The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
RFP FA483024R0007
Attachment 11
Updated on 4 November- AR
ATTACHMENT 11
Questions & Answers Matrix 11 October 2024
| Solicitation Reference |
| Question/Comment |
| Government Response |
(Govt Use Only)
| Resulted in change of SOW or drawings? (Govt Use Only) |
| Change Reference |
(Govt Use Only)
Example:
· Atch 3 - SOW, Para. 2.4.(c)
· SF 1442 Section B Example: Please confirm the submission requirement for a detailed design IAW Phase 3 or Phase 5 (final design), prior to award.
Yes/No Example: Atch 1 – SOW, para # or Atch 2 – Design Drawings, pg#
| Section L, Paragraph L-4.3.2.1 (c) and Paragraph L-3.2, Table 1 |
| Paragraph L-4.3.2.1 (c) requires that a complete Accident Prevention Plan (APP) be included in our proposal. Our APP is some 30 pages plus long. The APP is part of the Subfactor 2 Management Plan. Table 1 in Paragraph L-3.2 states that Subfactor 2 is limited to no more than 10 pages. Can the APP be considered not to be a part of Subfactor 2? Or can the APP requirement just be limited to certain specifics like responsibilities? |
| IAW Section M-3.1.2(c), Task Order specific APP, including emergency contact information, safety policies, responsibilities and lines of authority, trainings, safety and health inspections, deficiency accountability, AHAs. |
Therefore, the APP should be for the Seed Project specifically.
The terms and conditions of Subfactor 2 remain as stated.
| Attachment 2 – General MACC SOW – Paragraph 3 |
| Are we to submit a Teaming Agreement, information, etc. for a Design Firm in our Proposal to encompass these possible Design-Build FOPRs requirements? |
Please reference L-6.4.3 of the RFP.
| M.4-3 Relevancy - Scope |
| Should submissions for past performance be similar to the MACC contract as a whole, or should they be similar to the scope of work of the seed project? |
| Work may include a broad |
range of design-build, bid-build projects for maintenance, repair, and minor construction. Project TOs can vary from trades such as carpentry, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, painting, pipe fitting, sheet metal, welding, roofing, site work, site utilities, excavation, concrete masonry, pavement repair, asbestos and lead paint removal, security hardware installation, mold remediation, demolition, etc.
| M..4-3 Relevancy - Magnitude |
| Please define the magnitude of Past Performance. Should it be similar to the total MACC IDIQ value not exceeding $150,000,000 or to the seed project magnitude between $500,000 and $1,000,000? |
| Individual TOs are estimated to be between $2,000 and $7,000,000 and will vary in size and complexity. |
| L.3. 2 *Offeror shall submit all volumes in electronic format, using re-writable CD/DVDs. Separate CD/DVDs are not required for each volume but use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions. |
| Would you permit the use of a flash/thumb drive in lieu of a CD or DVD for electronic submission? |
| No. Please follow instructions provided in L-3.2. |
| Bid Bond |
| Is a bid bond required in the proposal for the seed project? |
| No. Please reference Sec A Block 13b of the RFP. |
| Attachment 3 – Seed Project SOW |
| This was referenced in the Solicitation, Section J List of Attachments, but it is missing from SAM. Can the Government provide the Seed Project SOW – Att. 3? |
| Please reference Amendment 0001. |
| Yes |
| Amendment 0001 |
| Section L, Paragraphs L-5.2.6 and L-5.2.7) |
| Please confirm that there is no page limit for these two requirements? |
Please reference L-3.2 Table 1.
| Attachment 8, Past Performance Information (PPI), Paragraph D |
| Paragraph D of Attachment 8 states to highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition. By current acquisition, do you mean the seed project (Lightning Protection) or the MACC itself which will have future projects? |
| RFP Atch 8, section D |
The offeror should be describing the contract effort of the respective PPI.
| Attachment 8, Past Performance Information (PPI), Paragraph G |
| Paragraph G of Attachment 8 references instant acquisition. By instant acquisition, do you mean the seed project (Lightning Protection) or the MACC itself which will have future projects? |
| Please reference changes made to Attachment 8 included in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 8, section G |
| Attachment 8, Past Performance Information (PPI), Paragraph H |
| Does this paragraph require percentage of the past performance project or the seed project? |
| RFP Atch 8, section H |
Please reference changes. The offeror should be describing the contract effort of the respective PPI.
| Please provide underground utility plans for each building. |
| Please reference utility maps included in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3a(iiii) Bldg 1107 Utility Map |
RFP Atch 3b(iiii) Bldg 1108 Utility Map RFP Atch 3c(iiii) Bldg 1109 Utility Map RFP Atch 3d(iiii) Bldg 1121 Utility Map
| Please provide civil as-builts for each building. |
| There are no civil-as builts available. |
| Please confirm the superintendent can be the SSHO & QCM. |
| Please see SOW par 5 Key Personnel sub par 5.2.5 which reads The Superintendent may not perform duties as the QCM/QC or SSHO on this project. |
sub par 5.5.2 which reads “The Contractor Quality Control (QC) person can be the SSHO on this project.”
There needs to be two separate individuals serving as the Superintendent and a Quality Control Manager (QCM). The position of SSHO can be designated to the QCM. All positions must maintain required certifications for each designation.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Please advise if there is a design build element to the Seed project or is this considered a Bid Build project? |
| RFP Atch 3 SOW Par 2.9 |
“This is not a Design/Build (D/B) project.”
| L-4 Volume Technical section L-4.3.2.1 line A |
| Per L-4 Volume Technical section L-4.3.2.1 line A it states "Complete key personnel organizational chart with a supporting narrative identifying precise lines of authority and responsibilities, including qualifications, certifications and duties of each person assigned to a key function." Please advise what qualifications and certifications are to be included. |
| Certification and qualifications are listed in RFP Atch 1a, 1b and 3. Depending on the TO additional certifications and qualifications may be required. |
The offeror should list the key personnel’s all-encompassing qualifications and certifications.
A few of the locations to find more information are listed below. This is not an all-encompassing list.
RFP Atch 1a Section 01 30 00, pg. 2
1.6 Supervision
Section 01 45 35, pg. 3
1.5 Special Inspector Qualifications
Please see specifications section 01 45 00.00 10 Quality Control par 3.4 Quality Control Organization
RFP Atch 3, Section 5 Key Personnel
| Per L-4 Volume Technical section L-4.3.2.1 line B |
| Per L-4 Volume Technical section L-4.3.2.1 line B it states "Narrative, or other effective means, detailing procedures for Quality Control (QC), scheduling, reviewing, certifying, and managing submittals." Please advise if this narrative is for the Seed project or for the overall MACC contract. |
| Seed Project specifically. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-4.3.2.1 (b) |
| Per the evaluation criteria in section M-3.1.2 subfactor 2: |
| Per the evaluation criteria in section M-3.1.2 subfactor 2: Management Plan a Task Order specific APP is to be provided. Please advise if the APP is for the seed project or an APP that will be used on future task orders. |
| IAW Section M-3.1.2(c), Task Order specific APP, including emergency contact information, safety policies, responsibilities and lines of authority, trainings, safety and health inspections, deficiency accountability, AHAs. |
| Please advise if multiple buildings can be worked on at the same time. |
| No. Due to the munitions mission of MAFB, only 1 facility may be under construction at a time. Each facility MUST BE COMPLETED in its entirety before relocating to the next. Therefore, proper phasing is required. See Seed Project SOW par 12. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Please advise how thick the concrete is around each building. |
| As per typical concrete repair detail on sheet E-4 of the design drawings. |
| Please advise if the concrete around each building is reinforced. |
| Contractor to assume reinforcement. |
| Please advise how thick the pavement is around each building. |
| Assume 2” as per typical asphalt repair detail on sheet E-4 of the design drawings. |
| In the area the underground counterpoise will be crossing the roadway and parking lots, please confirm these will be free of all vehicles, equipment, storage, etc. before construction begins. |
| Confirmed. |
| section 31 00 00 page 9 of the spec line 3.2.2 Geotechnical Engineer |
| Per section 31 00 00 page 9 of the spec line 3.2.2 Geotechnical Engineer, it states "Hire a Professional Geotechnical Engineer to provide inspection of excavations and soil/groundwater conditions throughout construction. The Geotechnical Engineer is responsible for performing pre-construction and periodic site visits throughout construction to assess site conditions. The Geotechnical Engineer is responsible for updating the excavation, sheeting and dewatering plans as construction progresses to reflect changing conditions and submit an updated plan if necessary. Submit a monthly written report, informing the Contractor and Contracting Officer of the status of the plan and an accounting of the Contractor's adherence to the plan addressing any present or potential problems. The Contracting Officer is responsible for arranging meetings with the Geotechnical Engineer at any time throughout the contract duration. Please advise if this is a requirement for the seed project |
| Required as specified. |
| section 31 00 00 page 13 of the specification section 3.10 Testing line C |
| Per section 31 00 00 page 13 of the specification section 3.10 Testing line C states "Perform tests on recompacted areas to determine conformance with |
specification requirements. Appoint a registered professional civil engineer to certify inspections and test results. These certifications shall state that the tests and observations were performed by or under the direct supervision of the engineer and that the results are representative of the materials or conditions being certified by the tests. The following number of tests, if performed at the appropriate time, will be the minimum acceptable for each type operation " Please advise if this is a requirement for the seed project and the contractor is to hire a civil engineer to meet this requirement.
Required as specified.
| section 26 41 00 page 2 of the specification section 1.4.1.1 |
| Per section 26 41 00 page 2 of the specification section 1.4.1.1 Overall system drawings states "Submit installation shop drawing for the overall lightning protection |
system. Include on the drawings the physical layout of the equipment (plan view and elevations), mounting details, relationship to other parts of the work, and wiring diagrams. Please advise if these need to be stamped drawings from an Engineer.
Yes.
| Section 26 41 00 page 2 of the specification section 1.4.1.2 |
| Per section 26 41 00 page 2 of the specification section 1.4.1.2 Major Components states "Submit detail drawings for each major component including manufacturer's descriptive and technical literature, catalog cuts, and installation instructions." Please advise if these need to be stamped drawings from an Engineer. |
| Major Components submittal data shall be in conformance to the Project specifications as well as the Lightning Protection Engineers shop drawings. |
| Please advise if escorts are required? If so, will they be provided or will the contractor have carry the cost. |
| Please reference RFP Atch 3 SOW |
par 1 subpar 1.1.2, 1.2.2, 1.3.2 and 1.4.2. Government escorts are provided.
| Table 1 – Proposal Organization in the solicitation |
| Per the Table 1 – Proposal Organization in the solicitation subfactor 2 is limited to 10 pages. Subfactor 2 requires a Complete key personnel organizational chart including qualifications and certifications of key personnel, along with a Quality Control Narrative and a Complete Accident Prevention Plan. On average our complete APP is 50 plus pages with the additional required parts to subfactor 2 we feel the 10 pages cannot be achieved. Can the page limit be increased. |
| IAW Section M-3.1.2(c), Task Order specific APP, including emergency contact information, safety policies, responsibilities and lines of authority, trainings, safety and health inspections, deficiency accountability, AHAs. |
The terms and conditions of Subfactor 2 remain as stated.
| Attachment 4 |
| Would you like the price broken out for each building separately or a lump sum for the seed project? |
| Yes, price broken out for each building separately. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-4.3.1.1 (c) |
RFP L-6.3.2
RFP M-3.1.1 Subfactor 1
RFP M-5 Factor 3
| Attachment 4 |
| Would you like a WBS for each building for the seed project? |
| Yes, price broken out for each building separately. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-4.3.1.1 (c) |
RFP L-6.3.2
| Solicitation Page 39 Section J line 6 |
| RFP Atch 3 – Seed Project SOW file is not included with other documents on SAM.gov. |
| Please reference Amendment 0001. |
| Yes |
| Amendment 0001 |
RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW
| Solicitation Page 39 Section J line 9 |
| RFP Atch 3a(iii) Bldg 1107 Submittal Registry not included with other documents on SAM.gov |
| Please reference Amendment 0001. |
| Yes |
| Amendment 0001 |
RFP Atch 3a(iii) Bldg 1107 Submittal Register
| RFP Atch 4 – Seed Project WBS and Price Worksheet |
| Please confirm we are only to complete the Seed Project related Division Tabs on this Worksheet? (Div 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 26, 31 and 33) |
| Yes, as required. |
| Solicitation Paragraph L-3.2.3 Binding and Labeling – FAR 52.215-1(e) and FAR 3.104-4 |
| Are we to apply these markings on every page of the Proposal? |
| Please read FAR 52.215-1(e) and FAR 3.104-4. |
| Section L, Paragraph L-4.3.2.1 (c) |
| Paragraph L-4.3.2.1 (c) requires a complete Accident Prevention Plan. Is this Accident Prevention Plan specifically to be prepared for the seed project or can it be a template Plan for various projects? |
| IAW Section M-3.1.2(c), Task Order specific APP, including emergency contact information, safety policies, responsibilities and lines of authority, trainings, safety and health inspections, deficiency accountability, AHAs. |
| Section L, Paragraph 5.2.6 |
| Subcontractor Letters of Consent – Are these Consent Letters to be completed and submitted only if the Prime & Subcontractor has a teaming arrangement/joint venture that is being submitted for the Prime’s Past Performance project(s)? |
OR is this letter to be completed and submitted for Subcontractors anticipated to be used for this Seed Project and MACC?
Offerors can submit Subcontractor Letters of Consent for:
1. If subcontractors were used on PPI submitted.
2. If subcontractors were used in the past and the offeror intends to use on future MACC task orders.
| Section I |
| Section I is 26 pages long. Only 2 pages require any entries. Should the entire 26 pages be submitted or can just the 2 pages with entries be submitted? |
| Only those pages that require offeror responses. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-6.4.1(b) |
| Section K |
| In Paragraph 52.204-8 (b)(2)(i) there is no place to mark that Paragraph (d) applies. Just indicate a X beside the Paragraph? |
| Yes, that is acceptable. |
| Section L, Paragraph L-3.2 |
| Table 1 in Paragraph L-3.2 indicates the page limit of Subfactor 2 to 10 pages. 10 pages is insufficient for the information required to be submitted for Subfactor 2. It is requested that the page limit be increased to 15 pages. 15 pages will provide a sufficient number of pages for Subfactor 2. |
| The terms and conditions of Paragraph L-3.2 Table 1 Subfactor 2 remain as stated. |
| Both Attachment 7, Past/Present Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), and Attachment 8, Past Performance Information (PPI), include a footnote titled “Controlled Unclassified Information” (CUI). A CD/DVD is required with our proposal, and which will include the PPI. In accordance with NIST 800-171 and other DOD security measures, a CD/DVD containing CUI information must be encrypted. Will Moody contracting be able to open and read the encrypted CD/DVD? It is recommended that the requirement for a CD/DVD be removed from the proposal. |
| The CD/DVD can be password protected. It is the offerors responsibility to ensure the password is provided to the Government within the proposal package. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-3.2 Table 1 |
| RFP – M-1 Source Selection |
| The solicitation indicates the MACC Award will be based on LPTA. How will the task orders be awarded? |
| Please reference RFP Atch 2a, 4.2.2. Task Order Proposal Evaluation. |
| RFP – M-1 Source Selection |
| Will all three socio-economic groups (9 contractors) compete for each task order? |
| Please reference RFP Atch 2a 4.1b Task Order Set-Aside. |
| RFP – M-1 Source Selection |
| Will a HUBZone price evaluation preference be included on each task order? |
| Please reference RFP Atch 2a 4.1b Task Order Set-Aside. |
| RFP – M-1 Source Selection |
| Will 8a contractors be given any sort of preference when bidding task orders? |
| Please reference RFP Atch 2a 4.1b Task Order Set-Aside. |
| In order to give you an accurate quote, are you looking for my company to show we can do any base related repair work? |
| Please reference Section L of the RFP. |
| Section L, Paragraph L-5.2.3 |
| Paragraph L-5.2.3 states that completed projects must have been within three (3) years of the date of solicitation issuance. Can the three (3) years be changed to five (5) years. More projects would be available within five (5) years. |
| The terms and conditions of L-5.2.3 remain as stated. |
| Section L, Paragraph L-4.3.1.1(b) |
| This paragraph states that the construction schedule be prepared in Microsoft Project 2016 or higher. Can Primavera P6 be utilized in lieu of Microsoft Project? |
| Please reference updates to L-4.3.1.1(b) and project specifications. |
| Yes |
| L-4.3.1.1(b) Primavera P6 added |
Atch 3 a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), 3d(i) section 01 32 01. 00 10, pg. 1, 2.1.1 Microsoft Project added.
| Section L, Paragraph L-3.2 and SF 1442 |
| Table 1 states that only an original hard copy has to be submitted. The SF 1442 states that the original and one (1) copy are to be submitted. Which is correct? |
| Please reference L-3.2 Table 1. |
· RFP Atch 3a(i) Bldg. 1107 Rocket Test Cell Shop LPS Specs;
· RFP Atch 3b(i) Bldg 1108 Missile Assembly Shop LPS Specs;
· RFP Atch 3c(i) Bldg 1109 Conventional Munitions Shop LPS Specs; and RFP Atch 3d(i) Bldg 1121 Ancillary Explosives Facility LPS Specs Task Order specific specifications state in Item 2.1.1 that “The Government intends to use Microsoft Project 2016.” However, Subsection Items 2.1.2.1 and 2.1.2.2 appear to specify the use of Primavera P6. More specifically, Subsection 2.1.2.2 states “If the contractor chooses software other than Primavera P6, that is compliant with this specification, provide for the Government’s use two licenses, two computers…” Please clarify which scheduling software will be required for this Task Order and throughout the MACC.
| Please reference updates to L-4.3.1.1(b) and project specifications. |
| Yes |
| L-4.3.1.1(b) Primavera P6 added |
Atch 3 a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), 3d(i) section 01 32 01. 00 10, pg. 1, 2.1.1 Microsoft Project added.
RFP Atch 1a Moody Installation Guide Specs (Vol 1); SECTION 01 32 01.00 10; 2.1.1 Government Default Software
| Master Moody Installation Guide Specs (Vol 1) Divisions 01-13, states in Item 2.1.1 that “The Government intends to use Primavera P6.” While Task Order specific specifications state in Item 2.1.1 that “The Government intends to use Microsoft Project 2016.”, but then continue on and reference Primavera P6. Please clarify which scheduling software will be required for this Task Order and throughout the MACC. |
| Please reference updates to L-4.3.1.1(b) and project specifications. |
The reference included for the Moody Installation Specifications does not apply to the seed project.
Yes
L-4.3.1.1(b) Primavera P6 added Atch 3 a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), 3d(i) section 01 32 01. 00 10, pg. 1, 2.1.1 Microsoft Project added.
| Solicitation - Section L-3.2 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits (pg 49 of 66) |
| Table 1 – Proposal Organization shows a maximum of 50 pages for Subfactor 1 and a maximum of 10 pages for Subfactor 2. Subfactor 2 shall contain a Complete Accident Prevention Plan (APP), which easily consumes all 10 pages, leaving no other room for the detailed Management Plan to include key personnel, Organizational Chart, Narrative for QC Control, scheduling, etc. |
Can the page limit for Subfactor 2 be increased? Or can a limit of 60 pages be “all-inclusive” of Subfactor 1 and Subfactor 2?
IAW Section M-3.1.2(c), Task Order specific APP, including emergency contact information, safety policies, responsibilities and lines of authority, trainings, safety and health inspections, deficiency accountability, AHAs.
The terms and conditions of Subfactor 1 and 2 remain as stated.
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3 |
| There are four (4) different buildings to perform demolition and new work on the Lightning Protection Systems. The statement of work indicates that all buildings will be occupied during the construction. During construction the building will be without lightning protection. Will this be an issue? Are temporary measures required? |
| Munition operations will not occur during construction. However, it is possible that personnel may be present in facilities. No temporary measures required. |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3 |
| There is no requirement for the project work to be phased. Without a phasing requirement, the contractor could work on all projects at the same time. Should phasing be required? |
| Due to the munitions mission of MAFB, only 1 facility may be under construction at a time. Each facility MUST BE COMPLETED in its entirety before relocating to the next. Therefore, proper phasing is required. See SOW par 12 Phasing |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3 |
| Paragraph 5.5.4.2 of Attachment 3 requires the SSHO to have completed the 30-hour OSHA construction safety class. Paragraph 5.5.4.3 requires the SSHO to have completed the 40-hour EM 385-1-1 construction safety course. Can the SSHO just have one or the other as both are essentially the same? |
| Please follow 5.5.4.2 and 5.5.4.3 of Attachment 3 as specified. |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3 |
| Paragraphs 5.2, 5.4, and 5.5 indicates requirements for Superintendent, Quality Control Officer, and Site Safety and Health Officer. It appears that 3 separate individuals are required to be present on site. However, the specifications indicate the one individual can serve all three positions. Is this correct? |
| Please see SOW par 5 Key Personnel sub par 5.2.5 which reads The Superintendent may not perform duties as the QCM/QC or SSHO on this project. |
sub par 5.5.2 which reads “The Contractor Quality Control (QC) person can be the SSHO on this project.”
There needs to be two separate individuals serving as the Superintendent and a Quality Control Manager (QCM). The position of SSHO can be designated to the QCM. All positions must maintain required certifications for each designation.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3, Paragraph 10, |
| Paragraph 10 outlines the hold point inspections. Can testing be performed after all lighting protection systems are complete at the four buildings? Rather than when each building is completed. This will permit all testing equipment and testing personnel to on site just one duration. |
| Due to MAFB mission requirements, project is to be phased. Each facility must be completed and UL certified prior to mobilizing to next facility. |
Section L-4.3.1.1
(b) Construction Schedule - Provide a Construction Work Schedule, identifying the definable features of work, in a Microsoft Project 2016 or higher format, and shall be generated using the critical path method, including the milestones. The Construction Work Schedule shall reflect project phasing construction/start date, hold-point inspections, completion date, utility outages, major equipment deliveries, and installation, tests, pre-final inspections, final inspections and delivery of project closeout documents as included in the Moody Installation Guide Specifications (Attachments 1a and 1b). See SOW par 12 Phasing.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3, Paragraph 10.6. |
| Paragraph 10.6 mentions photo documentation. The specifications for each building does not reference or require photo documentation. Please clarify. |
| Please follow para 10.6 as specified in the SOW. |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3, Paragraph 1.1.2 |
| Paragraph 1.1.2 of Attachment 3 states that the contractor and all personnel will be required to sign in at the walk-up window in B1111. Is this a daily requirement? |
| Confirmed. This will be required each time access is requested. See SOW par 1.1.2, 1.2.2, 1.3.2 and 1.4.2. |
| Statement of Work, Attachment 3, Paragraph 1.1.2 |
| Paragraph 1.1.2 states that no entry will be allowed without an escort. If the contractor elects to work on all 4 buildings at the same time, will an escort be provided for each building? There is no requirement which restricts the contractor from working on multiple buildings concurrently. |
| Due to MAFB mission requirements, project is to be phased. Each facility must be completed and UL certified prior to mobilizing to next facility. |
Section L-4.3.1.1
(b) Construction Schedule - Provide a Construction Work Schedule, identifying the definable features of work, in a Microsoft Project 2016 or higher format, and shall be generated using the critical path method, including the milestones. The Construction Work Schedule shall reflect project phasing construction/start date, hold-point inspections, completion date, utility outages, major equipment deliveries, and installation, tests, pre-final inspections, final inspections and delivery of project closeout documents as included in the Moody Installation Guide Specifications (Attachments 1a and 1b). See SOW par 12 Phasing.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Section I |
| Section I is some 26 pages long. However, there are only 2 pages which require information from the contractor. Are all 26 pages required to be submitted in the proposal or just the 2 pages marked with contractor information? |
| Only those pages that require offeror responses. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-6.4.1(b) |
| Section L, Paragraph L-5.2.7 |
| Paragraph L-5.2.7 requires that a PPQ be submitted for projects. Our company has a highly significant project it desires to include in our proposal. However, due to unique circumstances there are no available government individuals to complete the PPQ for this project. These individuals have either retired or relocated. In lieu of a PPQ, will the government accept a CPARs evaluation for this project? The Contracting Officer has been requested to submit a PPQ, but the CO has refused and stated he would recommend the use of a CPAR evaluation. Your consideration to accept a CPAR evaluation for this project would greatly be appreciated. |
| Section M-4 |
Relevant and recent CPARS will be reviewed by the Government for PPIs submitted.
If an offeror cannot obtain PPQs, CPARS can be utilized to support PPIs.
The offeror should not submit printed copies of CPARS reports.
| Will the Government provide specifications for building 1109 project? |
| Specifications were provided as RFP Atch 3c(i) Bldg 1109, Conventional Munitions Shop, LPS Specs. |
| Will the Government provide specifications for building 1121 project? |
| Specifications were provided as RFP Atch 3d(i) Bldg 1121, Ancillary Explosives Facility, LPS Specs. |
| SF 1442 |
| The provided solicitation Period of Performance (POP) covers the MACC base plus options contracts. A duration is not provided for individual buildings or for full award of scope. Will the Government provide a POP for the seed task award? |
| Please reference L-4.3.1.1(b). |
| 01 30 00 |
| Will the Government provide the number of calendar days for RFI responses? |
| RFIs will be responded to within 10 working days. |
| 01 30 00 |
| Will the Government provide the number of calendar days for submittals reviews? |
| Please reference Atch 1a, Atch 3a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), and 3d(i). |
| SF 1442 |
| Will the Government clarify if there are any liquidated damages on the seed task order? |
| Please reference RFP Atch 2a para 4.2.9. |
| A21 Bid Schedule |
| The bid document calls out the buildings as an option with no reference to intent to award all, some, or a base scope. Will the Government clarify their intent for awarding all, some, or a minimum quantity of buildings with the seed project award? |
| Please reference L-4.3.1. |
| 01 30 00 |
| Will the Government clarify where the laydown area will be located in relation to the project site? |
| Material laydown will be allowed at the facility where construction is being performed. For security reasons, no job trailers will be allowed in the munitions area. |
| 01 30 00 |
| Will the Government confirm adequate parking at the project site for the contractor’s employees? |
| Parking will be provided adjacent to B1111. No POV’s will be allowed inside the Munitions Area. |
| 01 14 00 |
| Will the Government provide any airfield restrictions for the project site? (ex: crane or bucket truck) |
| There are no airfield restrictions inside the Munitions Area. |
| 05 50 13 |
| Will the Government provide a detail for the bollards? |
| Please reference Bollard Mounting Detail T on sheet E-4 of the drawings. |
| RFP_Atch_1b_-_Moody_Installation_Guide_Specs_(Vol_2).pdf |
| The provided specifications reference specification divisions not provided. Will the Government provide the specs vol 1 file? |
| RFP Atch 1a Moody Installation Guide Specs (Vol 1) was included. |
| 01 11 00 |
| Will the Government clarify which materials will be salvaged or remain the custody of the Government following demolition? |
| All copper and other metals that can be recycled. |
| 01 30 00 |
| Will the Government accept virtual preconstruction meeting? |
| Virtual meetings will not be accepted. |
| 01 30 00 |
| Will the Government require facilitated partnering meetings for this task order? |
| Yes. |
| A21 Bid Schedule |
| Will the Government clarify if the project is bid as a single lump sum cost for all 4 bldgs with breakdown by the provided four divisions or if the bid should include a bid CLIN/option for each bldg. with the provided four divisions for each? |
| Facilities shall be broken down separately by use of the Work Break Down Structure spreadsheet. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-4.3.1.1 (c) |
RFP L-6.3.2
| 31 23 00 |
| Will the Government confirm that the soil in the project area is not contaminated? |
| No contaminations anticipated. |
| 01 11 00 |
| Will the Government provide underground utility drawings for the project site? |
| Government will provide GIS utility maps in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3a(iiii) Bldg 1107 Utility Map |
RFP Atch 3b(iiii) Bldg 1108 Utility Map
| 01 50 00 |
| Will the Government confirm the availability of temporary power at the laydown site? |
| Utilities should be available at each facility. |
SOW
| Will the Government confirm that escorts to access the project site will be provided at no cost to the contractor? |
| Confirmed. |
| SOW |
| Will the Government clarify how POP is to addressed in the technical approach? |
| Please reference L-4.3.1.1(b). |
Solicitation, Vol II Past Performance Attch 7, Past Performance
| Could you please verify if relevant previously completed PPQ’s/CPARs would be accepted for the Past Performance section of the response? |
| Section M-4 |
Relevant and recent CPARS will be reviewed by the Government for PPIs submitted.
If an offeror cannot obtain PPQs, CPARS can be utilized to support PPIs.
| L-4 |
| Would the government consider accepting electronic submissions? If not can you specify what information will need to be put on a file vs on paper for submission For example does the government expect the construction schedule be on a file or on paper? |
| Please reference L-3.1 and L-3.2 Table 1. |
| What is the expected start date for the project once the contract is awarded? |
| Please reference L-4.3.1. |
| Are there any critical milestones or deadlines that the government prioritizes? |
| Please reference RFP Atch 3a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), and 3d(i) Specifications section 01 32 01.00 10 par 3.3.7. |
| Will there be any restrictions on work hours, access to the site, or utilities that we need to consider in our schedule? |
| For the seed project, normal workdays will be Monday – Friday 7 a.m. to 3:30 pm. Utilities should be available at each facility. |
| Are there any specific utility outages or site access restrictions we should be aware of? |
| No utility outages are anticipated. |
| Can you confirm the specific technical requirements for the Lightning Protection System (LPS), particularly any unique specifications for grounding and bonding? |
| Please reference project specifications and drawings provided. |
| L-3.1 Proposal Submission |
| Please confirm that the proposal is required to be submitted in hardcopy per L-3.1. Due to the nature of construction projects, the pricing for the SEED project from our subcontractors would not likely arrive until the last minute to avoid price shopping. We request that the proposal submission be allowed via email or DoD SAFE. |
| Please follow information listed in L-3.1 and L-3.2 Table 1. |
| Sheet Reference No. E-2, Building 1109 |
| The sheet reference does not reflect the concrete and asphalt that exist at the building. The existence of the concrete and asphalt were noted at the site visit. This concrete and asphalt will have to be removed and replaced to remove and replace the counterpoise system. Please provide the thickness of the concrete and the asphalt. This is applicable to Buildings 1107 and 1108 also. |
| As per typical concrete repair and asphalt repair details on sheet E-4 of the design drawings. |
| Sheet Reference No.E-3, Building 1107 |
| Can the new underground counterpoise system be routed such that it is under the existing asphalt and not under the existing concrete. |
| The Government cannot recommend means and methods. However, the means and methods must be per the Lightning Protection System shop drawings to be submitted for approval by the successful contractor. |
· RFP Atch 3a(i) Bldg. 1107 Rocket Test Cell Shop LPS Specs;
· RFP Atch 3b(i) Bldg 1108 Missile Assembly Shop LPS Specs;
· RFP Atch 3c(i) Bldg 1109 Conventional Munitions Shop LPS Specs; and
· RFP Atch 3d(i) Bldg 1121 Ancillary Explosives Facility LPS Specs RFP Atch 1a Moody Installation Guide Specs (Vol 1); SECTION 01 35 26; 1.6.1 Personnel Qualifications Task Order specific specifications state in Item 1.6.1.1.1 that “The SSHO may also serve as the Quality Control Manager. The SSHO may also serve as the Superintendent.” This leads one to believe that a Triple-Hat is acceptable.
However, the Master Installation Guide Specs (Vol 1) Divisions 01-13, states in Item 1.6.1.1.1 “The SSHO may also serve as the Quality Control Manager. The SSHO may also serve as the Superintendent, although not if already designated as Quality Control Manager.”
Please clarify if a Triple-Hat Site Super- QC Manager-SSHO can be utilized on these Task Orders or if a separate Site Super and SSHO-QC Manager will need to be used (two persons vs one Triple-Hat.)
Please see SOW par 5 Key Personnel sub par 5.2.5 which reads The Superintendent may not perform duties as the QCM/QC or SSHO on this project.
sub par 5.5.2 which reads “The Contractor Quality Control (QC) person can be the SSHO on this project.”
There needs to be two separate individuals serving as the Superintendent and a Quality Control Manager (QCM). The position of SSHO can be designated to the QCM. All positions must maintain required certifications for each designation.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| RFP Atch 8 – Past Performance Information (PPI); Item I. states: “Identify and explain which aspects of the proposed effort and how they relate to the requirement described in this solicitation. Please see Section L, Instructions to Offerors, Paragraph L.5.2.6.” |
| Please clarify what this is asking. It appears some words are missing. “Identify and explain which aspects of the proposed effort [ ] and how they relate...” is there some verbiage missing here? The question goes on to reference the Subcontractors Letters of Consent paragraph in the RFP (Paragraph L5.2.6) – Is this question asking about which aspects of the proposed effort were subcontracted? Please clarify and restate the question so the proper answer can be provided. |
| Please reference updated RFP Attachment 8 provided in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 8 L-5.2.3 |
| How would you like to see a pricing sheet? For example, do you want pricing per individual building or combine into one cost estimating. |
| Facilities shall be broken down separately by use of the Work Break Down Structure spreadsheet. |
| Yes |
| RFP L-4.3.1.1 (c) |
RFP L-6.3.2
| Do you want construction schedule per building or combine construction schedule? |
| Please reference L-4.3.1.1(b). |
| Will this MACC allow one person to be triple hat? |
| Please see SOW par 5 Key Personnel sub par 5.2.5 which reads The Superintendent may not perform duties as the QCM/QC or SSHO on this project. |
sub par 5.5.2 which reads “The Contractor Quality Control (QC) person can be the SSHO on this project.”
