TSA IV Section L Attachment 9 - PP Questionnaire - RevA.docx

SECTION L, ATTACHMENT 9

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN COMPLETED THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________ B. CAGE Code of Contractor: ___________________________________________________ C. Contract Number/Task Order Number: __________________________________________ D. Contract Type: _____________________________________________________________ E. Competitive Contract? Yes __________ No _________ F. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________ G. Initial Contract Value: $______________________________________________________ H. Current/Final Contract Value: $________________________________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer/Agency Name: ____________________________________________________ B. Customer/Agency Description (if applicable): ____________________________________ C. Geographic Description of Services under this Contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands): __________________________________________________________

SECTION 3. RESPONDER IDENTIFICATION

A. Responder’s Name: _________________________________________________________ B. Responder’s Title: __________________________________________________________ C. Responder’s Phone Number/Email: ____________________________________________ D. Number of Years Responder Worked on Subject Contract: __________________________

SECTION 4: SURVEY RESPONSES

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

a. Systems Engineering: Utilized a systems engineering process that applied emerging systems engineering initiatives and practices. Utilized engineering methods to reduce risk of obsolescence.

b. Configuration Management (CM) and Control: Utilized a CM process to implement and maintain CM and change control throughout the training system/device life cycle, to include management of multiple/overlapping baselines when necessary.

c. Concurrency Modifications: Demonstrated a change management process for maintaining training system concurrency.

d. Integration: Effectively identified, evaluated, and/or integrated new technologies into the simulator environment.

e. Innovation: Applied innovative concepts to training system concurrency.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

a. Training System Support Center (TSSC): Effectively performed and/or managed TSSC operations, responsibilities, and interaction with development teams.

b. Contractor Logistics Support (CLS): Effectively managed support resources, technical data, spares, support equipment, maintenance, Government-Furnished Property (GFP) accountability, device status reporting, student throughput, and technicians to sustain training systems and ensure normal and surge trainer availability requirements.

· Rapid repair to maintain training system availability in sustainment.

c. Distributed Mission Operations (DMO): Effectively executed DMO requirements to include resource allocation, scheduling, coordination, establishing connectivity for pre-mission briefings, mission execution, post-mission debriefing activities, and security.

d. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Materiel Shortages (DMS/MS): Effectively forecasted, identified, monitored, and mitigated deficiencies due to DMS/MS and obsolescence issues within the training system.

e. Efforts to obtain, hard-to-find, or one-of-a-kind-spares, as part of the obsolescence effort.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

a. Courseware Development: Effectively developed courseware.

b. Student Instruction: Met student instruction and student throughput requirements. Effectively maintained qualified instructor workforce with no impact to student throughput.

· Hiring: Hiring of personnel and instructors to meet and sustain the requirements of the contract.

· Surge: Able to hire additional labor when necessary for any surge requirements.

· Retaining: Effectively retain personnel and instructors with a minimal turnover rate.

c. Training Management: Effectively operated and maintained a training management system and followed a process for analyzing student data to improve or enhance student performance.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

a. Program Management: Ensured appropriate personnel clearances. Ensured cybersecurity requirements were met to include Authority to Operate (ATOs), as appropriate. Utilized an effective recruiting process to ensure contract performance.

· Agile Environment: Ability to manage within an agile/scrum development paradigm.

b. Risk Management: Utilized a comprehensive risk management process to ensure program performance.

c. Quality Assurance: Utilized a comprehensive quality management system to ensure accountability for contract requirements.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes ___ Default ___ Convenience ___ Pending Terminations ___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Responder’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Email questionnaires to Steve Godby, steven.godby@us.af.mil and Marcia Hall, marcia.hall@us.af.mil NLT 3:00pm EST, 620 May 2021