RFP Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

RFP FA8523-24-R-00 7

ATTACHMENT 2

Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 1 of 6

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC/WNKD) is in the process of competitively selecting sources for the ALE-47 Countermeasure Dispenser System (CMDS) program.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the quality of offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet acquisition milestones, we will be reaching out to you to schedule a time for a telephone interview to discuss the areas identified in the enclosed questionnaire. Should you prefer to provide a written response in lieu of a telephone interview, we request you advise us of that preference and also request your written response no later than 14 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of discussions.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to Mellissa Smith (mellissa.smith@us.af.mil) and Daniel Daniels (daniel.daniels.2@us.af.mil). Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Mellissa Smith Contracting Officer AFLCMC/

WNKD

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

RFP FA8523-24-R-00 7

ATTACHMENT 7

Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 2 of 6

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? Yes No

K. Contractor’s Role: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the questions below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by checking the appropriate box under each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

RFP FA8523-24-R-0007

ATTACHMENT 7

Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 3 of 6

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

A. Rate the Offeror’s performance for the following:

1. Program/Schedule Management

a. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract (or IMP/IMS if prior to delivery)? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates (or IMP/IMS if prior to delivery) and, if schedule slips occurred, state the number of slips and cumulative schedule variance.

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

b. How effective was overall contract management?

E V S M U N/A

RFP FA8523-24-R-0007

ATTACHMENT 7

Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 4 of 6

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

c. How successful was the contractor with timely award and effective management of subcontracts? In supporting information, discuss how well the contractor met participation goals for small/small dis-advantaged businesses, historically black colleges and universities, minority institutions, and woman-owned business.

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

d. How well did the contractor develop, manage, and control system and subsystem interface requirements and communicate and manage system and subsystem requirements to the subcontractor?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

e. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff, including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

f. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. System Engineering/Technical Performance

a. How well did the contractor understand and meet the technical requirements? (Identify any waivers/deviations/contract modifications that were required.)

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

b. How well did the contractor develop and execute test and evaluation efforts?

E V S M U N/A

RFP FA8523-24-R-0007

ATTACHMENT 7

Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 5 of 6

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

c. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

3. Product Support/Quality/Configuration Control

a. How well did the contractor integrate the logistics support elements to provide effective support planning? (e.g., LRIP and/or fielded assets, CLS, ICS, Type 1 Training, and Life Cycle Cost visibility, provisioning)

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

b. How well did the contractor execute the technical manual/order program to meet overall program schedules?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

c. How well did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

d. How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

E V S M U N/A

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No

RFP FA8523-24-R-0007

ATTACHMENT 7

Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 6 of 6

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

C. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I would or would not award to this contractor today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Signature Block Date