Section_J _Attachment_9 _PP_Questionnaire_-_24May.docx

RFP FA4600-16-R-0007

Section J, Attachment 9

Attachment 9: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ___________________________________ B. Contract number: __________________________ CAGE Code: _______________ C. Type Contract/Task Order (underline one) CPFF CPIF CPAF T&M FFP Other: _____

1. Type security clearance required: Secret TS TS/SCI SAP/SAR Other: _____

2. Facility clearance required: Secret SCIF Other_______ D. Total Contract/Task Order Current Value to Date: _____________Status: Active: __ Completed: __ E. Date of Award/Period of Performance: _______________________ F. Contract Completion Date (including extensions): ___________________ G. Was this a competitive contract? Yes ____ No _____ H. Initial contract cost: ________________ Current/Final contract cost: ________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs, if applicable:

J. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts only:

1. If this is a task order placed on an IDIQ contract (excluding GSA contracts), please provide the ceiling amount of the master IDIQ contract: $_________________

2. Please provide the ceiling amount of the task order referenced: $_________________

3. Period of Performance for the IDIQ contract: _______________________________

4. Period of Performance for the task order: _______________________________ K. Government Contracts Only: Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? No ____ Yes___ Default_______ Convenience_______ Pending Terminations________

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

L. Did the contractor use any of the following tools/software to support this Contract/Task Order?

RedHat JBOSS Enterprise Application Server

JBoss Developer Studio

Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Atlassian JIRA or any software development tracking program

VMware/VSphere

Eclipse Integrated Development Environment (IDE)

Oracle RDBMS

Oracle PL/SQL and SQL Developer

XML and XML Schema

Java Enterprise Edition (EE)

JavaScript (Sencha, EXT-JS, GeoExtJS)

Junit Testing

Fortify 360

M. Please provide a detailed description of the work provided by the Contractor (feel free to copy and paste or provide the PWS as an Attachment). This is extremely helpful to us in assessing the relevancy to our current acquisition. We appreciate your effort and assistance very much:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

Customer or agency name: ____________________________________ Geographic location of services under this contract: ____________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

Please provide information for primary individual completing this survey.

A. Evaluator’s Name/Title, Telephone Number, Mailing/e-mail Address:

B. Relationship to Contract: ___________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATION

A. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL (E) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

V VERY GOOD (V) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

S SATISFACTORY (S) – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL (M) – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY (U) – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE (N) – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance on this element or sub-element, or information was not available. Do not know.

DISCLAMER: If the evaluations provided conflict with CPARS, CPARS will take precedence over individual evaluations.

B. For each question, please place an “X” in the box corresponding to the rating. Please provide supporting rationale for all ratings except “Satisfactory” or “Not Applicable”. The narratives need not be lengthy, just clear and concise. Space for narrative comments is provided at the bottom of the questionnaire. If more space is needed, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages.

CONTRACT/PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE:

SES1: Did software engineering processes have the ability/flexibility to support agile/rapid development, short duration release cycles, the creation of applicable web services, to ensure requirements were met?

Comment:

SES2: Did the integration strategy identify technical impacts of the design, coding, test, security adherence, and implementation/integration to the defined enterprise architecture?

Comment:

SES3: Did software sustainment processes ensure quality (e.g., minimize defects) and operational availability of software delivered?

Comment:

SES4: Did processes accurately document and track changes during the release cycle and ensure documentation of modifications between releases?

Comment:

SE1: Did the processes (system engineering, configuration management, testing, etc.) mitigate and manage risk, metric collection, ensure quality, continuous improvement methodologies, contribute to a more optimal/efficient design, minimize deliverable errors and ensure on time deliveries?

Comment:

SE2: Did the process identify impacts from external programs, trace requirements between external system, system requirements, software requirements and impacts to the enterprise architecture?

Comment:

SE3: Did the risk management process identify and analyze all risks including security and IA risks, implement processes, tools, and techniques across the lifecycle, and provide planning, implementation, and monitoring of mitigation efforts for all moderate or high risks?

Comment:

SE4: Did security processes implement tools and techniques across the software lifecycle that resolve or mitigate security findings, deliver system information security documentation and ensure accreditation prior to implementation?

Comment:

SE5: Did the database processes identify, capture, and track metrics to measure database performance, kept customer informed of performance status and timely notification of issues, provide a risk management process which includes risk identification and analysis of all database admin and database performance risks and provide planning, implementation, and monitoring of mitigation efforts for all moderate or high risks?

Comment:

SE6: Did the system management processes identify, capture, and track metrics to measure system performance, kept customer informed of performance status and timely notification of issues, provide a risk management process which includes risk identification and analysis of all system admin and system performance risks and provide planning, implementation, and monitoring of mitigation efforts for all moderate or high risks?

Comment:

PM1: Did the contractor recruit, hire, retain, and replace trained and qualified personnel with appropriate security clearances and certifications to support mission requirements at the beginning of full performance?

Comment:

PM2: Did the contractor provide unscheduled technical support (Including uninterrupted 24/7 support during a labor strike, surges, natural disasters, disruptive world events, terrorist attacks, shutdowns and/or other emergencies)?

Comment:

PM3: Did the contractor effectively managed facilities, equipment, and material provided?

Comment:

PM4: Did the management processes tracked priorities and minimized schedule variances? Did they accurately report cost, schedule, and performance status, and issues with contract performance?

Comment:

PM5: Did the contractor demonstrate an understanding of activities and resources required for successfully contract transition? Did it mitigate transition risks and implemented mitigation measures to ensure a successful transition?

Comment:

SBP1: Did the contractor demonstrate its ability to assist, promote and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and/or service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB)?

Comment:

O1. Overall performance rating

NARRATIVE SUMMARY FOR ALL CONTRACTS

(DO NOT INCLUDE PERSONAL NAMES IN THE NARRATIVE SECTION.)

N1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

N2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

N3. Would you award another contract to this contractor?

N4. Comments on the above sections for Technical, Program Management, Cost Performance:

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Do you know of any other contracts performed by this contractor? If yes, please provide the following contract information, if known:

a. Contract Number: _______________________________________________________

b. Contractor Name: ________________________________________________________

c. Type of Contract: ________________________________________________________

d. Status: Active Completed: ________

e. Date of Award: __________________________________________________________

f. Contract Amount: ________________________________________________________

g. Contract Completion Date (Including Extensions): ______________________________ Thank you!

Please return this by e-mail to the Government POC, Ms. Amy Elizondo-Williams at Amy.Elizondo-Williams.3@us.af.mil and Ms. Theresa Bryant at Theresa.Bryant@us.af.mil or Fax to 402-294-0430.

RFP FA4600-16-R-0007

Section J, Attachment 9 Source Selection Sensitive Information – See FAR 3.104