Solicitation Amendment FA524023R00310001 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

1) Revise Block 10, reference to Section J, change from (Attachment 8) to (Attachment 6).

2) Additional information was inputted into Section L, page 64 paragraph 2.3.

3) Revision made to Section L, page 64, paragraph 2.5. Attachment number changed to indicate correct number.

4) Change of information made to Section M, page 72, section B, paragraph 3.

5) Change made to Solicitation, Attachment 4 (Past Performance Fact Sheet), Section 1 (K, L & M).

All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Contract Description

This is a competitive HUBZone set-aside for a design-build construction contract to design-build construction requirement to repair the installation command post radio and antenna system at Building 21007, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam in accordance with the Statement of Work and attachments herein (Section J).

This is a solicitation for a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) construction contract for Project No. AJJY 22-2008 design-build construction requirement to repair the installation command post radio and antenna system at Building 21007, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.

NAICS: 237130 Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction with a size standard of $45M.

The magnitude of this project is between $100,000 and $250,000 in accordance with FAR 36.204(c). Follow the instructions in Section L for submission of proposals.

Proposals MUST BE submitted electronically through

PIEE.

A pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for this project. See instructions in Section J (Attachment 8).

Information and instructions for Request for Information (RFI’s) will be provided and updated on SAM.gov posting.

THIS ACQUISITION IS BEING ISSUED AS A

HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS

ZONE PROGRAM SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE.

OFFERORS NOT MEETING THIS CRITERIA WILL

BE DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE AND INELIGIBLE

FOR AWARD.

This is a competitive HUBZone set-aside for a design-build construction contract to design-build construction requirement to repair the installation command post radio and antenna system at Building 21007, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam in accordance with the Statement of Work and attachments herein (Section J).

This is a solicitation for a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) construction contract for Project No. AJJY 22-2008 design-build construction requirement to repair the installation command post radio and antenna system at Building 21007, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.

NAICS: 237130 Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction with a size standard of $45M.

The magnitude of this project is between $100,000 and $250,000 in accordance with FAR 36.204(c). Follow the instructions in Section L for submission of proposals.

Proposals MUST BE submitted electronically through

PIEE.

A pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for this project. See instructions in Section J (Attachment 6).

Information and instructions for Request for Information (RFI’s) will be provided and updated on SAM.gov posting.

THIS ACQUISITION IS BEING ISSUED AS A

HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS

ZONE PROGRAM SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE.

OFFERORS NOT MEETING THIS CRITERIA WILL

BE DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE AND INELIGIBLE

FOR AWARD.

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

FA524023R00310001

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

1. PROPOSAL DELIVERYINSTRUCTIONS

1.1 Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are cautioned that noncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in their proposal being deemed ineligible for consideration or award. Offerors shall submit only one proposal and the Government will review only one proposal per offeror. Proposals must be received by 36 CONS/PKA no later than the date and time specified in Block 13of the solicitation. Proposals delivered after the exact date and time for receipt of proposals will not be considered.

1.2 Electronic bidding will be utilized for this acquisition. Prospective offerors SHALL deliver proposals through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). The web link is posted in the solicitation.

1.3 In order to submit proposals via PIEE, offerors must create an account, identify a Proposal Manager, and be logged in. Instructions have been posted with the solicitation package.

2. VOLUME INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Prospective offerors SHALL organize electronic proposals in the following volumes:. General

Volume Description Number of Copies

I Completed SF 1442 (Solicitation) One (1)

II Past Performance Fact Sheets One (1) for each effort

III Bonding One (1)

2.1.1 Proposals shall be in the English language and all monies in US Dollars.

2.1.2 Volumes (i.e., files) shall be separated and easily identified (ex. Volumes I, II, & III).

2.1.3 Only the SF 1442, Past Performance Fact Sheet, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) received from the applicable Points of Contact (POCs), and bonding information will be considered part of the offeror's proposal. Additional proposal documentation will not be considered.

2.1.4 Each page containing proprietary information should be marked:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION--SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

2.2 Volume I -Completed SF 1442 (Solicitation)

The offeror shall submit the SF 1442 with all required fill-ins. Complete blocks #14, #15, #16 (if different than block #14), #17, #20a, #20b, #20c, and block #19, if amendments have been issued. An authorized official of the firm must sign block 20b of the SF 1442. Complete pricing information on all Contract Line Items (CLINs). Complete all appropriate and applicable Representations and Certifications.

2.3 Volume II -Past Performance Fact Sheet

The Offeror shall submit a minimum of three (3) Past Performance Fact Sheets. Information on each Past Performance Fact Sheet shall closely relate to the scope, size, and complexity of the proposed work under this solicitation. To demonstrate relevancy, the offeror shall compare the past performance work completed with the work description in the Statement of Work (Attachment 1). In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems, such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc. Provide the most current information for the Points of Contact (POCs) identified on the Past Performance Fact Sheets. At least two of the following (in descending order of availability) should be identified as current POCs:

(a) Procuring Contracting Officer/Contract Negotiator or equivalent

(b) Program/Project Manager, or equivalent

(c) Administrative Contracting Officer/Contract Administrator or equivalent

(d) Other (As specified in your Past Performance Fact Sheet)

The Past Performance Fact Sheet information is intended to assist in determining relevancy of a given project and , by itself, be evaluated for will not performance. Any past performance submitted by a subcontractor on behalf of the prime contractor must include a copy of a subcontractor agreement specific to the project.

