Solicitation Amendment FA483024R00070004 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to:Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

1. Extend proposal due date to 07 Jan 2025.

2. Provide Section L and M updates. Please note highlighted areas.

3. Update Atch 3 Seed Project SOW.

4. Update Atch 3a(i) B1107 LPS Specs, Atch 3b(i) B1108 LPS Specs, Atch 3c(i) B1109 LPS Specs, and Atch 3d(i) B1121 LPS Specs.

5. Provide Atch 3a(iiii) B1107 Utility Map, Atch 3b(iiii) B1108 Utility Map, Atch 3c(iiii) B1109 Utility Map, and Atch 3d(iiii) B1121 Utility Map.

6. Renumber and provide WD updates for Atch 5a(i) Highway, Lanier and Lowndes, GA, Atch 5a(iii) Building, Lanier and Lowndes, GA, Atch 5b(i) Highway, Colquitt, GA, Atch 5b(ii) Heavy, Colquitt, GA, Atch 5b(iii) Building Colquitt, GA, Atch 5c(i) Highway, Polk, FL, Atch 5c(ii) Heavy, Polk, FL, Atch 5c(iii) Building, Polk, FL, Atch 5d(i) Highway, Highlands, FL, Atch 5d(ii) Heavy, Highlands, FL, Atch 5d(iii) Building, Highlands, FL.

7. Update Atch 8 Past Performance Information.

8. Provide Question and Answer Form responses.

9. Update MACC Site Visit Sign-In.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 05 Dec 2024 07 Jan 2025

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

RFP Atch 11 - Question and Answer Form RFP Atch 2 General MACC Statement of Work (SOW) (3 Jul 24) RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Repair LPS RFP Atch 3a(i) - Bldg 1107 Rocket Test Cell Shop LPS Specs RFP Atch 3a(iiii) - Bldg 1107 Utility Map RFP Atch 3b(i) - Bldg 1108 Missile Assembly Shop LPS Specs RFP Atch 3b(iiii) - Bldg 1108 Utility Map RFP Atch 3c(i) - Bldg 1109 Conventional Munitions Shop LPS Specs RFP Atch 3c(iiii) - Bldg 1109 Utility Map RFP Atch 3d(i) - Bldg 1121 Ancillary Explosives Facility LPS Specs RFP Atch 3d(iiii) - Bldg 1121 Utility Map RFP Atch 5a(i) WD GA20240066 Highway 20 Sep 24 (Lanier & Lowndes, GA) RFP Atch 5a(iii) WD GA20240316 Building 15 Nov 24 (Lanier and Lowndes GA) RFP Atch 5b(i) WD GA20240212 Highway 05 Jan 24 (Colquitt, GA) RFP Atch 5b(ii) - WD GA20240060 Heavy 18 Oct 24 (Colquitt, GA) RFP Atch 5b(iii) WD GA20240166 Building 18 Oct 24 (Colquitt GA) RFP Atch 5c(i) WD FL20240267 Highway 13 Sep 24 (Polk, FL) RFP Atch 5c(ii)- WD FL20240131 Heavy 12 Jul 24 (Polk, FL) RFP Atch 5c(iii)- WD FL20240223 Building 6 Dec 24 (Polk, FL) RFP Atch 5d(i) WD FL20240251 Highway 13 Sep 24 (Highlands, FL) RFP Atch 5d(ii) - WD FL20240093 Heavy 05 Jan 24 (Highlands, FL) RFP Atch 5d(iii)- WD FL20240207 Building 06 Dec 24 (Highlands, FL) RFP Atch 8 Past Performance Information (PPI)

The following attachments were deleted:

RFP Atch 11 - Question & Answer Form RFP Atch 2 - General MACC Statement of Work (SOW) (3 Jul 24) RFP Atch 3 - Seed Project SOW, QSEU 23-0118, Repair Lighting Protection System (LPS) RFP Atch 3a(i) - Bldg 1107, Rocket Test Cell Shop, LPS Specs RFP Atch 3b(i) - Bldg 1108, Missile Assembly Shop LPS, Specs RFP Atch 3c(i) - Bldg 1109, Conventional Munitions Shop, LPS Specs RFP Atch 3d(i) - Bldg 1121, Ancillary Explosives Facility, LPS Specs RFP Atch 5a(i) WD FL20240066 Highway 20 Sep 24 (Lowndes, GA) RFP Atch 5a(iii) WD FL20240316 Building 20 Sep 24 (Lanier & Lowndes, GA) RFP Atch 5b(i) WD FL20240066 Highway 20 Sep 24 (Lanier, GA) RFP Atch 5c(i) - WD, GA20240212, Highway 05 Jan 24 (Colquitt, GA) RFP Atch 5c(ii) - WD, GA20240060, Heavy 26 Jul 24 (Colquitt, GA) RFP Atch 5c(iii) WD FL20240166 Building 20 Sep 24 (Colquitt, GA) RFP Atch 5d(i) WD FL20240267 Highway 13 Sep 24 (Polk, FL) RFP Atch 5d(ii)- WD, FL20240131, Heavy 12 Jul 24 (Polk, FL) RFP Atch 5d(iii)- WD, FL20240223, Building 12 Jul 24 (Polk, FL) RFP Atch 5e(i) WD FL20240251 Highway 13 Sep 24 (Highland, FL)

FA483024R00070004

RFP Atch 5e(ii) - WD, FL20240093, Heavy 05 Jan 24 (Highlands, FL) RFP Atch 5e(iii)- WD, FL20240207, Building 12 Jul 24 (Highlands, FL) RFP Atch 8 - Past Performance Information (PPI)

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

they are L.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTIONS

L-1.1 To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. This Section L of the Request for Proposal (RFP) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested in Section L and must be submitted in accordance with (IAW) these instructions. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this Section L and/or failure to meet a requirement may result in an offeror being ineligible for award.

L-1.2 Proposals must demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the nature and scope of work required. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal must not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather, shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements such as "will comply,"

Cursory responses or responses that merely "noted and understood," "IAW industry best practices/standards," etc., without supporting narrative is unacceptable.

reiterate or paraphrase Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Specifications language will not be considered to satisfy the requirements of the RFP.

L-1.3 Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding detailed artwork, and other embellishments are neither necessary nor desired.

L-1.4 The Government requires a minimum acceptance period of from the date of receipt of offers as stated in Section A, Block 13D of the 180 calendar days contract/solicitation; however, offerors may specify an acceptance period exceeding the Government's minimum requirement. In that case, the offeror must affirmatively state an acceptance period in Section A, Block 17.

L-1.5 The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation at any point before contract award. In the event this solicitation is cancelled, the Government has no obligation to reimburse offerors for any costs incurred.

L-2 GENERAL INFORMATION

L-2.1 The Contract Specialists (CS) listed below are the Government's sole points of contact for this acquisition. The deadline Government Points of Contact.

for all questions, concerns, and/or request for clarification is no later than 14 calendar days prior to the proposal due date. Any questions submitted after this date may not be answered. Contact information is as follows:

23 CONS/PKA

Brittany Richardson

Telephone: 229-257-4713 brittany.richardson.8@us.af.mil

23 CONS/PKA

Amanda Richardson

Telephone: 229-257-9756

Amanda.richardson.13@us.af.mil

L-2.2 Debriefings. The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range if a competitive range is established; whereupon the offeror may request and receive a debriefing IAW FAR

15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request either a pre-award debriefing or post-award debriefing. NOTE: Offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to a single debriefing. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision IAW FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request IAW the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

L-2.3 Discrepancies. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the claimed omission or error. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

FA483024R00070004

mailto:brittany.richardson.8@us.af.mil mailto:Amanda.richardson.13@us.af.mil

L-2.4 Conflicting Proposals. Proposal must be submitted in both electronic and paper format specified in L.3 and Table 1. In case of a conflict between paper and electronic proposal copies, the paper version will take precedence.

L-3 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

L-3.1 Proposals must be completed and received prior to the time specified in Block 13 of the SF 1442. The sealed envelope or package used in submitting your proposal must be plainly marked with the time and date specified for receipt, solicitation number, Proposals and offeror's POC name, address, and phone number.

must only be delivered via commercial carriers or hand-delivery. Proposals submitted by e-mail or regular mail (other than commercial carriers) be WILL NOT accepted. Proposals can be delivered to the following address:

23d Contracting Squadron/PKA

ATTN: Amanda Richardson

4380 Alabama Road, Bldg. 932, Moody AFB, GA, 31699

Note: Access to Base Facilities - 23d Contracting Squadron (23 CONS) is located on an Air Force installation and all access to the installation is controlled by the US Armed Forces. An escort may be required and access will not be granted based solely on the need to submit a proposal (Offerors who have no visitor pass must notify the CO via e-mail not later than 4:00 PM (EST) two (2) days prior to hand-delivery for arranging a meeting time at the gate). Furthermore, the Air Force may conduct random exercises which may require the closure of the main entrance gate and the utilization of an alternate base entry. Any delay based on access will not be accepted as a reason for late receipt of the proposal by the Government. Late proposals will be processed IAW FAR 52.215-1(c), Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.

L-3.2 The proposal will be comprised of three (3) separate volumes as Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits.

prescribed in L-3.2, Table 1, Proposal Organization. Volume titles, submittal formats, quantities, and page limits shall comply with Table 1. The specific contents of each proposal volume are described in the paragraph below:

Table 1 - Proposal Organization

V o l

Volume Title Font and Size Page Limit CD/DVD Hard

Copies

I Technical Times New Roman, size 12

Subfactor 1: No more than 50 pages

Subfactor 2: No more than 10 pages

Quantity not Restricted*

1 Origin al

II Past Performance Times New Roman, size 12

See Subsection L. 5.2 Quantity not Restricted*

Original

II

I

Price and Other Contracting Considerations

Times New Roman, size 12

*Unlimited Quantity not Restricted*

Original

* Offeror shall submit all volumes in electronic format, using re-writable CD/DVDs. Separate CD/DVDs are not required for each volume but use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions. The electronic proposal shall be delivered concurrently with the hard copy. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression utility must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a "bookmarked" PDF format readable by Adobe Acrobat generated by Word, Excel, Project, PowerPoint, etc., as applicable. Offerors are cautioned that the original hardcopy form of the offeror's proposal shall take precedence if any inconsistencies or discrepancies exist between the offeror's original hard copy proposal and the documents submitted on electronic media. The CD/DVD can be password protected. It is the offerors responsibility to ensure the password is provided to the Government within the proposal package.

L-3.2.1 Page Limitation. Page limitations for each volume are listed in L-3.2, Table 1 and shall be treated as the maximum limitation. Each page shall be counted except the following: the front and back cover, executive summary, blank pages, title pages, glossaries, and those parts of the proposal noted as unlimited. If the

Page limitations may also proposal volume exceeds the page limitation, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal volume.

be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

L-3.2.2 Page Size and Format. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two (2) pages. Typing shall be in Times New Roman font size 12, single-spaced, on plain white paper. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11inches, not including foldouts, one (1) inch margin all-around. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by proposal Volume. No material may be incorporated by reference. Each volume shall contain a table of contents. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Elaborate formats, bindings, or color presentations are not desired or required. These page formats also apply to responses to ENs, if issued. These limitations apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

L-3.2.3 Binding and Labeling. The original hard copy proposal shall have each volume separately bound in a 2-, 3-, or 4-ring loose leaf binder which shall permit it to lie flat when open. Volumes I through III shall not be submitted together within the same binding.

Staples shall not be used. Each volume shall include a cover sheet that clearly indicates the volume number, title, solicitation identification, and the offeror's name. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed IAW FAR 52.215-1(e), , and FAR 3.104-4, Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data or .Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid Proposal Information and Source Selection Information

L-3.2.4 Narrative Graphics. Legible tables, charts, graphs, and figures should be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. This paragraph applies to any graphics used within the proposal only; this does not apply for drawings or Work Breakdown Structure estimate (see L.4.3.1.1(c)). These displays shall be simple to understand and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and each surface containing information will count as a single page. Foldout pages shall only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics, not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than font size 10. These limitations apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

L-3.2.5 Cross Referencing. To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation that is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

L-3.2.6 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

L-3.2.7 Operating System and Applications. Proposals will be accessed with the Microsoft Windows 10 Operating System. Proposal files shall be submitted using only the applications listed below:

Application / File Valid Extensions

Portable Document Files .pdf

Microsoft Word .docx

Microsoft Excel .xlsx

Microsoft Power Point .pptx

Microsoft Project

Primavera P6

L-3.3 QUESTIONS.

(a) Offerors are encouraged to submit all additional written questions and requests for clarification. All questions regarding this solicitation and the MACC requirement must be submitted in writing, in Microsoft Word format, using Questions & Answers (Q&A) Form (Attachment 11), and shall be emailed to points of contacts listed in paragraph Questions or requests for RFP clarification must be received NLT 14 calendar days prior to ALL L-2.1.

proposal due date 23 CONS assumes no responsibility for non-delivery due to problems . Any questions submitted after this date may not be answered.

with email servers, and extensions are at the sole discretion of the CO. The Government is NOT extending due date of the Q&A form. The Government will not accept any further RFIs.

(b) To ensure all offerors have availability to information at the same time, the received questions and subsequent answers will be posted to the System for Award Management (SAM) website, www.sam.gov. It is the responsibility of the contractor to continuously monitor the site for updates. Failure of a prospective offeror to submit any questions or attend the pre-proposal conference and site visit will be construed to mean that the prospective offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. Questions will be answered and posted NLT the established due date.

L-3.4 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT: IAW , a single pre-FAR 15.201, Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals proposal conference/site visit will be held at . , Building 780, 8414 Vanguard Road, Moody AFB GA o at 9:00 AM (EST- Eastern Standard Time)n 17 Oct 2024 All prospective offerors are highly encouraged to attend this conference/site visit and are advised that this will be held solely for the purpose of explaining the concepts involved in the seed project and the specification, terms, and conditions of this solicitation. Please see the separate " Pre-Proposal Conference/Site

" and " ," within the RFP package for complete details. Visit Invitation Site Visit Pre-Registration Form

L-4 VOLUME I- TECHNICAL

L-4.1 General. Each offeror shall submit a Technical volume with its proposal. The Technical volume shall be specific, detailed, complete, and clearly demonstrate the offerors thorough understanding of requirement for the accomplishment of this effort. Submissions will be evaluated against the Technical subfactors defined in . Using the instructions provided below, provide a detailed approach to accomplish/satisfy Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award all subfactors. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the Statement of Work (SOW) for Seed Project

By submitting a proposal, the offeror affirms that its organization will perform all the requirements (Attachment 3) or MACC General SOW (Attachment 2).

specified in the solicitation.

L-4.2 Volume Organization. The Technical volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

1) Table of Contents

2) Summary Page(s)

3) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

4) Cross Reference (if applicable)

5) Subfactor 1- Complete Technical Approach & Plan of Execution of Seed Project

6) Subfactor 2- Management Plan

L-4.2.1 Summary Page(s). To aid the Government's understanding, provide a summary of the offeror's proposed technical approach that explains how the approach will efficiently and effectively meet the requirement. The Summary Page(s) shall not exceed two (2) pages.

L-4.2.2 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Offeror shall provide a glossary of abbreviations and acronyms utilized in the Technical volume to clarify unfamiliar terms.

L-4.3 Technical Subfactors

L-4.3.1 Subfactor 1: Complete Technical Approach & Plan of Execution of Seed Project. This subfactor will assess the offeror's technical approach to accomplish all work elements of the MACC Seed Project, Project No. QSEU 23-0118, Repair Lightning Protection System, Multi-Facilities. The seed project magnitude is between $500,000 and $1,000,000 IAW FAR 36.204

(e). The seed project is a programmed and tangible task order which the Government intends to execute under the new MACC in the near future.

*NOTE: The Government discloses an Architect-Engineering (A-E) firm as the developer of the seed project requirements, Project No, QSEU 23-0118. IAW FAR 36.209, this firm is ineligible for bidding on the new MACC as the prime contractor because as the requirement developer, they possess source selection information that is relevant to the contract but is not available to all competitors. However, to prevent any potential Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) and the appearance of an unfair competitive advantage described in FAR 9.505(a), the offerors are instructed not to contact/use the below identified A-E firm as their subcontractor or enter into a joint venture partnership and/or make a teaming

This restraint applies only to the Project No. QSEU 23-0118 and for arrangement with them for the purpose of bidding on this solicitation.

the duration of the MACC source selection or until the final MACC contracts are awarded. Any offeror who is not in compliance with this solicitation provision will be rendered non-responsible and ineligible for award.

J Glenn Gregory & Associates Architects PC

1807 N Patterson St

Valdosta, GA 31602

L-4.3.1.1 Provide a preliminary work plan IAW the SOW for Seed Project (Attachment 3 and all the sub-attachments) and Moody Installation Guide Specifications (Attachments 1a and 1b) to demonstrate coordination efforts among the different trades/subcontractors, the sequencing of construction, and the implementation of roles and responsibilities of the key personnel.

(a) Scope of Work - Provide a written narrative summarizing, explaining, and documenting the processes anticipated to successfully fulfill the requirements of the seed project from task order award to final acceptance.

Identify the different trades and subcontractors and demonstrate how each will coordinate work to show a fluid

The narrative shall clearly define the roles and responsibilities of all key personnel and show sequence and minimize down-time or delay.

how each will implement their responsibilities.

(b) Construction Schedule - Provide a Construction Work Schedule, identifying the definable features of work, in a Microsoft Project 2016, or higher format, and shall be generated using the critical path method, Primavera P6 including the milestones. The Construction Work Schedule shall reflect project phasing construction/start date, hold-point inspections, completion date, utility outages, major equipment deliveries, and installation, tests, pre-final inspections, final inspections and delivery of project closeout documents as included in the Moody Installation Guide Specifications (Attachments 1a and 1b).

(c) - Using Seed Project WBS/Bid Schedule Price Worksheet (Attachment 4), provide WBS for the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) estimates construction of the seed project based on the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI)Master Format, IAW Moody Installation Guide each building for Specifications (Attachments 1a and1b) MACC General SOW (Attachment 2), and SOW for Seed Project (Attachment 3),and its related sub-attachments.

L-4.3.2 Subfactor 2:Management Plan (MP). This subfactor will assess the offeror's capability to appropriately manage and employ the necessary resources to execute the contract and all task orders for the duration of the contract. Upon contract award, this MP will be incorporated into the basic contract to be a part of the contract requirements. Additional task order specific information may be required for future individual task orders.

L-4.3.2.1 Provide a detailed MP to include, as a minimum, the following components to cover all activities, both onsite and offsite, work by subcontractors, fabricators, suppliers, and purchasing agents IAW the Moody Installation Guide Specifications (Attachments 1a and 1 b):

(a) Complete key personnel organizational chart with a supporting narrative identifying precise lines of authority and responsibilities, including qualifications, certifications and duties of each person assigned to a key function.

(b) Narrative, or other effective means, detailing procedures for Quality Control (QC), scheduling, reviewing, certifying, and managing submittals for the .seed project

(c) Complete Accident Prevention Plan (APP) to include identification of the Site Safety Health Officer (SSHO), document that outlines occupational safety and health policy, responsibilities, program requirements, and Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA).

L-5.0 VOLUME II - PAST PERFORMANCE

L-5.1 General. Each offeror shall submit a Past Performance volume prepared IAW all instructions contained within Section L. The Past Performance volume will be evaluated the evaluation criteria in Section M. Volume II shall contain the following:IAW

L-5.2 Format and Specific Content

L-5.2.1 Volume Organization. The Past Performance volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

1) Table of Contents

2) Summary Page(s)

3) Glossary

4) Past Performance Information (PPI)

5) Organization Structure Change History

6) Client Authorization Letters

7) Subcontractor Letters of Consent

8) Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ)

L-5.2.2 Summary Page(s). Describe the role of the offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner for whom the offeror is required to provide PPI sheets. The Summary Page(s) shall not exceed two (2) pages. If the offeror intends to fulfill the requirements of this RFP in a teaming arrangement or joint venture, the offeror must provide complete information as to the arrangement, including their roles, responsibility, and line of authority in the Summary Page(s).

L-5.2.3 Past Performance Information (PPI): Utilizing the PPI (Attachment 8), submit accurate information on no more than three (3) total recent contracts/task orders the offeror considers most relevant in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. One (1) of the past performance references may be for a subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement (i.e., 25% or more of the work). "Recent" is defined as ongoing contracts/task orders or those completed within three (3) years of the date of issuance of this solicitation, to include at least six (6) months of documented performance during the three-year period. Include rationale supporting the offeror's assertion of relevance. For a description of the characteristics or aspects the Government will consider in determining relevancy, reference Section M. Letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc., which demonstrate customer satisfaction with overall job performance may be provided as part of the PPI. The PPI for each contract along with any corresponding letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc., is limited to five

(5) pages total per contract. The Government may collect additional references from other sources during the evaluation of past performance. It is the offeror's responsibility to ensure the POC information provided in the PPI is accurate, is available, and knowledgeable of the performance provided under that contract.

L-5.2.3.1 Specific Content. The PPI for each contract or subcontract shall include the following:

(a) Contracting Agency/Customer.

(b) Contract Number and/or Task Order (TO) Number (for subcontracts, provide the prime contract number and subcontract number).

(c) Contract Type.

(d) Total Dollar Value of the Task Order (TO) and Total Dollar Contract Value.

(e) Date of Award.

(f) Period of Performance.

(g) Narratives addressing how performance of the subject contract is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

(h) Description of the role of the offeror and each subcontractor.

(i) Contracting Officer's Name or Commercial Customer POC, Telephone Number and e-mail Address.

The offeror is required to identify and explain aspects of the proposed effort and how they relate to the requirements described in this solicitation. This may include a discussion of steps taken by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts, as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risks. NOTE: Merely encountering problems does not automatically result in "Unacceptable" rating, since the problems encountered may have occurred on a more complex project, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to successfully overcome the problems. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified.

L-5.2.4 Organizational Structure Change History. Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of your company. A pamphlet or other commercial document describing such reorganizations may suffice. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as provided by the offeror(s), your "roadmap" should be both applicable to the efforts you identify and general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources. There is no page limit applied to Organizational Structure Change History; however, the offeror is requested to limit the number of pages to the minimum required to clearly articulate the pertinent information.

L-5.2.5 Client Authorization Letters. If applicable, offerors must also include Client Authorization Letters (Attachment 9) for each identified effort performed for a commercial customer (i.e. non-Governmental client), authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.

L-5.2.6 Subcontractor Letters of Consent. Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor's consent. Proposals must include a Subcontractor Consent Letter (Attachment 10) by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

L-5.2.7 Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs). The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of the offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirement of this RFP. As soon as practicable, offerors shall complete Section 1 of the PPQ (Attachment 7) and email it to all POC(s) the offeror has identified in the PPI (Attachment 8). The POC(s) will then complete the PPQ and send them directly to the Government representatives identified in the PPQ by e-mail, no later than the proposal due date stated in SF 1442 Section A, Block 13 of this RFP. Offerors shall follow-up with respondents to ensure they have completed and sent the PPQ to 23 CONS/PKA. Once submitted, the information contained therein shall be considered sensitive and shall not be released to the offeror. Include the completed Sections 1 of the PPQ in the

Past Performance proposal volume. Any PPQs submitted directly by an offeror will not be considered. It is the sole responsibility of the offeror to send out and track the completion of a PPQ to ensure it is received by the proposal deadline.

L-6 VOLUME III: PRICE AND OTHER CONTRACTING CONSIDERATIONS

L-6.1 General. The Price and Other Contracting Considerations proposal shall be prepared according to these instructions and will be evaluated IAW the evaluation criteria in Section M of this RFP. Compliance with these requirements is mandatory and failure to comply may render the proposal unawardable.

L-6.2 Volume Organization. The Price and Other Contracting Considerations volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

1) Table of Contents

2) Summary Page(s)

3) Price Data for the Seed Project No. QSEU 23-0118

4) Teaming Arrangement(s) and/or Letter of Intent (if applicable)

5) Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions

6) Offer Acceptance Period

7) Bonding Capability

L-6.2.1 Summary Page(s). To aid the Government's understanding, describe how the offeror's proposed price is reasonable and matches the proposed technical approach to meet the requirement. The summary Page(s) shall not exceed two (2) pages.

L-6.3 Price Data for the Seed Project No. QSEU 23-0118

L-6.3.1 Price Reasonableness. The source selection will be conducted with the expectation of adequate price competition for this acquisition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1); therefore, certified cost or pricing data are not required per FAR 15.403-1(b) (1). If at any time, however, if the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists or if price/coefficient rate reasonableness cannot be determined, offerors may be required to submit certified cost or pricing data or additional data other than certified cost or pricing data, as appropriate, for the CO to determine price reasonableness. The proposal prices shall be based on the offeror's own technical approach submitted in the Technical Proposal (Volume I) and the Seed Project SOW requirements.

L-6.3.2 Proposed Price. The offeror shall provide a for the Seed Project by providing a completed Seed price breakdowns

Project WBS/Bid Schedule Price Worksheet (Attachment 4) for the entire construction work required to of each building complete the seed project IAW SOW. This is the same attachment/format requested under the Technical Subfactor 1(c); however, the offerors are requested to submit the same attachment under the Price volume for the Price evaluation by the Price evaluation team. Offers should be complete, accurate, and sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their price reasonableness, reflect a clear understanding of the requirement, and be consistent with the offeror's technical proposal. The burden of proof or credibility of proposed pricing rests with the offeror. Potential rounding shall be limited to 2 digits after the decimal. (NOTE: Do not insert proposed price for the seed project under the CLINs in Section B of this solicitation. Section B will be completed by the Government at the time of contract award.)

L-6.4 Other Contracting Considerations.

L-6.4.1 Cover Page. Include a cover letter or proposal cover page. The Government intends to make a total of nine (9)

MACC awards in three (3) Small Business (SB) categories: three (3) awards for HUBZone small businesses, three(3) awards for Section 8(a) concerns, and three (3) awards for Small Businesses. To ensure the Government's accurate understanding, clearly indicate all your SB socio-economic statuses on the top of the cover page. If your firm belongs to both HUBZone and Section 8(a) sub-categories, you MUST indicate both. Please carefully read the proposal evaluation process steps outlined in Section M-1.3.2 for complete details on how the Government intends to separate and evaluate the offerors' proposals within each SB category. Additionally, list the name(s), title, office/mobile phone number, and e-mail address(es) of those individuals authorized to make decisions on behalf of the offeror with respect to the proposal and those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government for this solicitation. The offeror shall also provide the official company/division street address, CAGE code as reflected in the System for Award Management (SAM) registration. In addition, offerors must complete the following and include in Volume III:

(a) Section A -Solicitation/Contract Standard Form 1442 (SF 1442). Offerors are required to complete blocks 14-19, 20A, 20B, and 20C of the SF 1442. An official having the authority to bind the offeror's company contractually must sign and date the SF 1442. The hard copy of the SF 1442 must bear an original authorized signature. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, as written in the RFP.

(b) Section I -Contract Clauses. The offeror shall complete and submit applicable clause only those pages for any requiring information to be filled in.

(c) Section K -Representations and Certifications. The offeror shall complete and submit this section in its entirety in addition to completing the on-line Representations and Certifications at SAM (https://www.sam.gov).

L-6.4.2 Responsibility Determination. IAW FAR 9.104-7, the offeror is required to comply with the submission regarding FAR 52.209-7, , found in Section K of this RFP. Since it is the Government's Information Regarding Responsibility Matters intent to make Award Without Discussions IAW FAR 52.215-1, the Government may request an offeror to submit additional information so a responsibility determination can be made. This request for additional information will not be construed as communications or discussions with an offeror as defined by FAR 15.306. An incomplete proposal maybe considered to indicate lack of understanding of the requirement and may result in the entire proposal being determined "Unacceptable" and eliminated from further consideration.

L-6.4.3 Teaming Arrangement and/or Letter of Intent. If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete, verifiable information detailing the arrangement, to include any relevant and recent information on previous teaming arrangement with the same partner. Disclose existing or planned agreements between and among the principals, each company's responsibility for financial management of the venture, the business systems contemplated for use by the entity and their location. Offerors shall identify whether they are proposing as Joint Ventures (JV). JVs must be approved by the SBA at the time of solicitation closing. The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of team arrangements. CAGE codes for all companies must be identified and small business status certified in SAM. If the offeror is a small business (JV), a copy of the JV Agreement must be included. If the JV Agreement requires approval by the Small Business Administration (SBA), SBA supporting documentation must be included.

L-6.4.4 Alternate Proposals. Alternate proposals will not be accepted.

L-6.4.5 Incurred Expenses. The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation. of the contract as a result of this MACC solicitation The awardees will be awarded a task order to meet the minimum guaranteed amount at the time of award. The Government intends to issue a task order for the seed project in the near future under the new MACC IDIQ contract. NO OFFEROR WILL BE

COMPENSATED FOR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL.

L-6.4.6 Bonding Capability. Provide evidence of bonding capacity that must be provided from an acceptable surety IAW FAR 28.202, . Acceptability of Corporate Sureties Evidence must show the offeror's sufficient bonding capability to meet the maximum task order amount of $7,000,000 as well as an aggregate amount of $10,000,000. The document must include the surety company's name, address, telephone number, and points of contact. The surety must be listed in the Department of Treasury Circular 570, "Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and Acceptable Reinsuring Companies". The project and aggregate bonding amounts shall not exceed the surety's underwriting limit certified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. This information will be used in the Contracting Officer's determination of responsibility.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

M-1 SOURCE SELECTION

M-1.1 Number and Length of Contracts. The Government intends to award nine (9) Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contracts for this Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) program from the pool of offers received. The Government intends to award three (3) contracts to offerors in each of the following categories:

HUBZone small businesses, Section 8(a) concerns, and Small Businesses. In addition, the Government intends to reserve a pool of up to two (2) "On-Ramp" contractors in each category (see Attachment 2a - MACC Special Contract Requirements, Section 5 - On/Off-Ramp Procedures for details). The Government reserves the right to award more or less contracts, or none, if the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines it to be in the Government's best interest. The period of performance of this MACC IDIQ contract will be seven (7) years (a single 5-year ordering period plus two (2)one-year option periods). All awardees as a result of this solicitation will be awarded an initial Task Order (TO) to meet the minimum guaranteed amount of $250 at the time of award. All routine TOs thereafter will range between $2,000 and $7,000,000.

M-1.2 Basis for Contract Award

M-1.2.1 This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection in accordance with (IAW) Air Force Source Selection Procedures, MP5315.3 and DoD Source Selection Procedures, dated 20 August, 2022. To be considered for award, the proposal must conform to all solicitation requirements and the offeror must be deemed responsible IAW FAR 9.104-1.

M-1.2.2 All technically acceptable offers with acceptable past performance rating shall be treated equally except for their prices. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offeror being determined technically unacceptable.

M-1.2.3 For the purpose of conducting evaluations, the Government will first separate all proposals into three (3) SB socio-economic categories: HUBZone small businesses, Section 8(a)concerns, and Small Businesses. Then the Government will rank the proposals within the same category pool by Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The Government will conduct the Technical and Past Performance evaluations for each SB category separately as detailed in M-1.3.2.

M-1.2.4 The SSA will make an integrated assessment best value award decision or determine the competitive range for the purpose of holding discussions. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

M-1.3 Discussions and Evaluation Process

M-1.3.1 Discussions. IAW FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award the contracts without discussions. Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors shall submit the required information in the format specified in Section L.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their Technical, Past Performance or Price proposal. Exchanges conducted with regard to adverse past performance or to resolve minor or clerical errors in any of the proposal volumes will not constitute discussions, and the Contracting Officer (CO) reserves the right to award a contract without granting an opportunity to revise the original proposal. In addition, the Government reserves the right to reject any or all offers if such action is in the Government's best interests.

M-1.3.1.1 The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. If the Government elects to hold discussions, a competitive range will be established based on FAR 15.306(c) procedures and this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to further limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. If the Contracting Officer determines that an offeror's proposal should no longer be included in the competitive range, the proposal will be eliminated from consideration for award. Written notice of this decision shall be provided to unsuccessful offeror

(s) IAW FAR 15.503.

M-1.3.1.2 If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror's proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror's proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

M-1.3.2 Evaluation Process. The Government will assume that each proposal is complete and IAW Sections L & M.

Immediately upon timely receipt of the proposals, all offers will be separated into one of the following categories:

HUBZone small businesses, Section 8(a) concerns, and Small Businesses. (NOTE: IAW instruction provided in Section L-6.4.1, all offerors MUST clearly indicate the offeror's SB socio-economic categories on the top of the cover page within Volume III, Price and Other

Contracting Considerations, for accurate categorization.) Once the SB categorization is completed, the Government will conduct the proposal evaluations as follows:

(1) HUBZones: First, all proposals in the HUBZone category will be ranked by TEP as indicated in the Seed Project WBS/Bid Schedule Price Worksheet (Attachment 4) from the lowest priced to the highest priced. Starting with the lowest priced offeror, the proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability. If the offeror's technical proposal is rated acceptable, the offeror will further be evaluated for past performance. If the offeror's technical proposal is rated unacceptable, the offeror will not be evaluated for past performance and will be considered ineligible for award. If the three (3) lowest priced HUBZone proposals are rated technically acceptable with acceptable past performance, they will be selected as the HUBZone proposals that represent the best value to the Government and the Government will stop the evaluation. If any evaluated HUBZone proposal is technically unacceptable or has unacceptable past performance, the offeror will be eliminated from further consideration and the Government will continue to evaluate HUBZone proposals until there are three (3) proposals that are technically acceptable with acceptable past performance or until all proposals in the HUBZone category have been evaluated. Any evaluated proposal in the HUBZone category that also has the 8(a) status will not be evaluated in the 8(a) category. Only the unevaluated proposals in the HUBZone category that also has the 8(a) status will be placed in the 8(a) category pool to compete within the 8(a) category. Any unevaluated HUBZone proposals that are not placed in the 8(a) category will be placed in the Small Business category.

(2) Section 8(a) Concerns: Next, proposals in the 8(a) category and unevaluated…