There needs to be two separate individuals serving as the Superintendent and a Quality Control Manager (QCM). The position of SSHO can be designated to the QCM. All positions must maintain required certifications for each designation. of any kind is being performed.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Can SSHO have either one certification or need to have both 30 hours OSHA and 40 hours EM 385? |
| Both are required. |
| In 10.6 An independent third-party inspector must be present. Question: The third-party inspector must be present at all time or just for final inspection only. |
| IAW 10.6. an independent 3rd party inspector must be present for the 100 percent inspection and the |
data/photo documentation by the contractor.
| Do we need to provide a different project PPI vs PPQ, or it must be same for both. |
| PPQ should support PPI. |
| Can we submit bid online via Sam.gov/dodSAFE link or must be hand deliver. |
| Please follow instructions at L-3.1. |
| For the seed project, can multiple building be under construction at the same time or are we limited to working one building at a time? |
| Due to MAFB mission requirements, project is to be phased. Each facility must be completed and UL certified prior to mobilizing to next facility. |
Section L-4.3.1.1
(b) Construction Schedule - Provide a Construction Work Schedule, identifying the definable features of work, in a Microsoft Project 2016 or higher format, and shall be generated using the critical path method, including the milestones. The Construction Work Schedule shall reflect project phasing construction/start date, hold-point inspections, completion date, utility outages, major equipment deliveries, and installation, tests, pre-final inspections, final inspections and delivery of project closeout documents as included in the Moody Installation Guide Specifications (Attachments 1a and 1b). See SOW par 12 Phasing.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| Atch 7 - PPQ |
| The blank template for Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionnaire is labeled “Controlled Unclassified Information.” Can the Government confirm this is correct? If incorrect, can a revised template be provided without the CUI designation? |
| CUI designation will remain due to information included on the form. |
| Preproposal Conference Briefing, Page 6 |
| While it is understood that attendee contact information will be redacted, would USG consider providing the sign-in sheet that shows the Organization names as well? Showing the Organization name would be most beneficial to developing effective teaming relationships to provide quality support for this effort. |
| Yes. |
| Yes |
| MACC Site Visit Sign-In |
| Solicitation+FA483024R0007+0002, Section L-3.1 |
| Will USG consider allowing offerors to submit their proposals via email or DoD SAFE? |
| Please follow instructions at L-3.1. |
| Pre-Proposal Conference |
| It is understood that one of the drawings for the Seed Project does not match the actual state of the facility. Can USG verify which drawings do/do not match the actual facilities? |
| Please use the drawings provided for each facility. |
| Solicitation, Vol II, Past Performance. Page 53 L-5.2.3 |
| Would you consider extending project recency from 3 years to 10 years? |
| Project recency will remain as stated in L-5.2.3. |
| Solicitation, Page 1 Due date |
| Since answers to the questions affect the content of the response and this is a hard copy, could you please extend the due date 2 weeks? |
| Please reference Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| Amendment 0004 |
RFP Sec A Block 13a
| Amendment 0002 Site Visit Sign In Form |
| Provided in Amendment 0002 is a redacted copy of the sign-in sheet from the site visit. Please provide the unredacted sign-in sheet as this may contain information on subs who attended that may be utilized during this contract. |
| Yes, the company name is unredacted. Please reference the updated sign in sheet provided with Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| MACC Site Visit Sign-In |
| RFP Atch 2a Special Contract Requirements – Section 7.2.1 |
| May the roles of Superintendent and Site Safety and Health Officer be dually filled by the same individual? |
| Please see SOW par 5 Key Personnel sub par 5.2.5 which reads The Superintendent may not perform duties as the QCM/QC or SSHO on this project. |
sub par 5.5.2 which reads “The Contractor Quality Control (QC) person can be the SSHO on this project.”
There needs to be two separate individuals serving as the Superintendent and a Quality Control Manager (QCM). The position of SSHO can be designated to the QCM. All positions must maintain required certifications for each designation.
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS |
| RFP Atch 2a Special Contract Requirements – Section 7.2.1 |
| May the roles of Project Manager and Quality Control Manager be dually filled by the same individual? |
| Please reference para 5.5.2 of RFP Atch 3. |
| Spec section 01 35 26 page 9 section 1.6.1.1.1 |
| Per the Seed project specification the SSHO may serve as the QCM and the SSHO may also serve as the Superintendent. Per the Moody Installation Guide Spec it states "The SSHO may also serve as the Quality Control Manager. The SSHO may also serve as the Superintendent although not if already designated as Quality Control Manager". Please advise if the superintendent can be both the SSHO and QCM or if two hats are required for the seed project. |
| Please see SOW par 5 Key Personnel sub par 5.2.5 which reads The Superintendent may not perform duties as the QCM/QC or SSHO on this project. |
sub par 5.5.2 which reads “The Contractor Quality Control (QC) person can be the SSHO on this project.”
There needs to be two separate individuals serving as the Superintendent and a Quality Control Manager (QCM). The position of SSHO can be designated to the QCM. All positions must maintain required certifications for each designation.
Yes
RFP Atch 3 Seed Project SOW QSEU 23-0118 Rpr LPS
| Atach 3 – SOW Para. 9.2.2.2 Below grade |
| Can the excavated material be used as backfill or will new material be required? |
| No unsuitable soils anticipated. Please reference RFP Atch 3a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), and 3d(i) Specifications section 31 23 00.00 20 par. 3.2 and 3.3. |
| section 25 41 00 page 7 of the specification |
| Per section 25 41 00 page 7 of the specification it states " a. Comply with UL 96A. A third-party inspector (not the designer and not the installer) must be present for the 100 percent inspection and data documentation by the contractor. This is to take place prior to project acceptance. Note that in many cases Air Force personnel have been trained to inspect and accept projects as the third-party inspector. Verify this before contract award." Please advise if Air Force personnel can provide the third-party inspection of the lightning protection system for each building. |
| Air Force personnel will not be providing third-party inspection. The contractor is required to obtain the third-party inspectors services. |
| section 26 41 00 page 6 of the specification section 3.3 restoration |
| Per section 26 41 00 page 6 of the specification section 3.3 restoration states "Maintain disturbed surfaces and replacements until final acceptance. Return to site after six months to fill in compacted surface". Please advise if this is a requirement for this project and what it applies to? Is the contractor to return six months and restore all compacted trenches? |
| This will be performed as a warranty item should the compactions fail (sink/crack etc.). |
| Atach 3 – SOW Para. 9.2.2.2 Below grade |
| Please provide the mix design for the concrete around each building to be able to match existing conditions. |
| Please reference RFP Atch 3a(i), 3b(i), 3c(i), and 3d(i) Specifications Division 3 Concrete section 03 00 00 par 2.5 “Mix Design.” |
| Table 1 – Proposal Organization on page 49 of 66 of the solicitation section L-3 Proposal Preparation Instructions |
| Per Table 1 – Proposal Organization on page 49 of 66 of the solicitation section L-3 Proposal Preparation Instructions it states to "See Subsection L. 5.2" for the page limit for Volume II Past Performance. Subsection L. 5.2 does not provide the page limit for Volume 2. What is the page limit for Volume II? |
| Please follow instructions provided throughout each section in L-5.2. |
| Attachment 8 Past Performance Information (PPI) |
| On Attachment 8 Past Performance Information (PPI) sheet, section E. Completion Date number 3 says "Estimate at Completion" is this supposed to be the estimated completion date or the final cost of the project once completed? |
| Please reference updated Attachment 8 provided via Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 8 Section E, 3 |
| Attachment 8 Past Performance Information (PPI) |
| On Attachment 8 Past Performance Information (PPI) sheet, section K asks if we have participated in other MACC programs. Can IDIQs and MATOCs be included in the list? |
| No. Please reference MACC IDIQs. |
| Section L-4 Volume I – Technical, section L-4.3.2.1 line (a) of the solicitation. |
| Please advise if the Key Personnel Organizational Chart is for the personnel that will be involved with the Seed project only or is it a corporate organizational chart? |
| Section L-4.3.2.1(a) is a complete key personnel organization chart for the whole company. |
| Section L-4 Volume I – Technical, section L-4.3.2.1 line (a) of the solicitation. |
| Please advise what need to be submitted for the Representations, Certification & Other Statements. |
| Section L-4.3.2.1(a) |
Included in the narrative should be the qualifications, certifications and duties of each person assigned a key function.
| attachment 8 PPI form section I |
| On the attachment 8 PPI form section I states "Identify and explain which aspects of the proposed effort and how they relate to the requirement described in this solicitation. Please see Section L, Instructions to Offerors, Paragraph L.5.2.6". Paragraph L.5.2.6 of the solicitation is the Subcontractor Letters of Consent. Please advise what requirements the PPI form is referring to. |
| Please reference updated RFP Attachment 8 provided in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 8 L-5.2.3 |
| attachment 8 PPI form section G |
| On the attachment 8 PPI form section G states "Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this contract and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions" Is the instant acquisition in this paragraph referring to the Seed project or MACC? Additionally in the last sentence, please advise what the statement "both acquisitions" is referring to. |
| Please reference updated Attachment 8 provided in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 8, section G |
| attachment 8 PPI form section G |
| On the attachment 8 PPI form section G states "Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this contract and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions" Please advise what to do if the individual that was part of this project won't be supporting the Seed or MACC. |
| Please reference updated Attachment 8 provided in Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| RFP Atch 8, section G |
| General |
| Can the proposal due date be extended? |
| Please reference Amendment 0004. |
| Yes |
| Amendment 0004 |
RFP Sec A Block 13a
| attachment 8 PPI section J |
| On the attachment 8 PPI section J, please advise if we need to provide every job that was ongoing during the project being used on the PPI (name and magnitude) or can we provide some project as examples or the total number with the total amount of all projects combined. |
| It is up to the offeror to determine what information to provide as a response. |
| Drawings |
| The drawings provided don't provide a detail for pole bases for the new poles. Please advise if these bases need to be designed and stamped or please provide a detail for the new pole bases. |
| Please reference RFP Atch 1b. |
Please see Division 33 Utilities section 33 71 01 Overhead Transmission and Distribution par. 3.1.
| Attachment 8, Past Performance Information |
| Attachment 8, Past Performance Information (PPI), form information is presented in font size 10. Is it acceptable for the response to this information be in font size 10? Using a larger font size will distort the entire PPI. |
| Please reference L-3.2 Table 1. |
| Atch 3- SOW |
| How thick is the concrete, asphalt, and any base material around the SEED project buildings? |
| As per typical concrete repair and asphalt repair details on sheet E-4 of the design drawings. |
| RFP VOLUME I TECHNICAL, Section M-4 FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE, para. M-4.1.3, Table 2 – RELEVANCY ASSESSMENT, page 64 |
| Please define “determine past effort” on both recent and relevant projects. Is this based upon the SEED project (lightning protection system) or General Construction? |
| Past effort does not have to be for lighting protection systems. |
The past effort should be similar in magnitude, complexities, and scope required for MACC task orders.
| RFP VOLUME I TECHNICAL, Section L-6.4 Other Contracting Considerations, para. L-6.4.1 page 55 |
| Please confirm the preferred location in the proposal response to address this Section, including Cover Page, SF 1442, Section I – Contract Clauses and Section K – Representations and Certifications inclusion, or please advise if this is a redundant request and is covered in another Section? |
| Please reference L-3.2 Table 1, L-6.2 and 6.4 sections. |
| RFP VOLUME I TECHNICAL, Section L-6.4 Other Contracting Considerations, para. L-6.4.1 page 56 |
| Please confirm that a Bid Bond is not required? |
| No. Please reference Sec A Block 13b of the RFP. |
| STANDARD FORM 1442, para.13, page 1 |
| Would the Government consider an electronic proposal submittal due to the limited constraints and time of producing and delivering a hard copy proposal? |
| No. Please use the instructions provided in L-3.2. |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.