2.4 : The Offeror shall submit proof of bonding capacity for 100% of the proposal price. To be considered, the contractor must Volume III -Bonding have a letter from an approved surety that states the contractor has a relationship with the company and required bonding capacity has been obtained or will be obtained upon award. Letters must be notarized and signed by someone who can represent the surety. Letters signed by agents are unacceptable unless accompanied by a Power of Attorney granting proper authority to the agent.

The offeror shall submit the bid bond in this section of the proposal.

List of certified sureties: https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/list-certified-companies.html

2.5 : The Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 5) is a key method used by the Government to Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) obtain past performance information and validate the Past Performance Fact Sheet. Each Past Performance Fact Sheet should have a corresponding PPQ. The offeror shall send out and track the completion of the PPQ with the POCs identified. The responsibility to send out and track the completion of the PPQs rests solely with the offeror. Offerors shall exert their to ensure a PPQ is returned for each Past Performance Fact Sheet best effort submitted. A completed PPQ must be submitted directly to the Government not later than the date and time established in the solicitation for receipt of proposals. Completed PPQs submitted by the offeror be accepted nor evaluated. will not

POCs shall submit their completed PPQs electronically, via email, to:

chuck_david.flores@us.af.mil tara.sablan@us.af.mil

Past Performance evaluation is not limited to review of the information provided in Volume II or PPQs received. The Government reserves the right to review all available past performance information in the integrated assessment.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

BASIS FOR CONTRACTAWARD: This is a competitive Lowest Price Acceptable Past Performance (LPAPP) best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Department of Defense (DoD) FAR Supplement Procedures, Guidance in which competing offerors' past and Information Subpart215.3, and Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedure (MP) 5315.3 performance information will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis (pass or fail). By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors.

Failure to meet a solicitation requirement may result in an offer being determined Unacceptable. The evaluation process will include the following:

A. . The Government will rank all offers by total evaluated price (TEP), which includes all line and sub-line items in the Price Evaluation Factor solicitation. The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the TEP. In addition, each offeror's separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced in accordance with FAR15.404-1(g). The Government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis. If the Government elects to perform a price realism analysis, the Government reserves discretion over the method within which it performs its price realism analysis. If the Government elects to perform a price realism analysis and finds a proposal unrealistic, the Government may withhold award to that offeror.

B. . The Government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information starting with the lowest-priced, fair, and Past Performance Factor reasonable offeror. If the lowest-priced offeror is assigned an Acceptable Confidence Rating, the source selection will conclude, and that offeror will be deemed as representing the best value to the Government. If the lowest-priced offeror is found Unacceptable, the source selection will continue on to an evaluation of the next price-ranked offeror. This process will continue until an Acceptable Confidence Rating is assigned to an offeror.

The evaluation will be based on and (ii) any data (i) any past performance information obtained from the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs), independently obtained by the Government. If a reference identified by the offeror does not submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), the Government may follow up with the referenced POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a referenced POC to provide the PPQ.

Past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors, key personnel, and subcontractors that will perform will not be evaluated unless a subcontractor agreement, teaming agreement or other formal documentation exists to clearly identify the relationship during project performance.

FA524023R00310001

mailto:tara.sablan@us.af.mil

(1) Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last five (5) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation. Any information submitted which exceeds this five-year period will not be considered for evaluation.

(2) Relevant contract performance efforts shall involve similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. In order to meet the acceptable criterion, the contract performance must be rated Relevant. The Government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table1 below:

Table 1. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Rating Definition

RELEVANT (Acceptable) Present/past performance effort involved scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this similar solicitation requires.

NOT RELEVANT (Unacceptable) Present/past performance effort involved of the scope and magnitude of effort and some, little or none complexities this solicitation requires.

(3) : For each of the recent past performance information reviewed, the performance quality of work will be Performance Quality Assessment assessed based on the (i)Quality Assessment Criteria on delivered Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs), and (ii) the evaluation ratings in the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)/Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), if available.

(4) Confidence Assessment Rating: The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror's ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated record of performance. The assessment process will result in an offeror's overall performance confidence assessment rating of or . As Acceptable - Satisfactory Confidence, Unacceptable - Limited Confidence a result of the relevancy and performance quality assessments, evaluated offerors will receive a past performance confidence assessment rating as described in Table 2.

Table 2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE

(Satisfactory Confidence) Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.expectation

UNACCEPTABLE

(Limited Confidence)

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a that low expectation the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

C. Award. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The offeror with the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP)and an Acceptable - Satisfactory Confidence rating will be selected for award. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed to be in its best interest.

APO AP 96543-4040, UNIT 14040

APO, AP 96543-4040

UNITED STATES

CHUCK DAVID FLORES, Email: chuck_david.flores@us.af.mil Telephone: 315-366-6598