Attachment 8 - PPQ 29 Jan 2020.docx

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire FA4621-20-R-0001, Fort Riley / McConnell AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER)

The 22d Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Air Mobility Command (AMC) is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Fort Riley/McConnell AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) – 2020 program. The effort requires the performance of repair and minor construction projects at both Fort Riley, KS and McConnell AFB, KS.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter or NLT 28 February 2020. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically or by hand and e-mailed to christina.muth.1@us.af.mil and derek.owen.1@us.af.mil. Please call Christina Muth at 316-759-4526 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Derek Owen Contracting Officer

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division): ______________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _______________________

C. Contract Number: _______________________

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.): _______________________

E. Program Title: ______________________________________________

F. Brief Program Description: __________________________________________________________

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Mfg Development (EMD)): _______________________

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _______________________ through _______________________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _______________________ through _______________________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable): ____________________________________________

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $_____________

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $_____________

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed: ______________________________________________________

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands): _______________________

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name: ______________________________________________

B. Respondent’s title: _______________________

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address: _________________________________

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.): _______________________

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role: _____________________________________________________________

F. Other suggested points of contact: _____________________________________________________

Section 4: Performance Information

In the questions below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by circling/marking the appropriate letter under each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

A. Quality Control

1. Was the quality of the workmanship sufficient?

2. Were the as-built drawings accurate and timely submitted?

3. Was identification/correction of deficient work accomplished timely?

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: __________________________________________________________

B. Timely performance

1. Were submittals provided on time?

2. Did the submittals clearly identify the proposed item?

3. Were progress schedules realistic?

4. Were progress schedules met?

C. Management Effectiveness

1. General Business Practices

a. Were experienced managers/supervisors provided who possessed the technical and administrative abilities necessary to manage the project and meet contractual requirements?

b. Were experienced subcontractors hired?

c. Were subcontractors/suppliers paid timely?

d. Was all contract work completed prior to requesting a final inspection, with no major deficiencies?

e. Were timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues provided after project completion?

f. Did the contractor cooperate to resolve problems, attend meetings (as applicable) and maintain effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution?

2. Pricing

a. Were price proposals submitted timely accurately representing the required work?

b. Was accurate, complete and reasonable supporting pricing information provided for modifications/change orders (not overinflated or underinflated)?

3. Site Management/Superintendence

a. Did the Site Manager/Superintendent have sufficient authority to make decisions or take action during project performance?

b. Was he/she consistently on site while work was being performed?

c. Did he/she ensure compliance with contract and safety requirements?

d. Was prompt action taken by him/her to resolve problems with work quality?

D. Compliance with Labor Standards

1. Were payrolls submitted timely?

2. Were payrolls completed and accurate?

3. Was the contractor compliant with all labors laws and regulations, with specific attention to the requirements of the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute?

E. Compliance with Safety Regulations

1. Were workplace safety standards and regulations (OSHA, Federal, State, Local and Agency) met?

2. Did the contractor submit and implement/enforce an adequate health and safety plan?

F. Compliance with Environmental and Other Standards

1. Did the contractor submit and implement an adequate environmental pollution control plan? (Including, but not limited to recycle and disposal of waste material, hazardous waste management and/or sediment and erosion control.)?

G. Other Past Performance Considerations

1. Assessment of liquidated damages (frequency, circumstances, severity of problem etc.)

2. Was the contractor cooperative in negotiating modifications so that they would result in fair and reasonable cost adjustments to the contract?

3. The contractor provided all deliverables (including documentation) in a timely and accurate manner.

4. Have there been any labor disputes or violations of public law?

5. Have there been any indicators that the contractor has had any financial difficulties?

6. Contractor submitted modifications and other required proposals in a timely manner.

7. Was the contractor ever issued a Cure or Show Cause Notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Additional Comments”

Please include any additional comments as appropriate: ______________________________________

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules): _____________

Section 5: General Comments

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. ________

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

22d Contracting Squadron Attn: Christina Muth 53384 Kansas Street Suite 118 McConnell AFB, KS 67221-3702

E-mail to: christina.muth.1@us.af.mil and derek.owen.1@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 8