Attch_8_-_PPQ.pdf

FA4610-17-R-0002

Attachment 8

ATTACHMENT 8

Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire

S OLICITATION FA4610-17-R-0002, VELA MACC – VANDENBERG AFB CA

SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing)

A. Contractor’s name and address: _________________________________________________________

B. Point of Contact: ___________________________________________________________________________

C. Phone Number (with area code): ______________________________________________________________

D. Contract Number: _________________________________________________________________________

E. Project Title and Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contract Type: ____ Stand Alone Contract ____ Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quanty Task Order

G. Project Award Date: ____________________ Scheduled Completion Date: ________________________

Current/Final Completion Date: ______________________

H. Project Award Amount: __________________ Current/Final Project Amount: ________________________

I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: ____ Prime Contractor ____ Subcontractor

J. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in Section 3 of this Questionnaire.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent)

Evaluated By:

(Signature) (Date)

_____________________________________ Address:

(Name and Title of Evaluator) ____________________________________

Phone Number: ________________________ ____________________________________

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________

SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes your confidence in the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

Evaluation Areas: Please circle a number.

1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the Contractor.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. QUALITY:

A Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

C Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

D Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. TIMELINESS:

A Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals 1 2 3 4 5 N/A C Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

D Contractor provided on-time submittals as required 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Rating Description

5 SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

4 SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

3 NEUTRAL CONFIDENCE

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

2 LIMITED CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

1 NO CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

E Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractors employees as required

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

F Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. RESPONSIVENESS:

A Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements, safety regulations, and applicable local, State and Federal guidelines.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

C Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems;

and performed as a Team Member

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

D Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. SUBCONTRACTS AND MANAGEMENT:

A Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

C Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

D Contractor ensured the project manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

E Contractor ensured site superintendent and quality control representative were consistently present on site when work was performed

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

F Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. DESIGN:

A Contractor provided complete, constructible and technically sound designs for the project 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B Contractor demonstrated the ability to incorporate users’ requirements into the design

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

C Contractor completed designs that were constructed as they were designed. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. CHANGE/COST CONTROL:

A Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and justifiable cost proposals 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or design projects or modifications within the magnitude specified in section 1 above.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

C Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

SECTION 4: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

3. Please provide any additional comment concerning the contractor’s performance, as desired.

4. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes_____ No_______

If yes, please select which type of termination and explain below (e.g., inabililty to meet cost, performance or delivery schedules, etc.):

Default______ Convenience_______ Pending Terminations______

5. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks”. No ____ Yes ____

ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing address: Jeffrey C. Grelck

30 CONS/LGCA

1515 Iceland Ave., Bldg 8500 Rm 150 Vandenberg AFB, CA 93437 Or Email encrypted when possible (preferred): jeffrey.grelck@us.af.mil

**If Section 2 is digitally signed, form must be returned via email.

ATTACHMENT 8