2019-08-12_RFI__5.pdf

PDF 56 KB Posted

Attached to
CEMACC II Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8501-19-B-A001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

This document contains a request for information (RFI) related to a scaffolding installation project at Robins Air Force Base. The RFI addresses questions from contractors regarding responsibilities for removing and reinstalling air ducts and louvers to access the work area. Responses clarify that the contractor must remove, store, and reinstall any ducts or louvers damaged during the project at no additional cost to the government. The document also includes a notice of a solicitation for the CEMACC II contract, an IDIQ contract for construction projects at Robins AFB. The contract has a one-year base period and four option years with a maximum value of $95 million to be awarded to multiple contractors. Work may include new construction, repair, alteration, and specialty construction. The contractor must provide all materials, labor, and general conditions for individual task orders valued typically from $250,000 to $3 million.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CEMACC II, newest first.
File Type Posted
Post_Award_Synopsis.docx DOCX document
Construction_Abstracts.pdf PDF
A11_Layout1.pdf PDF
A14_Layout1.pdf PDF
M09-Layout1.pdf PDF
A13_Layout1.pdf PDF
2019-08-08_RFI__4.docx DOCX document
X01-Layout1.pdf PDF
M06-Layout1.pdf PDF
A09_Layout1.pdf PDF
M07-Layout1.pdf PDF
RFI__3_Final.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_Amendment_FA850119BA0010001_SF_30.pdf PDF
Photo_5.JPG JPG image
Photo_7.JPG JPG image
Photo_3.JPG JPG image
Photo_2.JPG JPG image
Photo_6.JPG JPG image
Photo_8.JPG JPG image
Photo_1.JPG JPG image
IMG_7174.JPG JPG image
Pre-Proposal_Conference_Briefing-FINAL__4_Aug_19.ppt PPT presentation
Site_Visit_Attendee_List_-_Final.pdf PDF
RFI__2.docx DOCX document
2019-07-31_UHHZ130375_-_Combined_Specifications_(Updated).pdf PDF
2019-07-31_UHHZ130375_Corrected_Final_Drawings_(Updated).pdf PDF
Notice_to_Bidders__4.docx DOCX document
UHHZ130375_-_Revision_No_2_(Addendum_20190718).pdf PDF
RFI__1.docx DOCX document
Notice_to_Bidders__3_Site_Visit.docx DOCX document
Appendix_C_1080274.pdf PDF
Solicitation_-_FA850119BA001.pdf PDF
Notice_to_Bidders__1.pdf PDF
Atch__7_-_BLANK_SAMPLE_AF_Form_3065.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch__5_-_Blank_Sample_AF_Form_3052.xls XLS spreadsheet
Atch__2_-_PROCEDURAL_GUIDE_FOR_DESIGNERS_INCLUDING_AE_FIRMS_29_May_15.pdf PDF
Atch__13_-_AFMAN_31-116_Motor_Vehicle_Traffic_Supervision.pdf PDF
Atch__11_-_Form_911,_xx__Design,_Discipline_Review.docx DOCX document
Demonstration_Project_Attachment_3_Corrected_Final_Drawings.pdf PDF
Atch__14_-_AFMAN_32-1084_Civil_Engineering_Facility_Requirements.pdf PDF
Sample_Bid_Bond_dated_June_24,_2019.pdf PDF
Demonstration_Project_Attachment_2_Addendum_1_dated_April_15_2019.pdf PDF
Atch__9_-_Master_Utility_Outage.pdf PDF
Atch__6_-_BLANK_SAMPLE_AF_Form_3064.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch__8_-_AF_Form_3000.pdf PDF
Demonstration_Project_Attachment_4_Bid_Schedule.docx DOCX document
Demonstration_Project_Attachment_1_Specifications.pdf PDF
CEMACC_SOW_dated_15_April_2019.pdf PDF
Atch__4_-_Robins_AFB_Asbestos_Management_Plan_-_January_2015.pdf PDF
Atch__15_-_AF_Form_2586_Flightline_Driving_Request.pdf PDF
Show all 50

CEMACC II has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFI #5

1. Upon further study of the drawings will the contractors be responsible for the removal and reinstallation of the air socks located inside the mechanical chase where the scaffolding is to be erected? I know this is a relatively small thing, but in the end could have an affect if they are damaged upon removal and would require replacement.

Answer: The contractor needs to plan on removing, storing and reinstalling the duct socks.

Prior to removal, all existing rips, tears, etc. will be documented with the Govt. inspector. Any sock sections damaged after work has started will be replaced by the contractor at no additional cost to the Govt.

2. During the visit, and upon inspection of the site it was made apparent that the only way to access the work area was upon the removal of the Air supply louvers located in the paint area of building 38. Will these be removed by the facilities personnel or are they to be removed by the contractor for access to the work area?

Answer: The contractor needs to plan on removing, storing and reinstalling the louvers. Prior to removal, all existing damage will be documented with the Govt. inspector. Any louvers damaged after work has started will be replaced by the contractor at no additional cost to the Govt.

3. I wanted to verify that all of the work for the Scaffolding install is to be located inside the mechanical space between the paint and blasting sides of building 38? As this area is limited access due to the walls and only one minimal sized access point located in the ceiling on the exterior of the building between the two cells.

Answer: The scope of the work is as outlined in the specifications. There is work to be performed for the mezzanine access in the paint side. In addition, the lights in the mezzanine area need to be circuited to the existing panelboard. The paint side will be shut down, so you can erect any temporary scaffolding in that area as necessary for the install. We do not specify means and methods – that is your call.

4. Can the driveway in front of the building be used for staging/laydown during the project?

Answer: The contractor may use the majority of the driveway apron outside of Building 38 for laydown area. If more is needed by the contractor, that may be coordinated through contracting and the user as needed.

5. Please provide any existing hazardous material reports for the Facility and any Safety Data Sheets for the products used in the materials processes in the Paint and Blast Rooms.

Answer: The blast bay does have hazardous materials, but the contractor will not be performing work inside the blast bay. The blast bay is exhausted and the mezzanine area/paint bay are pressurized. Because of this, there should be no contamination in the work area (mezzanine area/paint bay).

6. Please clarify if contractor will be required to perform hazardous material testing to identify any hazardous materials present that could be disturbed by project construction activities. Please confirm that if hazardous materials are present that any cleanup or abatement will be handled via contract modification.

Answer: The contractor will not be required to perform hazardous material testing. See response above.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .