. Subfactor 5 is evaluated based the most recent DCMA Form 640 or equivalent.

Offerors should use their processes described under Subfactor 1 as a basis to establish the labor categories that will be loaded in the Cost Model. The ratio of hours between the Prime and Subs reflected in the Cost Model should be traceable to the ratios/strategies described throughout the entire technical proposal.

2) IDIQ Rate Table – categories by Prime/Sub or for the “Team”:

Question: To ensure that appropriate labor categories are included in the IDIQ rate table does the Government expect to see all possible labor categories for our entire team of companies, whether each of those labor categories will be used in the first delivery order or not, and including some labor categories for specialist subcontractors that may never be used if the need does not arise?

Government Response: The IDIQ rate table should reflect the labor categories reasonably anticipated to complete the SOW requirements, based on the technical processes/strategies described throughout an Offeror’s proposal.

The Government does not desire an exhaustive list of Labor Categories that “could be” used on future delivery orders, but rather a list of labor categories that most accurately represents the skill mix of the team Offerors propose to meet the SOW requirements based on their process and staffing strategies. It is not unreasonable to believe that every potential Offeror has already given staffing/skill mix a great deal of thought regardless of what specific requirements are identified on individual DOs. Except for surge requirements or staffing increases due to additional funding, the Government does not anticipate the staffing/skill mix to be in constant flux due to significant changes in the complexity of requirements from one DO to another.

The Government understands that under certain circumstances labor categories may need to be added to the table to support specific delivery order requirements after contract award. These labor categories may be added, when determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .