FA4620-12-R-B001 Amendment 2 Revised Section L Page 61 of 65.pdf
PDF 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fairchild MACC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4620-12-R-B001
About this file
FA4620-12-R-B001 Amendment 2 Revised Section L Page 61 of 65
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4620-12-R-B001
design-build effort. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past and present performance.
2.2.3 Relevant Contracts: Submit information on contracts that you consider relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform under the multiple award construction contract program. Provide data for up to five relevant contracts held within the last three years for each entity the offeror wants the Government to consider. Performance Information Sheets for each contract is limited to three (3) pages. Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance. Note that the Government will not consider performance on an effort that concluded more than three years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
Relevant past performance information must demonstrate design/build construction experience with multiple projects, such as new construction, renovation, alteration and repair, with associated architectural and engineering work, with multiple disciplines, such as airfield, pavement, renovation, repair, additions/upgrades, along with specific work in heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), electrical, mechanical and other major trades.
Projects shall be similar in size, scope, and complexity as those anticipated under this contract, i.e., having a project value of $1,000,000 and above, and include projects with the Federal Government, state and local government agencies, and commercial customers.
2.2.4 Specific Content: Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Little Confidence or No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Significant Confidence candidate. For example, submittal of quality performance indicators or other management indicators that clearly support that an offeror has overcome past problems is required.
2.2.5 History of Organizational Structure Change: Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant present or past efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of your company. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider present and past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the offeror(s), your "roadmap" should be both specifically applicable to the efforts you identify and general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources.
2.2.6 Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaires: The Government requests the offeror to send out Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaires to each of the Points of Contact (POCs) identified in the Past Performance Volume. In turn, the evaluating agencies shall submit the completed questionnaire to:
Via Mail:
92 CONS/LGCB
ATTENTION: Donna Early 110 West Ent Street Fairchild AFB WA 99011-8568
Or via Email: donna.early@us.af.mil
Or via Fax: 509-247-8685, Attention: Donna Early
FA4620-12-R-B001
Amendment 2 2 May 2012
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .