Attachment_1_FACTS_Sheet.pdf

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FA8533-16-R-0002

ATTACHMENT 1

Past/Present Performance “FACTS Sheet” (To Be Completed By Offeror or Joint

Venture Member, If Applicable)

Pursuant to the RFP Provision, “Proposal Requirements,” the offeror/joint venture member shall complete a FACTS Sheet for each of the three efforts it identified in its Volume III.

A. OFFEROR:

1. Name (Company/Division)

2. Address

3. CAGE Code

B. Contract Number or Project Title:

C. Role of Offeror in Effort: ______ Prime Contractor ______Subcontractor

Note that the information provided in this FACTS Sheet shall reflect the role that the offeror/joint venture member performed in the effort, i.e. an offeror who performed as a subcontractor shall identify the contract type, dollar value, description, etc. of its subcontract with the prime contractor.

D. Name of Customer:

E. Customer Points of Contact:

Name: ___________________________________ Telephone Number: ________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________

Name: ___________________________________ Telephone Number: ________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________

F. Contract Type(s) – (Firm Fixed Price, Time & Materials, Cost Reimbursable, etc.):

G. Contract Dollar Value. Describe any changes in dollar value that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the effort or the present, whichever is applicable:

Initial Dollar Value:

H. Period of Performance (identify any changes that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the contract or the present, whichever is applicable:

I. The offeror shall provide a detailed and comprehensive description of work on this Contract/Effort for which it was responsible:

RELEVANCY TABLE

(Complete this Table for each contract/effort identified in Volume III)

Category: Offeror/Joint Venture Member to provide information specific to the program described on this FACTS Sheet (Use additional pages as needed):

1. Provide a Detailed Description of Item involved

Circle all that apply

Collapsible fuel tank

Collapsible liquid storage tank

Collapsible tank material

Other:

2. Nature of Business Area(s) involved

Circle all that apply

Design Production

3. Describe the type of fluid the item stored

Circle all that apply

Jet fuel

Diesel based fuel

Other:

4. Storage capacity of the item in gallons

Circle one

Greater than 210,000 gallons

50,000 to 210,000 gallons

Less than 50,000 gallons

5. Did the item have a minimum Storage life of 12 years?

Circle one:

YES NO

6. Did the item have a minimum Service life of 3 years?

Circle one:

YES NO

7. Did the effort include analysis or other data collection to support minimum Safety factor of 4?

Circle one:

YES NO

8. Quantities of Items produced, repaired or other quantitative data

Provide quantity information

Monthly qty:

Yearly qty:

Total qty:

9. Program Similarity to the 10,000, 50,000, and 210,000 Collapsible Fuel Tanks program encompassed in this solicitation

Circle one and explain

Yes:

No:

10. Program Complexity in comparison to the 10,000, 50,000, and 210,000 Collapsible Fuel Tanks program encompassed in this solicitation

Circle one and explain

Complex:

Non-complex:

11. Present status of Program, (e.g. early development and design; testing; or full rate of production, etc.)

Explain

12. Reports/Technical Manuals/Plans/Data/Drawings

Explain the types of data required by the effort

J. Discuss the offeror’s/joint venture member’s compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. That is, under the effort discussed in this FACTS Sheet, did the offeror/joint venture member carry out the policy of the United States in the awarding of subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? This is applicable to all offerors, including small businesses. If FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in the effort, whenever subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of the effort, address whether or not it was the offeror’s policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance.

K. If the offeror is a newly formed entity that either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

L. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.

M. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation.

It is not presumed that the offeror's performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

N. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the contracting personnel and phone numbers.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.