Attachment_2_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 18 KB Posted

Attached to
10K, 50K, & 210K Collapsible Fuel Tanks
Solicitation number
FA8533-16-R-0002
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 2 Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FAX_NOTICE.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_dtd_03_FEB_16.pdf PDF
Rev_Att_1_MIL32233B_dtd_02FEB2016.pdf PDF
FA853316R0002_______0003.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_dtd_27_JAN_16.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_dtd_19_JAN_16.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_dtd_11_JAN_16.pdf PDF
E004_Request_for_Variance_dtd_72215.pdf PDF
FA853316R0002_______0002.pdf PDF
E001_Product_Base_Line_Index_dtd__3Dec14.pdf PDF
E003_Notice_of_Revision_dtd_22july2015.pdf PDF
E002_Engineering_Change_Proposal_dtd_72215.pdf PDF
B001_Technical_Report-Study_Services_dtd_3Dec14.pdf PDF
Initial_Provisioning_Performance_Spec_(IPPS).pdf PDF
SOW_dtd_21Jul2015.pdf PDF
FA853316R0002_______0001.pdf PDF
210K_EDL_5430015114293.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_FACTS_Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Excel_Price_Model_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_Questionnaire_Tracking_Record.pdf PDF
FA853316R0002.pdf PDF
10K__EDL_5430015112125.pdf PDF
MIL-PRF-32233B_ _Attachment_I.pdf PDF
B003_FATest_Inspection_Report.pdf PDF
A001_Conference_Agenda.pdf PDF
50K_EDL_5430015178580.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Client_Authorization_Ltr.pdf PDF
D002_Engineering_Data_for_Provisioning.pdf PDF
E004_Request_for_Deviation.pdf PDF
E002_Engineering_Change_Proposal.pdf PDF
B002_FATest_Procedures.pdf PDF
IUIDs.pdf PDF
D001_Logistics_Product_Data.pdf PDF
A002_Conference_Minutes.pdf PDF
E003_Notice_of_Revision.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Transmittal_Letter.pdf PDF
Packaging_Requirements.pdf PDF
C001_TMCR.pdf PDF
E001_Product_Base_Line_Index.pdf PDF
E005_Safety_Assessment_Report.pdf PDF
General_Engineering_Notes.pdf PDF
SOW_dtd_19_Dec_14.pdf PDF
A003_Contractor's_Monthly_Status_Report.pdf PDF
B001_Technical_Report-Study_Services.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FA8533-16-R-0002

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:

Name and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):________________________________________________________ Business: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone No. _______________________________ FAX No. ____________________________________

Return your completed questionnaire via fax to (478) 222-1854 or electronically mail to Desura.Gates.1@us.af.mil or Salena.Arrington@us.af.mil . Please Call (478) 222-1908 or -1755, respectively before transmitting by fax to ensure confidentiality.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION:

Name of Contractor: _____________________________________________ CAGE Code: __________

Program Title and Brief Description: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Contractor’s Role in the Program: _____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years? ____________________

Contract Type(s), i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc: ___________________________________________________________

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION:

Period of Performance (assuming all options exercised) of Contract or Effort: Beginning Date _________ through ____________

Current Dollar Value: ______________________

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS:

1. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract, or action of any kind to terminate performance? If yes, explain.

2. Describe the contractor’s strong and/or weak characteristics:

3. If given a choice, would your company award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

TABLE

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions in the table below. Should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation on an additional sheet to this document (which is in WORD format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted to be “satisfactory.”

PERFORMANCE AREAS Not

Applicable Unsatis-factory

Marginal Satisfactory Very Good

Excep-tional

1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the requirements of your contract or project:

2. Company’s proficiency with preparing technical data such as test plans, test reports, operations and maintenance manuals, drawing packages, or parts provisioning documents:

3. Company’s proficiency with processing your order including timely initiation of work, timely deliveries of products/services and invoices:

4. Customer’s satisfaction with the company’s response to warranty claims, corrective actions, product recalls, and/or other “after the sale” actions:

5. Company’s knowledge and proficiency with industry specifications and standards, e.g. ANSI C2, NFPA 70, NEMA, 2007 NESC:

6. Quality of completed product:

7. Extent to which Company utilized small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and other such socio-economic business sectors in its contract performance:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP FA8533-16-R-0002

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not transmit this page when faxing your input to the name/address listed on page 1.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .