Atch 7. Past Performance Questionnaire_Rev 1_2 Mar 21.docx

FA485521R0002

Attachment 7 02 Mar 21

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 7: Past Performance Questionnaire

The 27th Special Operations Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Special Operations Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Melrose Air Force Range (MAFR) Operations, Maintenance and Support program. Melrose Air Force Range (MAFR) is a Department of Defense (DoD) premier Special Operations training complex that focuses on Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) core mission support, joint integrated Special Operations Forces (SOF) missions, and DoD air-to-surface, surface-to-air, and ground training. MAFR is a primary training range (PTR) consisting of 70,010 acres that contains target arrays, Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT) sites, landing zones (LZs), dudded and inert impact areas, threat simulators, weapons scoring systems, and provides Service Class A and C range capabilities. MAFR consists of Electronic Warfare Range (EWR), Air and ground ranges, ground training facilities, and administrative facilities. MAFR is particularly unique in the range operations and training capabilities offered to users. The contractor shall provide operations and maintenance to support operations on a fully functional PTR to meet war-fighter training and readiness requirements. The Contractor shall provide personnel, training, supervision, and administrative support to perform nine regimes of support encompassing facility maintenance, aerial gunnery and bombing ranges, ground training ranges, MOUT sites, electronic/technology, scheduling, wildland fire, paramedic, and Situational Force (SITFOR). These regimes include all operations, OM&S for MAFR. MAFR provides a wide range of operations and training capabilities offered to users within the Air Force. In addition, the Contractor is responsible for supporting operation and maintenance of all range equipment including vehicles and heavy equipment used to support the operations of MAFR.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response not later than the date established in the RFP for receipt of proposals. Questionnaires are due to the CO by the proposal due date in Block 8 on the Standard Form 1449. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

The questionnaire must be filled out electronically and e-mailed to Ms. Sarah Muraco, sarah.muraco@us.af.mil, SSgt Shelby Wiggins, shelby.wiggins@us.af.mil and 2d Lt Tri Dinh, tri.dinh.1@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact the Contract Specialists by e-mail at shelby.wiggins@us.af.mil and tri.dinh.1@us.af.mil or by phone at 575-784-6549 / 575-784-6349.

1 Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Detailed description of work performed:

J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last six (6) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors possessing the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of noted discrepancies.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

18. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

19. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

20. Met or exceeded small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

☐ Yes

24. Is there any amplifying information that you would add that a source selection team should consider?

☐ Yes

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: sarah.muraco@us.af.mil, shelby.wiggins@us.af.mil, and tri.dinh.1@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 9 of 9